6 research outputs found

    μ΄ˆκ³ μ§„κ³΅ 화학기상증착법을 μ΄μš©ν•œ Si와 SiGe λ‹¨κ²°μ •λ§‰μ˜ 선택적 μ„±μž₯

    No full text
    Thesis (doctoral)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μž¬λ£Œκ³΅ν•™λΆ€,2003.Docto

    A Study on the Development of an Electronic Voltage Transformer embedded in a Spacer of Gas Insulated Switchgears

    No full text
    λ³€μ „μ†Œμ˜ κ°€μŠ€μ ˆμ—°κ°œνμž₯치(GIS)μ—λŠ” μ „μ•• 츑정을 μœ„ν•΄ λ³„λ„μ˜ 탱크 내에 λŒ€ν˜•μ˜ μ² μ‹¬ν˜• κ³„κΈ°μš© λ³€μ••κΈ°λ₯Ό μ„€μΉ˜ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” GIS의 μ†Œν˜•ν™”μ™€ μΉœν™˜κ²½ν™”, μ„±λŠ₯ ν–₯상을 μœ„ν•΄ μŠ€νŽ˜μ΄μ„œ λ‚΄μž₯ν˜• μ „μžμ‹ λ³€μ••κΈ°(EVT)에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ „μžμ‹ λ³€μ••κΈ°λŠ” μŠ€νŽ˜μ΄μ„œμ— λ‚΄μž₯의 μš©λŸ‰μ„± λΆ„μ••μ„Όμ„œ(CVD)와 κ³ μž…λ ₯-μ €μΆœλ ₯ μž„ν”Όλ˜μŠ€μ˜ μ „μ•• ν΄λ‘œμ–΄λ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μš©λŸ‰μ„± λΆ„μ••μ„Όμ„œλŠ” μ ˆμ—° μ„±λŠ₯을 ν™•λ³΄ν•˜κ³ , μš΄μ „ 쀑 진동과 좩격을 κ²¬λŽŒλ‚Ό 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ Flexible PCBν˜•νƒœλ‘œ μ œμž‘ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹œμ œμž‘ μ „μžμ‹ λ³€μ••κΈ°μ˜ λΆ„μ••λΉ„λŠ” 42,270이며, –3dB의 주파수 λŒ€μ—­μ€ 0.33Hz ~ 3.9MHz이닀. 정격 μ „μ•• 170kV의 6%, 12% 및 18%μ—μ„œ λΆ„μ••λΉ„ μ˜€μ°¨λŠ” 0.32%, μœ„μƒμ°¨λŠ” 12.9[min]μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” IEC 60044-7에 κ·œμ •λœ 0.5κΈ‰μ˜ 정확도 이내이며, 정격 μ „μ••μ˜ 80% ~ 120%μ—μ„œλ„ λ§Œμ‘±ν•œλ‹€. λ³Έ EVT둜 κΈ°μ‘΄ μ² μ‹¬ν˜• κ³„κΈ°μš© λ³€μ••κΈ°λ₯Ό λŒ€μ²΄ν•˜λ©΄ GIS의 bayλ‹Ή 높이 11% μΆ•μ†Œμ™€ SF6 μΆ©μ§„λŸ‰μ„ μ΅œμ†Œ 10% κ°μ†Œμ‹œν‚€λŠ” νš¨κ³Όκ°€ μžˆμ„ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κΈ°λŒ€ν•œλ‹€.I μ„œ λ‘  1 II 이 λ‘  4 1. κ³ μ „μ•• μΈ‘μ • 4 2. μŠ€νŽ˜μ΄μ„œ λΆ„μ••κΈ° 8 III 섀계 및 μ œμž‘ 13 1. μš©λŸ‰μ„± λΆ„μ••μ„Όμ„œ 14 2. μ „μ•• ν΄λ‘œμ–΄ 18 IV 평가 및 뢄석 21 1 μ‹€ν—˜κ³„ 21 2 μ‹€ν—˜ 및 뢄석 23 V κ²° λ‘ 27Maste

    μ „μž 곡λͺ… μˆ˜μ†Œ ν”ŒλΌμ¦ˆλ§ˆλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ κΈˆμ†ν™” 곡정전 μ €μ˜¨ 기판 세정화에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :λ¬΄κΈ°μž¬λ£Œκ³΅ν•™κ³Ό,1998.Maste

    Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: In contrast to the significant advantages of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy, robotic gastrectomy has shown little benefit over laparoscopic gastrectomy. This study aimed to compare multi-dimensional aspects of surgical outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy. METHODS: Data from 915 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy by one surgeon between March 2009 and May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative parameters were analyzed for short-term outcomes. Surgical success was defined as the absence of conversion to open surgery, major complications, readmission, positive resection margin, or fewer than 16 retrieved lymph nodes. RESULTS: This study investigated 241 patients undergoing open gastrectomy, 511 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy, and 173 patients undergoing robotic gastrectomy. For each approach, the respective incidences were as follows: conversion to open surgery (not applicable, 0.4%, and 0%; p = 0.444), in-hospital major complications (5.8, 2.7, and 1.2%; p = 0.020), delayed complications requiring readmission (2.9, 2.0, and 1.2%; p = 0.453), positive resection margin (1.7, 0, and 0%; p = 0.003), and inadequate number of retrieved lymph nodes (0.4, 4.1, and 1.7%; p = 0.010). Compared with open and laparoscopic surgery, robotic gastrectomy had the highest surgical success rate (90, 90.8, and 96.0%). Learning-curve analysis of success using cumulative sum plots showed success with the robotic approach from the start. Multivariate analyses identified age, sex, and gastrectomy extent as significant independent parameters affecting surgical success. Surgical approach was not a contributing factor. CONCLUSIONS: Open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy exhibited different incidences and causes of surgical failure. Robotic gastrectomy produced the best surgical outcomes, although the approach method itself was not an independent factor for success.restrictio
    corecore