35 research outputs found

    μ•‘μƒμ²¨κ°€μ œλ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•œ ν΄λ¦¬μš°λ ˆνƒ„ 폼의 νŠΉμ„± ν–₯상 λ°©μ•ˆ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : 화학생물곡학뢀, 2017. 2. ν•œμ’…ν›ˆ.Polyurethane is a polymer material made by the exothermic reaction between polyol and isocyante. It has many good properties that it has been widely used in various kinds of industry. [1] Especially rigid polyurethane foam is one of best thermal insulation materials and it has been used as a main insulator for cryogenic industries such as Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) storage tanks, LNG carriers etc. [1-4] Blowing agent is a material which makes polyurethane cellular material and gives polyurethane foam insulating ability. CFCs were typical blowing agents. But they have not been used because they destroy the stratospheric ozone layer. HCFC-141b was chosen for an alternative to CFCs. However, although small ozone depletion potential (ODP) of HCFC-141b compared to CFCs, additional alternative blowing agents with zero ODP such as hydroflurocarbons (HFCs) have been needed because of tougher environmental regulations since 2000s. LNG demand has risen by an estimated 7.5% per year since 2000. [5] Nowadays the price of natural gas has become higher and the efficiency of propulsion systems of liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers has improved. Due to these trends, required boil-off rate (BOR) has been lowered from 0.15%/day to 0.12%/day for conventional LNG carriers with sizes between 125,000 m3 and 170,000 m3. This requirement of BOR can be satisfied by using a rigid polyurethane foam (PUF) blown by 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b) as an insulator but we cannot use it anymore. So new alternative blowing agent should be used instead of HCFC-141b. But the use of alternative blowing agent can make another problem like deterioration of thermal conductivity due to its relatively high thermal conductivity. [1, 3, 6-12] This research introduces HFCs as an alternative to HCFC-141b and discuss characteristics of rigid PUFs prepared with HFCs and shows its application to LNG carriers. We also discuss effects of liquid-type additives to enhance properties of rigid PUFs under laboratory atmosphere and the possibility of their adaptability to mass production type PUFs. For these three liquid-type additives, propylene carbonate (PC), perfluoroalkane (PFA), and acetone, were introduced. The addition of perfluoroalkane induced the small cell size of the PUFs. Based on the morphology, thermal conductivity, and compressive strength, it is suggested that the perfluoroalkane is an efficient liquid-type additive for the improving the thermal performance of PUFs. [13, 14] Based on this result, a mass production type rigid PUF for a LNG carrier was manufactured and evaluated for BOR, mechanical strengths over operation temperature range, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and thermal shock stability for LNG carriers. The calculated BOR of the manufactured rigid PUF is below 0.12%/day, which satisfies the recent and tough BOR specification for LNG carriers. Other properties also meet the specifications for a conventional LNG carrier. [13] Consequently, it is expected that the results in this paper will bring low BOR (<0.12%/day) LNG carries with rigid PUFs using ODP free blowing agents and contribute environmental protection through saving energy and preserving the ozone layer in the stratosphere. Besides that, the product of this paper will reduce the time required to construct the raw material system and make the blending system configuration process easier.CHAPTER 1 : Introduction 1 1.1. Research motivation 1 1.2. Trend in blowing agent selection and checking the effect of various additives on properties of polyurethane foam 6 1.3. Research objectives 10 1.4. Outline of the thesis 11 CHAPTER 2 : Effect of Liquid-Type Additives on Properties of Polyurethane Foam 12 2.1. Introduction 12 2.2. Factors to affect properties of polyurethane foam 14 2.3. Experiment 20 2.3.1. Materials 20 2.3.2. Preparation of polyurethane foams 22 2.3.3. Measurement and experimental conditions 24 2.4. Effects of additives on properties of polyurethane foam 29 2.4.1. Blowing agent on rigid PUF performance 31 2.4.2. Propylene carbonate on rigid PUF performance 34 2.4.3. Effects of acetone on rigid PUF performance 37 2.4.4. Effects of perfluoroalkane on rigid PUF performance 40 2.5. Conclusion 44 2.5.1. Surface tension of polyol solutions 44 2.5.2. Cell size of PUF 47 2.5.3. Thermal Conductivity of PUFs 50 2.5.4. Compressive Strength of PUFs 53 CHAPTER 3 : Construction of Blending System for Commercial Mass Production Type PUF 57 3.1. Introduction 57 3.2. Blending system for mass production type polyurethane foam 60 3.3. Conclusion 65 CHAPTER 4 : Evaluation and Confirmation of the Possibility of Using the Mass-produced Polyurethane Foam Insulation for a LNG Carrier 66 4.1. Introduction 66 4.1.1. Heat transfer in conjugated membrane type insulation panel 69 4.1.2. Calculation of boil-off rate in LNG carrier 73 4.2. Measurement and experimental conditions 74 4.3. Evaluation results 81 4.3.1. Mechanical strength characteristics 81 4.3.2. Thermal conductivity characteristics 84 4.3.3. Thermal stability characteristics 86 4.4. Lifetime Evaluation of Polyurethane Foam 88 4.5. Economics 93 4.6. Conclusion 96 CHAPTER 5 : Concluding Remarks 97 5.1. Conclusions 97 5.2. Future works 99 Nomenclature 100 Literatures cited 102 Abstract in Korean (μš” μ•½) 109Docto

