11 research outputs found

    Duration and magnitude of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase phosphorylation determine adipogenesis or osteogenesis in human bone marrow-derived stem cells.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: Imbalances between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation leads to diseases such as osteoporosis. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the differences in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation during both adipogenesis and osteogenesis of human bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using troglitazone, GW9662 and U0126, we investigated their role in hBMSC differentiation to adipogenic and osteogenic fates. RESULTS: ERK1/2 inhibition by U0126 suppressed proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)ฮณ expression and lipid accumulation, while it decreased the mRNA expression of adipogenic genes (lipoprotein lipase, PPARฮณ, and adipocyte protein) and osteogenic genes (type I collagen and osteopontin). ERK phosphorylation was transient and decreased during adipogenesis, whereas it occurred steadily during osteogenesis. Troglitazone, a PPARฮณ agonist, induced adipogenesis by inhibiting ERK phosphorylation even in an osteogenic medium, suggesting that ERK signaling needs to be shut off in order to proceed with adipose cell commitment. Cell proliferation was greatly increased in osteogenesis but was not changed during adipogenesis, indicating that ERK might play different roles in cellular proliferation and differentiation between the two committed cell types. CONCLUSION: The duration and magnitude of ERK activation might be a crucial factor for the balance between adipogenesis and osteogenesis in human bone marrow-derived stem cells.ope

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma/signal transducers and activators of transcription 5A pathway plays a key factor in adipogenesis of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells and 3T3-L1 preadipocytes

    Get PDF
    Adipogenesis is largely dependent on the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway. However, the molecular mechanism of the STAT pathway in the adipogenesis of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells (hBMSCs) remains not well understood. The purpose of this research was to characterize the transcriptional regulation involved in expression of STAT5A and STAT5B during adipogenesis in hBMSCs and 3T3-L1 cells. The expression of STAT5A and STAT5B increases with the onset of adipogenesis in hBMSCs and 3T3-L1 cells. The PPAR response elements regulatory element of STAT5A exists at a promoter region ranging from -346 to -101, and the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) regulatory element is located at -196 to -118 of the STAT5B promoter. C/EBPฮฒ and C/EBPฮฑ bound to the STAT5B promoter region, whereas peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ฮณ (PPARฮณ) bound to STAT5A. RNA interference of STAT5A completely blocked differentiation, whereas the inhibition of STAT5B only partially blocked differentiation. We propose that C/EBPฮฑ, C/EBPฮฒ, and PPARฮณ control adipogenesis by regulating STAT5B and STAT5A and that STAT5A is necessary, whereas STAT5B plays a supplementary role during adipogenesis. Further, the regulation of PPARฮณ-STAT5 by C/EBPฮฒ signaling seems to be the crucial adipogenesis pathway-initiating cascade of the various adipogenic genes.ope

    Differential Expression of STATs and Its Function in Osteogenesis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: To investigate the role of STAT5 during osteogenesis differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells(hMSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the expression pattern of STATs during osteogenic differentiation, we performed western blot analysis and RT-PCR. By RNA interference, we have performed effect of STAT5A and STAT5B in osteogenesis. As a result of Luciferase assay, the promoter activity of DLX5 was decreased by STAT5A. RESULTS: To assess the expression pattern of STATs during osteogenic differentiation, we have performed western blot and RT-PCR after 14 day differentiation period. STAT1, 2, 3 and 4 showed no change in expression level during differentiation, while STAT5A and STAT5B displayed steady increase compared to the control. When STAT5A was knock down, the level of osteogenesis was increased. The transcriptional activity of DLX5 was decreased about 70% by STAT5A. CONCLUSION: The expression of STAT5A and STAT5B increased during osteogenesis of hMSC. Also, we shown that STAT5A regulated the transcriptional activity of DLX5. These results indicate that STAT5A acts as a pivotal transcription factor in osteogenesis of hMSC.ope

