224 research outputs found
Extralesional cryotherapy combined with intralesional triamcinolone injections after keloid excision
ope
Use of Topical Rapamycin as Maintenance Treatment after a Single Session of Fractionated CO2 Laser Ablation: A Method to Enhance Percutaneous Drug Delivery
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant
neurocutaneous disorder with an incidence of approximately 1 in 5,000 to 10,000 live births. TSC has various clinical
manifestations such as multiple hamartomas in systemic organs, including the skin. Angiofibromas are the most common skin lesions in patients with TSC. Although benign, angiofibromas develop in childhood and puberty, and can be
psychosocially disfiguring for patients. Skin lesions in TSC,
specifically angiofibromas, have no significant risk of malignant transformation after puberty; thus, they require no treatment if not prominent. However, the presentation of TSC is
important owing to its impact on patient cosmesis. Surgical
treatment and laser therapy are the mainstream treatments
for angiofibromas. Although the evidence is limited, topical
mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors such as sirolimus
(rapamycin) are effective in facial angiofibroma treatment.
We describe an adult patient with an angiofibroma who had
an excellent response to treatment with topical rapamycin after a single session of carbon dioxide (CO2) laser ablation.
The patient showed no sign of relapse or recurring lesions for
a year. CO2 laser ablation may serve as a new paradigm of
treatment for angiofibromas in TSC. Since the selection of laser devices can be limited for some institutions, we suggest
a rather basic but highly effective approach for angiofibroma
treatment that can be generally applied with the classic CO2
device.ope
Dual cortical tunneling method for endoscopic forehead lift
Background
Endoscopic forehead lift with cortical tunneling is an effective option for rejuvenation of the upper third of the face. Although it has been considered safe and reliable, with relatively consistent long-term results, relapse and weakening of adhesion have been common problems.
Methods
We suggest the dual-tunneling method for overcoming these limitations. A total of 100 patients aged 17 to 65 years underwent forehead lifting with cortical tunneling by the senior author from August 2016 to December 2017. The single-tunnel method was applied in one half of the patients and the dual-tunnel method in the other half. Bilateral brow positions were measured immediately following surgery and 6 months later.
Results
For all cases, cortical tunneling was done at the central incision and both paramedian incisions; therefore, three tunnels were used in the control group and six tunnels in the experimental group. In the single-tunnel group, relapse distances were 2.39Β±0.83 mm for the medial brow and 3.26Β±0.91 mm for the lateral brow (6 months postoperatively; n=100). The dual-tunnel group showed significantly smaller (P<0.001) relapse distances, with values of 1.69Β±0.46 mm and 2.17Β±0.59 mm for the medial and lateral brow, respectively (6 months postoperatively; n=100). The experimental group did not show an increase in complications.
Conclusions
The dual-tunneling method, designed to minimize the cheese-wiring effect, uses a triangular plane to avoid a focal fixation. The fixation also includes the periosteum to hold the forehead tissue in place, inducing stronger adhesion.ope
Robotic Microsurgery Training for Robot Assisted Reconstructive Surgery
Purpose: Recent advances in robotic surgery have affected not only surgery for visceral organs but also head and neck
cancer surgery and microsurgery. The authors intended to analyze and share experience gained from performing microanastomosis
training in a new robotic surgery system.
Methods: Robotic microanastomosis training was performed using Da Vinci Xi. The robot arm used two black diamond
forceps, one Potts scissor, and one vision camera. First, basic robotic surgery skills were trained with Da Vinci Skill Simulator
training. Actual microanastomosis practice was performed using artificial blood vessel, chicken wing and porcine
leg.
Results: Three simulation training sessions were performed and five vessel anastomosis were performed. A total of 8 vascular
anastomosis were performed, and anastomosis for one vessel took 31-57 minutes. The number of sutures used was
more than one initially due to suture material damage, but one suture was used after four anastomosis. In the anastomosis
time analysis with porcine legs, the actual anastomosis process took 2 minutes 15 secondsΒ±41 seconds per stitch. The
vascular anastomosis interval took more time than vascular anastomosis itself due to robot arm change and camera movement.
