Geometric Phases for Mixed States during Cyclic Evolutions

The geometric phases of cyclic evolutions for mixed states are discussed in the framework of unitary evolution. A canonical one-form is defined whose line integral gives the geometric phase which is gauge invariant. It reduces to the Aharonov and Anandan phase in the pure state case. Our definition is consistent with the phase shift in the proposed experiment [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{85}, 2845 (2000)] for a cyclic evolution if the unitary transformation satisfies the parallel transport condition. A comprehensive geometric interpretation is also given. It shows that the geometric phases for mixed states share the same geometric sense with the pure states.Comment: 9 pages, 1 figur

Uhlmann's geometric phase in presence of isotropic decoherence

Uhlmann's mixed state geometric phase [Rep. Math. Phys. {\bf 24}, 229 (1986)] is analyzed in the case of a qubit affected by isotropic decoherence treated in the Markovian approximation. It is demonstrated that this phase decreases rapidly with increasing decoherence rate and that it is most fragile to weak decoherence for pure or nearly pure initial states. In the unitary case, we compare Uhlmann's geometric phase for mixed states with that occurring in standard Mach-Zehnder interferometry [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 2845 (2000)] and show that the latter is more robust to reduction in the length of the Bloch vector. We also describe how Uhlmann's geometric phase in the present case could in principle be realized experimentally.Comment: New ref added, refs updated, journal ref adde

Open system effects on slow light and electromagnetically induced transparency

The coherence properties of a three-level $\Lambda$-system influenced by a Markovian environment are analyzed. A coherence vector formalism is used and a vector form of the Lindblad equation is derived. Together with decay channels from the upper state, open system channels acting on the subspace of the two lower states are investigated, i.e., depolarization, dephasing, and amplitude damping channels. We derive an analytic expression for the coherence vector and the concomitant optical susceptibility, and analyze how the different channels influence the optical response. This response depends non-trivially on the type of open system interaction present, and even gain can be obtained. We also present a geometrical visualization of the coherence vector as an aid to understand the system response.Comment: Several changes; journal reference adde