5 research outputs found

    Cost-benefit analysis of the case management for the elderly patients with hypertension

    No full text
    κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό/박사[ν•œκΈ€]λ³Έ 논문은 λ§žμΆ€ν˜• λ°©λ¬Έκ±΄κ°•κ΄€λ¦¬μ‚¬μ—…μ—μ„œ 노인을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•œ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 λΉ„μš©-편읡 뢄석을 톡해 λ…ΈμΈμ˜ λ§Œμ„±μ§ˆν™˜ 관리에 λŒ€ν•œ 경제적 타당성을 λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ μž λ§žμΆ€ν˜• λ°©λ¬Έκ±΄κ°•κ΄€λ¦¬μ‚¬μ—…μ˜ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 8μ£Ό 사둀관리λ₯Ό 톡해 μˆ˜μ§‘λœ 2μ°¨ 자료λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜λŠ” ν›„ν–₯적-μ„œμˆ μ  연ꡬ 이닀. 연ꡬ λŒ€μƒμ€ 2007λ…„ 4μ›” 1일뢀터 6μ›” 30μΌκΉŒμ§€ μ„œμšΈμ‹œ 25개 λ³΄κ±΄μ†Œμ™€ 경기도 45개 λ³΄κ±΄μ†Œμ˜ λ§žμΆ€ν˜• λ°©λ¬Έκ±΄κ°•κ΄€λ¦¬μ‚¬μ—…μ—μ„œ 65μ„Έ 이상 λ…ΈμΈμœΌλ‘œ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 μ„œλΉ„μŠ€λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅λ°›μ€ μ „μˆ˜ 372λͺ… 쀑 사둀관리 μ’…λ£Œ ν›„ μ΅œμ†Œ 7κ°œμ›” λ™μ•ˆ 좔후관리가 제곡된 335λͺ…μ˜ 자료λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μžλ£ŒλŠ” λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 일반적 νŠΉμ„± νŒŒμ•…μ„ μœ„ν•œ 섀문지, κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 μˆ˜ν–‰ 기둝지, λ§žμΆ€ν˜• 방문건강관리사업 μ •λ³΄μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ˜ μ„œλΉ„μŠ€ μ œκ³΅κΈ°λ‘μ§€, λ§žμΆ€ν˜• 방문건강관리사업 사둀관리 λΉ„μš©μ‘°μ‚¬ λ“± 2008λ…„ 1월에 μˆ˜μ§‘λœ 자료λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이외 κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 쀑증도에 λ”°λ₯Έ μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ μ‚°μ •, κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• νˆ¬μ•½μž 평균 μ™Έλž˜ 일수, κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 쀑증도 진행λ₯ , 2005λ…„ κ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜μ‹¬μ‚¬ν‰κ°€μ› 청ꡬ자료 및 κ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜ν™˜μžμ˜ λ³ΈμΈλΆ€λ‹΄μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„, μž„κΈˆκ΅¬μ‘°κΈ°λ³Έν†΅κ³„μ‘°μ‚¬ν‘œ, 생λͺ…ν‘œ, μžλ™μ°¨ 사망에 λŒ€ν•œ 손해배상앑 λ“±μ˜ μžλ£Œμ›μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λΉ„μš©-편읡 뢄석 틀은 μ‚¬νšŒμ  κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ μ—°κ°„ λΉ„μš©κ³Ό μ—°κ°„ νŽΈμ΅μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 총 λΉ„μš©μ€ μ§μ ‘λΉ„μš©μΈ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 λΉ„μš©(인건비, κ΅μœ‘λΉ„, 사업비 포함), κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• μ§„λ£Œ λΉ„μš©(μ™Έλž˜ μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ 및 μ•½μ œλΉ„)κ³Ό κ°„μ ‘λΉ„μš©μΈ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• μ™Έλž˜ λ°©λ¬Έ κ΅ν†΅λΉ„λ‘œ μ‚°μΆœν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, νŽΈμ΅μ€ μ§μ ‘νŽΈμ΅μΈ μ™Έλž˜?μž…μ› μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ 절감 편읡, μ™Έλž˜ μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ λ°œμƒ κ°μ†Œ 편읡과 κ°„μ ‘νŽΈμ΅μΈ 합병증 λ°œμƒ 방지 편읡, μ‹œκ°„λΉ„μš© μ ˆμ•½νŽΈμ΅, 생λͺ…μ—°μž₯ 편읡으둜 μΆ”κ³„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 자료 뢄석은 spss v12.0을 μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λΉˆλ„, λ°±λΆ„μœ¨μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1) κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅λ°›μ€ 65μ„Έ 이상 노인 335λͺ…은 μ—¬μž 233λͺ…(69.6%), λ‚¨μž 