    The regulation of STAT5 by C/EBPa, C/EBPb, and PPARr in adipogenesis

    No full text
    Dept. of Medical Science/๋ฐ•์‚ฌAdipogenesis is a complex process that includes the proliferation of precursor cells, their commitment to the adipogenic lineage, and terminal differentiation. During the differentiation of preadipocytes, the expression of adipocyte-specific genes depends on the transcriptional activation and the expression of families of transcription factors, C/EBPs and PPARs. In addition, adipogenesis is largely dependent on the STAT (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription) pathway. However, the molecular mechanism of the STAT pathwayโ€™s role on the adipogenesis of human bone marrow derived-stromal cells (BMSCs) is still not well known. In this study, we investigated transcriptional regulation involved in the expression of STAT5A and STAT5B during adipogenesis.We determined that the expression of STAT5A and STAT5B increases from the onset of adipogenesis of hBMSCs and 3T3-L1 cells and is maintained throughout adipogenesis. In addition, we successfully determined that STAT5A is regulated at the transcriptional level by PPAR? and RXR?, whereas STAT5B is regulated by C/EBP? and C/EBP?. The PPRE regulatory element of STAT5A exists at a promoter region ranging from nucleotides -346 to -101, and the C/EBP regulatory element was located at the -196 to -118 nucleotide region of the STAT5B promoter. We determined that C/EBP? and C/EBP? collectively bind to the STAT5B promoter region, whereas PPAR? binds to that of STAT5A using EMSA and ChIP assays. RNA interference with STAT5A resulted in a complete blockage of the differentiation, whereas inhibition of STAT5B only partially blocked the differentiation. We propose that C/EBP?, C/EBP? and PPAR? control adipogenesis by regulating STAT5B and STAT5A, respectively, and that STAT5A is absolutely necessary; STAT5B only plays a supplemental role during adipogenesis. Furthermore, PPAR?-STAT5 regulation by C/EBP? signaling seems to be crucial in the adipogensis pathway-initiating cascade of various adipogenic genes.restrictio

    Analysis of the success factors of smoking cessation of new and re-registrants of smoking cessation clinics at public health centers.

