36 research outputs found

    γ€Œλ¬΄μ§„κΈ°ν–‰γ€μ˜ 자기 λ°˜μ„± μ„œμ‚¬ μ „λž΅

    Get PDF
    λ¬Έν•™κ΅μœ‘μ—μ„œ μ°½μž‘ κ΅μœ‘μ΄λ‚˜ κΈ€μ“°κΈ° κ΅μœ‘μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜κ°€ μƒˆμ‚Ό 뢐을 이루고 μžˆλ‹€. λŒ€ν•™μ—μ„œμ˜ λ¬Έμ˜ˆμ°½μž‘κ³Ό ν™œμ„±ν™”λΌλŠ” μ œλ„μ  쑰건도 κ·Έ λ°œλ‹¨μ„ λ§ˆλ ¨ν–ˆκ² μ§€λ§Œ, λ¬Έν•™κ΅μœ‘ λ‚΄λΆ€μ—μ„œ 보면 수용자 μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ λ¬Έν•™κ΅μœ‘μ΄λΌλŠ” λ¬Έμ œμ˜μ‹μ˜ λ°œμ „μ  귀결이라고 ν•  수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. 수용자 μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ λ¬Έν•™κ΅μœ‘μ΄ λ¬Έν•™μž‘ν’ˆμ˜ 이해와 κ°μƒμ—μ„œ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ 말할 수 μžˆλŠ” ꢌ리λ₯Ό κ°•ν•˜κ²Œ λΆ€κ°μ‹œν‚¨ 것이라면, μ°½μž‘κ΅μœ‘μ€ 문학을 μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κ³  ν–₯μœ ν•˜λŠ” μ™„μ„± λ‹¨κ³„λ‘œμ„œ (ν•™μŠ΅μž)의 λ¬Έν•™ λ¬Έν™” 생산과 ν–₯유"1)λ₯Ό 지ν–₯ν•œλ‹€λŠ” μ§‘μ—μ„œ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ μœ„μΉ˜λ₯Ό μƒμ‚°μ˜ μœ„μΉ˜λ‘œκΉŒμ§€ 높이고 있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€

    μ΅œμΈν›ˆ 에세이적 μ†Œμ„€ ν˜•μ‹μ˜ 문화철학적 κ³ μ°°: μ†Œμ„€κ°€ κ΅¬λ³΄μ”¨μ˜ 일일을 μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ

    No full text
    κΈ€μ“°κΈ°λŠ” 인간이 μžμ‹ κ³Ό 세계λ₯Ό λ“œλŸ¬λ‚΄λŠ” λ¬Έν™” ν–‰μœ„μ˜ ν•˜λ‚˜μ΄λ‹€. 문학도 결ꡭ은 κΈ€μ“°κΈ° μ–‘μ‹μ˜ μ œλ„ν™”λœ ν˜•νƒœλΌκ³  ν•œλ‹€λ©΄οΌŒ λ¬Έν•™μ˜ 각 ν˜•μ‹λ“€μ€ μ •νƒœν™”λœ ν‹€λ‘œ μ‘΄μž¬ν•œλ‹€κΈ°λ³΄λ‹€ 인간이 세계와 관련을 λ§Ίμ–΄ κ°€λŠ” λ¬Έν™”ν–‰μœ„μ˜ ν•˜λ‚˜λ‘œ μž‘μš©ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€κ³  μ–„ 수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. μ—¬κΈ°μ„œ λ¬Έν™”λž€ 인간 이 ν™˜κ²½μ— λŒ€ν•΄ λŠ₯동적인 μžκ°€ μ‹€ν˜„μ„ 펼쳐 λ‚˜κ°€λŠ” κ³Όμ • (process)이라고 ν•˜λŠ”οΌŒ κ·Έ 역동성에 μ΄ˆμ μ„ λ§žμΆ˜λ‹€. λ³Έκ³ μ—μ„œ μ‚¬μš©ν•œ 문화철학이 λž€ κ°œλ…λ„ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 과정에 λŒ€ν•œ 원리적 νƒμƒ‰μ΄λž€ 의미λ₯Ό 닦고 μžˆλ‹€. μ§€λ‚˜μΉ˜κ²Œ 포괄적이라고 ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 이런 μš©μ–΄λ₯Ό λŒμ–΄ λ“€μ—¬ 온 이유λ₯Ό λ¬Έμ œμ˜μ‹ μ°¨μ›μ—μ„œ μ„€λͺ…ν•΄ 보도둝 ν•˜κ² λ‹€. λ£¨μΉ΄μΉ˜λŠ” μ†Œμ„€μ˜ 내적 ν˜•μ‹μ„ 역사 λ°œμ „μ˜ μœ ν† ν”Όμ•„μ  λΉ„μ „μ΄λΌλŠ” 역사철학적 ν‹€λ‘œ μ„€λͺ…ν•œ λ°” μžˆλ‹€