102λͺ…(30.4%)μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 평균 연령은 72.78μ„Έμ˜€λ‹€. κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€μ€ μ΄ˆλ“±ν•™κ΅ 쑸업이 122λͺ…(36.4%), 무학이 120λͺ…(35.8%)으둜 μ΄ˆλ“±ν•™κ΅ μ‘Έμ—… μ΄ν•˜κ°€ 72.2%μ˜€λ‹€. μ˜λ£ŒκΈ‰μ—¬ λŒ€μƒμžλŠ” 258λͺ…(77%), 지역 및 직μž₯ λ³΄ν—˜κ°€μž…μžλŠ” 77λͺ…(21%)μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 2) 사둀관리 μ „ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• μ‘°μ ˆμœ¨μ€ 9%(31λͺ…)μ˜€μœΌλ‚˜, 사둀관리 ν›„ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• μ‘°μ ˆμœ¨μ€ 73%(244λͺ…)둜 64νΌμ„ΌνŠΈν¬μΈνŠΈ μ¦κ°€ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ΄λŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 사둀관리 μ „ 경증은 213λͺ…(64%)μ—μ„œ 321λͺ…(96%)으둜 32νΌμ„ΌνŠΈν¬μΈνŠΈ μ¦κ°€ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 3) κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 1인당 총 λΉ„μš©μ€ 557,224μ›μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 이쀑 μ§μ ‘λΉ„μš©μΈ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 λΉ„μš© 221,474원, κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„μš© 317,750μ›μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , κ°„μ ‘λΉ„μš©μΈ κ΅ν†΅λΉ„λŠ” 18,000μ›μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 4) κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 1인당 총 νŽΈμ΅μ€ μ΅œμ†Œ 1,792,062μ›μ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 2,202,966μ›μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 이쀑 1인당 직접 νŽΈμ΅μ€ μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ κ°μ†ŒνŽΈμ΅(μ™Έλž˜, μž…μ› μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„)와 μ™Έλž˜ μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ λ°œμƒ κ°μ†Œ 편읡으둜 μ΅œμ†Œ 154,134μ›μ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 437,321μ›μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , κ°„μ ‘ νŽΈμ΅μ€ 합병증 λ°œμƒ κ°μ†Œ 편읡, μ‹œκ°„λΉ„μš© μ ˆμ•½νŽΈμ΅, 생λͺ…μ—°μž₯ 편읡으둜 μ΅œμ†Œ 1,637,503μ›μ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 1,765,645μ›μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 5) λ”°λΌμ„œ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 1인당 μˆœνŽΈμ΅μ€ μ΅œμ†Œ 1,234,838μ›μ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 1,645,742μ›μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 사둀관리 λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 편읡-λΉ„μš© λΉ„λŠ” μ΅œμ†Œ 3.28μ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 4.01둜 1보닀 크게 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 결둠적으둜 λ§žμΆ€ν˜• λ°©λ¬Έκ±΄κ°•κ΄€λ¦¬μ‚¬μ—…μ—μ„œ 노인을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•œ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 사둀관리 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ€ κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• μ‘°μ ˆμœ¨μ„ 9%(31λͺ…)μ—μ„œ 73%(244λͺ…)으둜 64νΌμ„ΌνŠΈν¬μΈνŠΈ ν–₯상함에 따라 κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• ν™˜μž 관리에 맀우 효과적인 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μž„μ„ μ•Œ 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 편읡-λΉ„μš© λΉ„κ°€ μ΅œμ†Œ 3.28μ—μ„œ μ΅œλŒ€ 4.01둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¨μ— 따라 경제적 타당성이 μžˆμŒμ„ 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ§žμΆ€ν˜• λ°©λ¬Έκ±΄κ°•κ΄€λ¦¬μ‚¬μ—…μ—μ„œ ν˜ˆμ••μ΄ μ‘°μ ˆλ˜μ§€ μ•Šκ±°λ‚˜, κ³ ν˜ˆμ•• 관리 μš”κ΅¬κ°€ 높은 λŒ€μƒμžμ—κ²Œ 사둀관리λ₯Ό ν™•λŒ€ μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μΆ”μ§„ν•˜λŠ” 것이 ν•„μš”λ‘œ λœλ‹€. [영문]The purpose of this study was to analyze economic validity for management of hypertension utilizing case management for the elderly patients. The subjects were 335 elderly people over 65 years old who were diagnosed as hypertension and received home care from the 70 public health centers where were in Seoul and Gyeong Gi Province from 1st April to 30th Jun, 2007. This study was to approach the yearly cost and benefit from a social perspective. Total cost are classified as direct and indirect expenditure. Direct expenditure stands for case management including personnel, educational and working expenses and medical cost and medicine for out-patients with hypertension. Indirect expenditure indicates traffic expenses for out-patient care. The benefit was estimated with the reduced treatment cost for in and out-patients and the treatment cost for out-patients as the direct effect and was calculated with the effect of prevention of complications, time reduction and life extension as the indirect effect. The data was analyzed by spss v12.o. The study results are as follows; 1) This sample had been conducted from elderly people over 65 years old were 335, female were 233(69.6%), male were 102(30.4%), a mean age of 72.78 years old. 122 people(36.4%) were elementary graduates, 72.2% were under elementary graduates including 120(35.8%) were no education. 258(77%) were received Medicaid, 77(21%) were received Region and Employees Medical Insurance. 2) The control rate of hypertension was 9%(31 people) before the case management, but after the case management, the control rate was increased from 64 percent point to 73% (244 people). 3) The total cost of the case management of hypertension was 557,224 won per personal, the direct cost was 221,474 won, the cost of hypertension treatment was 317,750 won and the traffic expenses as the indirect cost was 18,000 won. 4) The total benefit of the case management of hypertension per personal ranged from minimum 1,792,062 won to maximum 2,202,966 won. The direct benefit per personal ranged from minimum 154,134 won to maximum 437,321 won. The indirect benefit was from minimum 1,637,503 won to maximum 1,765,645 won. 5) Therefore, the net benefit per personal ranged from minimum 1,234,838 won to maximum 1,645,742 won. The cost-benefit ratio was more than 1 as minimum 3.28 to maximum 4.01 on the case management of patients with hypertension. As a result, the case management for the elderly patients with hypertension had economical validity. Therefore, the case management utilizing are needed to extend and apply for the people who have uncontrolled hypertension.ope

    Effect of physical ability, depression and social support on quality of life in low income elders living at home.

    No full text
    κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€]x λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ €μ†Œλ“ μž¬κ°€λ…ΈμΈμ˜ 신체적 κΈ°λŠ₯, 우울 및 μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지가 μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ— λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯을 νŒŒμ•…ν•˜μ—¬ μ΄λ“€μ˜ μ‚Άμ˜ 질 증진을 μœ„ν•œ κ°„ν˜Έμ€‘μž¬ 개발의 기초자료λ₯Ό λ§ˆλ ¨ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ‹œλ„λœ μ„œμˆ μ  상관관계 연ꡬ이닀. μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘μ€ 2002λ…„ 10μ›” 1일뢀터 11μ›” 15μΌκΉŒμ§€ μ›μ£Όμ‹œμ˜ M볡지관을 μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” 65μ„Έ 이상 μ €μ†Œλ“ μž¬κ°€λ…ΈμΈμ„ μž„μ˜ν‘œμ§‘ ν•˜μ—¬ 142λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ 진행은 첫 번째 λ°©λ¬Έμ‹œ λ©΄λ‹΄λ²•μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ‘°ν™”λœ μ§ˆλ¬Έμ§€λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘μ„ ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 두 번째 λ°©λ¬Έμ‹œ 신체적 κΈ°λŠ₯을 μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 신체적 κΈ°λŠ₯을 μ•Œμ•„λ³΄κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬λ„κ΅¬λ‘œλŠ” 건강관련 체λ ₯ μΈ‘μ •, Barthel Indexλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ ADL, Lawton & Brody(1969)에 μ˜ν•΄μ„œ 개발된 IADL 등이 μ΄μš©λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μš°μšΈμ€ 기백석(1996)에 μ˜ν•΄ ν‘œμ€€ν™”λœ ν•œκ΅­νŒ 노인 우울 척도 λ‹¨μΆ•ν˜• 도ꡬ, μ‚¬νšŒμ  μ§€μ§€λŠ” μž₯μˆ™μ•„(2000)κ°€ μ‹œμ„€λ…ΈμΈμ„ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ κ°œλ°œν•œ μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지 도ꡬλ₯Ό μž¬κ°€λ…ΈμΈμ—κ²Œ μ ν•©ν•˜λ„λ‘ μˆ˜μ •ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ€ λ…Έμœ μž(1986)κ°€ κ°œλ°œν•œ μ‚Άμ˜ 질 λ„κ΅¬λ‘œ μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μˆ˜μ§‘λœ μžλ£ŒλŠ” SPSS/PC+λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 기술적 톡계, t-test, ANOVA, 상관관계, 단계별 νšŒκ·€λΆ„μ„μ˜ 톡계방법을 μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬ결과λ₯Ό μš”μ•½ν•˜λ©΄ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1. λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 일반적 νŠΉμ„±μ€‘ 성별은 λ‚¨μž 25.4%, μ—¬μž 74.6%둜 μ—¬μžκ°€ λ§Žμ•˜μœΌλ©°, 연령은 75μ„Έ 이상이 53.6%둜 평균 연령은 75.67μ„Έμ˜€κ³ , μ›”μˆ˜μž…μ΄ 25λ§Œμ› μ΄ν•˜μΈ 노인이 50.8%둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€.2. 신체적 κΈ°λŠ₯ 쀑 체λ ₯μƒνƒœλŠ” 7점 만점 쀑 평균 2.85점으둜 평균 Rohrer μ§€μˆ˜λŠ” 160.08, μ•…λ ₯은 18.99kg, μ˜μžμ—μ„œ μ•‰μ•˜λ‹€ μΌμ–΄μ„œκΈ°λŠ” 10.18회, μœ—λͺΈμ•žμœΌλ‘œ κ΅½νžˆκΈ°λŠ” 6.08cm, 눈뜨고 ν•œλ°œ λ“€κΈ°λŠ” 12.27초, 6m κ±·κΈ° μ†λ„λŠ” 9.48초, κ³„λ‹¨μ˜€λ₯΄κΈ°λŠ” 30.63μ΄ˆμ˜€λ‹€. ADL은 100점 만점 쀑 평균 93.94μ μ΄μ˜€κ³ , ADLμ μˆ˜κ°€ 100점인 λŒ€μƒμžλŠ” 35.2%λ₯Ό μ°¨μ§€ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. IADL은 12점 만점 쀑 평균 9.48μ μ΄μ˜€κ³ , IADLμ μˆ˜κ°€ 12점인 λŒ€μƒμžλŠ” 29.6%μ˜€λ‹€. 3. 우울 μ μˆ˜λŠ” 평균 11.11점으둜 우울 μ μˆ˜κ°€ 10점이상인 λŒ€μƒμžλŠ” 69.7% μ΄μ˜€λ‹€.4. λŒ€μƒμžλŠ” 평균 3.18λͺ…μœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° 지지λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅λ°›μ•˜κ³ , μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지 μ μˆ˜λŠ” 12점 만점 쀑 배우자 7.95점, μžλ…€ 7.27점, ν˜•μ œ 4.21점, 친ꡬ 6.42점, 이웃 5.25점으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 5. μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ€ 220점 λ§Œμ μ— 평균 120.07μ μ΄μ˜€λ‹€. 