15 research outputs found

    Effects of wedged insole angle on knee varus torque and electromyographic activity in healthy subjects

    No full text
    ์žฌํ™œํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณดํ–‰ ์‹œ wedged insole ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ์™€ ํ•˜์ง€์˜ ๊ทผํ™œ์„ฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋Š” ๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์„ฑ์ธ ๋‚จ์ž 15๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Wedged insole ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์ธก ๊ฐ๊ฐ 10ยฐ, 15ยฐ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ์™€ ๊ทผํ™œ์„ฑ๋„(๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ทผ๋ง‰์žฅ๊ทผ, ๊ฐ€์ชฝ ๋„“์€๊ทผ, ์•ˆ์ชฝ ๋„“์€๊ทผ, ์•ž์ •๊ฐ•๊ทผ, ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฏธ๊ทผ)๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ผ์ฐจ์› ๋™์ž‘์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ธ Elite์™€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด๊ทผ์ „๋„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. MatLab 5.3 ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณดํ–‰์ฃผ๊ธฐ 100%(0%: ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์ ‘์ง€; 100% ๋™์ธก ๋ฐœ์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์ ‘์ง€)๋กœ ์ •๊ทœํ™”(normalization)ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์˜ ๊ทผ์ „๋„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ตœ๋Œ€๋“ฑ์ฒ™์„ฑ์ˆ˜์ถ•๋Ÿ‰ (%MVIC)๊ณผ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ 100%(0%: ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์ ‘์ง€; 100%: ๋ฐœ๊ฐ€๋ฝ๋–ผ๊ธฐ)๋กœ ์ •๊ทœํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ›„์กฑ์— ์ฐฉ์šฉํ•œ wedged insole ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ํ›„๊ธฐ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์˜ ๊ทผ์ „๋„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ธก์ •๋œ ์ผ์š”์ธ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋ถ„์„(one-way repeated ANOVA)์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ ์‹œ ๋‚ด์ธก 10ยฐ, 15ยฐ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ wedged insole ์ ์šฉ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ •์ƒ ๋ณดํ–‰ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(p>0.05). ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์™ธ์ธก 10ยฐ, 15ยฐ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ wedged insole ์ ์šฉ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ •์ƒ ๋ณดํ–‰ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(p0.05). ํ›„๊ธฐ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ ์‹œ ๋‚ด์ธก 10ยฐ, 15ยฐ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ wedged insole ์ ์šฉ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ •์ƒ ๋ณดํ–‰ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(p0.05). ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‚ด์ธก 10ยฐ์™€ 15ยฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์™ธ์ธก 10ยฐ์™€ 15ยฐ๊ฐ„์—๋Š” ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค(p>0.05). Wedged insole ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ž…๊ฐ๊ธฐ ์‹œ ๊ฐ ๊ทผ์œก์˜ ๊ทผ์ „๋„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Ÿ‰์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ทผ์œก์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํ›„์กฑ์— ์ฐฉ์šฉํ•œ wedged insole์ด ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ์˜ ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์ธก ๊ตฌํš ํž˜(compartment force)์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์ธก ๊ตฌํš ํž˜์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ wedged insole๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณด์กฐ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์ธก ๊ตฌํš์— ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ‡ดํ–‰์„ฑ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ wedged insole ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์Šฌ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋‚ด๋ฒˆ ํ† ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the angle of a wedged insole on knee varus torque and electromyographic activity during walking. Fifteen healthy subjects were recruited. Knee varus torque and electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured using three-dimensional motion analysis (Elite) and a surface EMG system. Knee varus torque was normalized to gait cycle (0%: initial contact; 100%: ipsilateral initial contact) and muscle activity was normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) and stance phase (0%: initial contact; 100%: ipsilateral toe off). The averaged peak knee varus torque and muscle activity (tensor fascia latae, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscle) during the stance phase of the gait cycle according to the different insole angles (10 or 15 degrees) were compared using one-way ANOVA with repeated measures. The results showed that in the early stance phase, the average peak knee varus torque increased significantly for both the medial 10 and 15 degree wedged insole conditions and decreased significantly for both the lateral 10 and 15 degree wedged insole conditions as compared with no insole (p 0.05). In the late stance phase, the average peak knee varus torque increased significantly for the medial 10 and 15 degree wedged insole conditions (p 0.05). Comparison of EMG amplitudes across all conditions revealed no significant differences among all muscles (p > 0.05). We suggest that these results may be beneficial for manufacturing foot orthotic devices, such as wedged insoles, to control medial and lateral compartment forces in the knee varus-valgus deformity. Further studies of the effect of wedged insole angle on knee varus torque in patients with medial-lateral knee osteoarthritis are needed.ope

