A study on the analysis of encounter patterns between merchant vessels and fishing vessels -Focused on area of TongYoung coastal VTS-

The purpose of this study is to analyze the encounter patterns between merchant ships and fishing vessels. The study area is set as TongYoung coastal vts control area. It is an area suitable for study because the number of fishing boats in the area is the largest in korean territorial sea. To analyze the traffic pattern, traffic data for 365days in 2017 was collected and was based on AIS signal. I got the result that the number of fishing boats groups with certain patterns were four in the area. The encounter pattern between each of the four groups and merchant ships were analyzed. As a result, the areas which has specific encouter pattern between each fishing boat group and merchant ships were found. And one of several area which each fishing boats has encounter pattern with merchant ships were matched. The area is also the most heavy traffic area of merchant ships. This study would be helpful for preventing from marine accidents.목 차 List of Tables ⅴ List of Figures ⅵ Abstract ⅶ 1. 연구 배경 1 2. 연구방법 2.1 연구절차 2 2.2 VTS 개요 2 2.2.1 우리나라 해양교통관제 시스템(VTS) 2 2.2.2 우리나라 VTS의 인원 및 시설, 장비현황 11 2.3 연구 대상 해역 15 2.3.1 연구 대상 해역 특성 15 2.3.2 연구 대상 해역 선박 통항량 17 2.3.3 연구 대상 해역 선박 이동경로 18 2.3.4 연구 대상 해역 선박 사고현황 19 2.3.5 연구 대상 해역 선박 이동경로 22 3. 실험 및 결과 3.1 실험방법 27 3.2 실험결과 28 3.2.1 상선 통항패턴 29 3.2.2 멸치권현망 통항패턴 31 3.2.3 낚시어선 통항패턴 33 3.2.4 대형선망어선 통항패턴 35 3.2.5 유자망어선 통항패턴 37 3.3 실험결과 분석 38 3.3.1 상선 간 조우패턴 분석 38 3.3.2 상선과 멸치권현망어선 간 조우패턴 분석 40 3.3.3 상선과 낚시어선 간 조우패턴 분석 42 3.3.4 상선과 대형선망어선 간 조우패턴 분석 44 3.3.5 상선과 유자망어선 간 조우패턴 분석 46 4. 결론 48 참고문헌 49Maste

A Process of Being Filmmaker: Focusing on the Experience of Film Festival

본 연구는 영화감독 지망생이 영화감독이 되어가는 과정을 영화제 경험을 중심으로 살펴본다. 영화감독 지망생은 단편영화를 만들며 감독으로서의 자질 을 키운다. 녹록하지 않은 환경 속에서 만들어지는 단편영화가 세상에 공개되 기 위해 영화제 입선은 필수적이다. 영화제에서 이들의 작품은 문화적으로 정 당한 것으로 승인됨으로써 상징자본으로 전환된다. 이 문화적 정당화의 과정 에서는 비일상적인 관계 맺기가 행해진다. 여기에서의 경험을 통해 영화감독 지망생은 정당한 가치를 획득한 존재로서 이후 체계에 통합되어 새로이 창작 활동을 이어간다. 이러한 점에서 영화제는 이들에게 통과의례이자 상징자본 획득의 주요한 관문으로 기능한다. 영화제 이후 이들은 영화산업에 자리하여 장편영화 제작으로 나아가기까지 자본 축적의 다양한 전략과 실천을 보인다. 이들이 속하게 되는 한국영화산업이라는 구조는 독립영화와 상업영화라는 이 분법과 지속되는 경쟁 시스템으로 특징지을 수 있다. This paper aims to analyze the process of being filmmaker, focusing on the experience of the film festival. Aspiring filmmakers develop the quality, making the short film. A short film which is created in the capital-limited environment should be submitted for the film festival to be shared with the world. Through the film festival, their film is converted to the symbolic capital, by being approved as a culturally legitimate work. After this cultural legitimation process, aspiring filmmakers return to system as a new being having the symbolic value. In this sense, the film festival functions as the obligatory point of passage and a rite of passage. After the experience of the film festival, aspiring filmmakers is located in the structure of Korean film industry and they take some steps toward the debut with the feature film. In the structure of film industry, their desire which is making good films and meeting many audiences is expressed in complicated ways