6. μ‚Άμ˜ 질과 우울(r=-.651, p<.01)은 μœ μ˜ν•œ 역상관관계가 μžˆμ—ˆκ³ , IADL(r=.545, p<.01), 체λ ₯μƒνƒœ(r=.454, p<.01), μˆ˜λ©΄μƒνƒœ(r=.338, p<.01), ADL(r=.335, p<.01), μ—¬κ°€ν™œλ™(r=.285, p<.01), 본인이 μ§€κ°ν•˜λŠ” κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœ(r=.275, p<.01), 배우자 지지(r=.264, p<.01)간에 μœ μ˜ν•œ 정상관관계가 μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 7. μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μ •λ„λŠ” 우울(42.4%), IADL(13.4%), μˆ˜λ©΄μƒνƒœ(3.9%), 체λ ₯μƒνƒœ(3.3%), ADL(1.7%), λ°°μš°μžμ§€μ§€(1.3%), μ—¬κ°€ν™œλ™(1.1%)의 μˆœμ„œμ˜€μœΌλ©° 이듀 μš”μΈμ΄ λͺ¨λ‘ ν•©ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚Άμ˜ 질의 λΆ„μ‚°μ˜ 67.0%λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 결둠적으둜 λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ— μœ μ˜ν•œ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” 우울, IADL, μˆ˜λ©΄μƒνƒœ, 체λ ₯μƒνƒœ, ADL, λ°°μš°μžμ§€μ§€, μ—¬κ°€ν™œλ™μœΌλ‘œ ν™•μΈλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ €μ†Œλ“ μž¬κ°€λ…ΈμΈμ˜ μš°μšΈμ„ κ°μ†Œμ‹œν‚΄μœΌλ‘œ μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ„ 높일 수 μžˆλŠ” μ •μ„œμ  κ°„ν˜Έμ€‘μž¬ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ΄ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€κ³  μ‚¬λ£Œλ˜λ©° 신체적 κΈ°λŠ₯, μˆ˜λ©΄μƒνƒœ, λ°°μš°μžμ§€μ§€, μ—¬κ°€ν™œλ™λ„ μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œ 노인 λŒ€μƒμž μ‚¬μ •μ‹œ ν¬ν•¨μ‹œμΌœμ•Ό ν•  μ€‘μš”ν•œ μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬λ£Œλœλ‹€. [영문] In this descriptive correlational study, the focus was on the effects of physical ability, depression and social support on quality of life. The participants were 142 people, 65 years of age or over with low incomes. They lived at home but frequently visited the M social welfare center in Wonju, Korea. Convenience sampling was used. Each participant was visited twice, the first time to collect data through one-to-one interviews and the second, to measure physical ability. The following instruments were used: Barthel Index for ADL, the IADL scale developed by Lawton & Brody (1969), the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form-Korea Version standardized by Gi Baek Suk (1996) and the social support scale by Jang Sook A (2000), adopted for use with elderly people in institutions and amended for use with elders at home. Quality of life was measured using the scale developed by You Ga No (1986). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression using the SPSS PC+ program. The results of this study are summarized as follows :1. Comparing gender, there were more women (74.6%) than men (25.4%). Mean age was 75.65 years but 53.6% were over 76. 50.8% of the Aged earned less than 250,000 won. 2. Physical fitness had a mean score of 2.85 out of 7 points. The mean for the Rohrer scale was 160.80, for grip strength 18.99 kg, getting up and down off a chair, 10.18 times, forward bending, 6.80 cm, one leg stand, 12.27 seconds, 6m walk velocity, 9.48 seconds, and stair climbing, 30.63 seconds. The mean ADL score was 93.34 out of 100, and 35.2% scored 100 points. The mean IADL score was 9.48 out of 12, and 29.6% scored 12 points. 