    Development of Neuronal Culture System for the Marine Mollusk Aplysia kurodai

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธๅคงๅญธๆ ก ๅคงๅญธ้™ข :็”Ÿ็‰ฉๅญธ็ง‘,1996.Maste

    Study on functions of the TM4SF5 intracellular domains

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์•ฝํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 8. ์ด์ •์›.TM4SF5๋Š”197amino acid๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ๋ง‰์„ 4๋ฒˆ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” transmembrane glycoprotein์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์•”์ข…์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜์–ด์˜จ tetraspanin์˜ subfamily์ด๋‹ค. Integrin๊ณผ์˜ cross-talk๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹จ์ผ ์„ธํฌ ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ๋Š” EMT(epithelial-mesenchymal transition)์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ cell์˜ morphological change ๋ฟ๋งŒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ actin reorganization์„ ํ†ตํ•œ migration๊ณผ invasion, ์„ธํฌ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ์ดํ–‰ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ cell proliferation ์ด‰์ง„์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ TM4SF5์˜ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์„ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋กœ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ intracellular signal๋กœ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋˜๋Š”์ง€ ๊ทธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ๊ด€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐํ˜€์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ„์•” ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ TM4SF5 ๋ง‰๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์˜ intracellular domain๋“ค์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. TM4SF5์˜ intra cellular loop domain๊ณผ C-terminal domain์˜ deletion mutant๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, TM4SF5์— ์˜ํ•œ FAK ํ™œ์„ฑ์€ TM4SF5์˜ intra cellular loop๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ FAK๊ณผ์˜ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ binding์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ฮฒ1 integrin antibody์™€ TM4SF5 inhibitor๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. C-terminal domain์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ๋Š” TM4SF5์— ์˜ํ•œ p130Cas์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ROS์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ECM์˜ ๋†๋„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ cell replating assay๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด TM4SF5์— ์˜ํ•œ p130Cas ํ™œ์„ฑ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์™ธ๋ถ€ํ™˜๊ฒฝ, ํŠนํžˆ ECM์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด TM4SF5์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ผ๋ จ์˜ FAK ํ™œ์„ฑ ๋ฐ mechanosensing๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ p130Cas์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด TM4SF5์˜ intracellular domain์— ์˜ํ•ด ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ „์ด ์กด์žฌํ•จ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค.Transmembrane4 L six family member5 (TM4SF5), a branch of the tetraspanin superfamily, is a tetratransmembrane glycoprotein that consists of 197 amino acid. Certain tetraspanins are highly expressed in tumor cells from many types of cancers, whereas TM4SF5 is reported to be over-expressed in hepatocarcinoma. The biological functions of TM4SF5 are predicted to be rendered in tetraspain-enriched microdomains (TERM), although direct evidence has not been previously shown. In previous studies, TM4SF5 is known to cross-talk with integrins and induces EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) at the cellular level, resulting in not only morphological elongation change through actin reorganization, but also promotion of cell migration/invasion and cell proliferation. However, the direct roles of TM4SF5 in intracellular signal transduction remain largely unknown. Here we explored the mechanistic roles of TM4SF5 in intracellular signal transduction. In this study, we have investigated the roles of TM4SF5 intracellular domain by using its deletion mutants of the cytoplasmic regions of TM4SF5 in diverse functions human hepatocarcinoma cells. An interesting aspect in TM4SF5 roles was observed with respect to both its intracellular loop domain and C-terminal domain. At first, we found that the functional blocking anti-integrin ฮฒ1 antibody and TSAHC inhibitor treatment abolished TM4SF5-enhanced FAK signaling activity. Moreover, we identified that the binding between TM4SF5 intracellular loop domain and FAK was essential for the TM4SF5-mediated FAK activation. Further study of TM4SF5 C-terminal deletion mutant, we observed that TM4SF5 regulates p130Cas signaling activity and ROS generation via its C-terminal domain. In addition, we revealed that the involvement of p130Cas activity which is known to mediate mechanosensing is associated with the differential regulation by TM4SF5 C-terminal domain depending on time and different extracellular environment, in particular, extracellular matrix concentration under cell adhesion-dependent condition. It is of further interest to determine the identification of a role for TM4SF5-mediated p130Cas regulation during mechanosensing and or ROS signaling. Altogether, this study suggests the mechanism of TM4SF5-mediated FAK activation and the mechanosensitive p130Cas activation via the TM4SF5 intracellular domains and partially gives a insight into the role of TM4SF5 in liver cancer.ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCEMaste

