Spatial distribution of breeding Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in respect to their natal sites

Study of philopatry and dispersal of pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca was launched on the Courish Spit (SE Baltic) in 1981. Since then, ca. 9,000 nestlings were ringed at different sites in the Russian part of the Courish Spit. A total of 557 individuals ringed as pulli were recaptured in subsequent seasons in the study area. Both males and females are more often recaptured in the plots where they were ringed than in other plots. These results were interpreted in the framework of the hypothesis forwarded by Löhrl (1959) and supported by Berndt & Winkel (1979). These authors suggested that cavity nesters (pied flycatchers and collared flycatchers F. albicollis) imprint their future local breeding area during the period of postfledging exploration. Birds that survive until the next spring, return to these imprinted areas to breed. A similar study done by Sokolov et al. (1984) on the Courish Spit in an open nesting species, the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, confirmed this finding. We assumed that juvenile pied flycatchers disperse for varying distances during their postfledging movements and imprint a local area, some 1–5 kilometres in diameter. This area is the goal of their migration next spring. It is suggested that in spring, yearlings are non–randomly distributed in respect to the area they have imprinted as juveniles. Recently, Vysotsky (2000, 2001) re–analysed the same data on philopatry of pied flycatchers on the Courish Spit and forwarded an alternative hypothesis. He suggests that juveniles, both males and females, do not imprint any local area during the postfledging period, but are distributed randomly across the area of several dozens of kilometres in spring. Vysotsky was able to show that distribution of distances of natal dispersal did not differ from the random pattern the study plot which was an 8.5 km long line of nest boxes along the Courish Spit. The aim of this study was to test these two alternative hypotheses. To do so, we set up nine new study plots in 2000. Over 800 nest–boxes were made available for the birds (in addition to the old 400) in the 44 km long area. We recaptured pied flycatchers returning for breeding during four years, 2000–2003. The distribution of natal dispersal distances was compared with the null model which assumes that pied flycatchers settle randomly in the study area. We took all nest boxes from which pied flycatchers successfully fledged in a particular year and all next boxes where we were able to capture either a male or a female in the subsequent year, and calculated the distances between each pair of such nest boxes. Simulations were run separately for each sex. Theoretical distributions already include control efficiency. If some nest boxes were not checked in some year, or if we failed to capture one or both members of a breeding pair, we did not include this nest box in the model. Some birds could settle outside the study plot. Therefore, the theoretical distribution may underestimate the actual range of natal dispersal, but is unlikely to overestimate it. The number of females ringed as nestlings and recaptured as one–year–old birds was 43. The distribution of their natal distances (mean 6,8 km, SE = 0,81; median 5,4 km) was not significantly different from the pattern predicted by the null model (Wilcoxon matched pairs test: z = 1,25; p = 0,21). Conversely, males settled significantly closer to their natal nest box (n = 83; mean 4,3 km, SE = 0,57; median 2,5 km) than predicted by the model (Wilcoxon matched pairs test: z = 2,45; p = 0,014). For example, 24% of males settle within one km from their natal site, as compared with 7% predicted by the model. Males are found with a greater than chance probability within the 7 km zone around their natal site. The hypothesis by Vysotsky (2000) can thus be rejected for pied flycatcher males. Pied flycatcher females are known to settle at larger distances from their natal nest box. The very fact that were controlled 83 males and only 43 females suggests, assumed that sex ratio at fledging is close to being equal and that true survival rates during the first year of life do not differ greatly between the sexes, that many females emigrated from of our study plot. This does not mean that juvenile females do not imprint a home area during the postfledging period, as suggested by Vysotsky (2000). We think that the reason for this is not the inadequate navigational ability of the females but the fact that they were attracted by a prospecting male at some distance from their migratory destination and settle there. Such intercepting was suggested by Fedorov (1996) for Acrocephalus warblers, and it may exist in other migratory passerines. This is supported by the data on natal site fidelity from Spain which show that in Spanish pied flycatcher populations, recruitment rate did not differ between female and male juveniles (Potti & Montalvo, 1991). Females from these southern populations have a limited chance to be attracted by prospecting males in even more southern areas

