35 research outputs found
μ‘μ첨κ°μ λ₯Ό νμ©ν ν΄λ¦¬μ°λ ν νΌμ νΉμ± ν₯μ λ°©μ
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (λ°μ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : ννμ물곡νλΆ, 2017. 2. νμ’
ν.Polyurethane is a polymer material made by the exothermic reaction between polyol and isocyante. It has many good properties that it has been widely used in various kinds of industry. [1] Especially rigid polyurethane foam is one of best thermal insulation materials and it has been used as a main insulator for cryogenic industries such as Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) storage tanks, LNG carriers etc. [1-4]
Blowing agent is a material which makes polyurethane cellular material and gives polyurethane foam insulating ability. CFCs were typical blowing agents. But they have not been used because they destroy the stratospheric ozone layer. HCFC-141b was chosen for an alternative to CFCs. However, although small ozone depletion potential (ODP) of HCFC-141b compared to CFCs, additional alternative blowing agents with zero ODP such as hydroflurocarbons (HFCs) have been needed because of tougher environmental regulations since 2000s.
LNG demand has risen by an estimated 7.5% per year since 2000. [5] Nowadays the price of natural gas has become higher and the efficiency of propulsion systems of liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers has improved. Due to these trends, required boil-off rate (BOR) has been lowered from 0.15%/day to 0.12%/day for conventional LNG carriers with sizes between 125,000 m3 and 170,000 m3. This requirement of BOR can be satisfied by using a rigid polyurethane foam (PUF) blown by 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b) as an insulator but we cannot use it anymore. So new alternative blowing agent should be used instead of HCFC-141b. But the use of alternative blowing agent can make another problem like deterioration of thermal conductivity due to its relatively high thermal conductivity. [1, 3, 6-12]
This research introduces HFCs as an alternative to HCFC-141b and discuss characteristics of rigid PUFs prepared with HFCs and shows its application to LNG carriers. We also discuss effects of liquid-type additives to enhance properties of rigid PUFs under laboratory atmosphere and the possibility of their adaptability to mass production type PUFs. For these three liquid-type additives, propylene carbonate (PC), perfluoroalkane (PFA), and acetone, were introduced. The addition of perfluoroalkane induced the small cell size of the PUFs. Based on the morphology, thermal conductivity, and compressive strength, it is suggested that the perfluoroalkane is an efficient liquid-type additive for the improving the thermal performance of PUFs. [13, 14]
Based on this result, a mass production type rigid PUF for a LNG carrier was manufactured and evaluated for BOR, mechanical strengths over operation temperature range, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and thermal shock stability for LNG carriers. The calculated BOR of the manufactured rigid PUF is below 0.12%/day, which satisfies the recent and tough BOR specification for LNG carriers. Other properties also meet the specifications for a conventional LNG carrier. [13]
