50 research outputs found

    Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI Diagnostic Interviews : A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses

    Get PDF
    Three previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) reported that, compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID), alternative reference standards, primarily the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), tended to misclassify major depression status, when controlling for depression symptom severity. However, there was an important lack of precision in the results.To compare the odds of the major depression classification based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI.We included and standardized data from 3 IPDMA databases. For each IPDMA, separately, we fitted binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of major depression classification, controlling for symptom severity and characteristics of participants, and the interaction between interview and symptom severity. Next, we synthesized results using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.In total, 69,405 participants (7,574 [11%] with major depression) from 212 studies were included. Controlling for symptom severity and participant characteristics, the MINI (74 studies; 25,749 participants) classified major depression more often than the SCID (108 studies; 21,953 participants; aOR 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.92]). Classification odds for the CIDI (30 studies; 21,703 participants) and the SCID did not differ overall (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.75); however, as screening scores increased, the aOR increased less for the CIDI than the SCID (interaction aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.80).Compared to the SCID, the MINI classified major depression more often. The odds of the depression classification with the CIDI increased less as symptom levels increased. Interpretation of research that uses diagnostic interviews to classify depression should consider the interview characteristics

    Macrophage-mediated degradation of crosslinked collagen scaffolds

    No full text
    Biological scaffolds used in tissue engineering are incorporated in vivo by a process of cellular in-growth, followed by host-mediated degradation and replacement of these scaffolds, in which phagocytic cells from the monocyte/macrophage cell lineage play a key role. The chemical degradation of scaffolds with collagenases is well established, but to date this has not been correlated with an in vitro model of cell mediated scaffold degradation. RAW264.7, a murine monocyte/macrophage cell line, was cultured on collagen scaffolds crosslinked either by dehydrothermal treatment (DHT) or by carbodiimide (EDC). These cells attached to collagen scaffolds, proliferated and exhibited macrophage aggregation to form giant cells. Crosslinking the scaffolds by either DHT or EDC increased the resistance of the scaffold to degradation by macrophages. Increasing the amount of crosslinking in the scaffold made them more resistant to degradation by collagenase. However, while EDC increased the scaffolds' thermal and mechanical properties and decreased the swelling ratio, DHT increased the mechanical properties, but decreased the denaturation temperature and swelling ratio. Altering the scaffold properties by crosslinking affects the rate of degradation by macrophages, and this is correlated with chemical degradation (r=0.658, p<0.01). This will help in the design of scaffolds with task-specific profiles for use in tissue engineering

    Getting started with self-ligation

    No full text
    This paper discusses some of the changes to everyday clinical practice necessary when three of the most popular types of self-ligating brackets are used in fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. These include bracket placement, archwire ligation, archwire sequencing, space closure and, in addition, the instruments and materials needed during their use. Clinical tips are highlighted to boost treatment efficiency and ease the transition from conventional to self-ligating brackets. </jats:p

    Prospective analysis of waiting times for emergency plastic surgery in four units.

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a significant part of the workload in plastic surgery. There are currently wide variations in the available resource for dealing with these patients. Delays to treatment currently exist and may result in poorer clinical outcomes. METHOD: Data was collected prospectively in 4 centres (Cork University Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Stoke Mandeville Hospital and Salisbury District Hospital) assessing delays to theatre. We assessed time to theatre, both from injury and from review, cancellation rate, starvation time and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 424 patients were audited over an 8-week period. The average time from review to theatre was 15.7 h and the average injury-to-theatre time was 58.6 h. The average starvation time was 10 h; the mean cancellation rate was 25%. Patients are satisfied overall with the service provided with 83% rating the service as excellent or good, and 63% feeling that there wait was not too long. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in provision of emergency plastic surgery trauma lists, the average wait for emergency plastic surgery is increasing. Despite this patients remain, on the whole, satisfied with the service that they are receiving
    corecore