50 research outputs found

    THE RETRIEVABILITY OF CEMENTATION TYPE IMPLANT ABUTMENT BY SURFACE TREATEMENTS AND TYPES OF CEMENTS

    No full text
    This study was performed to investigate the retrievability of the cementation type implant abutments. The cements used in this study were Cavitec, Tembond and Zinc Phosphate Cement. The types of surface conditioning were no treatment, 50 microne sandblasting, 250 microne sandblasting, fine diamond finishing point and coarse diamond point. The retention of cast crown was measured with Instron Universal Testing Machine(Instron Engineering Co., U.S.A.). The results were as fellows: 1. The Maximium retention was obtained by the group of Z.P.C. cementation and Coarse diamond point surface conditioning. 2. Z.P.C. shows maximum retention, and reduced in orders Tembond, Cavitec, No cement. 3. The value of retention of surface condition was highest in coarse diamond point, lowest in no tretment. 4. The similar results were obtained between fine diamond point and 50 microne sandblasting, coarse diamond point and 250 microne sandblasting. 5. The were no direct corelation between mechanical retention and cementation retention.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณต์—…๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์กฐ์„ฑ๊ธฐ๊ธˆ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋น„ ์ง€์›๊ณผ ์ˆ˜๋ฏผ์ข…ํ•ฉ์น˜์žฌ์ƒ์‚ฌ์˜ ํ˜„๋ฌผ์ œ๊ณต์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด ์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    ์„ฑ๊ต์œก ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต ๊ณผํ•™์ˆ˜์—…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณผํ•™๊ต์‚ฌ๋“ค์˜ ํƒœ๋„์™€ ์š”๊ตฌ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ ์ƒ๋ฌผ์ „๊ณต,2002.ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)-

    ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ์œจ๊ณผ ํˆฌ๊ณผ์œจ ์ธก์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ฐ•๋ง‰์˜ ๊ด‘ํ•™์  ์ƒ์ˆ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๊ณผ ์‘์šฉ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ „๊ณต,2001.Maste

    (The)Effect of uncertainty concept on the process of measurement and data interpretation in physics inquiry activity

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ „๊ณต,2006.Docto

    A study on the complete retrieval system of the cementation type implant abutment

    No full text
    Purpose: This study was peformed to investigate the retrievability of the cemented crown from the cementation type implant abutment. Material and method: The cementation type implant abutments (NEOBIOTECH implant abutment regular, 3 degree taper, 10mm length, 4mm diameter, Ti grade III, machined surface. Hwasung, Kyunggi-do) and cemented crowns were divided into 3 groups, depending on their hole angles formed in the crowns for their retrievability. The abutments and crowns were luted with 4 kinds of cements and separation test using metal wedge was executed with Instron 4465 Universal Testing Machine and the maximum impact force of the modified crown ejector was measured. Results and conclusion : 1. All of the cementation type implant abutments and cemented crowns were separated with relatively small force by metal wedge. 2. The retrieving force was minimum when the metal wedge was applied perpendicular to the axis of abutment. 3. The force for retrieving crowns from abutments was maximum in resin cement group, and reduced in orders of zinc phosphate cement, glass ionomer cement and zinc oxide eugenol cement. 4. The maximum force obtained by the crown ejector was higher than the retrieval force in ZOE and GI cement and lower than that in ZPC and resin cement. 5. If it has similar conditions clinically, the cemented crowns luted with 2 types of cements (ZOE, GI cement) can be safely retrieved from the cementation type implant abutments by the modified crown ejector.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์‹ ์ž„๊ต์ˆ˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ •์ฐฉ๊ธˆ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋น„์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์›๋˜์—ˆ์Œ

    A STUDY ON THE COMPLETE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM OF THE CEMENTATION TYPE IMPLANT ABUTMENT

    No full text
    Purpose: This study was peformed to investigate the retrievability of the cemented crown from the cementation type implant abutment. Material and method: The cementation type implant abutments (NEOBIOTECH implant abutment regular, 3 degree taper, 10mm length, 4mm diameter, Ti grade III, machined surface. Hwasung, Kyunggi-do) and cemented crowns were divided into 3 groups, depending on their hole angles formed in the crowns for their retrievability. The abutments and crowns were luted with 4 kinds of cements and separation test using metal wedge was executed with Instron 4465 Universal Testing Machine and the maximum impact force of the modified crown ejector was measured. Results and conclusion : 1. All of the cementation type implant abutments and cemented crowns were separated with relatively small force by metal wedge. 2. The retrieving force was minimum when the metal wedge was applied perpendicular to the axis of abutment. 3. The force for retrieving crowns from abutments was maximum in resin cement group, and reduced in orders of zinc phosphate cement, glass ionomer cement and zinc oxide eugenol cement. 4. The maximum force obtained by the crown ejector was higher than the retrieval force in ZOE and GI cement and lower than that in ZPC and resin cement. 5. If it has similar conditions clinically, the cemented crowns luted with 2 types of cements (ZOE, GI cement) can be safely retrieved from the cementation type implant abutments by the modified crown ejector

    ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ž ์ฃผ๋„ ์žฌ๊ณ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง์—์„œ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ €ํ•˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ œ์•ˆ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฐ์—…์กฐ์„ ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™ ์ „๊ณต, 2013. 2. ๋ฐ•์ง„์šฐ.๊ณ ๊ฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ์†ก์ถœ๋œ ์ œํ’ˆ์—์„œ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋˜๋ฉด ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ VMI(Vendor Managed Inventory)์— ๋ณด๊ด€์ค‘์ธ ์ „์ฒด ์žฌ๊ณ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•œ ํ›„ ์ •์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋œ ์ œํ’ˆ๋งŒ ๊ณ ๊ฐ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์‹œ ํˆฌ์ž…์ด ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์›์ธ ๋ถ„์„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ์ œํ’ˆ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ์ •ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‹ฌํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ VMI์— ๋ณด๊ด€์ค‘์ธ ์ „์ฒด ์žฌ๊ณ ๋กœ ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋น„์šฉ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์œ ํ˜•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‹œ ์›์ธ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ์˜์—ญ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋กœํŠธ๋ณ„ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ๋„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ’€๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒํ™ฉ๋ณ„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๋กœํŠธ๊ฐ€ VMI์— ์ž…๊ณ ๋˜๋ฉด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜๊ณ , ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋กœํŠธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ ํ›„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์ง€์ •๋œ ์กฐ์น˜๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ณ ๊ฐ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฌธ์ œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค.๋ชฉ ์ฐจ ์ œ 1 ์žฅ ์„œ ๋ก  1 ์ œ 1 ์ ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์  1 ์ œ 2 ์ ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 3 ์ œ 3 ์ ˆ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 4 ์ œ 2 ์žฅ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์ด๋ก  ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ 5 ์ œ 1 ์ ˆ VMI ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง ํŠน์„ฑ 5 2. 1. 1. VMI ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ •์˜ 5 2. 1. 2. ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๋ณด๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ธ๋„ 6 2. 1. 3. ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ €ํ•˜ 7 ์ œ 2 ์ ˆ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ 8 2. 2. 1. ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๋ณด์ฆ 8 2. 2. 2. ์ œํ’ˆ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ 9 ์ œ 3 ์ ˆ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ 11 2. 3. 1. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ •์˜ 11 2. 3. 2. ํ‘œ๋ณธ ์ถ”์ถœ ๊ฒ€์ˆ˜ 13 2. 3. 3. ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณก์„  14 2. 3. 4. VMI ์žฌ๊ณ  ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ์  17 ์ œ 4 ์ ˆ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒ€ํ†  18 ์ œ 3 ์žฅ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ •์˜ 20 ์ œ 1 ์ ˆ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๋ฐ ํ’ˆ์งˆํŠน์„ฑ 20 3. 1. 1. ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ ํŠน์„ฑ 21 3. 1. 2. ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ 24 3. 1. 3. ํ’ˆ์งˆํŠน์„ฑ 26 ์ œ 2 ์ ˆ ๋กœํŠธ ์ •๋ณด๊ด€๋ฆฌ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ 27 3. 2. 1. ๋กœํŠธ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฆญ์Šค ๊ตฌ์ถ• 27 3. 2. 2. ๋กœํŠธ ์˜จ์Šต๋„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ 29 ์ œ 3 ์ ˆ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ œํ’ˆ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค 31 ์ œ 4 ์ ˆ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ๊ตฌ์ถ• 34 ์ œ 5 ์ ˆ ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค 40 ์ œ 4 ์žฅ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 43 ์ œ 1 ์ ˆ ๋ถ„์„ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค 43 4. 1. 1. ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ์ •์˜ 43 4. 1. 2. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์„ค๋ช… 44 ์ œ 2 ์ ˆ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 47 ์ œ 5 ์žฅ ๊ฒฐ๋ก  55 Appendices 58 ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 60 Abstract 64Maste

    THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF INTERNALLY CONNECTED IMPLANT SYSTEMS

    No full text
    Statement of problem: Currently, there are some 20 different geometric variations in implant/abutment interface available. The geometry is important because it is one of the primary determinants of joint strength, joint stability, locational and rotational stability. Purpose: As the effects of the various implant-abutment connections and the prosthesis height variation on stress distribution are not yet examined this study is to focus on the different types of implant-abutment connection and the prosthesis height using three dimensional finite element analysis. Material and method. The models were constructed with ITI, 3i TG, Bicon, Frialit-2 fixtures and solid abutment, TG post, Bicon post, EstheticBase abutment respectively. And the super structures were constructed as mandibular second premolar shapes with 8.5 mm, 11 mm, 13.5 mm of crown height. In each model, 244 N of vertical load and 244 N of oblique load were placed on the central pit of an occlusal surface. von Mises stresses were recorded and compared in the crowns, abutments, fixtures. Results: 1. Under the oblique loading, von Mises stresses were larger in the crown, abutment, fixture compared to the vertical loading condition. 2. The stresses were increased proportionally to the crown height under oblique loading but showed little differences with three different crown heights under vertical loading. 3. In the crown, the highest stress areas were loading points under vertical loading, and the finish lines under oblique loading. 4. Under the oblique loading, the higher stresses were located in the fixture/abutment interface of the Bicon and Frialit-2 systems compared to the ITI and TG systems. Conclusions: The stress distribution patterns of each implant-abutment system had difference among them and adequate crown height/implant ratio was important to reduce the stresses around the implants

    Vibrotactile Score for Designing Vibrotactile Patterns

    No full text
    MasterDespite the plethora of available vibrotactile applications that have already begun to impact our everyday life, how to design vibrotactile patterns easily and efficiently continues to be a challenge. As an intuitive and effective approach for vibrotactile pattern design, this paper proposes a vibrotactile score. The term comes from a metaphor of a musical score and its design is adapted from two common musical scores (piano score and guitar tablature). Another metaphorical feature analogous to the musical clef, named a vibrotactile clef, is also introduced to decouple the processes of low-level vibrotactile signal design and high-level pattern composition. The conceptual design of the vibrotactile score and clef are fully realized in a graphical authoring tool named the Vibrotactile Score Editor (VibScoreEditor). We demonstrate the expressiveness of the vibrotactile score with several examples. In addition, the usability of the vibrotactile score was evaluated, focusing on its learnability, efficiency, and user preference. Experiment 1 was to compare the vibrotactile score and the current dominant practices of vibrotactile pattern implementation including programming and scripting. The results gained from programming experts validated the substantially superior performance of the vibrotactile score. Experiment 2 was to compare the vibrotactile score with the waveform-based design already implemented in a few recent graphical authoring tools for vibrotactile patterns. Ordinary users without programming backgrounds participated in this experiment, and the results substantiated the excellent performance of the vibrotactile score.์ตœ๊ทผ ์ง„๋™ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„๋™ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋””์ž์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์•„์ง ๋งŽ์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์Œ๊ณผ ์ง„๋™์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์— ์ฐฉ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”ผ์•„๋…ธ ์•…๋ณด์™€ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ํƒ€๋ธŒ ์•…๋ณด์˜ ํ‘œํ˜„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ์ง„๋™์„ ๋””์ž์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ง„๋™ ์•…๋ณด์™€ ์ง„๋™ ์Œ์ž๋ฆฌํ‘œ๋ผ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์Œ์•…์  ๋ฉ”ํƒ€ํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ง„๋™ ํŒจํ„ด๊ณผ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ง„๋™ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•ด์„œ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋†’์€ ํŽธ์˜์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ, ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ง„๋™ ์•…๋ณด์™€ ์Œ์ž๋ฆฌํ‘œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•œ ์ง„๋™ ํŒจํ„ด ์ €์ž‘ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ VibScoreEditor๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ์ง„๋™ ํŒจํ„ด ์ €์ž‘ ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง„๋™ ์•…๋ณด์˜ ํ‘œํ˜„๋ ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ง„๋™ ์•…๋ณด์˜ ์žฅ์ ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์ง๊ด€์„ฑ, ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ, ์„ ํ˜ธ๋„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์‹คํ—˜์€ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์— ๋Šฅ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ค„์กŒ์œผ๋ฉฐ, VibScoreEditor๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง„๋™ ์•…๋ณด๋ฅผ ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์ด๋‚˜ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŒ… ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒํ˜• ์กฐ์ž‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ์•…๋ณด ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ง„๋™ ์ €์ž‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์•…๋ณด ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ํŒŒํ˜• ์กฐ์ž‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค
    corecore