42 research outputs found
ΠΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅
Objective: to compare the data of knee joint X-ray and arthroscopic studies in the presence of rheumatoid synovitis.
Subjects and methods. Sixty-seven patients who had undergone 72 arthroscopic synovectomic operations on 72 joints for chronic knee-joint synovitis in the presence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were examined. Preoperative knee-joint X-ray study was carried out with the standard projections in all the patients. In most cases, the magnitude of X-ray changes corresponded to grade 1 according to the Larsen classification. The degree of articular cartilage destruction was intraoperatively estimated. Repeated X-ray films were made 6 and 30-36 months after arthroscopy. Results. It has been fount that in 72,2% of cases, the true articular cartilage changes detectable by arthroscopic revision were ascertained to coincide in their magnitude with the X-ray changes determined by the Larsen classification or to exceed them.
Conclusion. In knee-joint RA, arthroscopic revision can provide the fullest information on the severity of pathological changes; however, X-ray study aids to a certain degree in the prediction of arthroscopic findings, including those of articular cartilage pathology.Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π° Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ°.
ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ 67ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π½Π° 72 ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Ρ
Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ 72 ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΡΠΎ-ΠΌΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π° Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ° (Π Π). Π ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΡ
. Π‘ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π° 1-ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Larsen. ΠΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΡΡΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 6 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 30-36 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΈ.
Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² 72,2% Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΡΡΠ°, Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Larsen, ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΈΡ
.
ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠΈ Π Π ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΈ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΡΡΠ°
Leibniz Seminorms and Best Approximation from C*-subalgebras
We show that if B is a C*-subalgebra of a C*-algebra A such that B contains a
bounded approximate identity for A, and if L is the pull-back to A of the
quotient norm on A/B, then L is strongly Leibniz. In connection with this
situation we study certain aspects of best approximation of elements of a
unital C*-algebra by elements of a unital C*-subalgebra.Comment: 24 pages. Intended for the proceedings of the conference "Operator
Algebras and Related Topics". v2: added a corollary to the main theorem, plus
several minor improvements v3: much simplified proof of a key lemma,
corollary to main theorem added v4: Many minor improvements. Section numbers
increased by
CHANGES AND CORRELATION OF THE DATA OF KNEE JOINT X-RAY AND ARTHROSCOPIC STUDIES IN RHEUMATOID SYNOVITIS
Objective: to compare the data of knee joint X-ray and arthroscopic studies in the presence of rheumatoid synovitis.
Subjects and methods. Sixty-seven patients who had undergone 72 arthroscopic synovectomic operations on 72 joints for chronic knee-joint synovitis in the presence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were examined. Preoperative knee-joint X-ray study was carried out with the standard projections in all the patients. In most cases, the magnitude of X-ray changes corresponded to grade 1 according to the Larsen classification. The degree of articular cartilage destruction was intraoperatively estimated. Repeated X-ray films were made 6 and 30-36 months after arthroscopy. Results. It has been fount that in 72,2% of cases, the true articular cartilage changes detectable by arthroscopic revision were ascertained to coincide in their magnitude with the X-ray changes determined by the Larsen classification or to exceed them.
Conclusion. In knee-joint RA, arthroscopic revision can provide the fullest information on the severity of pathological changes; however, X-ray study aids to a certain degree in the prediction of arthroscopic findings, including those of articular cartilage pathology
Arthroscopic synovectomy in rheumatoid synovitis of knee joint
Objective. To determine indications to and efficacy of arthroscopic synovectomy (AS) via anteriolateral portal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with knee joint synovitis. Material and methods. 139 pts with RA and knee joint synovitis were included. Kneeswelling, pain, restriction of movement score (from 0 to 3) were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. Coefficient of conservative treatment inefficacy (duration of treatmentwithout significant improvement) was counted. Value of this coefficient multiplication by the sum of the above mentioned measures was used to determine indications to AS. AS was indicated in 111 cases (79,9%). It was performed in 72 pts (group 1). In 39 pts of group 2 this operation was not performed. 28 pts without indications to AS (group3) continued conservative treatment. Before the operation and after 6 months pts filled SF-36 questionnaire to assess quality of life. We used Russian version of SF-36 which was prepared to assess quality of life of Saint Petersburg adult inhabitants. This version possesses necessary psychometric features and is appropriate for conducting studies of quality of life and health status of Russian population. Results. AS provided significant improvement. All Clinical measures in group 1 showed similar mean improvement approximately by 1 (from 0,83 to 0,95, p<0,001). Integral measures (physical health and psychological health) in group 1 pts were higher (by 3,4 and 3,8 respectively). In group 3 all clinical measures values decreased to 0-1 while 30,8-48,7% assessments in group 2 pts showed 2 and in 5,1% - 3 for restriction of movement. Conservative treatment in rheumatoid synovitis is not equally effective for all pts. It does not provide sufficient effect in presence of indications to synovectomy. On the other hand in pts with less severe form of the disease not having indications to synovectomy such therapy provides fast and significant clinical improvement during 6 months of follow up. Conclusion. In pts with rheumatoid synovitis of knee joint having indications to this operation AS provides better results than conservative treatment only
Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Hip Dysplasia by Individual Augments: Early Results
Relevance. The altered hip anatomy makes total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia a difficult and non-standard task. The acetabulum is deformed with femoral head in subluxation or dislocation. The most important task of surgery is to restore the anatomical position of the hip center of rotation.The study purpose β to evaluate the early results of hip arthroplasty with individual augments in the patients with hip dysplasia.Materials and Methods. Since 2017, nine patients with hip dysplasia have undergone surgery using individually printed augments. All patients were women with average age 51.3Β±14.5 years (23 to 67). The mean follow-up was 14.3Β±5.2 months (8 to 20). Patients were evaluated using follow-up X-rays, a visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC).Results. There was no a single case of endoprosthesis dislocation, loosening of components, prosthetic infection or revision surgery in the analyzed group of patients. The planned sizes of the acetabular components were equal to the placed in 7 cases (77.8%). In two cases (22.2%), the acetabular components were 2 mm larger because the surgeon wanted a greater degree of press-fit fixation. The restoration of the anatomical position of the acetabular component was noted. Before the surgery, the femoral head was on average 22.7Β±11.7 mm (10 to 43 mm) higher. After the surgery, the level of the acetabular component was on average only 0.75Β±2.1 mm (1.7 to 5 mm), p = 0.008. Also, there were a decrease in pain and quality of life improvement by VAS from 6.78Β±1.39 before surgery to 2.22Β±1.09 at follow-up (p = 0.007), HHS increase from 30.5Β±18. 1 to 77.59Β±14.26 (p = 0.008), and WOMAC decrease from 73.3Β±14.1 to 18.22Β±8.2 (p = 0.008).Conclusion. The individually printed augments have shown high efficacy for restoration of the anatomical center of rotation and good early results in the patients with hip dysplasia undergone hip arthroplasty