23 research outputs found

    (A) study of patient satisfaction with nurses and nursing care

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์—ญํ• ๊ณผ ์ „๋ฌธ์  ์ฑ…์ž„์ด ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์งˆ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณ„์†์ ์ธ ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ์—…์„ ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์งˆ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์ˆ˜์š”์ž์˜ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ ๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ์€ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ ์งˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ์ฃผ์š”๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๋ถ€๊ฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›๊ณผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›์ด ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ , ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„์žฌ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์งˆ์  ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜๊ณ , ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋งž๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„ ์ธก์ •๋„๊ตฌ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•จ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 1980๋…„ 11์›” 21์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 11์›” 30์ผ๊นŒ์ง€์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์„œ์šธ์‹œ์— ์†Œ์žฌํ•œ Y๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋ถ€์†๋ณ‘์› ๋‚ด๊ณผ์™€ ์™ธ๊ณผ์— ์ž…์›ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž ์ „์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์ง‘๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„์˜์  ํ‘œ๋ณธ ์ถ”์ถœ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ‰๊ณฝ๋‚ด๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋‚ด๊ณผํ™˜์ž ๋ฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์™ธ๊ณผ ํ™˜์ž๋กœ์„œ 16์„ธ ์ด์ƒ, ์ž…์›๊ธฐ์ผ 3์ผ ์ด์ƒ, ์‘๊ธ‰์ž…์›์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์˜ ์ฐธ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ฝํ•œ ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด 171๋ช…์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ๋Š” Risser์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„ ์ธก์ •๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฒˆ์—ญ๋ณด์™„ํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ, ์‚ฐ์ˆ ํ‰๊ท  ๋ฐ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ, Internal Consistency Reliability Test, T-test, Analysis of Variance๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. A. ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌยท์‚ฌํšŒํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ž…์›์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ œ ํŠน์„ฑ 1. ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌยท์‚ฌํšŒํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ ํ‰๊ท ์—ฐ๋ น ์•ฝ 41์„ธ๋กœ 50์„ธ ์ด์ƒ ์ง‘๋‹จ์ด 31.6%๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‚จ์ž๊ฐ€ 56.1%, ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์ด 79.5%, ๊ฐ€์กฑ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 4-6๋ช…์ธ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์ด 56.7%, ์ข…๊ต๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์ด 31.6%, ๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต ์กธ์—…์ด 48.3%๋กœ ๋†’์€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 2. ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ž…์›์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ œ ํŠน์„ฑ ์ž…์›๊ณผ๋Š” ํ‰๊ณฝ๋‚ด๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋‚ด๊ณผ๊ฐ€ 66.7%์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ž…์›์ผ์ˆ˜๋Š” 7์ผ ์ด๋‚ด๊ฐ€ 70.2%๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์— ์ž…์›๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ 48.5%, ์˜๋ฃŒ๋ณดํ—˜์— ๊ฐ€์ž…ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ 63.7%๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. B. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›๊ณผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„. 1. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์ „๋ฌธ์  ์˜์—ญ ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์ „๋ฌธ์  ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์€ ใ€Œ์น˜๋ฃŒํ•  ๋•Œ ์˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋Šฅ์ˆ™ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋„์™€์ค€๋‹คใ€๊ฐ€ ํ‰๊ท ํ‰์  1.89์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์€ ใ€Œ๋‚˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•  ๋•Œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ผผ๊ผผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹คใ€๋กœ ํ‰๊ท ํ‰์  2.42์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฌธํ•ญ์ „์ฒด์˜ ํ‰์ ์‚ฐ์ˆ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 2.21์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ต์œก์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ ๊ต์œก์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์€ ใ€Œ๋‚˜์—๊ฒŒ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฌผ์–ด๋ณด๊ธฐ๋งŒ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์•„๋ฌด ๊ฒƒ๋„ ํ•ด์ฃผ์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๋Š”๋‹คใ€๋กœ ํ‰๊ท ํ‰์  2.09์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์€ ใ€Œ๋‚˜์˜ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ๋” ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ด ์ฃผ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉด ์ข‹๊ฒ ๋‹คใ€๊ฐ€ ํ‰๊ท ํ‰์  3.80์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฌธํ•ญ์ „์ฒด์˜ ํ‰์ ์‚ฐ์ˆ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 2.60์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์€ ใ€Œ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ด์„œ ์งœ์ฆ์ด ๋‚œ๋‹คใ€๊ฐ€ ํ‰๊ท ํ‰์  1.44์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ฌธํ•ญ์€ ใ€Œ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›์€ ํ™˜์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๊นŠ์€ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๊ธฐ์šธ์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹คใ€๋กœ ํ‰๊ท ํ‰์  3.81์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฌธํ•ญ์ „์ฒด์˜ ํ‰์ ์‚ฐ์ˆ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 2.63์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›๊ณผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ˆœ์œ„๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์ „๋ฌธ์  ์˜์—ญ, ๊ต์œก์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ, ์‹ ๋ขฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋ถˆ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. C. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์ „๋ฌธ์  ์˜์—ญ 7๋ฌธํ•ญ์—์„œ .751, ์—ญ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ๋ฌธํ•ญ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธ์‹œํ‚จ ๊ต์œก์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ 6๋ฌธํ•ญ์—์„œ .717, ์‹ ๋ขฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ 11๋ฌธํ•ญ์—์„œ .761์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋น„๊ต์  ๋†’์€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. D. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›๊ณผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„์™€ ์ œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ 1. ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„์™€ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌยท์‚ฌํšŒํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ „์ฒด ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ๊ต์œก์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์  ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ๊ต์œก์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๊ณ (P<0.05), ๊ธฐ์ˆ -์ „๋ฌธ์  ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ต์œก์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๊ณ , ๋‚จ์ž๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ์ž๋ณด๋‹ค ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค.(P<0.05) 2. ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„ ์™€ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ž…์›์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ œ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—๋Š” ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ „์ฒด์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ๊ฐ ์˜์—ญ์— ์žˆ์–ด ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์—†๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.(P>0.05) A STUDY OF PATIENTS SATISFACTION WITH NURSES AND NURSING CARE Hye Kyung Lim Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Yonsei University (Directed by Professor Chi Joung Shim) Today as the roles and professional responsibilities of the nurse are expanding greatly and consumer's expectations of health care services are increasing, continuous evaluation is required to assure quality nursing care. Accordingly emphasis is being placed on the consumer's involvement in planning and evaluating the quality of nursing services. The patient's satisfaction is especially emerging as a major criterion in the evaluation of the quality of nursing care. The purpose of this study was therefore, to determine the patient's level of satisfaction with the nursing care given by nurses and compare the satisfaction level with various areas of nursing care. Thereby to grasp the current nursing situation in order to contribute to improvement of the quality of nursing care and to provide basic information for the development of a tool to measure patient satisfaction in our country. The subjects for this study were 171 medical and surgical patients who had been hospitalized for 3 days or more. They were arbitrarily selected from a university hospital located in Seoul. Data was obtained through questionnaires from November 21st to November 30th 1980. Data analysis included percentages, mean and standard deviation, internal consistency reliability test, T-test and analysis of variance. The findings of this study were as follows. A. the socio-economic and demographic characteristics and characteristics related to hospitalization of the respondents. 1. The Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the respondents. The mean age of the subjects was 41, 56.1% were male, 79.5% were married, 56.7% had 4-6 family members, 31.6% did not have any religion and 43.3% graduated from high school. 