Knee arthroscopy and exercise versus exercise only for chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Arthroscopy is often used to treat patients with chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). As there is a lack of evidence, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of arthroscopy in patients with chronic PFPS.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 56 patients with chronic PFPS were randomized into two treatment groups: an <it>arthroscopy group </it>(<it>N </it>= 28), treated with knee arthroscopy and an 8-week home exercise program, and a <it>control group </it>(<it>N </it>= 28), treated with the 8-week home exercise program only. The arthroscopy included finding-specific surgical procedures according to current recommendations. The primary outcome was the Kujala score on patellofemoral pain and function at 9 months following randomization. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scales (VASs) to assess activity-related symptoms. We also estimated the direct healthcare costs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both groups showed marked improvement during the follow-up. The mean improvement in the Kujala score was 12.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2–17.6) in the arthroscopy group and 11.4 (95% CI 6.9–15.8) in the control group. However, there was no difference between the groups in mean improvement in the Kujala score (group difference 1.1 (95% CI -7.4 - 5.2)) or in any of the VAS scores. Total direct healthcare costs in the arthroscopy group were estimated to exceed on average those of the control group by €901 per patient (<it>p </it>< 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this controlled trial involving patients with chronic PFPS, the outcome when arthroscopy was used in addition to a home exercise program was no better than when the home exercise program was used alone.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 41800323</p

Spinal stenosis subsequent to juvenile lumbar osteochondrosis

This paper describes eight patients with spinal stenosis associated with marked osteochondrous changes in the vertebral bodies due to juvenile lumbar osteochondrosis (Scheuermann's disease). In no case was the midsagittal or interpedicular diameter of the spinal canal indicative of bony stenosis. On the other hand, in the myelograms the sagittal diameter of the dural sac was in all cases significantly narrowed, a diagnostic sign of central spinal stenosis. Therefore, myelography should always be contemplated when osteochondrous changes are present and spinal stenosis is suspected clinically regardless of whether the spinal canal diameters are normal in plain films.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46799/1/256_2004_Article_BF00204096.pd

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of the lumbar spine, back symptoms and physical function among male adult patients with Scheuermann's disease

BACKGROUND: There are only a few studies on untreated Scheuermann's disease and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in the lumbar spine. The primary aim of this study was to clarify lumbar MRI findings in patients with Scheuermann's disease and to compare with subjects without diagnosed spine disease. METHODS: Twenty-two male adult Scheuermann's patients (mean age 64.7 years (Standard Deviation [SD] 6.4) and 26 males (mean age 59.7 years [SD 7.4]) from a national health survey were included in this study. From MR images, the dimensions of the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs and the dural sac were measured. Spondylolisthesis, Modic changes (MC), high intensity zone values (HIZ), and Schmorl's nodes were registered from both groups as well as self-reported data concerning general health, quality of life, and back pain symptoms. RESULTS: Significantly more patients with Scheuermann's disease had at least one MC compared to the controls at the level L1/L2 (Odds Ratio [OR] 21.11, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 2.31–192.96), at the level L3/L4 (OR 13.62, 95% CI 1.41–131.26), and at the level L5/S1 (OR 6.11, 95% CI 1.50–24.83). Patients had significantly more Schmorl's nodes compared to the controls (64% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). The area of the dura sac (L3/L4) was larger (mean 201 mm(2) vs. 152 mm(2), p = 0.017) in the patients compared to controls. At level L1/L2 patients had higher disc than controls (mean 7.9 mm vs. 6.8 mm, p = 0.038). After adjusting for age patients had more commonly constant back pain (OR 9.4, 95% CI 1.56–56.97), and difficulties in walking up one floor without resting (OR 9.8, 95% CI 1.01–95.34) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Schmorl's nodes and Modic changes on lumbar MRI, back pain and physical function restrictions seem to be more prevalent among patients with Scheuermann's disease than in the general population