Effect of fuel load, date, rain and wind on departure decisions of a migratory passerine

Meteorological conditions, fuel load and date in the season can affect the departure decisions among migratory birds. However, it is poorly understood to what extent the departure decisions are more influenced by some parameters in relation to others, and how they interact with each other. We explored here how fuel load, date, rain and wind (measured on the ground and at high altitude, codified as a tailwind component) influenced the departure decisions of migratory Blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla) from a stopover site. We used mark recapture data of 947 Blackcaps collected during the autumn migration period 2005 at a stopover site in northern Iberia, estimating the emigration likelihood with Cormack-Jolly-Seber models, in which we tested for the effect of these four study variables. Best models fitting data showed an additive and positive effect of tailwind and fuel load on the emigration likelihood.Meteorological data were provided by Gobierno de Navarra and NOAA (US Department of Commerce). The Gobierno de Navarra also authorised the ringing activity. J.A. was supported by a post-graduate fellowship from the Basque Government. D. Alonso and I. Fernandez collaborated during the field work. E.B. and E.J.B. were partially supported by project CGL2007-61395 (Spanish Ministry of Education and Science). H. Schmaljohann and one anonymous reviewer provided very valuable comments that improved an earlier version.Arizaga, J.; Belda Pérez, EJ.; Barba, E. (2011). Effect of fuel load, date, rain and wind on departure decisions of a migratory passerine. Journal od Ornithology. 152(4):991-999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0685-2S9919991524Åkesson S, Hedenström A (2000) Wind selectivity of migratory flight departures in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:140–144Åkesson S, Alerstam T, Hedenström A (1996) Flight initiation of nocturnal passerine migrants in relation to celestial orientation conditions at twilight. J Avian Biol 27:95–102Åkesson S, Walinder G, Karlsson L, Ehnbom S (2001) Reed warbler orientation: initiation of nocturnal migratory flights in relation to visibility of celestial cues at dusk. Anim Behav 61:181–189Åkesson S, Walinder G, Karlsson L, Ehnbom S (2002) Nocturnal migratory flight initiation in reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus: effect of wind on orientation and timing of migration. J Avian Biol 33:349–357Alerstam T (1990) Bird migration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeAlerstam T, Linström A (1990) Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy and safety. In: Gwiner E (ed) Bird migration: the physiology and ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 331–351Arizaga J, Belda EJ, Barba E (2008) Fuel management and stopover duration of blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla stopping over in northern Spain during autumn migration period. Bird Study 55:124–134Barriocanal C, Montserrat D, Robson D (2002) Influences of wind flow on stopover decisions: the case of the reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus in the western Mediterranean. Inter J Biometeorol 46:192–196Bayly N (2007) Extreme fattening by sedge warblers, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, is not triggered by food availability alone. Anim Behav 74:471–479Belda EJ, Barba E, Monrós JS (2007) Resident and transient dynamics, site fidelity and survival in wintering blackcaps: evidence from capture–recapture analyses. Ibis 149:396–404Berthold P (1996) Control of bird migration. Chapman & Hall, LondonBolshakov CV, Bulyuk VN (1999) Time of nocturnal flight initiation (take-off activity) in the European robin Erithacus rubecula during spring migration: direct observation between sunset and sunrise. Avian Ecol Behav 2:51–74Bolshakov CV, Rezvyi SP (1998) Time of nocturnal flight initiation (take-off activity) in the European robin Erithacus rubecula during spring migration: visual observation between sunset and darkness. Avian Ecol Behav 1:37–49Bolshakov CV, Chernetsov N, Mukhin A, Bulyuk VN, Kosarev V, Ktitorov P, Leoke D, Tsvey A (2007) Time of nocturnal departures in European robins, Erithacus rubecula, in relation to celestial cues, season, stopover duration and fat scores. Anim Behav 74:855–865Bulyuk VN, Tsvey A (2006) Timing of nocturnal autumn migratory departures in juvenile European robins (Erithacus rubecula) and endogenous and external factors. J Ornithol 147:298–309Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference. A practical information theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkChan K (1995) Take-off behaviour and effects of weather on the migration of the silvereye (Zosterops lateralis). Ring 17:77–90Choquet R, Reboulet AM, Pradel R, Lebreton JD (2001) U-care (utilities: capture–recapture) user’s guide. CEFE/CNRS, MontpellierCochran WW (1987) Orientation and other migratory behaviours of a Swainson’s thrush followed for 1,500 km. Anim Behav 35:927–929Cochran WW, Wikelski M (2005) Individual migratory tactics of New World Catharus thushes: current knowledge and future tracking options from space. In: Greenberg R, Marra P (eds) Birds of two worlds: ecology and evolution of migrants. