Novel minimally invasive tape suture osteosynthesis for instabilities of the pubic symphysis: a biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION Open book fractures are challenging injuries oftentimes requiring surgical treatment. The current treatment of choice is symphyseal plating, which requires extensive surgery and entirely limits physiological movement of the symphyseal joint, frequently resulting in implant failure. Therefore, we investigated the biomechanical properties of a semi-rigid implant (modified SpeedBridge™) as a minimally invasive tape suture construct for the treatment of open book fractures and evaluated the superiority of two techniques of implementation: criss-cross vs. triangle technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine synthetic symphyseal joints were dissected creating an open book fracture. The different osteosynthesis methods (plating, modified SpeedBridge™ in criss-cross/triangle technique) were then applied. All constructs underwent horizontal and vertical loading, simulating biomechanical forces while sitting, standing and walking. For statistical analysis, dislocation (mm) and stiffness (N/mm) were calculated. RESULTS Symphyseal plating for the treatment of open book fractures proved to be a rigid osteosynthesis significantly limiting the physiological mobility of the symphyseal joint (dislocation: 0.08 ± 0.01~mm) compared to the tape sutures (dislocation: triangle technique 0.27 ± 0.07~mm, criss-cross technique 0.23 ± 0.05~mm) regarding horizontal tension (p 0.05 in all directions). Considering vertical loading, no statistical difference was found between all osteosynthesis methods (caudal: p = 0.41; cranial: p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS Symphyseal plating proved to be the osteosynthesis method with the highest rigidity. The modified SpeedBridge™ as a semi-rigid suture construct provided statistically sufficient biomechanical stability while maintaining a minimum of symphyseal movement, consequently allowing ligamental healing of the injured joint without iatrogenic arthrodesis. Furthermore, both the criss-cross and the triangle technique displayed significant biomechanical stability without one method being superior

The T-pod is as stable as supraacetabular fixation using 1 or 2 Schanz screws in partially unstable pelvic fractures: a biomechanical study

Introduction: Unstable fractures of the pelvis remain the predominant cause of severe hemorrhage, shock and early death in severely injured patients. The use of pelvic binders has become increasingly popular, particularly in the preclinical setting. There is currently insufficient evidence available about the stability of the pelvic binder versus supraacetabular fixation using 1 or 2 Schanz screws. We aimed to analyze the stability of the pelvic binder and supraacetabular fixateurs using either 1 or 2 Schanz screws in a cadaver model of an induced pelvic B-type fracture. Materials and methods: The study was undertaken in 7 human fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvises with induced AO-type B fractures. Three stabilization techniques were compared: T-POD (pelvic bandage), supraacetabular external fixator with 1 pin on each side and external fixator with 2 pins on each side. Stability and stiffness were analyzed in a biomechanical testing machine using a 5-step protocol with static and dynamic loading, dislocation data were retrieved by ultrasound sensors at the fracture sites. Results: No significant differences in fracture fragment displacement were detected when using either the T-POD, a 1-pin external fixator or a 2-pin external fixator (P > 0.05). The average difference in displacement between the three methods was < 1 mm. Conclusions: Pelvic binders are suitable for reduction of pelvic B-type fractures. They provide stability comparable to that of supraacetabular fixators, independently of whether 1 or 2 Schanz screws per side are used. Pelvic binders provide sufficient biomechanical stability for transferring patients without the need to first replace them with surgically applied external fixators. However, soft tissue irritation has to be taken into consideration and prolonged wear should be avoided. Level of evidence: Level III

Modified less invasive anterior subcutaneous fixator for unstable Tile-C-pelvic ring fractures

Background Operative procedures for unstable pelvic ring fractures remain controversially discussed. Minimally invasive treatment options for pelvic ring fractures have several benefits for the patient. But they can also provide disadvantages. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (INFIX) has shown promising biomechanical results in pelvic ring fractures, but there is a high complication rate of nerve injuries. An additional screw to the INFIX seems to be more stable. The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of a new modified unilateral INFIX fixing the unilateral injured pelvic ring with the standard INFIX. Methods 24 composite synthetic full pelvises were used in this study. 4 groups each with a number of six pelvic specimens were randomly assigned. A C1.3-type pelvic fracture was made with an osteotomy of the sacrum and an osteotomy of the anterior pelvic ring. Fracture fixation was performed within the four groups: (1) unilateral INFIX, (2) “extended” unilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw, (3) bilateral INFIX, (4) “extended” bilateral INFIX + additional pubic ramus pedicle screw. All specimens were cyclic loaded with 200 N until maximum of 300 N. Distance/dislocation of the fracture fragments were detected with 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Stiffness was calculated. Results Extended unilateral INFIX showed the lowest mean dislocation. Lowest rotational stability was displayed by the standard bilateral INFIX. A significant difference (P = 0.04) was shown between the extended unilateral INFIX and the “standard” bilateral INFIX in terms of rotational stability. Extended unilateral INFIX showed significantly improved stability of anterior fracture dislocation (P = 0.01) and unilateral INFIX showed the highest rotational stiffness. Anterior fixation stiffness of the unilateral INFIX was significantly improved using an additional symphysis/pubic ramus screw (P = 0.002). Conclusion Extended unilateral INFIX (+ additional pubic ramus pedicle screw) is a feasible minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Higher stability and lower probability of bilateral nerve damage is provided by the extended unilateral INFIX compared to the standard bilateral INFIX