    An analysis of the relative efficiency and the total factor productivity changes of SMEs in SME funding program

    No full text
    이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ€‘μ†ŒκΈ°μ—… μ •μ±…μžκΈˆμ„ 지원 받은 κΈ°μ—…μ˜ 지원 이후 μƒλŒ€μ  νš¨μœ¨μ„±κ³Ό 생산성 좔이λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•˜κ³ , 쒅업원 수, 자본금 λ“± κΈ°μ—…κ·œλͺ¨μ™€ μ—…μ’… λ“± κΈ°μ—… νŠΉμ„± λ³€μˆ˜μ™€ μ •μ±…μžκΈˆμ˜ μ’…λ₯˜, 비쀑, 규λͺ¨ λ“± μ •μ±…μžκΈˆ λ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 수혜 기업을 μ§‘λ‹¨ν™”ν•˜μ—¬, μƒλŒ€μ  νš¨μœ¨μ„± 및 생산성 μΆ”μ΄μ˜ κΈ°μ—… 집단간 μ„±κ³Ό 차이λ₯Ό ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό, κΈ°μ—… νŠΉμ„± λ³€μˆ˜μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œλŠ” 쒅업원 수 및 자본금의 규λͺ¨κ°€ 큰 κΈ°μ—…μΌμˆ˜λ‘ μ„±κ³Ό λ³€μˆ˜μ™€ 높은 연관이 있음이 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, μ—…μ’…λ³„λ‘œλŠ” 전기업쒅에 λŒ€ν•œ 지원이 λ‹€λ₯Έ 업쒅에 λΉ„ν•΄ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 높은 성과와 μ—°κ΄€λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμŒμ„ μ•Œ 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. ν•œνŽΈ μ •μ±…μžκΈˆ λ³€μˆ˜μ™€ μ„±κ³Όμ™€μ˜ 연관성을 보면, μ§μ ‘λŒ€μΆœμ΄ λŒ€λ¦¬λŒ€μΆœ 방식에 λΉ„ν•΄, μš΄μ „μžκΈˆ μœ„μ£Όμ˜ 지원이 μ‹œμ„€μžκΈˆ μœ„μ£Όμ˜ 지원에 λΉ„ν•΄, 그리고 μ§€μ›κ·œλͺ¨κ°€ 클수둝 보닀 높은 νš¨μœ¨μ„±μ΄λ‚˜ 생산성 변화에 μ—°κ΄€λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμŒμ„ μ•Œ 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. The objective of this study is to measure the relative efficiency and the total factor productivity(TFP) changes of SMEs funded by Korea government's SME funding program. To do this, we use data envelopment analysis(DEA) and Malmquist productivity index. The results show that the average efficiency score is about 0.49-0.62 and the TFP of the sample is in trend of increasement in the sample years. Further, we relate the results with the characteristics of the firms(such as employment size, capital size, types of industry) and the methods of funding. We find that, in general, the performance of SME funding program is highly related to the larger firms, larger amounts of funding, direct funding rather than indirect funding, and funding for working fund rather than equipment fund.이 논문은 2005λ…„ κ±΄κ΅­λŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ‹ μž„κ΅μ›μ—°κ΅¬λΉ„ 지원에 μ˜ν•œ λ…Όλ¬Έμž„

    μ „μžμ •λΆ€μ œλ„ λ„μž…(The Introduction of e-Government in Korea)

    No full text
    λ…ΈνŠΈ : λ³Έ λ³΄κ³ μ„œλŠ” μ˜λ¬Έλ³΄κ³ μ„œλ₯Ό μΆ•μ•½ν•˜μ—¬ μž‘μ„±ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ ꡬ체적인 λ‚΄μš©μ€ μ˜λ¬Έλ³΄κ³ μ„œλ₯Ό μ°Έκ³ ν•˜μ‹œκΈ° λ°”λžλ‹ˆλ‹€

    λΆ€μœ μ‹ ν•΄μ–‘κ΅¬μ‘°λ¬Όμ˜ μš΄λ™μ‘λ‹΅ 및 ꡬ쑰해석

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈε€§ε­Έζ ‘ 倧學陒 :ι€ θˆΉζ΅·ζ΄‹ε·₯學科,1995.Maste

    A study on the social integration policy for married immigrant in Gwangju area

    No full text

    A Comparative Study of the Relationship between Government Regulation and Productivity in OECD countries

