10 research outputs found

    λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  ν˜•μ„±μ˜ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜ 연ꡬ

    No full text
    The semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have attracted much attention from researchers due to many advantages such as ease of color tuning by quantum size effect. The research of synthesis and characterization about QDs nanocrystal has extensively developed, since L. E. Brus et al. had reported size effects in the excited electronic properties of semiconductor nanocrystals. The development of synthesis method has led to use synthetically convenient and safety chemicals such as CdO, 1-octadece and the single-molecular precursors have been used sources for the synthesis of semiconductor QDs.5-8 Beside the reaction kinetics of monomer formation prior to particle nucleation and shape evolution have led to synthesize quantum dots, rods and tetrapods of CdSe QDs and core-shell structure QDs Despite the development of synthesis method and application, the mechanistic study of nanocrystals formation has been properly made out. Commonly, the mechanism of colloidal nanocrystals synthesis based on the simulations is described that molecular precursors are reacted to produce active monomers. The rapid burst of these monomers creates a high supersaturation condition, which initiates nucleation of clusters or very small nanocrystals. As monomer concentration and temperature fall, the nucleated particles grow by interparticle Ostwald ripening. However, this mechanism have been not perfectly explained the conversion from precursors to nanocrystals and just understood the size distribution and selective plane growth after seed formation. In chapter 1, it explained historical background for semiconductor QDs nanocrystals from quantum physic to application. In chapter 2 and 3, we respectively propose a new mechanism for II-VI semiconductor QDs nanocrystals formation by heating-up and hot-injection methods on the basis of the results of studies conducted on the isolated intermediates and the side products obtained In chapter 4, we implemented basic kinetic study dealing with the measurement of formation reactivity of respective precursors and synthesized gradient alloy QDs nanorcrystals based on the kinetic study of precursors. Moreover, it was able to synthesize QDs in the range of full visible light by changing synthetic method a little. In chapter 5, we suggested surface modification on the QDs nanocrystals using the alkylcarboxylic acid metal salt for more stable QDs nanocrystals. The major disadvantages of semiconductor QDs about stability would be mitigated through the synthesis of highly stable and quantum efficiency semiconductor QDs nanocrystals by metal oxide treatment on the surface based on the thermal decomposition mechanism of metal carboxylates complex in the presence of alkylamine. Moreover, we have fabricated quantum dots enhancement film (QDEF) for application of highly stable CdO-coated QDs nanocrystals.λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μžλŠ” μ–‘μžμ œν•œ νš¨κ³Όμ— μ˜ν•œ 크기에 따라 광학적, 물리적 νŠΉμ„±μ΄ λ³€ν•˜λŠ” μ„±μ§ˆλ‘œ 인해, λ§Žμ€ 연ꡬ 그룹에 μ˜ν•œ μ–‘μžμ  μ œμ‘°λ°©λ²• 및 κ·Έ μ‘μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•΄μ™”λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°œμ „μ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μ–‘μžμ  ν˜•μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” λ―ΈλΉ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 졜근 λͺ‡λͺ‡ 연ꡬ 그룹에 μ˜ν•΄ μ–‘μžμ μ„ ν¬ν•¨ν•œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μž ν˜•μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ§„ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ‚˜, λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ€ λ‚˜λ…Έμ”¨μ•— ν˜•μ„± ν›„ λ°˜μ‘ 속도 연ꡬ에 μ˜ν•œ κ· μΌν•œ λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μž ν˜•μ„± 및 λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μž ν˜•μ„±μ— μžˆμ–΄ νŠΉμ • μ„±μž₯λ©΄ μ œμ–΄λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λͺ¨μ–‘을 κ°–λŠ” λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μž ν˜•μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ에 κ΅­ν•œλ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이에 