Correction: Gait in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: Feasibility of Multi-Center Measurement in the Clinic and Home with Body-Worn Sensors: A Pilot Study (vol 63, pg 331, 2018)

Ríona Mc Ardle, Rosie Morrisa, Aodhán Hickey, Silvia Del Din, Ivan Koychev, Roger N. Gunn, Jennifer Lawson, Giovanna Zamboni, Basil Ridha, Barbara J. Sahakian, James B. Rowe, Alan Thomas, Henrik Zetterberg, Clare MacKay, Simon Lovestone and Lynn Rochester, on behalf of the Deep and Frequent Phenotyping study team [Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 63(1), 2018, 331-341, DOI 10.3233/JAD-171116] https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad171116 On page 334, in figure 1(e), the term “micro gait” appears on the left hand side as well as on the right hand side. On the right hand side, however, it should read “macro gait”

Electrochemical Synthesis of Spinel Type ZnCo₂O₄ Electrodes for Use as Oxygen Evolution Reaction Catalysts

A new electrochemical synthesis route was developed to prepare spinel-type ZnCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄ as high quality thin film-type electrodes for use as electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Whereas Co₃O₄ contains Co²⁺ in the tetrahedral sites and Co³⁺ in the octahedral sites in the spinel structure, ZnCo₂O₄ contains only Co³⁺ in the octahedral sites; Co²⁺ in the tetrahedral sites is replaced by Zn²⁺. Therefore, by comparing the catalytic properties of ZnCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄ electrodes prepared with comparable surface morphologies and thicknesses, it was possible to examine whether Co²⁺ in Co₃O₄ is catalytically active for OER. The electrocatalytic properties of ZnCo₂O₄ and Co₃O₄ for OER in both 1 M KOH (pH 13.8) and 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) solutions were investigated and compared. The results suggest that the Co²⁺ in Co₃O₄ is not catalytically critical for OER and ZnCo₂O₄ can be a more economical and environmentally benign replacement for Co₃O₄ as an OER catalyst

Erratum: Gait in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: Feasibility of Multi-Center Measurement in the Clinic and Home with Body-Worn Sensors: A Pilot Study (Journal of Alzheimer's Disease (2018) 63:1 (331-341) DOI: 10.3233/JAD-171116)

On page 333 it says: Participants inclusion criteria were: between 55 and 80 . This should be: Participants inclusion criteria were: between 50 and 85