    No full text
    ν˜„λŒ€ μ •λΆ€κ°€ 규제의 μ§ˆμ„ κ°•μ‘°ν•˜λŠ” κ·œμ œκ°œν˜μ„ μΆ”μ§„ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μ •λΆ€κ·œμ œμ˜ 경제적 νš¨κ³Όμ— λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석이 선결적 과정이라고 ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸΌμ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μ •λΆ€ 고유의 κ°•μ œλ ₯에 κΈ°λ°˜ν•˜μ—¬ κ΅­λ―Ό μƒν™œκ³Ό κΈ°μ—… ν™œλ™μ— κ°œμž…ν•˜λŠ” μ •λΆ€κ·œμ œμ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μœ λ¬΄ν˜•μ˜ 영ν–₯에 λŒ€ν•œ 효과 츑정은 쉽지 μ•ŠμœΌλ©°, κ·Έ 결과에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλ„ λ…Όλž€μ˜ 여지가 λ§Žλ‹€. 이 같은 어렀움 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌμ˜ 경우 μ •λΆ€ 규제의 경제적 효과λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜λŠ” 연ꡬ가 λ§Žμ§€ μ•Šμ€ 싀정이닀. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ§₯λ½μ—μ„œ 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” OECDμ—μ„œ νšŒμ›κ΅­μ˜ μ •λΆ€κ·œμ œ ꡬ쑰 및 정책을 주기적으둜 νŒŒμ•…ν•˜λŠ” κ·œμ œμ§€μˆ˜ 섀문쑰사(Regulatory Indicators questionnaire) 데이터λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬, 각 ꡭ의 κ·œμ œμ •λ„μ™€ μƒμ‚°μ„±κ³Όμ˜ 관계λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석은 두 λ‹¨κ³„λ‘œ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ‘ŒλŠ”λ°, 첫번째 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ” λ§˜ν€΄μŠ€νŠΈμ§€μˆ˜(Malmquist index)λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•΄ 각ꡭ의 μ΄μš”μ†Œμƒμ‚°μ„±λ³€ν™”(total factor productivity change, TFPC)λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‘λ²ˆμ§Έ λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ”, 첫번째 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œ μΈ‘μ •λœ 생산성변화λ₯Ό μ’…μ†λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜κ³ , OECD 22개 κ΅­κ°€λ₯Ό ν‘œλ³ΈμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬ μ •λΆ€κ·œμ œμ •λ„λ₯Ό μ§€μˆ˜ν™”ν•œ PMR(product market regulation)μ§€μˆ˜λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬, 규제의 μƒμ‚°μ„±μ—μ˜ 영ν–₯을 μ‹€μ¦λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 첫째, 1998λ…„κ³Ό 2003λ…„μ˜ 두 μ‹œμ λ™μ•ˆ OECD 22κ°œκ΅­μ€ 평균 μ•½17%의 μ΄μš”μ†Œμƒμ‚°μ„± ν–₯상이 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°, κ·Έ λ³€ν™”μ˜ λ§Žμ€ 뢀뢄이 기술적 λ³€ν™”(technical change)에 κΈ°μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, μ •λΆ€κ·œμ œμ˜ 개혁의 정도가 클수둝 생산성 μ¦κ°€μ˜ 폭이 큰 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ κ°€μš΄λ°, λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μœ ν˜•μ˜ μ œν’ˆμ‹œμž₯에 λŒ€ν•œ 규 제 쀑 ꡭ외지ν–₯적(outward) κ·œμ œλ³΄λ‹€λŠ” ꡭ내지ν–₯적(inward) κ·œμ œκ°€ 생산성 변화에 μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 큰 영ν–₯을 미치고 있음이 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. One of the hottest topics in the field of regulation is about the effects of government regulation on a nation's productivity. This study empirically investigates the relationship between government regulation and productivity among the OECD countries, utilizing Regulatory Indicators Questionnaire data, collected and provided by the OECD. In a two-step analysis, this paper first analyzes the changes to total factor productivity among OECD countries over the 1998 to 2003 time period, using the Malmquist index method. During the period, the countries showed about a 17% growth rate in productivity, mainly due to technical innovation. In the second step, we analyzed the relationships between government regulation and the productivity growth obtained in the first step. The results indicate that more market-oriented regulatory reforms have positive effects on productivity growth

    μΆ©λ‚¨κ³΅κ³΅λ””μžμΈ μ„Έλ―Έλ‚˜(CNIμ„Έλ―Έλ‚˜2017-145)(박성남,μ΄μ˜λ²”)

    No full text
    κ³΅κ³΅λ””μžμΈκ³Ό λ„μ‹œμž¬μƒμ˜ 연계, ν˜‘λ ₯ λ°©μ•ˆ λ„μΆœ 및 좩남 κ³΅κ³΅λ””μžμΈ ν™œμ„±ν™”λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ μ§€μ—­μž¬μƒ 방법둠 λͺ¨μƒ‰- 개회 및 κ΅­λ―Όμ˜λ‘€ - 인사말씀 (좩남연ꡬ원μž₯) - 인사말씀 (좩청남도 ꡭ토ꡐ톡ꡭμž₯) - λ°œν‘œ 1 (κ±΄μΆ•λ„μ‹œκ³΅κ°„μ—°κ΅¬μ†Œ μ„Όν„°μž₯ - λ°œν‘œ 2 (κ²½κΈ°λŒ€ν•™κ΅ 건좕학과 ꡐ수) - ν† λ‘  (쒌μž₯ 좩남연ꡬ원μž₯)
    corecore