2. The characteristics related to hospitalization of the respondents. Of the total respondents 66.7% were medical patients, 70.2% had been hospitalized within 7 days, 48.5% had been previously hospitalized and 63.7% had medical insurance. B. The level of patients satisfaction with various areas of nursing care, 1. Technical-Professional area The item which showed the highest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse is skillful in assisting the doctor with procedures" (mean score: 1.89), the item which showed the lowest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse is not precise in doing her work" (mean score: 2.42) and the grand mean of this total area was 2.21. 2. Teaching Relationship area The item which showed the highest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse asks a lot of questions, but once she finds the answers, she doesn't seem to do anything" (mean score: 2.09), the item which showed the lowest level of patient satisfaction was "I wish the nurse would tell me about the results of my tests more than she does" (mean score: 3.80) and the grand mean of this total area was 2.60. 3. Trusting Relationship area. The item which showed the highest level of patient satisfaction was "I'm tired of the nurse talking down to me" (mean score 1.44), the item which showed lowest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse should be more attentive than she is" (mean score: 3.81) and the grand mean of this total area was 2.63. The results show that items in the trusting relationship area elicited the most expressions of dissatisfaction from the respondents. C. The reliability test of the measurement tool used in this study. The measurement tool used in this study demonstrated a comparatively high level of reliability(.751โˆผ.761). D. The relationship between the level of patient satisfaction with nursing care and nurses and related variables. 1. Relationship between the level of patient satisfaction and the socio-economic and demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference between the educational level of the patient and the level of satisfaction in the teaching relationship area and the trusting relationship area. The higher the educational level the lower the level of satisfaction.(P<0.05) In the technical-professional area, there were significant differences between the educational level of the respondents and the satisfaction level and between the sex of respondents and level of satisfaction. The higher the educational level the lower the level of satisfaction, male respondents had a lower satisfaction level than female respondents. (P<0.05). Also when the level of satisfaction in all three are as of nursing were considered together a significant difference between the educational level and level of satisfaction was found.(P<0.05). 2. There was no significant difference between the characteristics related to the hospitalization of the respondents and satisfaction.(P>0.05). [์˜๋ฌธ] Today as the roles and professional responsibilities of the nurse are expanding greatly and consumer's expectations of health care services are increasing, continuous evaluation is required to assure quality nursing care. Accordingly emphasis is being placed on the consumer's involvement in planning and evaluating the quality of nursing services. The patient's satisfaction is especially emerging as a major criterion in the evaluation of the quality of nursing care. The purpose of this study was therefore, to determine the patient's level of satisfaction with the nursing care given by nurses and compare the satisfaction level with various areas of nursing care. Thereby to grasp the current nursing situation in order to contribute to improvement of the quality of nursing care and to provide basic information for the development of a tool to measure patient satisfaction in our country. The subjects for this study were 171 medical and surgical patients who had been hospitalized for 3 days or more. They were arbitrarily selected from a university hospital located in Seoul. Data was obtained through questionnaires from November 21st to November 30th 1980. Data analysis included percentages, mean and standard deviation, internal consistency reliability test, T-test and analysis of variance. The findings of this study were as follows. A. the socio-economic and demographic characteristics and characteristics related to hospitalization of the respondents. 1. The Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the respondents. The mean age of the subjects was 41, 56.1% were male, 79.5% were married, 56.7% had 4-6 family members, 31.6% did not have any religion and 43.3% graduated from high school. 2. The characteristics related to hospitalization of the respondents. Of the total respondents 66.7% were medical patients, 70.2% had been hospitalized within 7 days, 48.5% had been previously hospitalized and 63.7% had medical insurance. B. The level of patients satisfaction with various areas of nursing care, 1. Technical-Professional area The item which showed the highest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse is skillful in assisting the doctor with procedures" (mean score: 1.89), the item which showed the lowest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse is not precise in doing her work" (mean score: 2.42) and the grand mean of this total area was 2.21. 