46 research outputs found
(The) differences in behaviors of utilization on western and oriental medical care in Korea
보건νμ νκ³Ό/λ°μ¬[νκΈ]λκ°, μΈμ , μ΄λμ, μ΄λ€ μλ£μλΉμ€λ₯Ό, μ΄λ»κ² μ΄μ©νλκ°? μ΄λ λ§€μ° λ³΅μ‘νκ³ μ΄λ €μ΄ λ¬Έμ μ΄λ€. μλ£μ΄μ©μ λ¨μΌμ°¨μμ΄ μλ, μ¬νμΈκ΅¬νμ νΉμ±, μ¬νμ¬λ¦¬μ μμΈ, λ¬Έν λ° κ²½μ μ μμΈ, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ§μλ΄ μλ£μμμ μ, μμμ λΆν¬ λ± λ€μν μμΈλ€μ΄ μνΈμμ©μ ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ κ²°μ λλ©°, μλ°©μλ£μ νλ°©μλ£μ μ΄μ©ννμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈκ°μλ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό 보μΈλ€. μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μμλ μΒ·νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© ννμ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό λ€μκ³Ό κ°μ΄ ꡬλͺ
νκ³ μ νμλ€; μΒ·νλ°©μλ£ μ νμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈ; μΒ·νλ°© μλ£μ΄μ© μ¬λΆμ μΒ·νλ°© μλ£μ΄μ©λμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ μ°¨μ΄; μΒ·νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© λ§μ‘±λμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ μ°¨μ΄; κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μΒ·νλ°©μλ£μ λ체κ΄κ³ ꡬλͺ
.
μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μ μμλ£λ νκ΅λ³΄κ±΄μ¬νμ°κ΅¬μμ 1998λ
κ΅λ―Όκ±΄κ°μ‘°μ¬ μλ£μ΄λ©°, λμμμλ λΉνμ°κ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό μ μΈν 39,060λͺ
μ΄λ€. κ°μ€μ κ²μ¦νκΈ° μν΄ μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μμλ μ§κΈκΉμ§ μ μλ
λμ μλ£μ΄μ© μ°κ΅¬μμ λ§μ΄ μ΄μ©λ λ° μλ Andersenλͺ¨νμ κΈ°λ³Έ λͺ¨νμΌλ‘ νμ¬ λ΄μ©μ λ°λΌ λ‘μ§μ€ν± νκ·λΆμ, λ€ν λ‘μ§νκ·λΆμ, μκ³μ λ€μ€νκ·λΆμ λ±μ μ€μνμλ€. μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μμ½νλ©΄ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
첫째, μμ©μΉλ£μμ μλ°©λ³μμμΌλ‘ κ°μ§κ³ μλ κ²½μ° μμ©μΉλ£μμ΄ μλ κ²½μ°λ³΄λ€ μλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© νλ₯ μ΄ 1.8λ°°μ λ μ¦κ°νλ κ²μ λΉν΄, μμ©μΉλ£μμ νλ°©λ³μμμΌλ‘ κ°μ§κ³ μλ κ²½μ° μμ©μΉλ£μμ΄ μλ κ²½μ°λ³΄λ€ νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© νλ₯ μ΄ λ¬΄λ € 6.7λ°°λ μ¦κ°νμλ€. λμ§Έ, μΒ·νλ°©μλ£ μ νμμΈμ κ΄ν λ€ν λ‘μ§νκ·λΆμ κ²°κ³Ό, μλ°©μλ£μ λΉν΄ νλ°©μλ£λ₯Ό μ νν νλ₯ μ κ΅μ‘μμ€μ΄ λμμλ‘, μμ©μΉλ£μμ νλ°©λ³μμμΌλ‘ κ°μ§κ³ μμμλ‘, μΈκ΅¬ 10λ§λͺ
λΉ νμμ¬μκ° λ§μμλ‘, 근골격κ³μ§νμ μ΄νλ μλ‘, μνκΈ°κ³μ§νμ μ΄νλ μλ‘, μ¬κ³ λ° νμ μ¦μ μ΄νλ μλ‘ μ¦κ°νμλ€. μ
μ§Έ, μκ³μ λ€μ€νκ·λΆμ κ²°κ³Ό, μλ°©μλ£κΈ°κ΄ λ°©λ¬Ένμμλ μλ£νμμμΈμ΄ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ λ°λ©΄, νλ°©μλ£κΈ°κ΄ λ°©λ¬Ένμμλ μλ£νμμμΈκ³Ό μλ£κ°λ₯μμΈμ΄ λΉμ·ν μ€λͺ
λ ₯μ λνλ΄μλ€. νΉν, κ°λ³ λ
