8 research outputs found

    The effect of lumasiran therapy for primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in small infants

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Lumasiran, a sub-cutaneous RNA-interference therapy, has been recently approved for primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), with doses and intervals according to body weight. Little is known as to its use in infants; the aim of this study was to describe treatment outcome in 3 infants who received lumasiran therapy before 2 years of age. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: Patient 1 was diagnosed antenatally and received lumasiran from day 9. According to the product information template (PIT), he received monthly lumasiran (3 times at 6 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg), with hyperhydration and potassium citrate. Despite decreased plasma oxalate levels, persistent normal kidney function, and good tolerance, kidney ultrasound performed after 2 months found nephrocalcinosis, without normalization of urinary oxalate (UOx). The dose was increased back to 6 mg/kg, inducing a normalization in UOx. Nephrocalcinosis started to improve at month 10. Patient 2 was diagnosed at 2.5 months (acute kidney failure); nephrocalcinosis was present from diagnosis. She received monthly lumasiran (6 mg/kg), with progressive decrease in UOx and substantial improvement in kidney function but stable nephrocalcinosis after 9 injections. Patient 3 was diagnosed fortuitously (nephrocalcinosis) at 3.5 months and received lumasiran before genetic diagnosis, leading to decreased UOx and maintenance of normal kidney function. Nephrocalcinosis improved after 5 injections. CONCLUSIONS: This report presents the youngest children treated with lumasiran worldwide. Lumasiran seems effective without side effects in infants but does not completely prevent the onset of nephrocalcinosis in the most severe forms. Higher doses than those proposed in the PIT might be required because of hepatic immaturity

    Data from a large European study indicate that the outcome of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 correlates with the AGXT mutation type

    No full text
    Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 displays a heterogeneous phenotype, likely to be affected by genetic and non-genetic factors, including timeliness of diagnosis and quality of care. As previous genotype-phenotype studies were hampered by limited patient numbers the European OxalEurope Consortium was constituted. This preliminary retrospective report is based on 526 patients of which 410 have the AGXT genotype defined. We grouped mutations by the predicted effect as null, missense leading to mistargeting (G170R), and other missense, and analyzed their phenotypic correlations. Median age of end-stage renal disease increased from 9.9 for 88 homozygous null patients, 11.5 for 42 heterozygous null/missense, 16.9 for 116 homozygous missense patients, 25.1 for 61 G170R/null patients, 31.2 for 32 G170R/missense patients, and 33.9 years for 71 homozygous G170R patients. The outcome of some recurrent missense mutations (p.I244T, p.F152I, p.M195R, p.D201E, p.S81L, p.R36C) and an unprecedented number of G170R homozygotes is described in detail. Diagnosis is still delayed and actions aimed at increasing awareness of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 are recommended. Thus, in addition to G170R, other causative mutations are associated with later onset of end-stage renal disease. The OxalEurope registry will provide necessary tools for characterizing those genetic and non-genetic factors through a combination of genetic, functional, and biostatistical approaches

    Plasma oxalate: comparison of methodologies

    Get PDF
    Measurement of oxalate in the blood is essential for monitoring primary hyperoxaluria patients with progressive renal impairment and on dialysis prior to transplantation. As no external quality assurance scheme is available for this analyte, we conducted a sample exchange scheme between six laboratories specifically involved with the investigation of primary hyperoxaluria to compare results. The methodologies compared were gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS), ion chromatography with mass spectrometry (ICMS), and enzymatic methods using oxalate oxidase and spectrophotometry. Although individual laboratories performed well in terms of reproducibility and linearity, there was poor agreement (absolute values) between centres as illustrated by a longer-term comparison of patient results from two of the participating laboratories. This situation was only partly related to differences in calibration and mainly reflected the lower recoveries seen with the ultrafiltration of samples. These findings lead us to conclude that longitudinal monitoring of primary hyperoxaluria patients with deteriorating kidney function should be performed by a single consistent laboratory and the methodology used should always be defined. In addition, plasma oxalate concentrations reported in registry studies and those associated with the risk of systemic oxalosis in published studies need to be interpreted in light of the methodology used. A reference method and external quality assurance scheme for plasma oxalate analysis would be beneficial
    corecore