Conclusion: Robotic microsurgery training was not difficult process for surgeons who had undergone conventional microsurgery.
However, more training was needed to replace the robot arm and move the camera. In the long term, mechanical
improvements in diamond forceps and camera resolution were necessary. In order to master robotic microsurgery,
surgeons must get used to robotic surgery system through simulation training.ope
Effective botulinum toxin injection point for treatment of headache
μΉκ³Όλν/λ°μ¬The underlying causes of migraine are often nerve and muscle disorders, which has led to botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection gaining traction as a viable treatment option. However, previous injection sites on the temporalis muscle for treating migraine were determined by observing the trigger point of migraines, and it is unsure whether these are the most anatomically effective sites for injection (Whitcup et al., 2014).
This study performed an extensive analysis of published research on the morphology of the temporalis muscle in order to provide an anatomical guideline on how to distinguish the temporalis muscle and temporalis tendon by observing the surface of the patientβs face. Furthermore, it was found that Sihlerβs staining could be applied to the temporalis muscle in order to identify accurate and effective BoNT-A injection sites for treating migraines.
Twenty-one hemifaces of cadavers (16 males, 5 females; mean age, 81.0 years; age range, 63οΌ93 years) were used in this study. The experiment was divided into two steps: (1) morphologically analyzing the temporalis region of the cadavers and (2) applying Sihlerβs staining to the temporalis muscle and tendon.
The posterior border of the temporalis tendon was classified into three types according to its location relative to five reference lines: in Type I the posterior border of the temporalis tendon is located in front of reference line L2 (4.8%, 1/21), in Type β
‘ it is located between reference lines L2 and L3 (85.7%, 18/21), and in Type β
’ it is located between reference lines L3 and L4 (9.5%, 2/21).
The vertical distances between the horizontal line passing through the jugale (LH) and the temporalis tendon along each of reference lines L0, L1, L2, L3, and L4 were 29.74Β±6.87 mm (meanΒ±SD), 45.06Β±8.84 mm, 37.76Β±11.18 mm, 42.50Β±7.59 mm, and 32.14Β±0.47 mm, respectively; the corresponding vertical distances between LH and the temporalis muscle were 55.02Β±8.25 mm, 74.99Β±9.90 mm, 73.97Β±10.12 mm, 55.24Β±13.25 mm, and 47.56Β±11.41 mm.
Sihlerβs staining shows that the anterior and posterior branches of the deep temporal nerve run through the anterior and posterior fibers of the temporalis muscle, respectively.
BoNT-A should be injected into the temporalis muscle at least 45 mm vertically above the zygomatic arch. This will ensure that the muscle region is targeted and so produce the greatest clinical effect with the minimum concentration of BoNT-A. In order to easily identify the temporalis muscle in a clinical setting, the second finger should be placed on the bottom corner of the zygomatic arch; the tip of the thumb will then be located 45 mm from the zygomatic arch.ope
μλ‘μ΄ νλ‘ν μμ’ μ‘°μ λ¨λ°±μ§μ κ΄ν μ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (λ°μ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : μλͺ
κ³ΌνλΆ, 2015. 8. μ μ©κ·Ό.The proteasome is a large protein complex that degrades diverse proteins in ubiquitine-proteasome system (UPS). Numerous substrates which play roles in many signaling to maintain homeostasis are known to be degraded by the complicated degradation processes. In addition, aberrant regulation in UPS and of this complex is associated with various diseases such as cancer, disorder of immune response and neurodegenerative disease. However, it is not known whether and how this elaborate machinery is regulated by diverse cellular signaling. Thus, discovery of novel proteasome regulators is important to understand UPS-associated cellular function and the pathogenesis of various diseases related to proteasome malfunction. To identify new proteasome modulators regulating the proteasome activity, a cell-based functional screening was established using Degron-GFP and a collection of cDNA library. In this study, I have isolated iRhom1 as a stimulator of proteasome activity from genome-wide functional screening using cDNA expression and an unstable GFP-degron. Expression level of iRhom1 regulated enzymatic activity and assembly of proteasome complexes. iRhom1 expression was induced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stressors, leading to the enhancement of proteasome activity, especially in ER-containing microsomes. iRhom1 interacted with PAC1 and PAC2, the 20S proteasome assembly chaperones, affecting their protein stability by dimerization of them. In addition, iRhom1 deficiency in D. melanogaster accelerated the rough-eye phenotype of mutant Huntingtin, while transgenic flies expressing either human iRhom1 or Drosophila iRhom showed rescue of the rough-eye phenotype.