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 274–289Cramp S (1992) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol VI. Oxford University Press, OxfordDänhardt J, Lindström Å (2001) Optimal departure decisions of songbirds from an experimental stopover site and the significant of weather. Anim Behav 62:235–243Dierschke V, Delingat J (2001) Stopover behaviour and departure decision of northern wheatears, Oenanthe oenanthe, facing different onward non-stop flight distances. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:535–545Elkins N (1999) Weather and bird behaviour. Poyser, LondonErni B, Liechti F, Underhill LG, Bruderer B (2002) Wind and rain govern intensity of nocturnal bird migration in central Europe: a log-linear regression analysis. Ardea 90:155–166Franklin AB (2001) Exploring ecological relationships in survival and estimating rates of population change using program MARK. In: Field R, Warren RJ, Okarma H, Sievert PR (eds) Proceedings of second international wildlife manage congress. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 290–296Fransson T (1998) Patterns of migratory fuelling in whitethroats Sylvia communis in relation to departure. J Avian Biol 29:569–573Gauthreaux SA (1971) A radar and direct visual study of passerine spring migration in southern Louisiana. Auk 88:343–365Greño JL, Belda EJ, Barba E (2008) Influence of temperatures during the nestling period on post-fledging survival of great tit Parus major in Mediterranean habitat. J Avian Biol 39:41–49Hebrard JL (1971) The nightly initiation of passerine migration in spring: a direct visual study. Ibis 113:8–18Jenni L, Schaub M (2003) Behavioural and physiological reactions to environmental variation in bird migration: a review. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) Avian migration. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–171Kaiser A (1993) A new multicategory classification of subcutaneous fat deposits of songbirds. J Field Ornithol 64:246–255Lack D (1960) The influence of weather on passerine migration. A review. Auk 77:171–209Liechti F (2006) Birds: blowin’ by the wind? J Ornithol 147:202–211Moore FR (1987) Sunset and the orientation behaviour of migrating birds. Biol Rev 62:65–86Moore FR, Aborn D (1996) Time of departure by summer tanagers (Piranga rubra) from a stopover site following spring trans-Gulf migration. Auk 113:949–952Newton I (2008) The migration ecology of birds. Academic, LondonPradel R, Hines JE, Lebreton JD, Nichols JD (1997) Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53:60–72Richardson WJ (1990) Timing and amount of bird migration in relation to weather: a review. In: Gwinner E (ed) Bird migration: physiology and ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 78–101Schaub M, Pradel R, Jenni L, Lebreton JD (2001) Migrating birds stop over longer than usually thought: an improved capture-recapture analysis. Ecology 82:852–859Schaub M, Liechti F, Jenni L (2004) Departure of migrating European robins, Erithacus rubecula, from a stopover site in relation to wind and rain. Anim Behav 67:229–237Schwartz CC, Haroldson MA, White GC, Harris RB, Cherry S, Keaty KA, Moody D, Servheen C (2005) Temporal, spatial and environmental influences on the demographics of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Wildlife Monograph 161Senar JC, Pascual J (1997) Keel and tarsus length may provide a good predictor of avian body size. Ardea 85:269–274Shirihai H, Gargallo G, Helbig AJ (2001) Sylvia warblers: identification, taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Sylvia. Christopher Helm, LondonSvensson L (1998) Guía para la identificación de los paseriformes de Europa. SEO/BirdLife, MadridTaylor JJ, Alisauskas RT, Kehoe FP (2004) Multistate modelling of brood amalgamation in white-winged scoters Melanitta fusca deglandi. Anim Biodiver Conserv 27:369–370Tsvey A, Bulyuk VN, Korasev V (2007) Influence of body condition and weather on departures of first-year European robins, Erithacus rubecula, from an autumn migratory stopover site. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1665–1674White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(suppl):120–13