    No full text
    Background and Purpose Smoking cessation clinics at public health centers play a key role in community smoking cessation projects, but the size of re-registrants and the success factors of smoking cessation are not well known compared to new registrants. The study aims to understand the number of new and re-registered smoking clinics nationwide from 2010 to 2020, and to find out the relationship between demographic characteristics, smoking-related characteristics, and 6-month smoking success of new and re-registered health centers nationwide from 2015 to 2020. Methods From 2010 to 2020, 4,478,300 new, re-registration, and age-specific registration trends were identified, and 2,172,038 users from 2015 to 2020, when the integrated smoking cessation service information system was established and managed, were analyzed. Frequency analysis and descriptive statistics were conducted to understand the characteristics of the study subjects, and the relationship between the success of smoking cessation of new registration and re-registration was analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted by correcting nicotine dependence, first smoking age, average daily smoking amount, smoking confidence, and smoking preparation due to demographic characteristics such as gender, age, social security, and service use. Result From 2010 to 2020, the total number of registrants per year was the highest in 2015 and decreased in 2020. Over the past 11 years, new registrations have been on the decline, and re-registration has been on the rise recently. Among the 2,172,038 subjects analyzed between 2015 and 2020, 1,930,536 males, 88.9% were 1,580 and 138 newly registered and 591,900 re-registered. Compared to new registrants, re-registrants often received behavioral therapy and supplements together, the number of consultations, smoking cessation confidence, and the degree of preparation for smoking cessation were high, and the amount of smoking per day was high. The four-week smoking cessation success rate was higher, but the six-month smoking cessation success rate was 37.9%, lower than 39.3% of new registrants. In the analysis of six-month smoking cessation success factors, the odds ratio for re-registrants to succeed was 0.84 (95% CI 0.83-0.84) lower than that of new registrants. The factors for smoking cessation success of new registrants and re-registrants were the same, with men, high age, health insurance subscribers, and anti-smoking assistance provided alone (OR 1.255,95% CI 1.23-1.28; re-registrants OR 1.30,95% CI 1.26-1.34; non-smoking confidence and 7.75%.) Conclusion Amid a decrease in the number of registered smoking cessation clinics at public health centers, the number of re-registrants is increasing. Re-registrants are more prepared to quit smoking than new registrants, but they consume more resources and are difficult to succeed. Smoking cessation clinics The factors for improving the success rate of smoking cessation were the same for new and re-registrants, and the increase in the number of consultations was the most characteristic. When the number of consultations increases, it is necessary to prepare an action plan after confirming the effect on improving the success rate. Research is needed to see if smoking cessation confidence and smoking cessation preparation also have the effect of improving the success rate during intervention, and further research is needed to develop a successful intervention strategy for the increasing number of re-registrants. ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์  ๋ณด๊ฑด์†Œ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰์€ ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์ค‘์ถ” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž๋ณด๋‹ค ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž์˜ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์™€ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต ์š”์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 2010๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2020๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ์ „๊ตญ ๋ณด๊ฑด์†Œ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰์˜ ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก ๋ฐ ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ด๋“ค์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ  ์ถ”์ด๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ , 2015๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2020๋…„ ์ „๊ตญ ๋ณด๊ฑด์†Œ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž, ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก ๋ฐ ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํšŒํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ, ํก์—ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ ํŠน์„ฑ, ์„œ๋น„์Šค ์ด์šฉ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ 6๊ฐœ์›” ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต์˜ ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 2010๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2020๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ์ „๊ตญ 258๊ฐœ ๋ณด๊ฑด์†Œ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•œ 4,478,300๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ ๊ทœ, ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก๊ณผ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„ ๋“ฑ๋กํ˜„ํ™ฉ ์ถ”์ด๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ธˆ์—ฐ์„œ๋น„์Šค ํ†ตํ•ฉ์ •๋ณด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๊ตฌ์ถ•, ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋œ 2015๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2020๋…„๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์ด์šฉ์ž 2,172,038๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต ๊ด€๋ จ ์š”์ธ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ œ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋นˆ๋„ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก ๋ฐ ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์˜ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต ๊ด€๋ จ ์š”์ธ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธ๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํšŒํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ๋ณ„, ์—ฐ๋ น, ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ณด์žฅ, ์„œ๋น„์Šค ์ด์šฉ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ์ œ๊ณต ๋‚ด์šฉ, ์ƒ๋‹ด ํšŸ์ˆ˜, ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋“ฑ๋ก ๊ฒฝ๋กœ, ํก์—ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ˆ์ฝ”ํ‹ด ์˜์กด๋„, ์ฒซ ํก์—ฐ ๋‚˜์ด, ํ•˜๋ฃจ ํ‰๊ท  ํก์—ฐ๋Ÿ‰, ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ค€๋น„ ์ •๋„ ์ค‘ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ž์‹ ๊ฐ, ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ค€๋น„ ์ •๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋กœ์ง€์Šคํ‹ฑ ํšŒ๊ท€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 2010๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2020๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„ ์ด๋“ฑ๋ก์ž ์ˆ˜๋Š” 2015๋…„์— ์ตœ๋‹ค์˜€๊ณ  2020๋…„์—๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 11๋…„๊ฐ„ ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์€ ๊ฐ์†Œ ์ถ”์„ธ, ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ์ถ”์„ธ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 2015-2020๋…„ ๋ถ„์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž 2,172,038๋ช…(๋‚จ์ž 1,930,536๋ช…, 88.9%) ์ค‘, ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž 1,580,138๋ช…, ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž 591,900๋ช…์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž๋Š” ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž๋ณด๋‹ค ํ–‰๋™์š”๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•˜๊ณ , ์ƒ๋‹ดํšŸ์ˆ˜, ๊ธˆ์—ฐ์ž์‹ ๊ฐ, ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ค€๋น„ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜๋ฃจ ํก์—ฐ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋งŽ์•˜๋‹ค. 4์ฃผ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์€ ๋” ๋†’์•˜์œผ๋‚˜, 6๊ฐœ์›” ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์€ 37.9%๋กœ ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž์˜ 39.3%๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. 6๊ฐœ์›” ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต ์š”์ธ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ, ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž๋Š” ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๊ณตํ•  ์˜ค์ฆˆ๋น„๊ฐ€ 0.84(95%CI 0.83-0.84)๋กœ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž์™€ ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž์˜ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต ์š”์ธ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋™์ผํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ, ๋‚จ์ž, ๋†’์€ ์—ฐ๋ น, ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ณดํ—˜ ๊ฐ€์ž…์ž, ๊ธˆ์—ฐ๋ณด์กฐ์ œ ๋‹จ๋… ์ œ๊ณต(์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž OR 1.25,95%CI 1.23-1.28; ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž OR 1.30,95%CI 1.26-1.34),๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ž์‹ ๊ฐ๊ณผ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ค€๋น„ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, 7.75ํšŒ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ์ƒ๋‹ด ํšŸ์ˆ˜(์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž OR 7.90,95%CI 7.84-7.96; ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž OR 6.96,95%CI 6.87-7.05), ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋‹ˆ์ฝ”ํ‹ด ์˜์กด๋„, ๋†’์€ ์ฒซ ํก์—ฐ ์—ฐ๋ น, ์ ์€ ํ•˜๋ฃจ ํ‰๊ท  ํก์—ฐ๋Ÿ‰์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ณด๊ฑด์†Œ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰ ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž๊ฐ€ ์ค„์–ด๋“  ๊ฐ€์šด๋ฐ ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž๋Š” ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ค€๋น„๋„๋Š” ๋†’์œผ๋‚˜ ์ž์›์„ ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ์†Œ๋ชจํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ฑ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ  ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์š”์ธ์€ ์‹ ๊ทœ๋“ฑ๋ก์ž์™€ ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž์—๊ฒŒ์„œ ๋™์ผํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ƒ๋‹ด ํšŸ์ˆ˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋‹ด ํšŸ์ˆ˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ  ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•œ ํ›„, ์‹คํ–‰ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋งˆ๋ จ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ž์‹ ๊ฐ๊ณผ ๊ธˆ์—ฐ ์ค€๋น„ ์ •๋„ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ฐœ์ž… ์‹œ ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ  ํ–ฅ์ƒ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ์™ธ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์žฌ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ฑ๊ณต์  ๊ฐœ์ž… ์ „๋žต ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.open์„