립λ³μμ€ μλ°©μλ£μ΄μ©λμ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ λ³μλ μ΄νμΌμμΈ λ°λ©΄, νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ©λμ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ λ³μλ νλ°©μλ£μλΉμ€ κ°κ²©μΌλ‘ λλλ¬μ§ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό 보μλ€. λ·μ§Έ, μλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© λ§μ‘±λμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ€ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ λ³μλ μΉμ μΈμλμμΌλ©°, λΉμ©μΈμλ, μ°λ Ή, λκΈ°μκ°μ μμΌλ‘ μν₯λ ₯μ λνλ΄μκ³ , νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© λ§μ‘±λμ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ λ³μ μμ μΉμ μΈμλμμΌλ©°, κ·Έ μΈ λΉμ©μΈμλμ λκΈ°μκ°μ΄ λΆμ μν₯λ ₯μ λνλ΄μλ€. νΉν, λλλ¬μ§ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό λ³΄μΈ κ²μ λΉμ©μΈμλμ κ²½μ° μλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© λ§μ‘±λλ³΄λ€ νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ© λ§μ‘±λμ λ ν° μν₯λ ₯μ 보μλ€. λ€μ―μ§Έ, νλ°©μλ£κ° μλ°©μλ£μ λ체μ¬λ‘ μ΄μ©λκ³ μλμ§ λλ 보μμ¬λ‘ μ΄μ©λκ³ μλμ§λ₯Ό ꡬλͺ
νκΈ° μν΄ νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ©νμλ₯Ό μ’
μλ³μλ‘ νμ¬ λ€μ€νκ·λΆμμ μ€μν κ²°κ³Ό, νλ°©μλ£λ μλ°©μλ£μ λ체μ¬λ‘ μ΄μ©λκ³ μλ κ²μΌλ‘ λ°νμ‘λ€.
κ²°λ‘ μ μΌλ‘ μΒ·νλ°© μλ£λ₯Ό μ΄μ©νλ ννμλ λͺκ°μ§ μΈ‘λ©΄μμ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό 보μλλ°, μ΄λ₯Ό ν λλ‘ λ€μκ³Ό κ°μ μ μ±
μ μ μΈν΄ λ³Ό μ μκ² λ€. 첫째, μΒ·νλ°©μλ£λ₯Ό μ ννλλ° μμ΄μ μμ©μΉλ£μμ μ’
λ₯μ κ°μ΄ νμ μλ£λ₯Ό μ΄μ©νλ μ΅κ΄μ΄ μ€μν μν₯μ λ―Έμ³€λ€. λ°λΌμ νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ©μ μ κ³ μν€κΈ° μν μ μ±
μ μννκ³ μ νλ€λ©΄, νλ°©μλ£μ κ³Όννμ λλΆμ΄ μλΉμμκ² νλ°©μλ£μ λν κΈμ μ μ΄λ―Έμ§λ₯Ό μΈμμν€κΈ° μν μ λ΅μ΄ νμν κ²μ΄λ€. λμ§Έ, μ§λ³μ μ’
λ₯κ° μΒ·νλ°© μλ£λ₯Ό μ ννλλ° μλΉν μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉκ³ μμκ³ , μ νμ μΌλ‘λλ§ μλ°©μλ£κ° νλ°©μλ£λ‘ λ체λ μ μμμ΄ μ¦λͺ
λ μ μ κ³ λ €ν λ, νλ°©, μλ°©, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μΒ·νλ°© νμ§μΌλ‘ μΉλ£ν¨κ³Όκ° λμ μ§λ³μ λν μ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μΒ·νλ°© μ€λ³΅μλ£ μ΄μ©ννλ₯Ό κ°μμν΄μΌλ‘μ¨ μλΉμ μΈ‘λ©΄μμλ μλ£λΉ λΆλ΄μ κ°μμν€κ³ , κ΅κ°μ μΈ‘λ©΄μμλ μμμ λλΉλ₯Ό λ§κ³ ν¨μ¨μ μΈ μμνμ©μ κΎν΄μΌ ν κ²μ΄λ€. μ
μ§Έ, μλ°©μλ£μ΄μ©μλ μ§λ³μ κ²½μ€λκ° κ°μ₯ μ€μν μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉκ³ μλ λ°λ©΄, νλ°©μλ£μ΄μ©μ μμ΄μλ μλ£μλΉμ€μ κ°κ²©μ΄ κ°μ₯ μ€μν μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉκ³ μλ μ μ κ°μ ν λ, νλ°©μλ£μλΉμ€μ λν μ κ·Όμ±μ μ κ³ μν€κΈ° μν΄μλ μλ£λ³΄νμ νλ°©κΈμ¬λ₯Ό κ°μ νμ¬ λ³ΈμΈλΆλ΄μ κ°μμμΌ μ£Όλ κ²μ΄ μκΈν κ³Όμ λΌ νκ² λ€.
