41 research outputs found

    Impact of Glycemic and Blood Pressure Variability on Surrogate Measures of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE—The effect of glycemic variability (GV) on cardiovascular risk has not been fully clarified in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effect of GV, blood pressure (BP), and oxidative stress on intima-media thickness (IMT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and sympathovagal balance (low frequency [LF]/high frequency [HF] ratio) in 26 type 2 diabetic patients (diabetes duration 4.41 6 4.81 years; HbA1c 6.70 6 1.25%) receiving diet and/or metformin treatment, with no hypotensive treatment or complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were used to calculate mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA)-2, mean blood glucose (MBG), mean postprandial glucose excursion (MPPGE), and incremental area under the curve (IAUC). Blood pressure (BP), circadian rhythm, and urinary 15-F2t-isoprostane (8-iso-prostaglandin F2a [PGF2a]) were also evaluated. Subjects were divided into dipper (D) and nondipper (ND) groups according to DBP. RESULTS—IMT and LVMIwere increased inNDversusD(0.7760.08 vs. 0.6860.13 [P=0.04] and 67 6 14 vs. 55 6 11 [P = 0.03], respectively). MBG, MAGE, and IAUC were significantly associated with LF/HF ratio at night (r = 0.50, P = 0.01; r = 0.40, P = 0.04; r = 0.41, P = 0.04, respectively), MPPGE was negatively associated with FMD (r =20.45, P = 0.02), andCONGA-2was positively associatedwith LVMI (r=0.55, P=0.006).TheDsystolic BP was negatively associated with IMT (r =20.43, P = 0.03) andwith LVMI (r =20.52, P = 0.01). Urinary 8-iso-PGF2a was positively associated with LVMI (r = 0.68 P , 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—An impaired GV and BP variability is associated with endothelial and cardiovascular damage in short-term diabetic patients with optimal metabolic control. Oxidative stress is the only independent predictor of increased LV mass and correlates with glucose and BP variability

    Quality of life and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes: A comparison between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections

    Get PDF
    Aims: The aim of this case-control study was to compare quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods: Consecutive patients aged between 18 and 55 years, and attending diabetes clinics for a routine visit, completed the Diabetes-Specific Quality-of-Life Scale (DSQOLS), the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Case (CSII) and control subjects (MDI) were recruited in a 1 : 2 ratio. Results: Overall, 1341 individuals were enrolled by 62 diabetes clinics; 481 were cases and 860 control subjects. Cases had a longer diabetes duration and were more likely to have eye and renal complications. Age, school education, occupation and HbA1c were similar. Of control subjects, 90% followed glargine-based MDI regimens and 10% used NPH-based MDI regimens. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical characteristics, scores in the following areas of the DSQOLS were higher in cases than control subjects: diet restrictions (ÎČ = 5.96; P < 0.0001), daily hassles (ÎČ = 3.57; P = 0.01) and fears about hypoglycaemia (ÎČ = 3.88; P = 0.006). Treatment with CSII was also associated with a markedly higher DTSQ score (ÎČ = 4.13; P < 0.0001) compared with MDI. Results were similar when CSII was compared separately with glargine- or NPH-based MDI regimens. Conclusions: This large, non-randomized, case-control study suggests quality of life gains deriving from greater lifestyle flexibility, less fear of hypoglycaemia, and higher treatment satisfaction, when CSII is compared with either glargine-based or NPH-based MDI regimens. © 2008 The Authors

    The need for identifying standardized indices for measuring glucose variability.