Consequently, it is expected that the results in this paper will bring low BOR (<0.12%/day) LNG carries with rigid PUFs using ODP free blowing agents and contribute environmental protection through saving energy and preserving the ozone layer in the stratosphere. Besides that, the product of this paper will reduce the time required to construct the raw material system and make the blending system configuration process easier.CHAPTER 1 : Introduction 1
1.1. Research motivation 1
1.2. Trend in blowing agent selection and checking the effect of various additives on properties of polyurethane foam 6
1.3. Research objectives 10
1.4. Outline of the thesis 11
CHAPTER 2 : Effect of Liquid-Type Additives on Properties of Polyurethane Foam 12
2.1. Introduction 12
2.2. Factors to affect properties of polyurethane foam 14
2.3. Experiment 20
2.3.1. Materials 20
2.3.2. Preparation of polyurethane foams 22
2.3.3. Measurement and experimental conditions 24
2.4. Effects of additives on properties of polyurethane foam 29
2.4.1. Blowing agent on rigid PUF performance 31
2.4.2. Propylene carbonate on rigid PUF performance 34
2.4.3. Effects of acetone on rigid PUF performance 37
2.4.4. Effects of perfluoroalkane on rigid PUF performance 40
2.5. Conclusion 44
2.5.1. Surface tension of polyol solutions 44
2.5.2. Cell size of PUF 47
2.5.3. Thermal Conductivity of PUFs 50
2.5.4. Compressive Strength of PUFs 53
CHAPTER 3 : Construction of Blending System for Commercial Mass Production Type PUF 57
3.1. Introduction 57
3.2. Blending system for mass production type polyurethane foam 60
3.3. Conclusion 65
CHAPTER 4 : Evaluation and Confirmation of the Possibility of Using the Mass-produced Polyurethane Foam Insulation for a LNG Carrier 66
4.1. Introduction 66
4.1.1. Heat transfer in conjugated membrane type insulation panel 69
4.1.2. Calculation of boil-off rate in LNG carrier 73
4.2. Measurement and experimental conditions 74
4.3. Evaluation results 81
4.3.1. Mechanical strength characteristics 81
4.3.2. Thermal conductivity characteristics 84
4.3.3. Thermal stability characteristics 86
4.4. Lifetime Evaluation of Polyurethane Foam 88
4.5. Economics 93
4.6. Conclusion 96
CHAPTER 5 : Concluding Remarks 97
5.1. Conclusions 97
5.2. Future works 99
Nomenclature 100
Literatures cited 102
Abstract in Korean (μ μ½) 109Docto
An analysis of the relative efficiency and the total factor productivity changes of SMEs in SME funding program
μ΄ μ°κ΅¬λ μ€μκΈ°μ
μ μ±
μκΈμ μ§μ λ°μ κΈ°μ
μ μ§μ μ΄ν μλμ ν¨μ¨μ±κ³Ό μμ°μ± μΆμ΄λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ νκ³ , μ’
μ
μ μ, μλ³ΈκΈ λ± κΈ°μ
κ·λͺ¨μ μ
μ’
λ± κΈ°μ
νΉμ± λ³μμ μ μ±
μκΈμ μ’
λ₯, λΉμ€, κ·λͺ¨ λ± μ μ±
μκΈ λ³μλ₯Ό κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ μν κΈ°μ
μ μ§λ¨ννμ¬, μλμ ν¨μ¨μ± λ° μμ°μ± μΆμ΄μ κΈ°μ
μ§λ¨κ° μ±κ³Ό μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ λΆμνμλ€. λΆμ κ²°κ³Ό, κΈ°μ
νΉμ± λ³μμ μμ΄μλ μ’
μ
μ μ λ° μλ³ΈκΈμ κ·λͺ¨κ° ν° κΈ°μ
μΌμλ‘ μ±κ³Ό λ³μμ λμ μ°κ΄μ΄ μμμ΄ λνλ¬μΌλ©°, μ
μ’
λ³λ‘λ μ κΈ°μ
μ’
μ λν μ§μμ΄ λ€λ₯Έ μ
μ’
μ λΉν΄ μλμ μΌλ‘ λμ μ±κ³Όμ μ°κ΄λμ΄ μμμ μ μ μμλ€. ννΈ μ μ±