    Comprison research on system of strategic planning by country : focused on national human resource development plan of Korea, USA and Japan

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) --์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ–‰์ •ํ•™๊ณผ(์ •์ฑ…ํ•™์ „๊ณต),2007.Maste

    Standing wall stretching ์‹œ ๋‚ด์ธก ์•„์น˜ ์ง€์ง€๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋น„๋ณต๊ทผ์˜ ๊ทผ-๊ฑด ์—ฐ์ ‘๋ถ€ ์ „์œ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    No full text
    Dept. of Rahabilitation Therapy/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] [์˜๋ฌธ]Standing wall stretching is often prescribed to increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion for sports fitness and rehabilita๏ฟขtion. However, the effect of standing wall stretching with medial arch support on the displacement of the myotendinous junction (DMTJ) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of standing wall stretching with and without medial arch supports (WMAS versus WOMAS) on the DMTJ of the medial gastrocnemius, rearfoot angle, and navicular height in subjects with neutral foot align๏ฟขment and pes planus. Fifteen subjects with neutral foot alignment and 15 subjects with pes planus performed standing wall stretching under WMAS and WOMAS conditions. Measurements of DMTJ and rearfoot position were performed using ultra๏ฟขsonography and video imaging. Navicular height was measured using a ruler. Dependent variables were examined with a 2-way mixed-design analysis of variance. The 2 factors were foot type (neutral foot versus pes planus) and stretching condition (WMAS versus WOMAS). This result of the study showed that there were significant interactions of medial arch support by foot type for DMTJ, rearfoot angle, and navicular drop (p < 0.01). A post hoc paired t test showed that standing wall stretching in the WMAS condition significantly increased the DMTJ, compared to stretching in the WOMAS condition, in subjects with neutral foot (mean ยฑ SD, 9.6 ยฑ 1.6 versus 10.5 ยฑ 1.6 ใŽœ; difference, 0.9 ใŽœ; 99% CI: 0.4-1.4 ใŽœ) and in those with pes planus (10.0 ยฑ 1.8 versus 12.7 ยฑ 2.0 ใŽœ; difference, 2.7 ใŽœ; 99% CI: 1.9-3.5 ใŽœ) (p < 0.01). When comparing WOMAS and WMAS, the differ๏ฟขence in DMTJ (1.8 ใŽœ; 99% CI: 0.9-2.7 ใŽœ) was significantly greater in subjects with pes planus than in those with neutral foot (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that standing wall stretching with medial arch support maintained subtalar joint neutral position and increased the length of the gastrocnemius in subjects with pes planus. When prescribing standing wall stretching, clinicians need to emphasize the use of medial arch support to effectively stretch the gastrocnemius in subjects with pes planus.ope

    ๊ต์œก์—ฐ๊ทน์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ์„œ ๋…์ผ์–ด ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด๊ต์œก๊ณผ ๋…์–ด์ „๊ณต,2002.Maste
    corecore