    Get PDF
    We read the article by Siegelaar and colleagues,1 which clearly suggests the lack of association between glycemic variability (GV) and oxidative stress estimated by 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) excretion rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with good metabolic control by oral glucose lowering agents. We have, however, some concerns. As an index of GV, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), one of the most widely used indexes for measuring GV, was chosen; although a gold-standard procedure is still lacking. In our article,2 we observed a positive correlation between 8-iso-PGF2α and GV, measured as continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA-2), in diabetic patients with short-term disease and optimal metabolic control. However, we were unable to show a significant correlation between MAGE and 8-iso-PGF2α. The observation of a different behavior between CONGA-2 and MAGE, in terms of association with oxidative stress, is possibly due to the metabolic characteristics of our patients. In fact, CONGA-2 is known to detect small glycemic swings, occurring over short-time intervals,3 thus appropriately describing the glycemic fluctuations of patients in optimal metabolic balance, without peaks and valleys. On the other side, MAGE displays several limitations, the most important being the arbitrary definition of significant peaks and nadirs in units of standard deviations. Moreover, the raw glycemic data, obtained by continuous glucose monitoring, are usually asymmetric (hypoglycemic is much narrower than hyperglycemic range). Hence we believe that because MAGE analysis is based on the standard deviation value, as a consequence, we can predict that MAGE will preferentially look at hyperglycemic peaks and will be relatively insensitive to hypoglycemic nadirs.3 Therefore, we suggest applying different indices for the measurement of GV, depending on the aim of the study and the metabolic characteristics of the studied population. We should also consider the possible confounding effect of insulin secretagogues and of the various drugs used in the population studied by Siegelaar and colleagues1 on GV and on oxidative stress parameters.4 In our study, in order to avoid these important confounding factors, we selected patients treated only by either diet alone or diet plus metformin. On the other side, it should be noted that, in agreement with our data, the population studied by Siegelaar and associates1 showed an optimal glycemic control, thus excluding the possible interference of glucotoxicity5 on the results observed

    Impact of glycemic variability on cardiovascular outcomes beyond glycated hemoglobin. Evidence and clinical perspectives.

    No full text
    Aims: The aim of this review is to focus on intra-day glucose variability (GV), specifically reviewing its correlation with HbA1c, the methods currently available to measure it, and finally the relationship between GV and cardiovascular outcomes, in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, and in the non-diabetic population. Data synthesis: The term GV has been used in the literature to express many different concepts; in the present review, we focus our attention on intra-day GV. In particular, we try to assess whether GV provides additional information on glycemic control beyond HbA1c, since GV seems to be incompletely expressed by HbA1c, particularly in patients with good metabolic control. Many different indexes have been proposed to measure GV, however at the moment no “gold standard” procedure is available. Evidence in vitro, in experimental settings and in animal studies, shows that fluctuating glucose levels display a more deleterious effect than constantly high glucose exposure. However, these findings are not completely reproducible in human settings. Moreover, the relationship between GV and cardiovascular events is still controversial. Conclusions: The term GV should be reserved to indicate intra-day variability and different indexes of GV should be used, depending on the metabolic profile of the population studied and the specific issue to be investigated. Self glucose monitoring or continuous glucose monitoring should be used for assessing glucose variability

    Acute caloric restriction improves glomerular filtration rate in patients with morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes

    No full text
    The role of caloric restriction in the improvement of renal function following bariatric surgery is still unclear; with some evidence showing that calorie restriction can reduce proteinuria. However, data on the impact of caloric restriction on renal function are still lacking

    Preliminary evidence that obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome are refractory to the acute beneficial metabolic effects of a very low calorie diet

    No full text
    Since obesity seems to play a causal role in both obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and type 2 diabetes, the question arises whether diet-induced weight loss is equally efficacious in type 2 diabetic patients with and without OSAHS. The present study was aimed to investigate the effect of 1 week very low calorie diet (VLCD) on oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and on glucose regulation in OSAHS versus non-OSAHS patients. Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity were enrolled. According to ODI, patients were divided into 2 groups (with and without OSAHS) and evaluated by a hyperglycemic clamp study, before and after a 7 day-VLCD. After a VLCD, a significant reduction of anthropometric parameters, in the overall group and in subgroups, was observed. M-value and acute insulin response increased significantly only in patients without obstructive sleep apnea (990.10 ± 170.19 vs. 1,205.22 ± 145.73 Όmol min(-1) m(-2), p = 0.046; -1.05 ± 8.40 vs. 48.26 ± 11. 90 pmol/L, p = 0.028, respectively). The average 24-h heart rate (24-h HR) fell significantly (p = 0.05), primarily because of a decrease during daytime (p = 0.041), in the whole group. In conclusion, we observed that morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes and OSAHS are specifically resistant to the acute beneficial effects of VLCD on metabolic parameters. Our preliminary observation deserves further investigation to clarify the pathogenetic mechanisms involved
    corecore