35 research outputs found
Impact of optimal therapy for noncommunicable diseases on the course and outcome of COVID-19 inpatients
Aim. To carry out a comparative analysis of the impact of optimal and suboptimal therapy for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) at the prehospital stage on the severity and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Material and methods. The study included 158 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and having one or more concomitant NCDs. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the quality of initial therapy for NCDs: group 1 β patients receiving treatment that does not meet modern clinical guidelines, taking drugs not regularly or not taking them at all (n=100; 63%), and group 2 β patients receiving treatment in accordance with current clinical guidelines, taking regularly prescribed therapy (n=58; 37%). The primary endpoint was inhospital death, while secondary endpoints β duration of fever, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay.Results. Inhospital mortality was significantly higher in the 1st group of patients compared with the 2nd group (18,0% vs 1,7%, p=0,002). Analysis of secondary endpoints revealed that patients of the 1st group (nonoptimal therapy), in comparison with the 2nd group (optimal therapy), had significantly longer period of fever (10 [7; 12] vs 9 [7; 10] days, p=0,03), longer ICU (0 [0; 3] vs 0 [0; 0] days, p<0,001) and hospital stay (10 [8; 14] vs 8 [7; 11] days, p=0,001).Conclusion. Patients who received standard NCD therapy before admission to the infectious disease hospital, in accordance with current clinical guidelines and who regularly take drugs, have a more favorable course of COVID-19 at the hospital stage and a lower inhospital mortality rate than patients with suboptimal therapy who are not adherent to treatment or not receiving drugs, but having indications for taking them
ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π² ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ
Organ transplantation is an effective treatment for many end-stage diseases. However, reperfusion injury constitutes a major complication of transplantation, which is associated with microcirculatory disorders and aggregation of blood corpuscles. Red blood cells (RBC) play an essential role in maintaining hemodynamic and rheological properties of the blood. Moreover, the study of mechanisms of changes in RBC functional indices is an urgent task. The main indicator of RBC functioning is the stability of RBC membrane structure. The issue of RBC membrane modification in organ transplantation has not been studied so far. Objective: to study the protein composition of RBC membranes, their aggregation and electrokinetic parameters in liver and kidney recipients, as well as in related kidney and liver fragment donors before and after operation. Research materials. Blood of 12 kidney recipients and 5 related kidney donors, 8 liver recipients and 4 related liver fragment donors β 1β2 hours before surgery, 1 week, 1, 2, 7, 10, 12 months after surgery. The control group consisted of 8 healthy volunteers. Research methods. Protein separation was done by Laemmli electrophoresis. RBC electrophoretic mobility, which characterizes the electrokinetic properties of cells, was measured by microelectrophoresis. Aggregation was calculated microscopically by counting unaggregated RBCs. Obtained values were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. Results. Examination of the RBC membrane of kidney recipients revealed a significant decrease in the amount of Band 3 protein and glycophorin before and after transplantation. Band 3 protein levels reduced at 1 month, glycophorin reduced at 7 months after surgery, with a maximum decrease in these protein fractions by more than 50% by 7 days compared with control values. There was also a decrease in spectrin content for 2 months after surgery with a maximum decrease of 30% by 1 month. In liver recipients, analysis of RBC membrane proteins revealed a decrease in the amount of glycophorin before surgery and further decrease at 2 months of post-transplant period. The maximum decrease in this index was 72% by 7 days after surgery. In addition, there was a fall in spectrin and Band 3 protein levels at 1 month by more than 60% relative to the control values. In donors, there were changes in the protein fraction of RBC membranes in the long-term post-operative period: spectrin and Band 3 protein levels reduced by 2 times at month 2 in kidney donors, while glycophorin levels reduced by 2.3 times at month 1 after operation in liver donors. Similarly, both groups of donors had increased actin levels at month 1 after surgery. The revealed changes in protein levels in the protein phase of RBC membranes were combined with functional indices of RBCs. In kidney recipients, decreased RBC electrophoretic mobility and increased aggregation were detected at 2 months. In liver recipients, the changes in these indicators were at 1 month. A decrease in RBC electrophoretic mobility was detected in donors of both groups. Conclusion. Changes in RBC membrane electronegativity are associated with changes in glycophorin and Band 3 protein levels, whereas in RBC aggregation process in liver/kidney recipients, the structural and functional disorders in the interrelationships of such membrane proteins as spectrin, Band 3 protein, and glycophorin, are significant factors. Alteration of actin determines inhibition of RBC aggregation growth in donors.Π’ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ΄Π° ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ Ρ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡ ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ², ΠΈΡ
Π°Π³ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΈ Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π°.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Ρ 12 ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ, 5 ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ, 8 ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ 4 ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ β Π·Π° 1β2 ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 1 Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Ρ, 1, 2, 7, 10, 12 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 8 Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π².ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π Π°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΡΠΌΠΌΠ»ΠΈ. ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ², Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ, ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π°. ΠΠ³ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π½Π΅Π°Π³ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ². Π‘ΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ U-ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°βΠ£ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 3 ΠΈ Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π΄ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π£ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 3 Π±ΡΠ» ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 1 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ°, Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π° β Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 7 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π° 50% ΠΊ 7-ΠΌ ΡΡΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 2 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π° 30% ΠΊ 1 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΡ. Π£ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ» ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π΄ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 2 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ β Π½Π° 72% β Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΊ 7-ΠΌ ΡΡΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 3 Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 1 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π° 60% ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ. Π£ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ: Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² 2 ΡΠ°Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 3 ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π° 2-ΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡ, Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π² 2,3 ΡΠ°Π·Π° β ΠΊ 1-ΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ
Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΊ 1-ΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π² Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ². Π£ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠ€ΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π³ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 2 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π², Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 1 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ°. Π£ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠ€ΠΠ.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π°, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 3, ΡΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Π°Π³ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ/ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΠ½, Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 3, Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½. ΠΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π°Π³ΡΠ΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²
Common conformational changes induced in type 2 picornavirus IRESs by cognate trans-acting factors
Type 2 internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and other picornaviruses comprise five major domains H-L. Initiation of translation on these IRESs begins with specific binding of the central domain of initiation factor, eIF4G to the J-K domains, which is stimulated by eIF4A. eIF4G/eIF4A then restructure the region of ribosomal attachment on the IRES and promote recruitment of ribosomal 43S pre-initiation complexes. In addition to canonical translation factors, type 2 IRESs also require IRES trans-acting factors (ITAFs) that are hypothesized to stabilize the optimal IRES conformation that supports efficient ribosomal recruitment: the EMCV IRES is stimulated by pyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB), whereas the FMDV IRES requires PTB and ITAF45. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the effect of ITAFs on the conformations of EMCV and FMDV IRESs by comparing their influence on hydroxyl radical cleavage of these IRESs from the central domain of eIF4G. The observed changes in cleavage patterns suggest that cognate ITAFs promote similar conformational changes that are consistent with adoption by the IRESs of comparable, more compact structures, in which domain J undergoes local conformational changes and is brought into closer proximity to the base of domain I
OPTIMIZATION OF PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT IN TRANSVAGINAL PELVIC RECONSTRUCTIVE PLASTIC SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PELVIC ORGANS PROLAPSE
The objective of this study was to optimize the preoperative assessment in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive plastic surgery for the treatment of pelvic organs prolapse. Materials and methods: We conducted the quantitative and qualitative analysis of vaginal biocenosis in 68 female patients before and after administration of Polygynax. It was shown that Polygynax improves vaginal biocenosis owing to the reduction of microbial content. Therefore, the use of Polygynax for the preoperative assessment can be an effective method of prophylaxis of infectious and inflammatory complications and promote tissue regeneration after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive plastic surgery for the treatmentof pelvic organs prolapse
MODERN GENETIC ASPECTS OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPS
The review of the russian and foreign literature on pelvic organ prolapse in women and its genetic aspects. According to the literature, an association of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 9q21, which are involved in the formation of elastic fibers of the connective tissue (CT). The association also polymorphism fibullin β 5 (FBLN5) and lysyl oxidase β like 1 (LOXL1) and theirrelationship to POP. Based on the literature, studies aimed at identifying the genetic nature of the POP, are incomplete and are important for the identification of risk groups who have a predisposition to POP, selecting the optimal policy for patients at risk and the initial stages of POP
Physiology and pathology of extracellular vesicules
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the first publication about blood plasma microparticles. Initially considered as cell fragments or βplatelet dustβ, extracellular vesicles currently attracted the attention of biochemists, biophysicists, physicians, pharmacists around the world. They are heterogeneous in structure and derived from many cell types, express different antigen and contain variety of biomolecules that determines wide range of biological activity, including procoagulant, regenerative, immunomodulating, and others. They play an important role in the pathophysiology of different diseases and conditions β from infarction, injuries and pregnancies to the βgraft versus hostβ disease. The vesicles as medicaments and their carriers, as well as the drugs that affect them, are a rapidly developing field of research
Electrokinetic, oxidative and aggregation properties of red blood cells in the postoperative period following kidney transplantation
Objective: to study the electrokinetic and aggregation properties, as well as the pro-oxidant and antioxidant processes in red blood cells following kidney transplantation in donors and in recipients in the postoperative period. Materials and methods. Blood from 12 recipients and 5 kidney donors over time β before transplantation, as well as at week 1, months 1, 2, 7, 10 and 12 after surgery, as well as from 8 healthy volunteers who formed the control group. We used microelectrophoresis to measure the electrophoretic mobility of red blood cells, characterizing the electrokinetic properties of cells. Aggregation was calculated microscopically by counting unaggregated red blood cells. Malondialdehyde concentration was measured spectrophotometrically at its absorbance maximum at 530 nm by reaction with thiobarbituric acid. Catalase activity was analyzed by reducing hydrogen peroxide in the sample spectrophotometrically at 240 nm wavelength. The obtained values were compared using the MannβWhitney U test. Results. Decreased electrophoretic mobility of red blood cells within 2 months after transplantation was associated with increased malondialdehyde concentration and erythrocyte aggregation, decreased catalase activity in kidney recipients, followed by restoration of indicators to the control values. Electrophoretic mobility of red blood cells decreased, while malondialdehyde concentrations increased in donors after surgery. However, the increase was less pronounced than in recipients. The changes indicate that the postoperative period causes changes at the cellular level both in donors and in recipients. This is manifested by decreased stability of erythrocyte membrane structure, which is largely determined by lipid peroxidation processes. At the systemic level, a change in the electrophoretic mobility of red blood cells indicates a stress reaction before and after kidney transplantation in recipients within 2 months after surgery, and in donors in 1β2 months in the postoperative period with gradual increase in the bodyβs resistance. Conclusion. Kidney transplantation is manifested at the cellular and systemic levels. At the cellular level, there is decreased stability of the membrane structure, which is largely determined by lipid peroxidation processes. At the systemic level, a change in the electrophoretic mobility of red blood cells indicates a stress reaction with gradual increase in the bodyβs resistance. The data obtained demonstrate changes in the functional properties of red blood cells both in kidney transplant recipients and in donors. These changes need to be taken into account when carrying out therapeutic measures