    Narrative Based Subject-Integration Character Education For the Social Emotional Learnng

    No full text
    λ³Έκ³ λŠ” μœ΅ν•©κ΅μœ‘μ˜ κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒλ₯Ό 기반으둜 ν•œ μΈμ„±κ΅μœ‘μ˜ λͺ¨λΈμ„ κ΅¬μ•ˆν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μΈμ„±κ΅μœ‘μ€ ꡐ과 ꡐ윑과의 연계가 λ°”λžŒμ§ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ κ°œλ³„ ꡐ과별 κ΅μœ‘λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” ꡐ과간 μœ΅ν•©μ„ ν†΅ν•΄μ„œ 보닀 효율적일 수 있으며, κ·Έ μœ΅ν•©μ˜ λ§€μ²΄λ‘œλŠ” λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒκ°€ μ ν•©ν•˜λ‹€. 이에 λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒμ˜ μΈμ„±κ΅μœ‘μ  κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό μ„Έ κ°€μ§€λ‘œ μ •λ¦¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 첫째, λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒλŠ” 인성이 μš΄μš©λ˜λŠ” μ‚Άμ˜ μ—¬λŸ¬ 차원을 μœ΅ν•©μ μœΌλ‘œ μ„±μ°°, 해석할 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ ν•œλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒλŠ” μž¬κ΅¬μ„±μ„ 톡해 ν–‰μœ„λ₯Ό μ‘°μ •ν•˜κ³ , ν•™μŠ΅μžκ°€ 자기 슀슀둜λ₯Ό λ³€ν™”ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 기회λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚¬νšŒμ™€ 개인이 μ‘°ν™”λ₯Ό μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λ©°, 전인적인 톡합을 이룰 수 μžˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ νŠΉμ§•μ„ μ‚΄λ € 곡감의 μΈμ„±κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 개발 μ˜ˆμ‹œλ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ ꡐ수 ν•™μŠ΅μ˜ μ ˆμ°¨λŠ” λ…μ„œ μΉ˜λ£Œμ—μ„œ λ…μ„œλ‘œ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ΄λŒμ–΄λ‚΄λŠ” ν•™μŠ΅ 과정을 μ›μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 인식 (recognition), κ³ μ°° (examination), λ³‘μΉ˜(juxtaposition), 자기적용 (application to self)의 λ„€ 단계가 그것이닀. 인식은 λ§ˆμ€‘λ¬Ό λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒμ— λŒ€ν•œ 지적, μ •μ„œμ  λ°˜μ‘μ„ 톡해 μΈμ„±μ˜ 문제λ₯Ό μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³ , 고찰은 κ·Έ λ¬Έμ œκ°€ λ§ˆμ€‘λ¬Ό λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒμ—μ„œ μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ μ œμ‹œλ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ”μ§€ 심측 해석을 톡해 μ„±μ°°ν•˜λ˜, λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ‚¬νšŒμ , 예술적 λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒλ‘œ ν™•μž₯ν•˜μ—¬ νƒκ΅¬ν•˜λ©°, λ³‘μΉ˜λŠ” μžμ‹ μ˜ λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ— λŒ€ν•œ λ°˜μ‘μ˜ 비ꡐ 양상과 λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ ν…μŠ€νŠΈλ“€μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ„ 비ꡐ, λŒ€μ‘°ν•˜μ—¬ μΈμ‹μ˜ ν™•μž₯, μ „ν™˜μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λŠ” 단계이닀. 자기 적용의 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ”, μ•žμ˜ 인성 문제λ₯Ό 자기 μ‚Άμ˜ λ‚΄λŸ¬ν‹°λΈŒλ‘œ ν‘œμΆœν•˜κ³  κ·Έ 문제λ₯Ό μΈμ‹ν•˜μ—¬ μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό 도λͺ¨ν•œλ‹€.This article develops a model of narrative based subject-integration character education for social emotional learning. The subject-integration character education is more efficient than the individual subject education for childrens character building. Because the subject-integration education can deal with the problem of all aspects of the learners personality. And the narrative can be considered with medium for the integration. This essay claimed three value of narrative in the subject-integration character education. First, the narrative is able to integrate the various dimensions of life associated with character development. Second, the narrative is able to be constructed and be reconstructed based on individual narratives. With this, the student change and increase their awareness their mind for meaningful growth. Third, the narrative can be completely integrated into an individual and generate harmony between individuals and society. This essay suggested the teaching model of narrative based character education. The thema of this program is sympathy. The procedure of the learning and teaching is to be developed according to the reading therapy principle, which will expedite meaningful changes for individuals, such as recognition, examination, juxtaposition, and adjustments to the self

