Nitric oxide synthase inhibition results in synergistic anti-tumour activity with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor alpha-based isolated limb perfusions

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important molecule in regulating tumour blood flow and stimulating tumour angiogenesis. Inhibition of NO synthase by L-NAME might induce an anti-tumour effect by limiting nutrients and oxygen to reach tumour tissue or affecting vascular growth. The anti-tumour effect of L-NAME after systemic administration was studied in a renal subcapsular CC531 adenocarcinoma model in rats. Moreover, regional administration of L-NAME, in combination with TNF and melphalan, was studied in an isolated limb perfusion (ILP) model using BN175 soft-tissue sarcomas. Systemic treatment with L-NAME inhibited growth of adenocarcinoma significantly but was accompanied by impaired renal function. In ILP, reduced tumour growth was observed when L-NAME was used alone. In combination with TNF or melphalan, L-NAME increased response rates significantly compared to perfusions without L-NAME (0–64% and 0–63% respectively). An additional anti-tumour effect was demonstrated when L-NAME was added to the synergistic combination of melphalan and TNF (responses increased from 70 to 100%). Inhibition of NO synthase reduces tumour growth both after systemic and regional (ILP) treatment. A synergistic anti-tumour effect of L-NAME is observed in combination with melphalan and/or TNF using ILP. These results indicate a possible role of L-NAME for the treatment of solid tumours in a systemic or regional setting. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaig

TNF- α augments intratumoural concentrations of doxorubicin in TNF- α -based isolated limb perfusion in rat sarcoma models and enhances anti-tumour effects

We have shown previously that isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in sarcoma-bearing rats results in high response rates when melphalan is used in combination with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). This is in line with observations in patients. Here we show that ILP with doxorubicin in combination with TNF-α has comparable effects in two different rat sarcoma tumour models. The addition of TNF-α exhibits a synergistic anti-tumour effect, resulting in regression of the tumour in 54% and 100% of the cases for the BN175-fibrosarcoma and the ROS-1 osteosarcoma respectively. The combination is shown to be mandatory for optimal tumour response. The effect of high dose TNF-α on the activity of cytotoxic agents in ILP is still unclear. We investigated possible modes by which TNF-α could modulate the activity of doxorubicin. In both tumour models increased accumulation of doxorubicin in tumour tissue was found: 3.1-fold in the BN175 and 1.8-fold in the ROS-1 sarcoma after ILP with doxorubicin combined with TNF-α in comparison with an ILP with doxorubicin alone. This increase in local drug concentration may explain the synergistic anti-tumour responses after ILP with the combination. In vitro TNF-α fails to augment drug uptake in tumour cells or to increase cytotoxicity of the drug. These findings make it unlikely that TNF-α directly modulates the activity of doxorubicin in vivo. As TNF-α by itself has no or only minimal effect on tumour growth, an increase in local concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs might well be the main mechanism for the synergistic anti-tumour effects. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaig

In vivo isolated kidney perfusion with tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in tumour-bearing rats

Isolated perfusion of the extremities with high-dose tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) plus melphalan leads to dramatic tumour response in patients with irresectable soft tissue sarcoma or multiple melanoma in transit metastases. We developed in vivo isolated organ perfusion models to determine whether similar tumour responses in solid organ tumours can be obtained with this regimen. Here, we describe the technique of isolated kidney perfusion. We studied the feasibility of a perfusion with TNF-α and assessed its anti-tumour effects in tumour models differing in tumour vasculature. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) proved to be only 1 μg TNF-α. Higher doses appeared to induce renal failure and a secondary cytokine release with fatal respiratory and septic shock-like symptoms. In vitro, the combination of TNF-α and melphalan did not result in a synergistic growth-inhibiting effect on CC 531 colon adenocarcinoma cells, whereas an additive effect was observed on osteosarcoma ROS-1 cells. In vivo isolated kidney perfusion, with TNF-α alone or in combination with melphalan, did not result in a significant anti-tumour response in either tumour model in a subrenal capsule assay. We conclude that, because of the susceptibility of the kidney to perfusion with TNF-α, the minimal threshold concentration of TNF-α to exert its anti-tumour effects was not reached. The applicability of TNF-α in isolated kidney perfusion for human tumours seems, therefore, questionable. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

Erratum: Acute cellular and vascular responses to photodynamic therapy using EGFR-targeted nanobody-photosensitizer conjugates studied with intravital optical imaging and magnetic resonance imaging: Erratum