S5b was previously identified as a proteasome-assembly chaperone in yeast and a negative regulator of 26S proteasome in mammalian. Although regulation of GRK2 is considered as one of cell death mediators in neuronal cells, the regulation of GRK2 expression is not known. Here, I show that GRK2 is regulated by S5b in neuronal cells and mouse model. GRK2 is down-regulated in the cortex and hippocampus of S5b transgenic mice, a chronic inflammation model and also reduced by S5b expression in HT22 mouse hippocampal cells. Conversely, knockdown of S5b expression increases GRK2 level through increasing the stability of GRK2 protein, independent of its ability to impair proteasome activity. GRK2 and GRK2 K220R, a kinase dead mutant, similarly interacts with S5b in the mouse cortex and HT22 cells through its C-terminal domain, and this domain also decreases GRK2 level. Membrane targeting of GRK2 is affected by S5b expression, as assessed with immunocytochemistry, fractionation, and surface biotinylation assays. In addition, neurotoxic effect of S5b is suppressed by overexpression of GRK2 but not by GRK2 K220R. Thus, S5b may exert its toxic effect through down-regulation of GRK2, a neurotoxic mediator, in neuronal cells, showing an aberrant role of S5b as a negative regulator of GRK2 in neuronal cell death. In addition, Psmd5/S5b knockout mouse was successfully generated by the Cas9/CRISPR-mediated Psmd5/S5b knockout cassette and show enhanced proteasome activity compared to aged matched littermates. Together, S5b plays a diverse role in the regulation of proteasome activity under pathologic condition and in neuronal cell death through GRK2. In conclusion, I suggest a novel stress signaling pathway responsible for proteasome regulation and critical role of S5b in neuronal cell death independent of its inhibitory function of proteasome.ABSTRACT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i
CONTENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . .ix
ABBREVIATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .xiii
CHAPTER I. iRhom1 regulates proteasome activity via PAC 1/2 under ER stress
I-1. Abstract. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
I-2. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
I-3. Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Cell culture and transfection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Generation of stable cell line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Genome-wide functional screening. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Plasmid construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Antibodies and western blotting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Assays for proteasome activities. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Reverse transcriptase-PCR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Subcellular fractionation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Glycerol gradient analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Immunoprecipitation assay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Immunocytochemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Native gel analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Filter trap assay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Drosophila genetics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
I-4. RESULTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
iRhom1 isolated by functional screening enhances proteasome
activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .13
iRhom1 affects the assembly of proteasome complexes. . . . . .. . . .15
iRhom1 regulates microsomal proteasome activity in response to ER
stress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
iRhom1 increases protein stability and dimerization of PAC1 and
PAC2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
iRhom1 relieves mutant Huntingtin aggregation in cells and
Drosophila . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