[μλ¬Έ]Korea is unique in that the status of oriental medicine is equal to that of western medicine, socially and politically. Until now, there has been no study on the separate analysis of western and oriental medical care. The objectives of this study were to examine the differences in behaviors of utilization and satisfaction on western and oriental medical care, to identify different motivation of choice for western and oriental medical care, and to see if there is a substitution of oriental medical care for western medical care.
The data came from a national health survey of noninstitutionalized Koreans conducted in 1998. The data were collected by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs and a total number of 12,283 Korean households with 39,060 household members took part in the γ1998 National Health and Nutrition Surveyγ. The Andersen model of health behavior was employed to guide the analysis and the development of hypotheses. The major statistical methods used for the analysis were multiple logistic regression analysis, hierarchical regression analysis, and polychotomous logistic regression analysis. The major findings are as follows;
1. The choice of oriental medical care is related with high educational level, regular source of oriental medical care, number of oriental physicians, musculoskeletal system disease, and circulatory system disease.
2. Most of the explained variance in the number of western medical care visits are accounted for by need characteristics with minimal contribution from the predisposing and enabling components. But most of the explained variance in the number of oriental medical care visits are accounted for by need and enabling characteristics with minimal contribution from the predisposing components. The number of illness days is the most important variable contributing to the explanation of the number of western medical care visits, while the costs per visit is the most important variable contributing to the explanation of the number of oriental medical care visits.
3. The level of satisfaction with western medical care is affected by kind, perception of high price for western medical care, age, and waiting time. The level of satisfaction with oriental medical care is affected by kind, perception of high price for western medical care, and waiting time.
4. There is a substitution between oriental medical care and western medical care.
The findings show that it is critical to focus on the reduction of cost sharing to access oriental medical care. Other policies for the improvement of western and oriental medical care delivery system include the method of prevention for hospital shopping behavior and improvement of quality of oriental medicine.ope
An Analysis of Nursing Work of Operating Room Nurses
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify nurses' duties and tasks for job analysis of the nurses in the operating room. Methods: This study was descriptive investigation research using the 3-point likert scale questionnaires and the level of importance, difficulty and the frequency of each duty and task were analyzed. Data were collected by 422 OR nurses from 57 hospitals. Results: Job of OR nurses included 13 duties and 105 tasks. The 13 duties were 'management of operative patient' 'assistive work for operation' 'supportive work for operation' 'infection control in OR' 'management of equipments and instruments for operation' 'administrating medicine for operation' 'supplies management for operation' 'safety management for operation' 'environmental management for operating room' 'administrative work for operation' 'education for operating room personnel' 'development of operation procedure books' and 'elf development of OR personnel' Conclusion: This study identified duties and tasks performed by OR nurses. Based on these results, the importance, frequency, and difficulty in this study will provide research evidence for developing training programs for OR nurses
Evaluation on the Practicum Using Standardized Patients for Nursing Assessment to Articular Disease
Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate of practicum by using standardized patient(SP) for nursing assessment. Method: This study had 2 steps. The 1st-step was pre-intervention stage including selection of a learning title, formation of case scenario, training of SP and developing the evaluation tools for students' clinical competence to assessment, 6 categories 29 items. The 2nd-step consisted of intervention and evaluation stages. 34 nursing students divided 2 groups participated in assessing the SP. Evaluation of each group was performed by 2 nursing professors. All students recorded their feelings after assessing the SP. The SP also evaluated about nursing students' attitude toward the SP. Results: ICC(Interclass correlation coefficient) between 2 groups was over 0.7 in all categories. Students' assessing score(range 0-1) was muscular-joint function status(0.41), nutritional status(0.39), history taking(0.38), IADL(0.18), ADL(0.15), and emotional status (0.07). The mean scores of the nursing students' attitude by SP was 4.03(range 1-6). Also most students showed positive reactions to the education using SP because they had the chance to experience what they could not practice in clinical setting. Conclusion: The evaluation tool revealed high reliability. Nursing students' clinical competence was below average. But they took a good attitude to SP. We recommended further research using SP with various disease