6 research outputs found

    (The) effect of gentamicin on calcim transport in normal rabbit lenses according to the route of administration

    No full text
    ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์•ˆ๋‚ด ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์ด๋‚˜ ์ฒœ๊ณต์„ฑ ์•ˆ์™ธ์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ํ›„ ์„ธ๊ท ์˜ ์•ˆ๋‚ด ์นจํˆฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด์— ์—ผ์ฆ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ์„ธ๊ท ์„ฑ ์•ˆ๋‚ด์—ผ์€ ์ˆ˜์ผ๋‚ด์— ์•ˆ๊ตฌ์— ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์†์ƒ์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๋…น๋†๊ท ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๊ทธ๋žŒ ์Œ์„ฑ ๊ฐ„๊ท ๋“ค์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”์„ธ๋กœ, ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ณ‘์˜ ์ง„ํ–‰์ด ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์˜ˆํ›„๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๋‹จํžˆ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์†Œ์‹ค๋˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์‹œ ์ ์•ˆ, ๊ฒฝ๊ตฌํˆฌ์—ฌ, ๊ทผ์œก์ฃผ์‚ฌ, ์ •๋งฅ์ฃผ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ๋ง‰ํ•˜์ฃผ์‚ฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ•ญ์ƒ์ œ ํˆฌ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ํ˜ˆ์•ก๋ง๋ง‰์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ํ˜ˆ์•ก๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜์ฑ…๋“ฑ์˜ ์•ˆ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ด๋ถ€์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด๋กœ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์˜ ์นจํˆฌ๊ฐ€ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•„ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ท ์„ฑ ์•ˆ๋‚ด์—ผ์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์—๋Š” ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ ํ•ญ์ƒ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด๋กœ ์ง์ ‘ ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์œ ํšจํ•˜๊ณ  ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์™”๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋…น๋†๊ท ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์œ ํšจํ•œ aminoglycoside ๊ณ„์—ด์˜ gentamicin์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ ํ•ญ์ƒ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ์„œ ๊ทธ๋žŒ ์–‘์„ฑ๊ท ๊ณผ ์Œ์„ฑ๊ท  ๋ชจ๋‘์— ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, gentamicin์„ ์ „๋ฐฉ์ด๋‚˜ ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด๋กœ ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์„ธ๊ท ์„ฑ ์•ˆ๋‚ด์—ผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ gentamicin์„ ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ gentamicin์ด ์ฃผ์œ„ ์•ˆ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ง์— ์นจํˆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธํฌ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ์ด์ƒ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ์ค‘ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒดํ˜ผํƒ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ง๋ง‰์— ๋…์„ฑ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ gentamicin์ด ์„ธํฌ๋‚ด์˜ calcium๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ๋…์„ฑ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ธ๋ฐ, ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์—์„œ๋Š” calcium transport system์ด ์–ต์ œ๋˜์–ด ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ด์˜ calcium๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜์–ด ๋ฐฑ๋‚ด์žฅ์ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ ์ถœ๋œ ์ •์ƒ๊ฐ€ํ† ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋ฅผ (45)**Ca์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ์šฉ์•ก๋‚ด์—์„œ incubation์‹œํ‚จ ํ›„ gentamicin์„ ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•  ๋•Œ (45)**Ca์˜ ๋Šฅ๋™์  ์œ ์ถœ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  gentamicin์ด Ca**++-ATPase์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„๋ฅผ ์–ต์ œ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ, Ca**++์ด ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ด์— ์ถ•์ ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ €์ž๋Š” ์ •์ƒ๊ฐ€ํ† ์•ˆ์— gentamicin์„ ์ „๋ฐฉ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด๋กœ ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , 1, 3 ๋ฐ 7์ผ ํ›„์— ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ ์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์˜ Ca**++-activated ATPase ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„์™€ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ Ca** ++ ์œ ์ถœ, ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ด์˜ Ca**++ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„ธ๊ท ์„ฑ ์•ˆ๋‚ด์—ผ์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์‹œ gentamicin ํˆฌ์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์—์„œ calcium ์ด๋™์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์˜ Ca**++-ATPase ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„๋Š” ์ƒ๋ฆฌ์‹์—ผ์ˆ˜ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์—์‹œ๋Š” ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ›„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, gentamicin ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ›„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์˜์˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์–ต์ œ๋จ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2. ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์—์„œ์˜ Ca**++ ์œ ์ถœ์€ gentamicin ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์ด ์ƒ๋ฆฌ์‹์—ผ์ˆ˜ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์˜์˜์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ด์˜ Ca**++ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์ƒ๋ฆฌ์‹์—ผ์ˆ˜ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ›„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, gentamicin ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ›„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์˜์˜์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4. ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์˜ Ca**++-ATPase ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„์˜ ์–ต์ œ, ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด์—์„œ์˜ Ca**++ ์œ ์ถœ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ด Ca**++ ๋†๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋Š” gentamicin์„ ์ „๋ฐฉ๋‚ด ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด ์ฃผ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋” ์‹ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋ณด์•„ gentamicin์ฃผ์‚ฌ์‹œ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ด์˜ Ca**++ ๋†๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด Ca**++-ATPase ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„์˜ ์–ต์ œ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ •์ฒด๋‚ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ Ca**++ ์œ ์ถœ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฐ ํ˜„์ƒ์€ ์ดˆ์ž์ฒด๋‚ด ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ์—์„œ ์ „๋ฐฉ๋‚ด ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ํ˜„์ €ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. The effect of gentamicin on calcium transport in normal rabbit lenses according to the route of administration Byung Joo Cho Department of Medical Science, The Graduate School, Yonsei University (Directed by Professor Hong Bok Kim) Endophthalmitis is one of the most catastrophic complications in intraocular surgery and penetrating injuries of the eye. Recently, gram-negative rods including pseudomonas have been found to be the major causative organisms of bacterial endophthalmitis. Gentamicin has been the conventional treatment for pseudomonas infection and therefore its use for eye infections was evaluated. Because of poor penetration of antibiotics into the eye and particularly into the vitreous via the conventional route of administration, the method of injection of antibiotics directly into either the anterior chamber or the vitreous employed. Although higher concentration of intraocular gentamicin were obtained, sight-limiting complications such as cataract and retinal toxicity secondary to toxic effects on adjacent ocular tissues resulted. The mechanism of cataract formation have not been proven definitively but the transparency of the lens is known to depend on its ^^Ca++ level, and many researchers have proven experimentally that cataracts may occur in cases of increased lens calcium levels. Recently, in vitro studies with rabbit lenses have showed that increased calcium levels in cataracts were the results of decreased active Ca**++ efflux from the lens secondary to inhibition of Ca**++ -activated ATPase activity in the lens. In this experiment, gentamicin and normal saline were administrated into the anterior chamber and into the vitreous. Ca**++-activated ATPase activity in the lens, active Ca**++ efflux from the lens and calcium concentration in the lens were measured at day 1, day 3 and 7 days after injection of gentamicin or saline solution into the anterior chamber or vitreous to compare the effect on calcium transport in the rabbit lenses according to the route of administration between four different groups. They included normal saline injection group(control group) and gentamicin injection group(experimental group), intracameral gentamicin injection group and intravitreal gentamicin injection group. The results are summarized as follows; 1. The Ca**++-activated ATPase activity of the lens showed no interval change in the control group, but progressively inhibited in the experimental group. 