Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing volitional competencies to enhance the performance of physical activities in chronic low back pain patients

BACKGROUND: Motivation has long been emphasized as the most important determinant of action. However, there is a substantial gap between people's goals and their attainment. Patients may be motivated and yet unable to take action if their volitional competencies are insufficient. One of the important tasks of volition is goal-maintenance. Research has stressed the importance of a volitional tool, the implementation intentions. Implementation intentions indicate where, when, and how the action leading to the goal will be performed. Forming implementation intentions favours the execution of goal-directed efforts, and reinforces the relationship between intentions and behaviours. Results from various studies clearly suggest that volitional competencies and implementation intentions could play a role in low back pain (LBP) patients. However, there is at present no questionnaire allowing assessing the capacity of implementation intentions of physical activities in LBP patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will develop such a questionnaire, using a 3-step approach. A first qualitative step to build categories and generate items; 30 patients suffering chronic LBP will be invited to participate in semi-structured interviews; verbatim and derived items will then be submitted to a panel of experts, using a Delphi method; a second quantitative step to examine the properties of items, and determine the factorial structure of the questionnaire; 100 patients suffering chronic LBP will be recruited to respond to this phase; and third, preliminary psychometric analyses (item-scale correlations, construct validity, reliability); 180 chronic LBP patients will be recruited for this phase of the study. The relationships between implementation intentions and variables affecting physical activity on chronic LBP patients, i.e. pain, physical capacities, fear-avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, work status, and level of physical activity will be considered. DISCUSSION: Developing a questionnaire to assess implementation intentions would allow investigating the role of these intentions in the transition from acute to chronic LBP. The results of this study should contribute to the understanding of the psychological processes at stake in the development of chronic LBP, and in particular to the identification of factors eventually favouring patients' participation in and adherence to active physical treatments

Quality of life and functionality after total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is a lack of data on the long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty procedures, as assessed by validated tools.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a follow-up study to evaluate the quality of life and functionality of 250 patients an average of 16 years (range: 11-23 years) after total hip arthroplasty using a validated assessment set including the SF-36 questionnaire, Harris Hip Score, WOMAC score, Functional Comorbidity Index, and a study specific questionnaire. Models of multiple stepwise linear and logistic regression analysis were constructed to evaluate the relationships between several explanatory variables and these functional outcomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The SF-36 physical indexes of these patients compared negatively with the normative values but positively with the results obtained in untreated subjects with severe hip osteoarthritis. Similar results were detected for the Harris Hip Score and WOMAC score. There was a 96% rate of post-surgical satisfaction. Hip functionality and comorbidities were the most important determinants of physical measures on the SF-36.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty have impaired long-term self-reported physical quality of life and hip functionality but they still perform physically better than untreated patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis. However, the level of post-surgical satisfaction is high.</p

The economic burden of musculoskeletal disease in Korea: A cross sectional study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Musculoskeletal diseases are becoming increasingly important due to population aging. However, studies on the economic burden of musculoskeletal disease in Korea are scarce. Therefore, we conducted a population-based study to measure the economic burden of musculoskeletal disease in Korea using nationally representative data.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study used a variety of data sources such as national health insurance statistics, the Korea Health Panel study and cause of death reports generated by the Korea National Statistical Office to estimate the economic burden of musculoskeletal disease. The total cost of musculoskeletal disease was estimated as the sum of direct medical care costs, direct non-medical care costs, and indirect costs. Direct medical care costs are composed of the costs paid by the insurer and patients, over the counter drugs costs, and other costs such as medical equipment costs. Direct non-medical costs are composed of transportation and caregiver costs. Indirect costs are the sum of the costs associated with premature death and the costs due to productivity loss. Age, sex, and disease specific costs were estimated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among the musculoskeletal diseases, the highest costs are associated with other dorsopathies, followed by disc disorder and arthrosis. The direct medical and direct non-medical costs of all musculoskeletal diseases were $4.18 billion and$338 million in 2008, respectively. Among the indirect costs, those due to productivity loss were $2.28 billion and costs due to premature death were$79 million. The proportions of the total costs incurred by male and female patients were 33.8% and 66.2%, respectively, and the cost due to the female adult aged 20-64 years old was highest. The total economic cost of musculoskeletal disease was $6.89 billion, which represents 0.7% of the Korean gross domestic product.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The economic burden of musculoskeletal disease in Korea is substantial. As the Korean population continues to age, the economic burden of musculoskeletal disease will continue to increase. Policy measures aimed at controlling the cost of musculoskeletal disease are therefore required.</p

Comparison of methods for generating quality of live items: individual interviews versus focus groups

Works centered on the search for a quality of life (QoL) definition have mostly privileged the individual interviews. No methodology has compared yet the quantitative production of items resulting from individual interviews with those from focus groups, concerning a lower limbs osteo-arthritis QoL. Purpose: To compare methods of item generation for methods : 2 individual interviews and 2 focus groups and to identify the pertinence of a theoretical construit of QoL. Methods: All methods compared relied on extraction of verbatim collected during tape recorded interviews, transcripted and analysed by 3 teams of health psychologists and sociologists independently. The 4 methods compared were interviewed with interview guide with OA patients in 1) focus group, 2) individual semi-structured interview and 3) using a cognitive interview technique to enhance memories. Using the final scale as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity, i.e. the contribution of each method to the scale, were estimated. Results: 66 individual and focus interviews were conducted with 96 OA patients. After exclusion of speeches not related to QoL (i.e. satisfaction, coping, locus of control), 80 items were identified relevant. With patients, focus group produced 74% of the items, while both individual methods contributed 100% of resulting items and none item except subject. Focus group methods contributed some themes but individuals gave more in depth information. Traditional semi-structured interviews contributed to known QoL themes and to items on the feeling of being embarrassed for people to be seen, to ask for help and to annoy close relatives, while cognitive interviews provided more fine tuned items on exchanges with and perception by others about their condition, as well as perspective in life and fears from future dependency. Conclusion. The selected method is relevant to explore the theoretical construit of QoL. One can recommend to use patients’ semi-structured interviews with a traditional or a cognitive technique, conducted by interviewers preferably non-specialist of the condition explored. Perspectives. The question is then what is the influence of the topic on the method to be retained