7 research outputs found

    (A) study on the social and health behavior of apartment residents

    No full text
    ๋ณด๊ฑดํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ ๋ณด๊ฑด์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์˜ค๋ž˜ ์ „๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋งŽ์€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ ๋ช‡๋…„๋™์•ˆ ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ ์ฃผ๋ฏผ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œ๋œ ๋ณด๊ฑด์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋Œ€์ฒด๋กœ ๋ณด๊ฑด ๋ฐ ์˜๋ฃŒ์‚ฌ์—…์„ ์ „๊ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณด๊ฑด๊ณ„ํš์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ, ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋“ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณด๊ฑด์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๋ฐ ์ƒํ™œ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„œ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ง€์–ด 1960๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘๋œ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ๋„์‹œํ™” ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผํƒ์˜ ์ฃผ๊ฑฐ์–‘์‹๋„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ใ€Œ์•„ํŒŒํŠธใ€์ฃผ๋ฏผ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ ์ง€์—ญ์ฃผ๋ฏผ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ, ๋ณด๊ฑด์ƒํƒœ, ์ƒํ™œ์ƒํƒœ ๋“ฑ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ  ์ด๋“ค ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ค€๋น„๋œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์„œ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ฉด์ ‘์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ๊ฐ€๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ฃผ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๋ฉด์ ‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด๊ด„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ฒ™๋„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์–ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ ์ง€์—ญ ์ฃผ๋ฏผ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ณ„๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋น„ 90.5๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜ ๋‚จ์ž ๋ณด๋‹ค ์—ฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•˜๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๋ น๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” ๋ถ€์–‘๋น„ 59.9๋กœ์„œ ๊ฒฝ์ œํ™œ๋™ ์ธ๊ตฌ์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น์ธต์ด ์ „์ฒด์˜ 2/3 ์ •๋„์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ ์ง€์—ญ ๋ถ€์ธ์˜ 39.2 %๋Š” 30๋Œ€ ์—ฐ๋ น์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ต์œก์ •๋„๋Š” ๊ณ ์กธ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ํ•™๋ ฅ์ด 45.8%์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ท  ๊ฐ€๊ตฌ์›์ˆ˜๋Š” 4.9๋ช…, ๊ฐ€์กฑ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ˜•ํƒœ๋Š” 82.7 %๊ฐ€ ํ•ต๊ฐ€์กฑ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ฐ€์ •์ƒํ™œ์— ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์š”์ฆ˜ ๊ฐ€์ •๋‚ด ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์—†๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ถ€์ธ์€ 37.5%์˜€๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •์ƒํ™œ์— ๋ถˆ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€์ •๋‚ด ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ถ€์ธ์€ 27.6%์˜€๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ถ€์ธ์€ 44.0%์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉํ–‰๋™์˜ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๋ถ€์ธ์€ 14.0%์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ถ€์ธ์€ 18.5%์˜€๋‹ค. ์น˜๋ฃŒํ–‰๋™์˜ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€๊ตฌ๋Š” 21.3%์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฐ€๊ตฌ๋Š” 36.2%์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์‚ฌ์šด์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ ์ค‘ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ณด๊ฑด ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ถŒ์ž๋Š” ๋ถ€์ธ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด 42.5%๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์–ด๋Š ๊ฐ€์‚ฌ์šด์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์—์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ถ€์ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. A Study an the Social and Health Behavior of Apartment Residents Haeng Mi Jin Department of Public Health Graduate School Yonsei University (Directed by professor Myung Ho Kim) The maim objective of this study was to clarify the correlation among three variables; general vital characteristics, health status and socio-economic status of the residents of apartment house in determining the health behavior of the population. For the data collection, housewives of the Yonhee Apt. house were interviewed directly by interviewer with pre-designed questionairs. These group were analyzed by the fellowing categories according to their health status, ways of house management and their frequency of participation in local communities, including other variables in determining their health behavior. Results were summarized as follows: 1. 39.2% of housewives were at thirties. 45.8% of housewives were above high school education. Average family size were 4.9 person/family. 82.7% of families were nuclear family and the sex ratio of residents was 90.5. 2. 37.5% of housewives were satisfied with houselife and also they did not complain any difficulties at home. Housewives who did not satisfied with houselife and having minor problems at home were found to be 27.6% of the total population. 3. About half of the population ( 44.0%) wanted to move to other place. 4. 14.0% of housewives showed positive attitude in practicing preventive health behavior and 18.5% of housewives showed negative attitude. 5. 21.3% of households showed positive attitude in practicing in health care and in contrast 36.2% of households showed negative attitude. 6. Major decisions concerning family health were made by the housewives which represent about 42.5% of the population. The housewive's participation in determining the health matt or were considered significantly high among any other decisions in house management. [์˜๋ฌธ] The maim objective of this study was to clarify the correlation among three variables; general vital characteristics, health status and socio-economic status of the residents of apartment house in determining the health behavior of the population. For the data collection, housewives of the Yonhee Apt. house were interviewed directly by interviewer with pre-designed questionairs. These group were analyzed by the fellowing categories according to their health status, ways of house management and their frequency of participation in local communities, including other variables in determining their health behavior. Results were summarized as follows: 1. 39.2% of housewives were at thirties. 45.8% of housewives were above high school education. Average family size were 4.9 person/family. 82.7% of families were nuclear family and the sex ratio of residents was 90.5. 2. 37.5% of housewives were satisfied with houselife and also they did not complain any difficulties at home. Housewives who did not satisfied with houselife and having minor problems at home were found to be 27.6% of the total population. 3. About half of the population ( 44.0%) wanted to move to other place. 4. 14.0% of housewives showed positive attitude in practicing preventive health behavior and 18.5% of housewives showed negative attitude. 5. 21.3% of households showed positive attitude in practicing in health care and in contrast 36.2% of households showed negative attitude. 6. Major decisions concerning family health were made by the housewives which represent about 42.5% of the population. The housewive's participation in determining the health matt or were considered significantly high among any other decisions in house management.restrictio
    corecore