2. The active efflux of Ca**++ from the lens was significantly decreased in the experimental group compared to the control group. 3. The calcium concentration in the lens showed no interval change in the control group, but progressively increased in the experimental group. 4. The inhibition of Ca**++-activated ATPase activity of the lens, decreased active Ca**++ efflux from the lens and increased calcium concentration in the lens were more severe in the intravitreal injection group than intracameral injection group. From the above results, it may be speculated that the decreased active efflux of Ca**++ from the lens induced by gentamicin is related to inhibiting Ca**++-activated ATPase activity of the lens and this makes the accumulation of calcium in the lens. These effects were more severe in the intravitreal gentamicin injection group than in the intracameral gentamicin injection group. [์˜๋ฌธ] Endophthalmitis is one of the most catastrophic complications in intraocular surgery and penetrating injuries of the eye. Recently, gram-negative rods including pseudomonas have been found to be the major causative organisms of bacterial endophthalmitis. Gentamicin has been the conventional treatment for pseudomonas infection and therefore its use for eye infections was evaluated. Because of poor penetration of antibiotics into the eye and particularly into the vitreous via the conventional route of administration, the method of injection of antibiotics directly into either the anterior chamber or the vitreous employed. Although higher concentration of intraocular gentamicin were obtained, sight-limiting complications such as cataract and retinal toxicity secondary to toxic effects on adjacent ocular tissues resulted. The mechanism of cataract formation have not been proven definitively but the transparency of the lens is known to depend on its ^^Ca++ level, and many researchers have proven experimentally that cataracts may occur in cases of increased lens calcium levels. Recently, in vitro studies with rabbit lenses have showed that increased calcium levels in cataracts were the results of decreased active Ca**++ efflux from the lens secondary to inhibition of Ca**++ -activated ATPase activity in the lens. In this experiment, gentamicin and normal saline were administrated into the anterior chamber and into the vitreous. Ca**++-activated ATPase activity in the lens, active Ca**++ efflux from the lens and calcium concentration in the lens were measured at day 1, day 3 and 7 days after injection of gentamicin or saline solution into the anterior chamber or vitreous to compare the effect on calcium transport in the rabbit lenses according to the route of administration between four different groups. They included normal saline injection group(control group) and gentamicin injection group(experimental group), intracameral gentamicin injection group and intravitreal gentamicin injection group. The results are summarized as follows; 1. The Ca**++-activated ATPase activity of the lens showed no interval change in the control group, but progressively inhibited in the experimental group. 2. The active efflux of Ca**++ from the lens was significantly decreased in the experimental group compared to the control group. 3. The calcium concentration in the lens showed no interval change in the control group, but progressively increased in the experimental group. 4. The inhibition of Ca**++-activated ATPase activity of the lens, decreased active Ca**++ efflux from the lens and increased calcium concentration in the lens were more severe in the intravitreal injection group than intracameral injection group. From the above results, it may be speculated that the decreased active efflux of Ca**++ from the lens induced by gentamicin is related to inhibiting Ca**++-activated ATPase activity of the lens and this makes the accumulation of calcium in the lens. These effects were more severe in the intravitreal gentamicin injection group than in the intracameral gentamicin injection group.restrictio

    Refractive State in Childhood with Normal Visual Acuity

    No full text
    ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[์˜๋ฌธ] [ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์‹œ๋ ฅ์€ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ์žฅ์• ๋ฅผ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์งˆํ™˜์ด ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ตด์ ˆ์ด์ƒ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ •์‹œ์•ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ํ•ญ์ƒ ์ •์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋‚˜ ๊ตด์ ˆ์ด์ƒ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋น„์ •์‹œ์•ˆ์ด๋ผ๋„ ๊ตด์ ˆ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์™€ ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ๋Š” ์ •์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ €์ž๋Š” 1985๋…„ 11์›” 1์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 1986๋…„ 3์›” 30์ผ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์—ฐ์„ธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™๋ถ€์† ์˜ ๋™์„ธ๋ธŒ๋ž€์Šค๋ณ‘์› ๋ฐ ์„ธ๋ธŒ๋ž€์Šค๋ณ‘์› ์•ˆ๊ณผ ์™ธ๋ž˜ ๋‚ด์›ํ™˜์ž์ค‘ ์‹œ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๊ตด์ ˆ์ƒํƒœ์— ์žฅ์• ๋ฅผ ์ค„๋งŒํ•œ ์งˆํ™˜์ด ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ Snellen์‹ ์‹œ์‹œ๋ ฅํ‘œ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ ฅ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋กœ ์–‘์•ˆ์˜ ๋‚˜์•ˆ์‹œ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 20/20์ด ์ƒ์ธ 6์„ธ์—์„œ 15์—๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ํ™˜์ž 190๋ช… 380์•ˆ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ํƒ€๊ฐ์  ๊ตด์ ˆ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์™€ ์ž๊ฐ ์  ๊ตด์ ˆ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆ์ „๊ณผ ์ ์•ˆํ›„์— ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ์ž๊ฐ์  ๊ตด์ ˆ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์ƒ, ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆ์ „์—๋Š” 147์•ˆ(38.7%)์ด ๋น„์ •์‹œ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋ช…๋˜์—ˆ ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ทธ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์›์‹œ์„ฑ๋‹จ๋‚œ์‹œ(50.3%), ์›์‹œ (37.4%), ๊ทผ์‹œ์„ฑ๋‹จ๋‚œ์‹œ (6.8%), ์›์‹œ์„ฑ๋ณต๋‚œ ์‹œ (5.4%) ์ˆœ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆํ›„์—๋Š” 183์•ˆ(48.2%)์ด ๋น„์ •์‹œ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋ช… ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  , ์›์‹œ์„ฑ๋‹จ๋‚œ์‹œ (49.7%), ์›์‹œ (38.3%), ์›์‹œ์„ฑ๋ณต๋‚œ์‹œ(8.7%), ๊ทผ์‹œ์„ฑ๋‹จ๋‚œ์‹œ (3.2%) ์ˆœ์ด ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2. ๋‚œ์‹œ๋ฅผ ์ง๋‚œ์‹œ์™€ ๋„๋‚œ์‹œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋ฉด ์ง๋‚œ์‹œ๊ฐ€ ๋„๋‚œ์‹œ๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ฝ 2.5๋ฐฐ ๋งŽ์•˜๋‹ค. 3. ๊ตด์ ˆ์ด์ƒ ์ •๋„๋Š” ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆ์ „์—๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  0.12 D.์˜€๊ณ , 12์„ธ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ•ํ•˜์˜€์œผ ๋ฉฐ(0.23 D.), ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆํ›„์—๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  0.22 D.์˜€๊ณ , 8์„ธ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(0.42 D.) . 4. ์›์‹œ์˜ ์ •๋„๋Š” ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆ์ „์—๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ 1.00 D. ์ดํ•˜ ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์กฐ์ ˆ๋งˆ๋น„์ œ ์ ์•ˆํ›„์—๋„ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ (93%)์—์„œ 1.00D. ์ดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 5. ๋‚œ์‹œ์˜ ์ •๋„๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„(98 %)์—์„œ 1.00 D.์ดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Refractive State in Ckildhood with Normal Visual Acuity Byung Joo Cho Department of Medica1 Science The Graduate School Yonsei University (Directed by Professor Ouk Choi ,M.D.) To manifest visual acuity of 20/20 or better, the requirements are good optical imagery, foveal fixation, intact receptor structure and function, and full integrity of the involved neural pathways. Person with hyperopia of 1-10 diopter or astigmatism of 1 diopter may be able to reats the line marked 20/20 of snellen's chart. Non-cycloplegic and chcloplegic subjective manifest refractions were done on 380 normal eyes with visual acuity of 20/20 or more to observe the prevalence, type and degree of the refractive errors. The results were as follows 1. In non-cycloplegic subjective manifest refraction, 147 eyes (38.7%) had refractive error such as simple hyperopic astigmatism (50.3%), hyperopia (37.4%), simple myopic astigmatism(6.8%) and compound hyperopic astigmatism(5.4%). In cycloplegic subjective manifest refraction, 183 eyes (48.2%) were ametropia such as simple hyperopic astigmatism(49.7%), hyperopia(38.3%), compound hyperopic astigmatism(8.7%) and simple myopic astigmatism(3.2%). 2. As to the type of astigmatisms, "with the rule" astigmatism was 2.5 times more than "against the rule". 3. Average degree of refractive errors were 0.12 diopter in non-cycloplegic refraction and 0.22 diopter in cycloplegic refraction. 4. The degree of hyperopia was less than 1.00 diopter in all cases of non-cycloplegic refractions and in most cases (93%) of cycloplegic refractions. 5. Degree of astigmatism were less than 1.00 diopter in the majority(98%).restrictio
    corecore