39 research outputs found
A study on the merger and abolition of quasi-governmental organizations and the strategy of Korean government
μλ μ λΆ νμμ μμ , μ§μ ν½μ°½μ κ³μν΄ μ¨ μ λΆμ°νκΈ°κ΄λ€μ λν΄ κ·Έ λ¬Έμ μ μ μ€μ¬μΌλ‘ λ§μ λ
Όμμ κ°νμ μλκ° μμ΄ μλ€. IMF κ²½μ μκΈ°μ 극볡μ μν΄ μ΄μ²΄μ ꡬ쑰쑰μ μ μꡬλ°μ κΉλμ€ μ λΆλ, κ°νμ μΌνμΌλ‘ 곡기μ
λ―Όμν λ° κ²½μνμ κ³νμ μ립νμκ³ , κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όμ νλλ‘ 2000λ
λμ§κ°λμ‘°ν©, λμ§κ°λμ‘°ν©μ°ν©ν λ° λμ΄μ΄μ§ν₯곡μ¬λ₯Ό ν΅νν©νμ¬ λμ
κΈ°λ°κ³΅μ¬λ₯Ό μΆλ²μμΌ°λ€. λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ μ λ°μ μΌλ‘ 곡기μ
λ―Όμνμ μ·¨μ§μ λ°νλ λ°©μμΌλ‘ ν΅νν©μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ§ μ΄μ λ₯Ό κ·λͺ
νκΈ° μν΄, λμ
μμ°κΈ°λ°μ λΉμ¬μ
μ μνν΄ μ¨ μΈ μ°νκΈ°κ΄λ€ κ°μ μμ¬μ ν΅νν© μ¬λ‘λ€μ λΆμνμλ€. λΆμ κ²°κ³Ό, κ·λͺ¨μ κ²½μ λ
Όλ¦¬μ κ·Όκ±°ν μ‘°ν© μ κ°μΆ μμ£Όμ ν΅νν©μ΄ μ λ‘μ μΌλ‘ λ°λ³΅λμ΄ μμΌλ©°, ν΅νν©μ ν΅ν΄μ κ΅κ°λ₯Ό λννμ¬ λλ¨μκ°λ°μ¬μ
μ μννλ 곡기μ
μ μ€νλ € μ±μ₯ λ° ν½μ°½μ κ±°λν΄ μμΌλ©°, κ°μμ ν΅νν©μ νλ λμ κ΅κ³ 보쑰λ₯Ό λμ΄κ³ μ₯κΈ°μ±λ₯Ό νκ°νλ λ°©μμΌλ‘ μ¬μ λΆλ΄μ΄ νλλ μλ°μ μμκ³ , μ λΆ ν΅μ μ κ°μ
μ΄ μ©μ΄ν ννλ₯Ό μ νΈνμ¬ λλ―Ό μ°Έμ¬μ μ°νκΈ°κ΄μ μμ¨μ±μ λ°°μ ν΄ μ€λ νΉμ§μ λ°κ²¬ν μ μμλ€. μ΄λ¬ν μμ¬μ μ λμ λ§₯λ½μ μ°μ₯μ μμμ 2000λ
ν΅νν©μ μ¬κ²ν ν΄ λ³Ό λ, λμ΄μ΄μ§ν₯곡μ¬μ λ―Όμνλ₯Ό ννΌν μ± μ€νλ € λ€λ₯Έ μ°νκΈ°κ΄λ€μ μ¬μ
μμμ ν‘μμμΌ μμ‘΄κ³Ό ν½μ°½μ κ°λ₯μΌ νκ³ , μ΄λ₯Ό μν΄ κ°μ±μμ°μ μ½ νμμ νν΄μ§ ν΅νν©μμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ κ²°κ³Όμ μΌλ‘ κ΅κ°μ¬μ λΆλ΄μ΄ λ 컀μ§λ μ‘°ν©λΉ μμ λ©΄μ λ°©μμ μ νν μλ°μ μμμΌλ©°, λ€μκΈ μ°νκΈ°κ΄μ λ―Όμ μ λ₯Ό νν΄μν€κ³ μ리μμ€ λ± μμ°μ κ΅μ ννλ ννλ‘ νν΄μ‘λ€λ νκ°λ₯Ό λ΄λ¦΄ μ μκ² λ€. This paper explores the factors and features of the merger and abolition of Quasi-governmental organizations (Quagos) in Korea and analyzes the Agricultural Land & Water Development Projects (ALWDP) of the Korean government as a case study. Korea has adopted a series of reform measures aimed at improving Quagos' accountability and management. Especially, the Rural Development Corporation(RDC), the Farmland Improvement Associations(FIAs) and the Federation of Farmland Improvement Association(FFIA) were merged into the Korean Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation (KARICO) of January 1, 2000. According to my analysis, the central bureaucracy-led merger of 2000 missed several historical lessons. First, this merger is not a market-oriented reform. Second, it seems that this merger is another success to extend government's power over Quagos rather than a mere