11 research outputs found
ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ
Depending on the chosen business model, banks can act as both shock absorbers and crisis catalysts. In this regard, the analysis of the relationship between banksβ business models and financial cycles becomes a useful tool for diagnosing and predicting crisis phenomena. The purpose of the research is to identify the relationship between the volume of debt of the banking and the debt burden of the economy. The research uses econometric methods. The key result of the research is two new econometric models, which were calibrated for the Russian economy. The models differ from each other by the types of bank liabilities used in the calculation of independent variables. The models also differ from the existing models by the calculation algorithm of independent variables. The source of information is the official statistics of the Bank of Russia for the period 2008β2019. The tests of the models confirmed the presence of a statistically significant cointegration relationship between the debt burden of the banking sector and the debt burden of the economy. Coupling coefficients in the models are identified as debt multipliers of the banking sector and characterize the multiplier effect of changes in the debt burden of banks. For the model containing banksβ balance sheet liabilities, the debt multiplier for the Russian economy was 6.7; and for the model using banksβ total liabilities was 3.1. The developed models are easy-to-use for forecasting financial cycles.Π Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°. Π ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ β Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π΄Π²Π΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ ΠΎΡ Π΄ΡΡΠ³Π° Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ², ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
, Π° ΠΎΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ β Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
. ΠΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΠ°Π½ΠΊΠ° Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ 2008β2019 Π³Π³. Π’Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³Π° Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠΈ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π±Π°Π»Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» 6,7; Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ² Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ² β 3,1. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Π½Ρ Π² ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ²
Russian population health-related quality of life indicators calculated using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire
Objectives. The paper aims was forming the first health-related quality of life population indicators using EQ-5Dβ3L survey that represents the Russian population by gender and age, as well as by the attained level of education. Material and methods. For compiling population indicators, we use the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The study was conducted on the adult Russian population aged 18 to 75 years. A representative sample was 12616 respondents. Results. 59.3 % of the sample is in good health (profile 11111). The proportion of respondents reporting any health problems increases with age. The average score on a 100-point visual analogue scale is 72.4 (standard deviation 18,1; 95 per cent confidence interval from 72,1 to 72,7). Men, on average, tend to assess their health higher than women. However there are no statistically significant differences in health scores among educational groups, taking into account gender and age data. Conclusions. Comparison of health-related quality of life estimations with normative population data allows us to track differences in health between population groups, as well as to analyze the health status and progress in treating patients. The Russian health-related quality indicators from EQ-5D-3L survey are similar to the Hungary population indices, as well as to many European countries, the USA, and Argentina for age cohorts under 45 years of age. For the cohorts of respondents older than 45 years, Russian estimations are much lower than in other countries. This evidence confirms that borrowing scales from other countries for converting EQ-5D-3L values into a preference EQ-5D-3L index is not acceptable for Russian patients, especially for the elderly
Total expenditure elasticity of healthcare spending in Russia
In this study we estimate the income elasticity of spending on different healthcare services and medication in Russia, taking into account the non-linear relationship between income level and expenditure. We employ the RLMS-HSE data, 2006β2017, to estimate the elasticities at household level. Our findings show these elasticities have not changed over the years. Additionally, we show that low-income and high-income households demonΒstrate different levels of elasticities, which is consistent with the fact that healthcare is less affordable for the poor. The study confirms that healthcare and medication are close to luxury level for low-income households and drugs are almost income inelastic for rich households. The results could help to reveal which services are the least affordable for the population