    The Role of MAP Kinase in Adipogenesis from Human Bone Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells

    No full text
    Adipogenesis is a complex process that includes the proliferation of precursor cells, their commitment to the adipogenic lineage and terminal differentiation. This study examined whether or not the ERK signaling pathway regulates the expression or activity of the adipogenic transcription factors during human adipogenesis. The bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSCs) were differentiated into adipocytes with the 25 ฮผM troglitazone for 14 days, and aP2 and LPL mRNA were detected. In order to determine the role of the activated ERK during adipogenesis, the BMSCs were exposed to troglitazone and U0126. After inducing differentiation, ERK activity was transiently decreased from 30 min to 6 h in the adipogenic medium and the adipogenic medium plus troglitazone. Those with U0126 markedly inhibited ERK activation. In the presence of troglitazone, the expression of the marker genes increased in a time-dependent manner, and the expression of aP2, LPL and PPARฮณ genes decreased in the adipogenic BMSCs treated with U0126 in RNA level. The treatment of the adipogenic BMSCs with troglitazone activated C/EBPฮฑ and PPARฮณ, and the U0126 treatment did not affect C/EBPฮฑ expression but inhibited PPARฮณ expression in protein level. In addition, U0126 blocked the change in the adipocyte phenotype. These results suggest that ERK activation is related to PPAR expression but not C/EBPฮฑ, and C/EBPฮฑ might mediate another pathway in the adipogenesis of BMSCs.restrictio

    Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cells as a Therapeutics, Especially Focusing on Bone Marrow Derived Stromal Cells

