26 research outputs found

    Chemistry courses as the turning point for premedical students

    Get PDF
    Previous research has documented that negative experiences in chemistry courses are a major factor that discourages many students from continuing in premedical studies. This adverse impact affects women and students from under-represented minority (URM) groups disproportionately. To determine if chemistry courses have a similar effect at a large public university, we surveyed 1,036 students from three entering cohorts at the University of California, Berkeley. We surveyed students at the beginning of their first year at the university and again at the end of their second year. All subjects had indicated an interest in premedical studies at the time they entered the university. We conducted follow-up interviews with a stratified sub-set of 63 survey respondents to explore the factors that affected their level of interest in premedical studies. Using a 10-point scale, we found that the strength of interest in premedical studies declined for all racial/ethnic groups. In the follow-up interviews, students identified chemistry courses as the principal factor contributing to their reported loss of interest. URM students especially often stated that chemistry courses caused them to abandon their hopes of becoming a physician. Consistent with reports over more than 50Ā years, it appears that undergraduate courses in chemistry have the effect of discouraging otherwise qualified students, as reflected in their admission to one of the most highly selective public universities in the US, from continuing in premedical studies, especially in the case of URM students. Reassessment of this role for chemistry courses may be overdue

    Alarm settings for the Marquette 8000 pulse oximeter to prevent hyperoxic and hypoxic episodes

    No full text
    Objective: To determine safe and appropriate alarm limits for the Marquette 8000 pulse oximeter to prevent hyperoxic and hypoxic episodes in neonates. It is necessary to define these limits for each brand of oximeter because of the variance in nonuser adjustable calibration algorithms used in pulse oximeters. Methodology: Oxygen saturation values obtained from a Marquette 8000 pulse oximeter (SpO(2)) were compared with simultaneous arterial brood gas PaO2 values obtained from blood gas analysis, for 322 samples in 24 consecutive neonates (median 30 weeks' gestation). Results: In order to prevent 95% of hyperoxic episodes (PaO2 > 90 mmHg), the upper alarm limit was 95% SpO(2) Similarly, to prevent 95% of hypoxic episodes (PaO2 < 40 mmHg), the lower alarm limit was 95% SpO(2). A sensitivity lower than 95% had to be accepted to develop an alarm range which prevented both hyperoxic and hypoxic episodes. To maintain PaO2 values between 40 and 90 mmHg, an appropriate alarm range of 94-97% SpO(2) (90% sensitivity, 28% specificity) was established. Conclusions: The relative merits of high sensitivity versus high specificity should be considered when determining appropriate alarm limits. Alarm limits which represent a balance between sensitivity and specificity will minimise false alarms and provide a clinically practical range. It would be useful for this type of information to be available for each brand of oximeter, to assist the user in determining appropriate alarm settings
    corecore