I-5. DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77
I-6. REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82
CHAPTER II. S5b induces neuronal cell death via downregulation of GRK2
II-1. Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94
II-2. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96
II-3. Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
Antibodies and sh- or si- RNA construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
Cell Culture and DNA Transfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
Immunoprecipitation and Immunohistochemisty . . . . . . . . . . . .99
Subcellular Fractionation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Biotinylation assay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
II-4. RESULTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 101
GRK2 level is regulated by S5b in HT22 cells and the brain of S5b
transgenic mice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101
S5b interacts with GRK2 through its C-terminus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
S5b impairs the targeting of GRK2 to the plasma membrane. . . . . .103
S5b affects neuronal cell death probably via down-regulation of
GRK2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105
Generation of Psmd5/S5b knockout mice with enhanced proteasome
Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105
II-5. DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130
II-6. REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .135
ABSTRACT IN KOREAN/κ΅λ¬Έ μ΄λ‘. . . . . . . . . . .143
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure I-1. Stimulatory effect of iRhom1 overexpression on proteasome
activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23
Figure I-2. Ectopic expression of iRhom1 reduces degron (GFPU) and
elevates proteasome catalytic activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
Figure I-3. Effects of cDNAs encoding polytopic membrane proteins on
proteasome activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Figure I-4. Downregulation of iRhom1 reduces proteasome activity and
increases the accumulation of ubiquitin-conjugates. . . . . . . . . .29
Figure I-5. Ectopic expression of iRhom1 increases catalytic activity of
proteasome and reduces ub-conjugation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...31
Figure I-6. Ectopic expression of iRhom1 increases proteasome assembly in
native gel and reduces MG132 induced ub-conjugation. . . . . . .33
Figure I-7. Overexpression effects of the Rhomboid protein family and their
activity-dead mutants on proteasome activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
Figure I-8. iRhom1 does not affect RNA or protein levels of proteasome
subunit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
Figure I-9. Downregulation of iRhom1 impairs the assembly of proteasome
complexes by native gel analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39
Figure I-10. Knockdown of iRhom1 expression impairs the assembly of
proteasome complexes in a fractionation assay . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Figure I-11. Ectopic expression of iRhom1 does not increase protein levels
of proteasome subunit but only elevates proteasome activity in
fractionation assays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
Figure I-12. iRhom1 localizes in the ER of HeLa and HEK293T cells. . . . ...45
Figure I-13. iRhom1 regulates proteasome activity in the microsomal
fractions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47
Figure I-14. iRhom1 regulates proteasome assembly in the microsomal
Fractions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
Figure I-15. iRhom1 is increased by ER stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51
Figure I-16. Increase in iRhom1 expression by stress signals . . . . . . .53
Figure I-17. Knockdown of iRhom1 expression impairs ER stress-induced
activation and assembly of proteasomes in the microsomal
fraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..55
Figure I-18. The amounts of PAC1 and PAC2 proteins are decreased by
iRhom1-knockdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57
Figure I-19. iRhom1 enhances the stability of PAC1 protein. . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
Figure I-20. iRhom1 regulates the stability of PAC1 and PAC2 proteins. . . .61
Figure I-21. iRhom1 affects the interaction between PAC1 and PAC2. . . . . .63
Figure I-22. ER stress increases PAC1/PAC2 dimerization in an iRhom1-
dependent manner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65
Figure I-23. Expression level of iRhom1 modulates the aggregation of mutant
Huntingtin in cells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
Figure I-24. Ectopic expression of PAC1 and PAC2 elevates proteasome
Activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
Figure I-25. Expression level of iRhom1 modulates the aggregation of the
rough-eye phenotype in a fly model expressing Htt120Q. . . . .71
Figure I-26. Overexpression of drosophila iRhom or human iRhom1 in
drosophila eye shows mild disturbance in eye development and
increases proteasome activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73
Figure I-27. Schematic diagram showing the proposed role of iRhom1 in
proteasome activation under ER stress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75
Figure II-1. S5b overexpression downregulates GRK2 in the cortex and
hippocampus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107
Figure II-2. Ectopic expression level of S5b reduces GRK2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .109
Figure II-3. Knockdown of S5b expression increases GRK2 at post-
translational level. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111
Figure II-4. S5b interacts with GRK2 via S5b C-terminal domain. . . . . . . 113
Figure II-5. Regulation in the translocation of GRK2 from cytosol to plasma
membrane by S5b expression. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115
Figure II-6. S5b recruits membrane GRK2 into cytosol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .117
Figure II-7. Ectopic expression of S5b induces apoptosis in HT22 cell line
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 119
Figure II-8. GRK2 activation suppresses S5b overexpression induced cell
death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Figure II-9 Generation of PSMD5/S5b knockout mice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123
Figure II-10. S5b expression levels were determined in th tissue of WT and
PSMD5/S5b deficient mouse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125
Figure II-11. Elevated proteasome activity in S5b knockout mouse . . . . . 127
Figure II-12. Proposed model for the role of GRK2 in S5b-mediated neuronal
cell death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129Docto
Selection of Varoius Free Flap Donor Sites in Palatomaxillary Reconstruction
PURPOSE : A palatal defect following maxillectomy can cause multiple problems like the rhinolalia, leakage of foods into the nasal cavity, and hypernasality. Use of a prosthetic is the preferred method for obturating a palate defect, but for rehabilitating palatal function, prosthetics have many shortcomings. In a small defect, local flap is a useful method, however, the size of flap which can be elevated is limited. In 12 cases of palatomaxillary defect, we used various microvascular free flaps in reconstructing the palate and obtained good functional results.
METHOD : Between 1990 and 2004, 12 patients underwent free flap operation after head and neck cancer ablation, and were reviewed retrospectively. Among the 12 free flaps, 6 were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps, 3 rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, and 3 radial forearm flaps.