avoidance of privatization the RDC. Third, development and growth-oriented policy that had been established in 1960s and 1970s continues now. Finally, it seems that reforming Quagos has more intensely been under influence of self-interested politicians and authoritative bureaucrats. In conclusion, the ALWDP of Korea was transformed into a more state-led type which was subject to more political and bureaucratic intervention. This change has caused the government to stretch its powers and the RDC to survive privatization and expand its functions. It means the continuing tendency of the central bureaucracy becoming more influential
(A)Study on the merger and abolition of quasi-governmental organizations and the strategy of Korean government
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :νμ νκ³Ό νμ νμ 곡,2003.Docto
Transformation of Class Structure During the Integration Process of Southern Vietnam Since the Unification, 1975~1985
λ² νΈλ¨μ 1975λ
λΆλΆκ° λ¨λΆλ₯Ό 무λ ₯μΌλ‘ ν΅μΌν ν λ¨λΆ μ μΉμ¬νμ‘°μ§μ νκΈ°μ ν¨κ» μμ μ λ³νμ ν΅ν μ¬νμ£Όμ 체μ λ‘μ ν΅ν©μ μλνμλ€. μ΄ μ¬νμ£Όμμ κ°μ‘°μμ
μ μ곡μ
μ κ΅μ νμ λμ
μ§μ²΄νλ₯Ό ν΅νμ¬ μνλμμΌλ©°, κ·Έ ν΅μ¬μ κΈ°μ‘΄ μ§λ°°κ³κΈμ νμ§μ μλ‘μ΄ κ³κΈκ΅¬μ‘°λ‘μ μ νμ΄μλ€. ν΅μΌ μ΄ν λ¨λΆμ μ μΉμ μ§λ°°μΈ΅μ μΈκ΅μΌλ‘ νμΆνκ±°λ μ κ²½μ μ§κ΅¬ λ±μΌλ‘ λ°©μΆλλ λμμ λΆλΆμ μΌλ‘λ μ¬κ΅μ‘μ ν΅νμ¬ μ¬νμ ν΅ν©λ λ°λ©΄, λΆλΆλ‘λΆν° μ΄μ£Όν μ§λμλ€μ΄ λ¨λΆ μ κΆμ μ μνκ³ μ£Όμ μ§μλ₯Ό μ°¨μ§ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ λΆλΆμ μ§λ°°λ₯Ό κ΄μ² μμΌ°λ€. μ곡μ
λΆλ¬Έμμλ 곡μ
κΈ°μ
μ κ΅μ νμ λκ·λͺ¨ μμ
μ κ΅μ νλ‘ μ¬νμ κ·Όκ°μ΄ λλ μ°μ
μμ μλ³Έκ°λ€μ μΌμνμμΌλ, μκ·λͺ¨ μμ
μ 60% μ λλ μ¬μ ν λ¨λΆ μ£Όλ―Όλ€μ μν΄ μμλμλ€. λμ
λΆλ¬Έμμλ μ€λμ΄ μ½ 70%λ₯Ό μ°¨μ§νμ¬ ν΅μΌ μ΄μ μ μ€λ μ€μ¬ κ³κΈκ΅¬μ‘°κ° μ§μλμλ€. μΌλΆ μ¬μ΄κ³΅ μ κΆ μ§λ°°μ§μμ΄μλ κ³³μμλ ν μ§μ‘°μ μ μ±
μ ν΅νμ¬ νΈμ€λ ν μ§μμ λ₯Ό μννμ¬ κ³κΈκ΅¬μ‘°μ λ³νκ° μλμ μΌλ‘ λλλ¬μ‘μΌλ 곡μ°μΈλ ₯μ΄ μ§λ°°νλ ν΄λ°©κ΅¬μμλ ν΅μΌ μ΄μ ν μ§κ°νμΌλ‘ μ΄λ―Έ λλ―Ό λ€μκ° μ€λνλ κ³κΈκ΅¬μ‘°μ ν° λ³νλ₯Ό 보μ΄μ§ μμλ€. μ΄λ° μν©μμ λμ
μ§μ²΄νλ₯Ό μΆμ§νλ €λ μ λΆμ μ μ±
μ λλ―Όλ€μ μ νμ μν΄ μ€μ§μ ν¨κ³Όλ₯Ό κ±°λ μ μμλ€. μ΄μ²λΌ λ² νΈλ¨μμ μ곡μ
λΆλ¬Έμ μ¬νΈκ³Ό λμ μΈκ΅¬μ λΆμ° μ μ±
μΌλ‘ λμμμμ κ³κΈκ΅¬μ‘°λ μλμ μΌλ‘ ν° λ³νλ₯Ό 보μμΌλ, μκ·λͺ¨ μμ
κ³Ό λμ΄μ κ³κΈκ΅¬μ‘°λ ν° λ³νλ₯Ό λνλ΄μ§ μμλ€. μ¬νμ£Όμ체μ μ μ°μ μμ λΆλΆκ° λ¨λΆλ₯Ό ν΅ν©ν λ² νΈλ¨μ μ¬λ‘λ μΌλ°©μ μν΄ ν‘μν΅μΌ λμλ€κ³ ν μ§λΌλ 체μ λ₯Ό μΌλ°©μ μΌλ‘ λΆκ³Όνμ¬ μ¬νλ₯Ό λ³νμν¬ μ μμμ 보μ¬μ€λ€. ν΅ν©λλ μ¬νλΌ ν μ§λΌλ κΈ°μ‘΄μ μ¬νκ²½μ κ΅¬μ‘°κ° μμ‘΄νκ³ κ·Έ μ§μλ ₯μ μ§λκ³ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. λ°λΌμ λ² νΈλ¨μ μ¬λ‘λ μμ΄ν 체μ μ ν΅ν©μ μλ ΄μ κ³Όμ μ ν΅νμ¬ μνλμ΄μΌ νλ€λ κ²½νμ 보μ¬μ€λ€.