    A Sü띠y on the Discourse of Multiculture Represented Korean Mass Image Narrative - Focuslng on the Communicatlve Ethlcs

    No full text
    이 논문은 ν•œκ΅­ μ˜ν™”μ™€ TV λ“œλΌλ§ˆμ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ λ‹€λ¬Έν™” λ‹΄λ‘ μ˜ 양상을 λΆ„μ„ν•΄λ³΄κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 특히, 기쑴의 λ‹€λ¬Έν™” 담둠이 주둜 차이의 μœ€λ¦¬μ— μ΄ˆμ μ„ 두고 λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€λ©΄, 이 논문은 μ†Œν†΅μ˜ 윀리라고 ν•˜μ—¬ νƒ€μžμ™€ 주체가 μ†Œν†΅ν•΄ λ‚˜κ°€λŠ” μƒν˜Έμž‘μš© κ³Όμ •μ˜ 윀리λ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λŠ” μš°μ •μ„ μ†Œν†΅ 윀리둜 μ‚Όμ•„ νƒ€μžμ˜ 고톡에 자발적으둜 μ‘λ‹΅ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ—°λŒ€ μ˜μ‹μ„ 느끼게 되고, λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ μžμ‹ μ˜ 정체성 μ—­μ‹œ λ³€ν™”ν•˜λŠ” 양상을 λ³΄μ—¬μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€. 반면 와 λŠ” νƒ€μžλ₯Ό μΈμ •ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” μžμ•„ 쀑심적 주체가 μ—¬λŸ¬ ν˜Όλž€μ„ κ±°μΉ˜λ©΄μ„œ νƒ€μžμ˜ νƒ€μžμ„±μ„ λ°œκ²¬ν•˜κ³ , λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ 인간적인 것을 μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ μ†Œν†΅ν•˜λŠ” 양상을 보여주고 μžˆλ‹€. 이 λ•Œ, νƒ€μžμ˜ 차이듀에도 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  인간적인 κ²ƒμ˜ κ³΅ν†΅κ°μœΌλ‘œ μ„œλ‘œλ₯Ό μ‘΄μ€‘ν•˜λŠ” 진정성이 μ€‘μš”ν•œ 윀리적 μ–‘μƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œλ‹€. λŠ” ν˜•μ œλΌλŠ” ν˜ˆν†΅μ  μœ„κ³„μ˜ λ‹΄λ‘ μœΌλ‘œ, 남과 뢁, μ •μ£Όλ―Όκ³Ό μƒˆν„°λ―Όμ„ μ€μœ ν•˜μ—¬ νƒ€μžμ˜ νƒ€μžμ„±μ„ κ±°μ„Έν•˜λŠ” μ–‘μƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λŒ€μ€‘λ§€μ²΄μ˜ λ‹€λ¬Έν™” 담둠은, ν˜„ ν•œκ΅­μ  λ‹€λ¬Έν™”μ£Όμ˜κ°€ 이주민의 차이에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식을 λ„˜μ–΄μ„œ νƒ€μžμ™€ μ†Œν†΅ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 자기 μ •μ²΄μ„±μ˜ 변화에 μ§λ©΄ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ •μ£Όλ―Όμ˜ λ¬Έμ œμ—κΉŒμ§€ λ‚˜μ•„κ°€κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ 보여쀀닀. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ 문화적 ν˜Όμ’…μ˜ λ¬Έμ œλŠ” 주둜 λ―Έμ„±λ…„ μ—¬μ„±μ΄λΌλŠ” μ£Όλ³€ν™”λœ 쑴재의 정주민에 λ¨Έλ¬Ό 뿐 남성 μ‹œλ―Όμ€ μžμ•„μ˜ ν™•μž₯ 정도에 λ¨Έλ¬Όκ³  μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. The task of the essay is to analyse the discourse of multiculture represented korean mass image narrative. The focus of this study is the communicative ethic. The analysis showed three aspect of the discourse of multiculture. First, in , the friendship is represented as communicative ethic. Second, in , the authenticity which appeal to human thing is represented as communicative ethic. It leaded to discover the human thing which could understand the otherness and communicate with open mind. Third, in , subject communicated the otherness through the common of the family. But it evirated the voice of the other and wallow in self-pity. Taken together, a analysis showed that the discourse of multiculture in korea to find way to change the self-identity to communicate with other

    1920λ…„λŒ€ 초기 νŽΈμ§€μ²΄μ†Œμ„€μ˜ ν‘œν˜„μ  의미

    No full text
    κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ—μ„œ ν‘œν˜„μ€ 이해와 ν•¨κ»˜ 핡심 범주이닀. μΈκ°„μ˜ 삢이 결ꡭ은 μžμ•„μ™€ νƒ€μžμ™€μ˜ κ΄€κ³„λ‘œ 이루어진닀고 ν•  λ•ŒοΌŒ ν‘œν˜„μ€ μžμ•„λ₯Ό λ“œλŸ¬λ‚΄λŠ” 일에 μ†ν•œλ‹€. κ΅¬νƒœμ—¬ μ œλ„κ΅μœ‘μœΌλ‘œμ„œμ˜ κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ— ν•œμ •ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šλ”λΌλ„ 이것이 우리 μƒν™œκ³Ό μ–Έμ–΄ν™œλ™μ— μžˆμ–΄ 기본적 ν™œλ™μž„μ€ λˆ„κ΅¬λ‚˜ 인정할 것이닀

    A Study on the discourse production method in Korean modern novel : the association `counter-discourse` and `literary education`

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ „κ³΅,1997.Docto

    Dialogism and the Model of Cultural Poduction Composition

    No full text
    The task of this paper is to investigate Dialogism Composition Education theory focus on cultural production The composition as cultural production supplement individual perception as creativity. From this point of view the language creativity is usual, collective, and popular. So, Composition education as cultural production stress on the context of language usage and answerability to 'ready made meaning'. Depending on this, we recognition a position of learner, composition principle and language cultural property. We regard learner as culture subject, so their writing mist be approved by their difference instead of good writing/bad writing. We regard expression knowledge as activated by learner's context. We regard language cultural property as education content

    The Sociocultural Approach of Literacy and Korean Language Education

    No full text
    The task of this paper is to inquire the sociocultural approach of literacy and to reflect it's significance in Korean Language Education. The theory of literacy has fallen into the field of discourse. It is the sociocultural approach of literacy that explains the literacy in context of concrete human activity, such as believing, interacting, acting, being etc. beyond individual writing and reading. This point is that the literacy is understood in the socio-culture process/ practice. The socio-culture context is structured four layers. 1) the layer of language culture resources-meaning shema, genre convention 2) the layer of discourse-ideology and model of identity 3) the layer of social institution and power relations. 4) the layer of the material structure. This approach imply the significance in korean language education following three point. First, school literacy needs critical approach and integrated various model. Second, the importance of critical practice. Third, the problem of identity and ethics in literacy practice and education
    corecore