Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal and floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma and concomitant histological verification of singular ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis (pN1-state) - A prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a comprehensive cohort design

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Modern radiotherapy plays an important role in therapy of advanced head and neck carcinomas. However, no clinical studies have been published addressing the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with small tumor (pT1, pT2) and concomitant ipsilateral metastasis of a single lymph node (pN1), which would provide a basis for a general treatment recommendation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The present study is a non-blinded, prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). As the primary clinical endpoint, overall-survival in patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy vs. patients without adjuvant therapy following curative intended surgery is compared. The aim of the study is to enroll 560 adult males and females for 1:1 randomization to one of the two treatment arms (irradiation/no irradiation). Since patients with small tumor (T1/T2) but singular lymph node metastasis are rare and the amount of patients consenting to randomization is not predictable in advance, all patients rejecting randomization will be treated as preferred and enrolled in a prospective observational study (comprehensive cohort design) after giving informed consent. This observational part of the trial will be performed with maximum consistency to the treatment and observation protocol of the RCT. Because the impact of patient preference for a certain treatment option is not calculable, parallel design of RCT and observational study may provide a maximum of evidence and efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcome. Secondary clinical endpoints are as follows: incidence and time to tumor relapse (locoregional relapse, lymph node involvement and distant metastatic spread), Quality of life as reported by EORTC (QLQ-C30 with H&N 35 module), and time from operation to orofacial rehabilitation. All tumors represent a homogeneous clinical state and therefore additional investigation of protein expression levels within resection specimen may serve for establishment of surrogate parameters of patient outcome.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The inherent challenges of a rare clinical condition (pN1) and two substantially different therapy arms would limit the practicality of a classical randomized study. The concept of a Comprehensive Cohort Design combines the preference of a randomized study, with the option of careful data interpretation within an observational study.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00964977</p

To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy: Evaluation of a Large German Cohort of Patients with Abnormal Liver Tests of Unknown Etiology

Background and Aims: Despite increasingly sensitive and accurate blood tests to detect liver disease, liver biopsy remains very useful in patients with atypical clinical features and abnormal liver tests of unknown etiology. The aim was to determine those elevated laboratory liver parameters that cause the clinician to order a biopsy, and whether laboratory tests are associated with pathological findings on histology. Methods: 504 patients with unclear hepatopathy, admitted to the outpatient clinic of a university hospital between 2007 and 2010, were analyzed with respect to laboratory results, clinical data, and the results of liver biopsies. Results: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) levels above the normal range significantly increased the likelihood of recommending a liver biopsy by 81% [OR with 95% CI 1.81 (1.21-2.71), p = 0.004] and 159% [OR with 95% CI 2.59 (1.70-3.93), p < 0.001], respectively. AST values above normal were associated with fibrosis (63 vs. 40% for normal AST, p = 0.010). Elevated ferritin levels pointed to a higher incidence of steatosis (48 vs. 10% for normal ferritin, p < 0.001) and inflammation (87 vs. 62% for normal ferritin, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our results indicate that elevated AST and GLDH were associated with a greater likelihood of recommending liver biopsy. Elevated AST and ferritin levels were associated with steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis on liver biopsies. Thus, AST and ferritin may be useful non-invasive predictors of liver pathology in patients with unclear hepatopathy