The authors regret to find an error in the published version of figure 1B, where the graph for 7D12-PS mistakenly was miscopied for 7D12-9G8-PS. During the review process a correct version of Figure 1B was included. The mistake was made while preparing the final text and figures in response to reviewers comments. The authors have revised Figure 1B, and confirm that the correction has no effect on the original data and conclusions. The authors apologize for any inconvenience that the errors may have caused

Acute cellular and vascular responses to photodynamic therapy using EGFR-targeted nanobody-photosensitizer conjugates studied with intravital optical imaging and magnetic resonance imaging: Erratum

Acute cellular and vascular responses to photodynamic therapy using EGFR-targeted nanobody-photosensitizer conjugates studied with intravital optical imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (Theranostics (2020) 10:5 (2436-2452) DOI: 10.7150/thno.37949

Isolated limb perfusion with actinomycin D and TNF-alpha results in improved tumour response in soft-tissue sarcoma-bearing rats but is accompanied by severe local toxicity

Previously we demonstrated that addition of Tumour Necrosis Factor-α to melphalan or doxorubicin in a so-called isolated limb perfusion results in synergistic antitumour responses of sarcomas in both animal models and patients. Yet, 20 to 30% of the treated tumours do not respond. Therefore agents that synergise with tumour necrosis factor alpha must be investigated. Actinomycin D is used in combination with melphalan in isolated limb perfusion in the treatment of patients with melanoma in-transit metastases and is well known to augment tumour cell sensitivity towards tumour necrosis factor alpha in vitro. Both agents are very toxic, which limits their systemic use. Their applicability may therefore be tested in the isolated limb perfusion setting, by which the tumours can be exposed to high concentrations in the absence of systemic exposure. To study the beneficial effect of the combination in vivo, BN-175 soft tissue sarcoma-bearing rats were perfused with various concentrations of actinomycin D and tumour necrosis factor alpha. When used alone the drugs had only little effect on the tumour. Only when actinomycin D and tumour necrosis factor alpha were combined a tumour response was achieved. However, these responses were accompanied by severe, dose limiting, local toxicity such as destruction of the muscle tissue and massive oedema. Our results show that isolated limb perfusion with actinomycin D in combination with tumour necrosis factor alpha leads to a synergistic anti-tumour response but also to idiosyncratic locoregional toxicity to the normal tissues. Actinomycin D, in combination with tumour necrosis factor alpha, should not be explored in the clinical setting because of this. The standard approach in the clinic remains isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor alpha in combination with melphalan

Acute cellular and vascular responses to photodynamic therapy using EGFR-targeted nanobody-photosensitizer conjugates studied with intravital optical imaging and magnetic resonance imaging

Targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) has the potential to selectively damage tumor tissue and to increase tumor vessel permeability. Here we characterize the tissue biodistribution of two EGFR-targeted nanobody-photosensitizer conjugates (NB-PS), the monovalent 7D12-PS and the biparatopic 7D12-9G8-PS. In addition, we report on the local and acute phototoxic effects triggered by illumination of these NB-PS which have previously shown to lead to extensive tumor damage. Methods: Intravital microscopy and the skin-fold chamber model, containing OSC-19-luc2-cGFP tumors, were used to investigate: a) the fluorescence kinetics and distribution, b) the vascular response and c) the induction of necrosis after illumination at 1 or 24 h post administration of 7D12-PS and 7D12-9G8-PS. In addition, dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of a solid tumor model was used to investigate the microvascular status 2 h after 7D12-PS mediated PDT. Results: Image analysis showed significant tumor colocalization for both NB-PS which was higher for 7D12-9G8-PS. Intravital imaging showed clear tumor cell membrane localization 1 and 2 h after administration of 7D12-9G8-PS, and fluorescence in or close to endothelial cells in normal tissue for both NB-PS. PDT lead to vasoconstriction and leakage of tumor and normal tissue vessels in the skin-fold chamber model. DCE-MRI confirmed the reduction of tumor perfusion after 7D12-PS mediated PDT. PDT induced extensive tumor necrosis and moderate normal tissue damage, which was similar for both NB-PS conjugates. This was significantly reduced when illumination was performed at 24 h compared to 1 h after administration. Discussion: Although differences were observed in distribution of the two NB-PS conjugates, both led to similar necrosis. Clearly, the response to PDT using NB-PS conjugates is the result of a complex mixture of tumor cell responses and vascular effects, which is likely to be necessary for a maximally effective treatment