따라 기쑴의 λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜ μ—°κ΅°λŠ” λΆ„μžμˆ˜μ€€μ˜ μ„ κ΅¬λ¬Όμ§ˆμ΄ λ‚˜λ…Έλ¬Όμ§ˆμ΄ ν˜•μ„±λ˜λŠ” μ •ν™•ν•œ λ°˜μ‘ 경둜λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이에 λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 방법을 ν†΅ν•œ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μž ν˜•μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ˜ 이해 및 이λ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ μ•ˆμ •μ„±κ³Ό 효율이 ν–₯μƒλœ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μžμ˜ ν•©μ„± 및 νŠΉμ„± 연ꡬλ₯Ό 진행 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 1μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μžμ— λŒ€ν•œ 물리적 νŠΉμ„±λΆ€ν„° μ‘μš©μ— 이λ₯΄λŠ” λ°°κ²½ 지식 및 λ³Έ 연ꡬ에 λŒ€ν•œ λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ œμ‹œ ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 2μž₯ 및 3μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” 단 λΆ„μž μ„ κ΅¬λ¬Όμ§ˆ 및 이쒅 μ„ κ΅¬λ¬Όμ§ˆμ˜ μ—΄λΆ„ν•΄ 방법 (μŠΉμ˜¨ν•©μ„± 및 고온 μ£Όμž…λ²•)에 μ˜ν•œ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  ν˜•μ„±μ„ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ‹€ν—˜μ  방법을 ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κ³  이λ₯Ό 톡해 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ„ μ œμ•ˆ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 4μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” μ–‘μžμ μ„ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜λŠ” 각각의 κΈˆμ† μ„ κ΅¬λ¬Όμ§ˆκ³Ό μΉΌμ½”κ²Œλ‚˜μ΄λ“œ μ„ κ΅¬λ¬Όμ§ˆ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ λ°˜μ‘ 속도 연ꡬλ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ ν•΅κ³Ό 껍질 ꡬ성 μ„±λΆ„μ˜ 점진적 ν˜Όν•© 결정측이 ν˜•μ„±λœ μ–‘μžμ  λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μžμ˜ ꡬ쑰적 뢄석 및 κ°€μ‹œλΆ€ μ „ 파μž₯ μ˜μ—­ λ°œκ΄‘ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  λ‚˜λ…Έμž…μž ν•©μ„± 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ 5μž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” μ œμ•ˆλœ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ„ μ‘μš©ν•œ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  ν‘œλ©΄μ˜ κΈˆμ† μ‚°ν™”μΈ΅ ν˜•μ„± 방법 μ œμ•ˆ 및 κΈˆμ† 산화측이 ν˜•μ„±λœ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ μ˜ 효율 및 μ•ˆμ •μ„± ν–₯상에 λŒ€ν•œ μ‹€ν—˜μ„ 진행 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 흰색 LED λ°œκ΄‘μ²΄ μ‘μš©μ„ μœ„ν•œ κ³ λΆ„μž-λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ–‘μžμ  필름λ₯Ό μ œμž‘ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이에 λŒ€ν•œ 내ꡬ성 ν…ŒμŠ€νŠΈμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ‹€ν—˜μ  κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.Docto

    Does performance of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within 2 weeks of prostate biopsy affect the outcome?

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed within either 2 or 4 weeks of prostate biopsy is associated with surgical difficulty or immediate postoperative outcome. METHODS: Of the 121 patients that underwent RALP at our institution, 104 patients were prospectively included. Patients were sequentially divided into three groups: first patient in group A (interval from biopsy to RALP: 2 weeks), second patient in group B (2-4 weeks), third patient in group C (more than 4 weeks), fourth patient in group A, and so on. The clinical, operative, pathological, and postoperative functional data were collected. RESULTS: Group A consisted of 31 patients, group B of 33, and group C of 40 patients. Median patient age and median follow up were 61.1 years and 14.1 months, respectively. In group A, mean estimated blood loss was significantly higher than the other two groups, even though there was no significant difference in the mean console time. Postoperative complications did not make any difference among the groups. In the multivariable analysis, the interval from biopsy to surgery did not affect operative times or surgical margins, or the immediate postoperative outcomes (e.g. recovery of erectile function, continence, and biochemical recurrence). CONCLUSION: A short interval for less than two weeks between the prostate biopsy and the RALP seems to be feasible and safe. Further studies with larger samples are needed to corroborate these findings.ope
    corecore