3. Depression scores averaged of 11.11 and 69.7% had a score of 10 or more.4. Support was provided by an average of 3.18 people. Mean social support score for spouse was 7.95, for children, 7.27, for siblings 4.21, for friends, 6.42, and for neighbors, 5.25.5. The average of the quality of life score was 120.07 out of 220.6. Quality of life scores correlated negatively with depression scores (r=-.651, p<.01) and positively with IADL (r=.545, p<.01), physical fitness (r=.454, p<.01), sleep status (r=.338, p<.01), ADL (r=.335, p<.01), leisure activity (r=.285, p<.01), perceived health status (r=.275, p<.01), and spouse support (r=.264, p<.01).7. Variables significantly influencing quality of life were depression (42.4%), IADL (13.4%), sleep status (3.9%), physical fitness (3.3%), ADL (1.7%), spouse support (1.3%), and leisure activity (1.1%). These variables explained 67.7% of the variance in quality of life In conclusion, factors identified as affecting quality of life were depression, IADL, sleep status, physical fitness, ADL, spouse support, and leisure activity. Nursing intervention programs developed to reduce depression in elders should include physical fitness, ADL, spouse support, and leisure activity. These factors must be assessed when planning nursing interventions to reduce depression and improve quality of life in elders at home.ope

    A Detection Model of Industrial Accident Related Disease in the National Health Insurance

    No full text
    μ‚°μ—…μž¬ν•΄μž„μ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜μ„ λΆ€λ‹Ήν•˜κ²Œ μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„ 청ꡬ건에 λŒ€ν•΄ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜κ³΅λ‹¨μ€ ν™˜μˆ˜μ‘°μΉ˜λ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν•˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ μ΄λŠ” μ‹€μ œ μ‚°μž¬μ€ν μΆ”μ • 규λͺ¨μ— λΉ„ν•΄ 맀우 적은 μˆ˜μ€€μ΄λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜μ„ λΆ€λ‹Ήν•˜κ²Œ μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” μ‚°μ—…μž¬ν•΄ 근둜자의 νŠΉμ„±μ„ νŒŒμ•…ν•˜κ³ , μ˜ˆμΈ‘ν•˜λŠ” λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ κ°œλ°œν•˜λŠ” 것이닀. μžλ£ŒλŠ” 2015λ…„ 3μ›”~2018λ…„ 8μ›” κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆ μ‚°μž¬κ·Όλ‘œμžμ˜ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜ λΆ€λ‹Ήμ΄μš© μžλ£Œμ—μ„œ 발췌된 ν™˜μˆ˜κ²°μ • 내역이닀. 뢄석결과 개인적 νŠΉμ„±μ΄ λ‚¨μž, 20λŒ€, μžκ²©λ³€λ™νšŸμˆ˜κ°€ 많고 κ³Όκ±° ν™˜μˆ˜κ²½ν—˜μ΄ μžˆλŠ” 경우, 평일 μ§„λ£Œμ™€ μ‚°μž¬μ€νκ°€ 높은 상병, 양상이 μ ˆλ‹¨μΌ λ•Œ λΆ€λ‹Ή 이용λ₯ μ΄ λ†’μ•˜λ‹€. 사업μž₯ νŠΉμ„±μ˜ 경우 쒅업원 μˆ˜κ°€ 5λͺ…~30λͺ…, κ΄‘μ—…μ—μ„œ λΆ€λ‹Ή 이용λ₯ μ΄ λ†’μ•˜λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ 개발된 μ‚°μž¬μ€ν 적발예츑λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μ μš©ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό, μ‚°μž¬κ·Όλ‘œμžμ˜ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜ λΆ€λ‹Ήμ΄μš© 적발λ₯ μ΄ ν˜„ν–‰ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜κ³΅λ‹¨μ˜ λΆ€λ‹Ήμ΄μš© 적발λ₯ λ³΄λ‹€ μ΅œλŒ€ 4λ°° 이상 ν–₯μƒλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, μ‹€μ œ 업무 μ μš©μ‹œ, μ‚°μž¬κ·Όλ‘œμžλ³„ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜ λΆ€λ‹Ήμ΄μš© 예츑이 μš©μ΄ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν‰μ ν‘œλ₯Ό κ°œλ°œν•˜μ—¬ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ 개발된 λͺ¨ν˜•μ€ μ‚°μ—…μž¬ν•΄ 미보고와 κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜ λΆ€λ‹Ήμ΄μš©μ„ μ λ°œν•˜λŠ” 업무에 ν™œμš©λ˜κ³ , κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•λ³΄ν—˜ μž¬μ •λˆ„μˆ˜ 방지와 μ‚¬νšŒλ³΄ν—˜μ œλ„μ—μ„œ μ‚°μž¬κ·Όλ‘œμžκ°€ μ μ ˆν•œ 치료λ₯Ό 받을 수 μžˆλŠ” μ •μ±…κ°œμ„ μ˜ 기초자료둜 ν™œμš©λ  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κΈ°λŒ€λœλ‹€.N
    corecore