The northern leaders in Vietnam tried to transform the southern society into the socialist system through the abolishment of politico-social institutions and private ownership system after unification of the region in 1975. The socialist transformation was comprised of nationalization of commercial and industrial sectors and collectivization of agriculture. Another major task in this regard was to abolish the existing dominant class and the creation of a new class structure. Responding to these policies, some of the dominant class in former South Vietnam were exiled or forced to move into the New Economic Zones. Rest of them were integrated into the new society after reeducation. Without doubt, the power vacuum was instantly filled by the northern leaders in this region. In the main commercial and industrial sectors, with the nationalization of the economy the former capitalists were totally removed. Such transformations, however, did not result in significant changes in the class structure; about 60% of the small-scale commerce was still operated by private merchants, whereas the agricultural sector was mainly run by the middle class peasant class, which consists about 70% of whole peasants. This means that the former class structure in the grassroots level with the dominant middle peasant class was not changed significantly, although the changes of the land ownership was comprehensive through the land adjustment policy in the area controlled by the former Saigon regime. Due to the peasant's resistance against the policy, the government's efforts to collectivize the rural area eventually failed. Thus, while the class structure in the urban area was thoroughly changed through the transformation policies of the commercial and industrial sectors and the scheme of dispersing the urban population, the degree of changes of the class structure in the small scale commercial sector and the rural area were marginal. The Vietnamese case of social integration, which was accomplished under the prevailing socialist circumstance by the North, reveals the vulnerability of a one-sided integration policy because the integrated society successfully preserved, to a degree, its own socio-economic structure. This case leads to an implication that the integration of different social systems should be accomplished through the process of convergence