RESULT : All microvascular flap surgery was successful. Mean follow up time was 8 months and after the follow up time all patients reported satisfactory speech and swallowing. Wound dehiscence was observed in 4 cases, ptosis was in 1 case and fistula was in 1 case, however, rhinolalia, leakage of food, or swallowing difficultly was not reported in the 12 cases.
CONCLUSION : We used various microvascular flaps for palatomaxillary reconstruction. For 3-dimensional flap needs, we used the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap to obtain enough volume for filling the defect. Two-dimensional flaps were designed with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, rectus abdominis flap and radial forearm flap. For cases with palatal defect only, we used the radial forearm flap. In palatomaxillary reconstruction, we can choose various free flap techniques according to the number of skin paddles and flap volume needed.ope
μ²λ μΈλ 격차문μ μ μλ‘μ΄ μ μ± ν¨λ¬λ€μμ νμμ±
20λ μ²λ
μΈλλ₯Ό λ°λΌλ³΄λ νκ΅μ¬νμ μμ μ λμ κ³Ό ν¬λ§μ λ λ¨μ΄λ‘ μμ½λλ€. μ°μ λμ μ μΈλ μ 체λ₯Ό λΆμν μλλ₯Ό λ§μ μ΅μλ°κ³ κ³ ν΅λ°λ μ¬λλ€λ‘ κ·μ νλ μμ μ΄λ€. μ·¨μ
, κ²°νΌ, μΆμ°μ ν¬κΈ°νλ€λ μΌν¬ μΈλλ‘ μ μ΄λ° μμ μ λννλ€. κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ ν¬λ§μ λ§μ°νκ² μ²λ
μ΄ μΌμ΄μμΌ λλΌκ° μΌμ΄μ λ€λ λ₯μ μμ μ΄λ€. μ μ±
μ μΌλ‘ λ§νμλ©΄ μλ‘μ΄ λ
Έλλ ₯μΌλ‘ 보며 μ΄ λ
Έλλ ₯μΌλ‘λΆν° μλ‘μ΄ μμ°μ΄ λ λ§μ΄ μΌμ΄λμΌ νκ΅κ²½μ κ° λλ ₯μ λ°μ μ μλ€λ μμ μ΄κΈ°λ νλ€. κ³Όμ₯λ μ²λ
μ°½μ
μ§ν₯μ μ±
μ΄ μ΄λ° λ§₯λ½μμ λμ¨λ€. μ΄ λ μμ λͺ¨λ μ²λ
κ³Ό μ²λ
μλ μ¬λλ€λ‘ μ¬νλ₯Ό λλκ³ μ²λ
μλ μ¬λλ€μ μμ μΌλ‘ μ²λ
μ λ°λΌλ³΄λ κ΄μ μ΄λ€. νμ§λ§ μ€μ λ‘ μ΄ μΈλκ° λ―Έλ νκ΅μ¬νμ νΉμ±μ 보μ¬μ€ μΈλλΌκ³ μκ°νλ€λ©΄, μ΄ μΈλ μ체μ νΉμ±μ μ νμ
νκ³ κ·Έμ λ§λ μ¬νμμ€ν
μ λμμΈν νμκ° μλ€. μ¦ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό μΈλ κ° κ°λ± λλ μ°λμ λ¬Έμ λ‘ μ΄ν΄νλ κ²μ΄ μλλΌ, λ―Έλμ μ¬νμ μ§λ°°μ λ€μκ° λ μΈλλ‘ κ·μ νκ³ λ°λΌλ³΄λ μκ°λ νμνλ€λ κ²μ΄λ€. κ·Έλ¬λ €λ©΄ μ°μ μ§κΈ νκ΅μ¬νκ° μ΄λμ μ μλμ§ μ΄ν΄λ΄μΌ νκ³ , μ²λ
μΈλκ° μ΄λ€ νΉμ±μ κ°κ³ μλμ§λ λ°μ Έλ΄μΌ νλ©°, νκ΅μ¬ν νΉμ±κ³Ό μ²λ
μΈλκ° μ λ§μμ§λ₯Ό μ΄ν΄λ³΄κ³ , λ§μ§ μλ€λ©΄ νμ¬ μ²λ
μΈλμ νΉμ±μ λ§λ μ¬νν¨λ¬λ€μμ μ΄λ€ κ²μΈμ§λ₯Ό μ€κ³νκ³ κ΅¬νν΄ κ°μΌ νλ€. μ΄ κΈμμλ ν λ§ νΌμΌν°κ° γ21μΈκΈ° μλ³Έλ‘ (Le Capital au XXIe siΓ¨cle)γμμ μ μν μΈμ΅μλ³Έμ£Όμ κ°λ
μ μ€μ¬μΌλ‘ νκ΅μ¬νμ νΉμ±κ³Ό μ²λ
μΈλ νΉμα
α
§αΌμ λ§λ μλ‘μ΄ μ¬νν¨λ¬λ€μμ κ°λ
μ μμ€μμ μ μνκ³ μ νλ€
Reconstruction of Ankle and Heel Defects with Peroneal Artery Perforator-Based Pedicled Flaps
BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of ankle and heel defects remains a significant problem for plastic surgeons. The following options exist for reconstructing such defects: local random flaps, reverse flow island flaps, and free flaps. However, each of these methods has certain drawbacks. Peroneal artery perforators have many advantages; in particular, they are predictable and reliable for ankle and heel reconstructions. In this study, we report our clinical experience with peroneal artery perforator-based pedicled flaps in ankle and heel reconstructions.
METHODS: From July 2005 to October 2012, 12 patients underwent the reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the ankle and heel using a peroneal artery perforator-based pedicled flap. These 12 cases were classified according to the anatomical area involved. The cause of the wound, comorbidities, flap size, operative results, and complications were analyzed through retrospective chart review.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.4 years. The size of the flaps ranged from 5Γ4 to 20Γ8 cm(2). The defects were classified into two groups based on whether they occurred in the Achilles tendon (n=9) or heel pad (n=3). In all 12 patients, complete flap survival was achieved without significant complications; however, two patients experienced minor wound dehiscence. Nevertheless, these wounds healed in response to subsequent debridement and conservative management. No patient had any functional deficits of the lower extremities.
CONCLUSIONS: Peroneal artery perforator-based pedicled flaps were found to be a useful option for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the ankle and heel.ope
- β¦