Efficacy of montelukast in the management of COVID-19: double blind randomized placebo controlled trial

Background: Objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of montelukast in reducing the severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a double blinded randomized controlled trial.Methods: Parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with placebo as comparison to montelukast. All patients above the age of 14 years both males and females, admitted with a diagnosis of mild or moderate COVID-19 (on the basis of a positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) report) at our facility during the study period from 01 September 2020-31 January 2021) and excluding those having adverse reaction to montelukast or those not willing to participate, and pregnant and lactating females. Patients in the intervention arm were given tablet montelukast 10 mg OD HS from the day of admission for 10 days. The patients in the placebo group were given an identical appearing placebo at bedtime for 10 days from the day of admission. The rest of the treatment was given as per the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the institute with minor adjustments as per the treating team’s judgement. Primary outcome was progression of the disease to severe grade and secondary outcomes were discharge on or before day 10 from admission, admission to ICU, need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality.Results: A total of 94 patients were enrolled for the study. 90 patients, 45 in each arm were included in the final analysis. The baseline characteristics of the two arms including age, sex, comorbidities, severity at admission and treatment given apart from montelukast or placebo, were comparable with respect to these variables. This study did not find any improvement in primary outcome of progression to severe disease and secondary outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality or need of mechanical ventilation, discharge on or by day 10 with the use of montelukast as compared to placebo in mild to moderate cases of COVID-19.Conclusions: There was no difference in primary or secondary outcomes with the use of Montelukast compared to placebo

Immunosuppressive therapy and bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anaemia-The CMC Experience

This is a single centre experience on the use of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with aplastic anaemia. Between 1985 and December 2013, 530 patients underwent IST while 214 underwent allogeneic SCT. Overall response rate with the use of IST was 58% with higher responses seen in adults (65.1%) compared to children (35.8%) [p = 0.001]. At a median follow up of 34 months (range: 1 - 264), 5 year KM estimates for OS for the entire group is 68.2 ± 2.2%. Loss of response or relapse was seen in 27 responders while clonal evolution to PNH was seen in 8 patients and transformation to MDS or AML was seen in 3. The 5 yr OS for children (45.7 ± 4.7%) was significantly lower than the OS of age groups 16-30 (75.6 ± 3.6%), 31-50 years (76.2 ± 4.2%) and > 50 years (73.0 ± 4.2%) (p = 0.0001). SCT was performed in 214 patients with engraftment seen in 91%. The incidence of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) was 38.4% with grade III-IV GVHD in 11.7%. Chronic GVHD was seen in 47.5% of evaluable patients with majority (73%) being limited chronic GVHD. At a median follow up of 32 months (range: 1 - 244), the 5 year KM estimates of OS for the entire cohort is 64.8 ± 3.3%); The 5 yr OS was significantly higher with the use of Flu/Cy (5 yr OS of 73.8 ± 3.6%) compared to Cy/ATG (5 yr OS of 44.4 ± 9.6%) or Flu/Bu conditioning (5 yr OS of 52.4 ± 8.9%) [p = 0.001]