2. Teaching Relationship area The item which showed the highest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse asks a lot of questions, but once she finds the answers, she doesn't seem to do anything" (mean score: 2.09), the item which showed the lowest level of patient satisfaction was "I wish the nurse would tell me about the results of my tests more than she does" (mean score: 3.80) and the grand mean of this total area was 2.60. 3. Trusting Relationship area. The item which showed the highest level of patient satisfaction was "I'm tired of the nurse talking down to me" (mean score 1.44), the item which showed lowest level of patient satisfaction was "The nurse should be more attentive than she is" (mean score: 3.81) and the grand mean of this total area was 2.63. The results show that items in the trusting relationship area elicited the most expressions of dissatisfaction from the respondents. C. The reliability test of the measurement tool used in this study. The measurement tool used in this study demonstrated a comparatively high level of reliability(.751โˆผ.761). D. The relationship between the level of patient satisfaction with nursing care and nurses and related variables. 1. Relationship between the level of patient satisfaction and the socio-economic and demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference between the educational level of the patient and the level of satisfaction in the teaching relationship area and the trusting relationship area. The higher the educational level the lower the level of satisfaction.(P<0.05) In the technical-professional area, there were significant differences between the educational level of the respondents and the satisfaction level and between the sex of respondents and level of satisfaction. The higher the educational level the lower the level of satisfaction, male respondents had a lower satisfaction level than female respondents. (P<0.05). Also when the level of satisfaction in all three are as of nursing were considered together a significant difference between the educational level and level of satisfaction was found.(P<0.05). 2. There was no significant difference between the characteristics related to the hospitalization of the respondents and satisfaction.(P>0.05).restrictio

    VG3, a putative adaptor protein, interacts with clathrin and ubiquitin in Arabidopsis

    No full text
    Maste

    Effects of demonstration of neonatal behavioral assessment on reciprocity between mother and infant

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผ/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ดˆ์‚ฐ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ชจ์•„์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ์ƒํ˜ธ์„ฑ์„ ์ฆ์ง„์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์˜ํ•ด ์‹ ์ƒ์•„์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ • ์‹œ๋ฒ”์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹œ๋„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ๋™๋“ฑ์„ฑ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ์‚ฌํ›„์„ค๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๊ณ , ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€1998๋…„ 5์›” 25์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 9์›” 26์ผ๊นŒ์ง€ ์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋Š” J์‹œ ์ง€์—ญ์— ์†Œ์žฌํ•œ1๊ฐœ ๋Œ€ํ•™๋ณ‘์›, 1๊ฐœ ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์›๊ณผ 1๊ฐœ ์‚ฐ๋ถ€์ธ๊ณผ์˜์›์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋งŒํ•œ ์ •์ƒ ๋ชจ์•„๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •๊ธฐ์ค€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ํ• ๋‹นํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ 26์Œ, ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ 24์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ด 50์Œ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ๋ชจ๋‘์—๊ฒŒ ์ฒ˜์น˜์ „์— ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ์˜์•„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ์ง€๊ฐ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์‚ฌํ›„์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ตฐ ๋ชจ๋‘์—๊ฒŒ ์ถœ์‚ฐ ํ›„ 4์ฃผ์— ๊ฐ€์ •๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ์•„์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋น„๋””์˜ค ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋กœ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์ฒ˜์น˜๋Š” ์ถœ์‚ฐ ํ›„ 1์ฃผ์— ๊ฐ€์ •๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ Brazelton์˜ ์‹ ์ƒ์•„ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ •์„ ์ง€์นจ์œผ๋กœ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์—๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๋ฒ”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…๋ฆฝ๋ณ€์ธ์€ ์‹ ์ƒ์•„๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ • ์‹œ๋ฒ”์œผ๋กœ Brazelton(1995)์˜ ์‹ ์ƒ์•„ํ–‰๋™์‚ฌ์ •์ฒ™๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ข…์†๋ณ€์ธ์ธ ๋ชจ์•„์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์€ ํ•˜์˜์ˆ˜(1987)๊ฐ€ ๋ฒˆ์—ญํ•œ Walker(1982)์˜ ๋ชจ์•„๋†€์ด์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์ฒ™๋„๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์•„์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์ธ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ์ง€๊ฐ์€ Wolke์™€ James-Roberts(1987)์˜ ์˜์•„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–ด๋จธ๋‹ˆ์˜ ์ง€๊ฐ์ฒ™๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฒˆ์—ญ, ์ˆ˜์ •๋ณด์™„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค ์ž๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋ถ„์„์€ SAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹ ์ƒ์•„ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ • ์‹œ๋ฒ”์„ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฐ›์€ ์ดˆ์‚ฐ๋ชจ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ • ์‹œ๋ฒ”์„ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฐ›์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ดˆ์‚ฐ๋ชจ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ชจ์•„์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์„ฑ์ด ๋” ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. Brazelton์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ •๋„๊ตฌ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ ์‹ ์ƒ์•„์˜ ํ–‰๋™ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ํ–‰๋™์กฐ์ง๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์ž์œจ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ  ๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ์€ ์Šต๊ด€ํ™”, ์šด๋™, ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ์ˆœ์ด์—ˆ๋ฉฐ ์ƒํƒœ์กฐ์ ˆ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•ด ๋ณด๋ฉด, ์‹ ์ƒ์•„ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ • ์‹œ๋ฒ”์€ ์ดˆ์‚ฐ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ชจ์•„์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ์ƒํ˜ธ์„ฑ์„ ์ฆ์ง„์‹œํ‚ค๋Š”๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] The main purpose of this study is to identify the effects of demonstration of neonatal behavioral assessment on reciprocity between mother and infant. The research design was an experimental study with an equivalent control group posttest only design. The subject of this study consisted of 50 pairs of mother and infant(26 pairs for experimental group and 24 pairs for control group), The subjects were selected from one university hospital, one general hospital and one OBGY clinic located in J city, and were assigned to both groups randomly. The data were collected by video-taping for interactive behaviors between mother and infants, a Questionnaire for demographic data and maternal perception of infant, from May 25 to September 26, 1998. The intervention for the experimental group was the demonstration on the development alassessment for the infants by using the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. The intervention was provided to the experimental group during the first week of the infant's birth through home visiting. The instruments used in this study were Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale by Brazelton, Mother-Infant Play Interaction Scale by Walker, and Mother and Baby Scale by Wolke & James-Roberts in order to measure the maternal perception of infant. The data analysis was done using SAS. The results of this study were as followings: The mother-infant interaction score of experimental group was significantly higher than control group. The highest ability of the behavioral organization of the newborn within the experimental group was the autonomic stability, following by the habituation, motor, and social interaction. The state regulation was the least ability of the newborn's behavioral organization. Therefore, the study results suggested that the demonstration of neonatal behavioral assessment might be an effective intervention for promotion of the reciprocity of interaction between mothers and infants during the first few weeks of the infant's birth.restrictio

    Contrasting responses of liver and kidney to experimentally-induced hepatic damage in mice

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์•ฝํ•™๊ณผ ์œ„์ƒํ™”ํ•™์ „๊ณต,1999.Docto

    The Publication of Sinpyeon-jejong-gyojang-chongrok by Uicheon and Its Historical Significance

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ตญ์‚ฌํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 2. ๋‚จ๋™์‹ .ๅคง่ฆบๅœ‹ๅธซ ็พฉๅคฉ์ด 1090๋…„์— ํŽธ์ฐฌํ•œ ใ€Šๆ–ฐ็ทจ่ซธๅฎ—ๆ•Ž่—็ธฝ้Œ„ใ€‹(์ดํ•˜ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹)์€ ไธ‰่—์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋™์•„์‹œ์•„ ์Šน๋ ค๋“ค์˜ ์ฃผ์„์„œ์ธ ็ซ ็–๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ชฉ๋ก์ด๋‹ค. ์ด 3๊ถŒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ๊ถŒ์— ็ถ“์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์žฅ์†Œ 561์ข… 2719๊ถŒ, ๏ง˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์žฅ์†Œ 142์ข… 467๊ถŒ, ่ซ–์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์žฅ์†Œ 307๋ถ€ 1692๊ถŒ, ์ด 1010๋ถ€ 4878๊ถŒ์„ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ์—์„œ๋Š” ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์˜ ํŽธ์ฐฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์˜ ํŠน์ง•๊ณผ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ไฝ›ๅ…ธ็›ฎ้Œ„์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์˜์˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜์ฒœ์€ ไธ‰่—์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๆ•Ž่—(์žฅ์†Œ)์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ผ์ฐ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ตญ๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๅฎ‹๊ณผ ๏งƒ, ๆ—ฅๆœฌ์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ่ซธๅฎ—์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์„ ๋‘๋ฃจ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ž…์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ฒœ ์—ฌ ๊ถŒ์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตญ๋‚ด์— ์œ ํ†ต์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๅฎ‹, ๏งƒ์—๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ณด๋‚ด๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์˜์ฒœ์€ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์„ ํŽธ์ฐฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์„œ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ใ€Š้–‹ๅ…ƒ้‡‹ๆ•Ž้Œ„ใ€‹์˜ ์ฐฌ์ˆ  ์ •์‹ ์„ ๋ณธ๋ฐ›๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์ด ็œžๅƒž์™€ ๆ˜ฏ้ž๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€๋ฆฐ๋‹ค๋Š” ใ€Š๊ฐœ์›์„๊ต๋กใ€‹์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ •์‹ ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ ์žฅ์†Œ์™€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๋“ค์„ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตํ•™์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ง€์นจ์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŽธ์ฐฌ๋œ ๊ฒƒ์ž„์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ใ€Š๊ฐœ์›์„๊ต๋กใ€‹๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์€ ์žฅ์†Œ๋งŒ์„ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ๊ทผ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ํŠน์ • ์ข…ํŒŒ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ €์ˆ ์„ ํญ๋„“๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•œ ์ข…ํ•ฉ ์žฅ์†Œ๋ชฉ๋ก์œผ๋กœ์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๋‹น์‹œ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์œ ํ†ต๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณ ๋ ค ๋ถˆ๊ต๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ค‘์‹œ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ๅ…ธ็ฑ์˜ ๋ฉด๋ชจ๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ๋„ ๊ทธ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์„ ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ „๋ชฉ๋ก๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์†์—์„œ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฌด์—‡๋ณด๋‹ค๋„ ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ็ถ“้Œ„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์žฅ์ ์„ ์žฅ์†Œ๋ชฉ๋ก์ด๋ผ๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ ˆ์ถฉยท๋ณ€์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์ด ์ฃผ๋ชฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋ก์€ ๅ”ไปฃ์— ๋“ค์–ด ์—ฐ๋Œ€์™€ ่ญฏไบบ์˜ ์ˆœ์„œ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ็ถ“่ซ–์˜ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ง„์œ„๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํŠนํžˆ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์€ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ๋ณ„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด์„œ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•œ ์ €์ˆ ๋“ค์€ ๋ชฉ๋ก์—์„œ ์ œ์™ธ์‹œํ‚ด์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‹œ๋น„๋ณ€๋ณ„์˜ ์ •์‹ ์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋™์‹œ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ธ๋ฌผ๋“ค์˜ ๅ‚ณ่จ˜้กž๋ฅผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์—ฐ๋Œ€๋ณ„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์žฅ์ ๋„ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์ด ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋ก์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์˜€์ง€๋งŒ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ฒด๊ณ„์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ก๋‚ด์šฉ์—์„œ๋Š” ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹๋งŒ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์ž˜ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋ก์ด ๋Œ€์Šน๊ณผ ์†Œ์Šน์˜ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„์„ ์šฐ์„ ์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์€ ์‚ผ์žฅ์„ 1์ฐจ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์‚ผ๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์ดํ•˜์— ๋Œ€ยท์†Œ์Šน์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์†Œ์Šน๊ณผ ๋Œ€์Šน์„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋˜ ์˜์ฒœ์˜ ๅ…ผๅญธ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๏ฅ้ƒจ์˜ ์†Œ์Šน๋ก  ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค ์ค‘์—๋Š” ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์ด ์ตœ์ดˆ๋กœ ๋ชฉ๋กํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์œ ์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์ด ์ƒ๋‹น์ˆ˜ ํ™•์ธ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ชฉ๋ก์—์„œ ๋ˆ„๋ฝ๋œ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ์ฐฌ์ˆ ๋œ ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์„ ์ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์€ ๋ถˆ์ „๋ชฉ๋ก์œผ๋กœ์„œ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์ด ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ž˜ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ์žฅ์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ก๋œ ํ™”์—„๊ฒฝ๋ถ€์™€ ๋ฒ•ํ™”๊ฒฝ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์žฅ์†Œ ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด ์˜์ฒœ์ด ๆ•Ž่ง€ๅนทไฟฎ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต์˜์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ค‘์‹œํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ™”์—„๊ฒฝ๋ถ€์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์€ ใ€Šํ™”์—„๊ฒฝใ€‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ่ง€้–€์„ ๋จผ์ € ์ดํ•ดํ•œ ํ›„์— ์„ธ๋ถ€์ ์ธ ๊ต๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ตํž ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ฐฐ์—ด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๅœฐ่ซ–ๅฎ— ์Šน๋ ค์˜ ์žฅ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋จผ์ € ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€๋ก ์ข…์—์„œ ํ™”์—„์ข…์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ใ€Šํ™”์—„๊ฒฝใ€‹ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ „ํ†ต์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๆ™บๅ„ผ-ๆณ•่—-ๆพ„่ง€์˜ ๊ตํ•™๊ณ„ํ†ต์ด ๋‘๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์ง„๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ง•๊ด€์˜ ์ €์ˆ ๋“ค์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์‹ค์ฒœ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ ์ง•๊ด€์˜ ํ™”์—„ํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜์ฒœ์˜ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฒ•ํ™”๊ฒฝ๋ถ€ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ™”์—„๊ฒฝ๋ถ€์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ใ€Š๋ฒ•ํ™”๊ฒฝใ€‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ตํ•™์„ ์ตํžŒ ํ›„ ์„ธ๋ถ€๊ต์˜๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ฐฐ์—ด๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ฒœํƒœ์ข… ์Šน๋ ค๋“ค์˜ ์ €์ˆ ์ด ๊ตฐ์ง‘๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ์ฒœํƒœ๊ตํ•™์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฒ•ํ™”๊ฒฝ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์˜๋„๊ฐ€ ์—ฟ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ๆญข่ง€ ๊ด€๋ จ ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์„ ๋…ผ๋ถ€์— ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด๋„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๅฑฑๅฎถๆดพ์™€ ๅฑฑๅค–ๆดพ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ก ์„œ๋“ค์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•™์„ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ท ํ˜•์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ใ€Š์˜์ฒœ๋กใ€‹์€ ๆ•Ž่ง€ๅนทไฟฎ๋ผ๋Š” ์˜์ฒœ์˜ ๊ตํ•™์  ์ž…์žฅ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ่ซธๅฎ—์„ ์•„์šฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๋ถˆ๊ฒฝ๋ชฉ๋ก์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹๊ฒฌ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์žฅ์†Œ๋ชฉ๋ก์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์— ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์žฅ์†Œ๋“ค์„ ์ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋กํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ๋ชฉ๋ก์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋„ ํฌ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.Sinpyeon-jejong-gyojang-chongrok (ๆ–ฐ็ทจ่ซธๅฎ—ๆ•Ž่—็ธฝ้Œ„, the newly edited total catalogue of entire Buddhist sects commentaries on the Tripitaka; shortened as Uicheonrok below) was compiled by Uicheon the Master of Great Enlightenment in A.D. 1090. It is a catalogue of East Asian Buddhist priests commentaries (็ซ ็–) on the Tripitaka (ไธ‰่—). Uicheonrok consists of three volumes and it as a whole has 4878 commentaries of 1010 kinds in it; 2719 commentaries of 561 kinds on Sutras (็ถ“), 467 commentaries of 142 kinds on Vinaya (๏ง˜), and 1692 commentaries of 307 kinds on Abhidharma (่ซ–). This study concerns the historical background to the publication of Uicheonrok and the intention behind it, and analyzes the compositional structure of Uicheonrok. It aims to elucidate distinct features of Uicheonrok and its historical significance as a catalogue of Buddhist writings. Uicheon was well aware of the significance of Buddhist commentaries for a clear comprehension of the Tripitaka. Therefore, he collected commentaries of various Buddhist sects from Sung Dynasty, Liao Dynasty, and Japan as well as domestic sects. He published thousands of collected commentaries and distributed them in the country. Moreover, he even exported them to Sung and Liao Dynasty. During this process, he compiled Uicheonrok and he noted in the preface that he tried to emulate the spirit of Gaewon-seokgyorok (้–‹ๅ…ƒ้‡‹ๆ•Ž้Œ„, the catalogue of Buddhist teachings written in the era of Emperor Gaewon of Tang Dynasty). Uicheonrok was compiled on the fundamental spirit of Gaewon-seokgyorok which was written to distinguish between right and wrong, true and false. This means that Uicheonrok differentiates reference-worthy commentaries from unworthy ones so that