19 research outputs found

    ์ดˆ๋“ฑํ•™์ƒ์˜ ์ฒด์œก์ˆ˜์—… ์ฐธ์—ฌ์œ ํ˜• ๋ถ„์„

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ฒด์œก๊ต์œก๊ณผ,1996.Maste

    Past Developments and Future Directions in Revision of Korean Secondary Physical Education Curriculum

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of past developments in revision of National Curriculum of Physical Education (NCPE) and to explore the issues related to curriculum development and implementation. In a curriculum text level, the structure of curriculum document, objectives, and contents of NCPE have been revised in response to the development of discipline of sport pedagogy and changing needs of society. Regarding the issues of curriculum revision, three critical issues have been emerged: (a) aligning general guidelines of national curriculum with physical education curriculum, (b) reconciling opinions of diverse agents in curriculum development, and (c) overcoming the breach between school context and NCPE. The implementation of NCPE has been improved from passive transmission of NCPE toward more active re-organization of NCPE, thus encouraging more innovative curriculum implementation in the school settings. Future NCPE should be developed to reflect the essential nature of physical education subject and should be developed as teacher-friendly curriculum that can bridge the school contexts and NCPE.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ค‘๋“ฑํ•™๊ต ์ฒด์œก๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์˜ ๋ณ€์ฒœ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณผ์ •๊ณผ ์‹ค ํ–‰์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์Ÿ์ ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ฒด์œก๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธ์„œ์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒด์œก๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์€ ์Šคํฌ์ธ ๊ต์œกํ•™์˜ ํ•™๋ฌธ์  ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ๋ณ‘ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌธ์„œ์ฒด์ œ, ๋ชฉํ‘œ, ๋‚ด์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์‹œ๋Œ€์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐœ์ „์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ • ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋ก ๊ณผ ๊ฐ๋ก  ๊ฐ„์˜ ์†Œํ†ต, ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ • ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์ฃผ์ฒด ๊ฐ„์˜ ์†Œํ†ต, ํ•™๊ต ํ˜„์žฅ๊ณผ์˜ ์†Œํ†ต์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์Ÿ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ€๊ฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒด์œก๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์‹คํ–‰ ์ธก ๋ฉด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฅ ์ ์ธ ์‹ค์ฒœ์—์„œ ์ ์ฐจ ์ž์œจ์ ์ธ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ๊ฑฐ์ณ ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ฒด์œก๊ณผ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์€ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์•ˆ๋ชฉ์—์„œ ์ฒด์œก ๊ต๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณธ์งˆ์„ ๋ฐ˜ ์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฑ…์ž„๊ฐ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •, ํ˜„์žฅ ์นœํ™”์ ์ธ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •, ์†Œํ†ต์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค

    A study on the occupational challenges and coping strategies of the student athlete coaches

    No full text
    [๋ชฉ์ ] ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ํ•™๊ต์šด๋™๋ถ€์ง€๋„์ž์˜ ์ง์—…์  ๊ณ ์ถฉ์„ ์ค‘์ธต(๊ด€๊ณ„-์ œ๋„)์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ๋Œ€์‘์˜ ์„ฑ์งˆ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ธ๊ถŒยท์นœํ™”์  ํ•™๊ต์šด๋™๋ถ€ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ •์ฐฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ๋‹ค. [๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•] ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ดˆ, ์ค‘, ๊ณ  ํ•™๊ต์šด๋™๋ถ€์ง€๋„์ž(n=5, ํ‰๊ท ๊ฒฝ๋ ฅ 19.2๋…„)๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜-๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฉด๋‹ด์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๊ท€๋‚ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(Patton, 2015). [๊ฒฐ๊ณผ] ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ํ•™๊ต์šด๋™๋ถ€ ์กฐ์ง ๋‚ด์™ธ์˜ ์ดํ•ด๋‹น์‚ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์—ญํ• ๊ธฐ๋Œ€์— ์ง€์ณ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์šด๋™๋ถ€ ๊ด€๋ จ ์ œ๋„ ๋ฐ ์ •์ฑ…์ธ ํ•™์Šต๊ถŒ ๋ณด์žฅ์ œ, ์ฃผ 52์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ทผ๋กœ์ œ, ์ธ๊ถŒ ๋ณด์žฅ์ œ๋Š” ์ง€๋„์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ณต์‹์ , ๋น„๊ณต์‹์  ์—ญํ• ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์— ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ดํ•ด๋‹น์‚ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์  ์š”๊ตฌ์™€ ์ •๋ถ€๊ธฐ๊ด€์˜ ์ œ๋„์  ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ถˆํ˜‘ํ™”์Œ์€ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ๊ธˆ ๋ฐ˜์ œ๋„์ , ๋น„์œค๋ฆฌ์ , ๋น„๊ต์œก์  ์ž์ถฉ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํƒํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ข…์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. [๊ฒฐ๋ก ] ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ธ๊ถŒ ์นœํ™”์  ํ•™๊ต์šด๋™๋ถ€ ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ ํ† ์ฐฉํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ •๋ถ€, ํ•™๊ณ„, ์‚ฌํšŒ์ „๋ฐ˜์ด ์šด๋™๋ถ€์ง€๋„์ž๋ฅผ ํ˜์‹ ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋ณด๋‹ค, ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ’€์–ด๊ฐˆ ํ˜์‹ ์˜ ์ฃผ์ฒด๋กœ ์žฌ์ธ์‹ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•จ์„ ์ œ์–ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์€ ์ดํ•ด๋‹น์‚ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์š”๊ตฌ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๊ฐ„๊ทน์„ ์ขํžˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์œ ํšจํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค. [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to understand student athletes coaches occupational challenges from the dual perspectives(social relationship-political system), to analyze the nature of the coping strategies for the challenges, and to provide implications for building a human rights-friendly student athletes club culture. [Methods] Five coaches(n=5, average career length= 19.2 years) were selected through purposeful sampling. Data were collected by semi-structuredinterviews with participants. The collected data were inductively analyzed(Patton, 2015). [Results] First, participants struggled with informal roles demanded by the interested parties(principals, athletic directors, parents, and university coaches). Second, the system for protecting student athletes learning rights, the 52-hour work system and the human rights system added difficulties to the coaches work environment. Third, the disharmony between interested parties demands and government agencies institutional ideals pushed participants to choose anti-institutional, un-ethical, un-educational coping strategies. [Conclusion] The findings suggest that the government, academia and the community should empower coaches as the subject of reform who can solve the problem together rather than regarding them as the object of reform. Furthermore, this conclusion is expected to provide implications to alleviate disharmony between interest parties demands and government agencies systems.N