    No full text
    Bone marrow derived-stromal cells (BMSCs) are pluriplotent progenitors for a variety of cell types, including osteoblast, chondrocyte, adipocyte, and so on. Stem cell research has enormous potential in the future clinical treatment of a wide range of diseases. Tracking stem cell localization, survival, differentiation, and proliferation after transplantation in living subjects is essential for understanding stem cell biology and physiology. However, we donโ€™t have exact evaluation methods and safeguards for clinical application. In this study, we investigated tracking BMSCs differentiation, localization, toxicity, and migration in vivo. The fluorescent vector used in our studies did not affect BMSCs viability or their ability to undergo osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in vitro. During differentiation, EGFP-BMSCs by Oil Red O and Alizarin Red S were stained. EGFP-BMSCs were transplanted into the femoral region in autologous rabbit. After one month, these cells were detectable by confocal microscopy and RTPCR. Transplanted EGFP-BMSCs were not detected another organs (spleen, kidney, liver, and muscle) in immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. In organ-function test and cell-toxicity examination, there is no difference between the before and after EGFP-BMSCs transplantation. we observed that transplanted EGFP-BMSCs were not affected cell-toxicity and migration. This results offer some evaluation methods and safeguards for clinical application using BMSCs. In further study, it will be needed to test reproductive and developmental toxicity after transplantation and observe migration of EGFP-BMSCs after transplantation.ope

    Importance of Sox2 in maintenance of cell proliferation and multipotency of mesenchymal stem cells in low-density culture.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: This study has aimed to repopulate 'primitive' cells from late-passage mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of poor multipotentiality and low cell proliferation rate, by simply altering plating density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of low density culture compared t high density culture on late-passage bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs and pluripotency markers of multipotentiality were investigated. Cell proliferation, gene expression, RNA interference and differentiation potential were assayed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We repopulated 'primitive' cells by replating late-passage MSCs at low density (17โ€ƒcells/cm(2) ) regardless of donor age. Repopulated MSCs from low-density culture were smaller cells with spindle shaped morphology compared to MSCs from high-density culture. The latter had enhanced colony-forming ability, proliferation rate, and adipogenic and chondrogenic potential. Strong expression of osteogenic-related genes (Cbfa1, Dlx5, alkaline phosphatase and type ฮ™ collagen) in late-passage MSCs was reduced by replating at low density, whereas expression of three pluripotency markers (Sox2, Nanog and Oct-4), Osterix and Msx2 reverted to levels of early-passage MSCs. Knockdown of Sox2 and Msx2 but not Nanog, using RNA interference, showed significant decrease in colony-forming ability. Specifically, knockdown of Sox2 significantly inhibited multipotentiality and cell proliferation. Our data suggest that plating density should be considered to be a critical factor for enrichment of 'primitive' cells from heterogeneous BM and that replicative senescence and multipotentiality of MSCs during in vitro expansion may be predominantly regulated through Sox2.ope

    miR-449a regulates the chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells through direct targeting of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1

    No full text
    microRNAs are small molecules, about 17-23 nucleotides in length, that act as translational regulators of their target gene. By binding to a target, microRNAs are known to either inhibit translation or induce degradation of the target. Despite the great interest in microRNAs, however, the exact targets of each individual microRNA in different processes remain largely unknown. In this study, we determined that the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF-1) was expressed during the chondrogenesis of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) and sought to identify a novel microRNA targeting this gene. Through subsequent studies, we have identified, for the first time, one particular microRNA, miR-449a, that recognizes and regulates the expression of LEF-1 in a dose-dependent and sequence-specific manner. In addition, we observed that the inhibition of LEF-1 via miR-449a led to the subsequent repression of Sox 9, which is a well-established regulator of chondrogenesis. Collectively, this study demonstrated that miR-449a directly targets LEF-1, which in turn affects the expression of Sox 9, ultimately leading to the proper regulation of the differentiation and chondrogenesis of human MSCs (hBM-MSCs).ope
    corecore