Vital capacity evolution in patients treated with the CMCR brace: statistical analysis of 90 scoliotic patients treated with the CMCR brace

<p>Summary</p> <p>Objective</p> <p>To study the evolution of pulmonary capacity during orthopaedic treatment of scoliosis with the CMCR brace.</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Investigating the impact of moderate scoliosis on respiratory capacity and its evolution during CMCR brace treatment with mobile pads.</p> <p>Context</p> <p>Several studies demonstrate the impact of scoliosis on respiratory capacity but few of them focus on the impact of bracing treatment. We studied the evolution of the pulmonary capacity of a cohort of 90 scoliotic patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This retrospective study included 90 scoliotic patients treated since 1999 with a brace with mobile pads called CMCR (n = 90; mean age: 13 years; 10-16). These patients were diagnosed with an idiopathic scoliosis (mean angulation 20.6°). All patients underwent a radiographic and respiratory evaluation at the beginning, the middle and the end of treatment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p><it>Mean age at treatment start was </it>13. Before treatment, our patients did not have a normal pulmonary capacity: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was only 75% of the theoretical value. All curvature types (thoracic, thoraco-lumbar and combined scoliosis) involved this reduced pulmonary capacity, with moderate-angulated scoliosis having a negative impact. At the beginning of brace treatment, the loss of real vital capacity with brace (0.3 litres) was 10% lower than without brace.</p> <p>At CMCR removal, the FVC had increased by 0.4 litre (21% +/- 4.2% compared to the initial value). The theoretical value had increased by 3%. This positive evolution was most important in girls at a low Risser stage (0,1,2), and before 11 years of age.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results supported our approach of orthesis conception for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis which uses braces with mobile pads to preserve thorax and spine mobility.</p

Flemish network on rare connective tissue diseases (CTD): patient pathways in systemic sclerosis. First steps taken.

peer reviewedDespite the low prevalence of each rare disease, the total burden is high. Patients with rare diseases encounter numerous barriers, including delayed diagnosis and limited access to high-quality treatments. In order to tackle these challenges, the European Commission launched the European Reference Networks (ERNs), cross-border networks of healthcare providers and patients representatives. In parallel, the aims and structure of these ERNs were translated at the federal and regional levels, resulting in the creation of the Flemish Network of Rare Diseases. In line with the mission of the ERNs and to ensure equal access to care, we describe as first patient pathways for systemic sclerosis (SSc), as a pilot model for other rare connective and musculoskeletal diseases. Consensus was reached on following key messages: 1. Patients with SSc should have multidisciplinary clinical and investigational evaluations in a tertiary reference expert centre at baseline, and subsequently every three to 5 years. Intermediately, a yearly clinical evaluation should be provided in the reference centre, whilst SSc technical evaluations are permissionably executed in a centre that follows SSc-specific clinical practice guidelines. In between, monitoring can take place in secondary care units, under the condition that qualitative examinations and care including interactive multidisciplinary consultations can be provided. 2. Patients with early diffuse cutaneous SSc, (progressive) interstitial lung disease and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension should undergo regular evaluations in specialised tertiary care reference institutions. 3. Monitoring of patients with progressive interstitial lung disease and/or pulmonary (arterial) hypertension will be done in agreement with experts of ERN LUNG

Management van reumatoïde artritis bij oudere personen

The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an aging population is steadily increasing as a consequence of the chronicity of the disease and the increased life expectancy. The phenotype of the disease differs according to the age at which RA first appears. In elderly-onset RA (EORA), the most important differential diagnosis is polymyalgia rheumatica. The use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologicals in older patients is currently not optimal. Literature data indicate that a higher disease activity in this age group is tolerated before adapting the pharmacotherapeutic management. Yet, there is no indication that the safety and efficacy of RA-specific drugs are essentially different between older and younger patients. An important criterion for making a decision is the biological age of the person to be treated. A discrepancy between the biological and the chronological age may be caused by frailty, multimorbidity and the presence of geriatric giant conditions (cognitive limitations, depression, sensory disorders, disturbed mobility and incontinence). In case of a favourable biological age, a sharp therapeutic target should be formulated and pharmacotherapy should be designed to reach such a target. If a person ages less successfully with an unfavourable biological age, drugs with a safety risk should be prescribed with more restraint and more safety surveillance. Non-pharmacotherapeutic care (exercise therapy, occupational therapy), in addition to drug therapy, has an important role for older patients with RA

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting with spinal involvement

A