미세 전산화단층촬영과 세절편 다중 검출기 전산화단층촬영에서의 발견능 비교

학위논문(석사)--서울대학교 대학원 :의학과 방사선과학전공,2005.Maste

Real-time Performance Comparison of Windows NT and Linux for Control Systems of Steel Works

Maste

Bond Market Development in Asia : Comparison of supervisory and regulatory reform on Credit Rating Agency

학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 국제학과, 2017. 2. 이영섭.When Asian Bond Market Initiatives (ABMI) was launched, development of local and rating credit rating agencies (CRA) were assigned to one of the six working groups. In order to achieve regional cooperation on the development of Asian bond market, enhancing the rating system and the strengthening the role of CRA was recognized as major issue by ASEAN+3 in 2003.Although there had been continuous studies and suggestion for having harmonized CRA system in Asia, growing concerns over the overall progress in the ABMI was recognized. ASEAN+3 proposed for the further development of well functioning bond market to meet increased regional investment. After the ABMI introduced a new road map in 2010, existing working groups were re-organized to four different Task Force groups and ASEAN+3 Bond Market Forum (ABMF) was established under the task force 3 focusing on standardization of market practices and harmonization of regulations. Achieving harmonization on regulation not only requires cooperative effort by market participants and finance ministers, but also requires national authorities to carry out the measures. Unless national authorities actively participate into implementation of harmonized standard or regulation, issues addressed by AMBI cannot efficiently apply to domestic regulation. This paper examines implementation of CRA regulation supervision in the EU and Asia. Most CRAs were not properly regulated until the recently and voluntary implementation of international standard was considered as enough measure. After the global financial crisis, issues related to CRA regulation received considerable attention by major countries. The most significant changes of institutional arrangement change after the global financial crisis was the elevation of the G20. Based on Transgovernmental network, G20 played an important role of providing the necessary political agreements to foster convergence and harmonization of rules and standards. Issues related to the CRA regulation was continuously addressed in G20 meetings and member countries revised their domestic regulations to follow the agreement. Including the US, the EU, Japan, and most of G-20 countries focused on strengthening CRA regulation after 2008. This paper aims to discuss global changes of CRA regulations and examines how Asian countries had reacted to such changes, and analyzes what led to implantation of international standard into domestic regulation in some countries, why the EU re-organized CESR to ESMA with more centralized supervision, and why there was lack of cooperative approach in Asia concerning CRA regulation supervision.1. Introduction 1 2. Background 7 2.1 Bond Market Developments in Asia 7 2.2 Current situation and Challenges 11 2.3 Regulation Harmonization 15 2.4 The role of Credit Rating Agencies and regulation in Bond Market 17 3. Asias regulation reform on CRA after the Global Financial Crisis 24 3.1 Japan 26 3.2 Malaysia 28 3.3 Thailand 30 4. Microprudential policy in EU: CRA regulation and ESMA 33 4.1 The Regulation of CRA before the global financial crisis 33 4.2 Micro prudential policy in Europe: Establishment of ESMA 35 5. Analysis of supervisory regulation reform 39 5.1 The case of FSB: High negative externalities and high incentive to emulate 50 5.2 The case of ESMA: High negative externalities and low incentive to emulate 54 5.3 The case of ACRAA: low negative externalities and high incentive to emulate 58 5.4 The case of no harmonization: low negative externalities and low incentive to emulate 61 6. Conclusion 65 7. Appendix. List of Abbreviations 70 8. Bibliography 72 국문 초록 77Maste