it could suggest an academic guideline for Buddhist study. However, unlike Gaewon-seokgyorok, Uicheonrok only contains commentaries and this fundamentally distinguishes it from Gaewon-seokgyorok. Uicheonrok is also the very first catalogue of commentaries whose sources of commentaries are not limited to certain Buddhist sects. And for the fact that Uicheonrok contains commentaries actually distributed at the time, it is also possible to comprehend the appearance of important Buddhist writings in the Buddhist society of Koryeo Dynasty through Uicheonrok. The compositional structure of Uicheonrok can be clearly understood by considering its connection with preceding Buddhist catalogues. It is quite interesting to find that Uicheonrok had adopted compositional merits of Chinese Buddhist catalogues and changed them to make a better structure to contain commentaries in it. Buddhist catalogues in China, since Tang Dynasty period, had put two classification methods together; one is to classify scriptures in chronological order or the order of translators era; the other is to classify scriptures according to their distinct features. During this process, it had become very important to discriminate the authenticity of scriptures. Uicheonrok classified commentaries according to their features and removed unworthy commentaries from its contents. Through this sorting process, it had embodied the spirit of authenticity discrimination. Uicheonrok had also partially adopted merits of chronological classification method by adding an appendix of biographies of important figures in the history of Buddhism. Though Uicheonrok had emulated the compositional structure of Chinese Buddhist catalogues, its detailed structure and contents still have their own distinct features. While Chinese catalogues categorized scriptures into Mahayana and Hinayana sections, Uicheonrok had commentaries classified into three sections of the Tripitaka and then added Mahayana and Hinayana categories under each sections. This difference could suggest that Uicheon, who thought that Mahayana Buddhism and Hinayana Buddhism were in a gradational relationship, had compiled this book from the perspective of combined studies (ๅ…ผๅญธ). And a considerable number of commentaries under Hinayana Buddhism category in Abhidharma section were catalogued for the very first time or verified as a solitary existing copy. Thus, the fact that Uicheonrok contains such rare commentaries proves the historical significance it has as a catalogue of Buddhist writings. By examining commentaries in the Lotus Sutra and the Avatamska Sutra categories, where the biggest number of commentaries are contained, this study has discovered that Uicheon made much importance of doctrinal study and practical self-cultivation from the perspective of combined practice of self-cultivation and doctrinal study (ๆ•Ž่ง€ๅนทไฟฎ). Commentaries in the Avatamska Sutra category are arranged in order to help people to understand the entire meaning of the sutra and Kwanmun (่ง€้–€, the method of practice) first, and then learn more detailed thoughts of the sutra. Uicheon, to put it more specifically, placed commentaries of priests from the Jiron Sect at the top of the list in order to reflect the academic tradition of the Avatamska Sutra which was initiated by the Jiron Sect and then handed down to the Avatamska Sect. The academic relations of doctrinal study among Jieom (ๆ™บๅ„ผ), Beopjang (ๆณ•่—), and Jingkwan (ๆพ„่ง€) can also be verified from it. The fact that Uicheon had highly regarded writings of Jingkwan can be an evidence of his special interests on the Avatamska study of Jingkwan who emphasized the importance of practical self-cultivation. Commentaries in the Lotus Sutra category are arranged in order to help people to gain basic knowledge of the sutra and then proceed to deal with more detailed teachings as well. There is a big group of commentaries of priests from the Cheontae Sect in the category and this fact suggests that Uicheon had intended to compose the category with the study of Cheontae Sect as the center. He also included commentaries on Shamatha-vipasyana (ๆญข่ง€) in Abhidharma section in order to emphasize practical self-cultivation. Along with these commentaries, Uicheon added the contents of discussions between Sangapa (ๅฑฑๅฎถๆดพ, the orthodox school of Cheontae Sect) and Sanoepa (ๅฑฑๅค–ๆดพ, the unorthodox school of Cheontae Sect) to Uicheonrok from a well-balanced perspective on various Buddhist theories. From the information gathered above, it is possible to say that Uicheon, from the perspective of combined practice of self-cultivation and doctrinal study, had compiled Uicheonrok to suggest an encompassing direction in Buddhist Study which embraces various thoughts from the entire Buddhist sects. It has also been verified that Uicheon had systematized Uicheonrok to accord with basic features of Buddhist catalogues and enthusiastically included new commentaries in it, on the basis of his profound knowledge about the developing process of Buddhist catalogues. In this sense, Uicheonrok can be regarded as one of the most important works in the history of Buddhism.Maste
    corecore