    A Systematic Literature Review on Teachers Beliefs in Elementary and Secondary Physical Education Practices: Implications for Continuity of P.E.

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ฒด๊ณ„์  ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๋ถ„์„(systematic literature review)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ดˆยท์ค‘๋“ฑํ•™๊ต์—์„œ ์ฒด์œก์„ ์ง€๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์‹ ๋…์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ดˆยท์ค‘๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก๊ต์œก์˜ ์—ฐ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ดˆ๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก์ˆ˜์—…, ์ค‘๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก์ˆ˜์—…, ์ดˆ๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก๊ต์‚ฌ, ์ค‘๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก๊ต์‚ฌ, ์ดˆ๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก ์‹ค์ฒœ, ์ค‘๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก ์‹ค์ฒœ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ๋กœ ์ตœ๊ทผ 10๋…„ ๊ฐ„ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ํ•™์ˆ ์ง€์— ๊ฒŒ์žฌ๋œ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ์„ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ตœ์ข… 45ํŽธ์„ ์„ ์ •, ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ์€ ๊น€์ข…์šฑ ์™ธ(2000)์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ฒด์œก๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์‹ ๋…์„ ๊ต๊ณผ๊ด€, ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ด€, ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •๊ด€์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ–ˆ๋˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ต๊ณผ๊ด€์—์„œ ์ฒด์œก์˜ ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์žฌ์  ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์ง€ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๊ต์œก์ฒด์ œ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ์‹ ๋…์ด, ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ด€์€ ๊ต์‚ฌ์ƒ, ๊ต์‚ฌ ์—ญํ• , ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์ž์งˆ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์‹ ๋…์ด, ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •๊ด€์€ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ์‹คํ–‰์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์‹ ๋…์ด ์ดˆยท์ค‘๋“ฑ ๊ต์‚ฌ ๊ฐ„์— ๊ณตํ†ต์ , ์ฐจ๋ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ดˆยท์ค‘๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก๊ต์œก ์—ฐ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ‰์ƒ ์ฒด์œก์˜ ํ† ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ต๊ณผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์ฒด์œก, ์ดˆยท์ค‘๋“ฑ ์ฒด์œก์„ ์ด์–ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์—ญํ• , ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ • ์‹คํ–‰ ์ „๋ฌธ์„ฑ์˜ ์ œ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•จ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. The purpose of this study was to analyze the teaching beliefs of elementary and secondary P.E. teachers through systematic literature review, and to draw implications for the continuity of elementary and secondary P.E.. For this purpose, literatures over the past 10 years were collected under the keywords Elementary P.E. Class, Secondary P.E. Class, Elementary P.E. Teachers, Secondary P.E. Teachers, Elementary P.E. Practice, Secondary P.E. Practice, and the final 45 published research were selected for analysis. The collected literatures were analyzed by using Kim, et al. (2000)s framework in which the beliefs of P.E. teachers were classified into the view on subject matters, the view on teachers, and curriculum. The results of the study are as follows. First, the beliefs on subject matters were built around intrinsic and extrinsic valueoriented P.E. and structural characteristics of the education system. Second, the beliefs on teacher were related to teacher image, role, and attributes. Third, for the beliefs on curriculum of elementary and secondary P.E., teachers showed both similarities and differences in curriculum perception and curriculum practice. Suggestions for the establishment of continuum between elementary and secondary physical education are: (a) enhancing the role of physical education that serves as a foundation of lifelong physical education, (b) building up the role as a bridge between elementary and secondary P.E., and (c) cultivating competences of P.E. teachers curriculum implementation.N
    corecore