μκΈ λ³μμ μ±κ³Όμμ μ°κ΄μ±μ 보면, μ§μ λμΆμ΄ λ리λμΆ λ°©μμ λΉν΄, μ΄μ μκΈ μμ£Όμ μ§μμ΄ μμ€μκΈ μμ£Όμ μ§μμ λΉν΄, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ§μκ·λͺ¨κ° ν΄μλ‘ λ³΄λ€ λμ ν¨μ¨μ±μ΄λ μμ°μ± λ³νμ μ°κ΄λμ΄ μμμ μ μ μμλ€. The objective of this study is to measure the relative efficiency and the total factor productivity(TFP) changes of SMEs funded by Korea government's SME funding program. To do this, we use data envelopment analysis(DEA) and Malmquist productivity index. The results show that the average efficiency score is about 0.49-0.62 and the TFP of the sample is in trend of increasement in the sample years. Further, we relate the results with the characteristics of the firms(such as employment size, capital size, types of industry) and the methods of funding. We find that, in general, the performance of SME funding program is highly related to the larger firms, larger amounts of funding, direct funding rather than indirect funding, and funding for working fund rather than equipment fund.μ΄ λ
Όλ¬Έμ 2005λ
건κ΅λνκ΅ μ μκ΅μμ°κ΅¬λΉ μ§μμ μν λ
Όλ¬Έμ
μ μμ λΆμ λ λμ (The Introduction of e-Government in Korea)
λ
ΈνΈ : λ³Έ λ³΄κ³ μλ μλ¬Έλ³΄κ³ μλ₯Ό μΆμ½νμ¬ μμ±ν κ²μΌλ‘ ꡬ체μ μΈ λ΄μ©μ μλ¬Έλ³΄κ³ μλ₯Ό μ°Έκ³ νμκΈ° λ°λλλ€
λΆμ μ ν΄μꡬ쑰물μ μ΄λμλ΅ λ° κ΅¬μ‘°ν΄μ
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈε€§εΈζ ‘ 倧εΈι’ :ι θΉζ΅·ζ΄ε·₯εΈη§,1995.Maste
A Comparative Study of the Relationship between Government Regulation and Productivity in OECD countries
νλ μ λΆκ° κ·μ μ μ§μ κ°μ‘°νλ κ·μ κ°νμ μΆμ§νκΈ° μν΄μλ μ λΆκ·μ μ κ²½μ μ ν¨κ³Όμ λν λΆμμ΄ μ κ²°μ κ³Όμ μ΄λΌκ³ ν μ μλ€. κ·ΈλΌμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ μ λΆ κ³ μ μ κ°μ λ ₯μ κΈ°λ°νμ¬ κ΅λ―Ό μνκ³Ό κΈ°μ
νλμ κ°μ
νλ μ λΆκ·μ μ λ€μν μ 무νμ μν₯μ λν ν¨κ³Ό μΈ‘μ μ μ½μ§ μμΌλ©°, κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όμ λν΄μλ λ
Όλμ μ¬μ§κ° λ§λ€. μ΄ κ°μ μ΄λ €μ λλ¬Έμ μ°λ¦¬λλΌμ κ²½μ° μ λΆ κ·μ μ κ²½μ μ ν¨κ³Όλ₯Ό λΆμνλ μ°κ΅¬κ° λ§μ§ μμ μ€μ μ΄λ€. μ΄λ¬ν λ§₯λ½μμ μ΄ μ°κ΅¬μμλ OECDμμ νμκ΅μ μ λΆκ·μ ꡬ쑰 λ° μ μ±
μ μ£ΌκΈ°μ μΌλ‘ νμ
νλ κ·μ μ§μ μ€λ¬Έμ‘°μ¬(Regulatory Indicators questionnaire) λ°μ΄ν°λ₯Ό νμ©νμ¬, κ° κ΅μ κ·μ μ λμ μμ°μ±κ³Όμ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό λΆμνμλ€. λΆμμ λ λ¨κ³λ‘ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ‘λλ°, 첫λ²μ§Έ λ¨κ³μμλ λ§ν΄μ€νΈμ§μ(Malmquist index)λ₯Ό νμ©ν΄ κ°κ΅μ μ΄μμμμ°μ±λ³ν(total factor productivity change, TFPC)λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ νμλ€. λλ²μ§Έ λ¨κ³μμλ, 첫λ²μ§Έ λ¨κ³μμ μΈ‘μ λ μμ°μ±λ³νλ₯Ό μ’
μλ³μλ‘ μ¬μ©νκ³ , OECD 22κ° κ΅κ°λ₯Ό νλ³ΈμΌλ‘ νμ¬ μ λΆκ·μ μ λλ₯Ό μ§μνν PMR(product market regulation)μ§μλ₯Ό μ€λͺ
λ³μλ‘ μ¬μ©νμ¬, κ·μ μ μμ°μ±μμ μν₯μ μ€μ¦λΆμνμλ€. λΆμ κ²°κ³Ό 첫째, 1998λ
κ³Ό 2003λ
μ λ μμ λμ OECD 22κ°κ΅μ νκ· μ½17%μ μ΄μμμμ°μ± ν₯μμ΄ μμμΌλ©°, κ·Έ λ³νμ λ§μ λΆλΆμ΄ κΈ°μ μ λ³ν(technical change)μ κΈ°μΈνμλ€. λμ§Έ, μ λΆκ·μ μ κ°νμ μ λκ° ν΄μλ‘ μμ°μ± μ¦κ°μ νμ΄ ν° κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ κ°μ΄λ°, λ€μν μ νμ μ νμμ₯μ λν κ· μ μ€ κ΅μΈμ§ν₯μ (outward) κ·μ 보λ€λ κ΅λ΄μ§ν₯μ (inward) κ·μ κ° μμ°μ± λ³νμ μλμ μΌλ‘ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉκ³ μμμ΄ λνλ¬λ€. One of the hottest topics in the field of regulation is about the effects of government regulation on a nation's productivity. This study empirically investigates the relationship between government regulation and productivity among the OECD countries, utilizing Regulatory Indicators Questionnaire data, collected and provided by the OECD. In a two-step analysis, this paper first analyzes the changes to total factor productivity among OECD countries over the 1998 to 2003 time period, using the Malmquist index method. During the period, the countries showed about a 17% growth rate in productivity, mainly due to technical innovation. In the second step, we analyzed the relationships between government regulation and the productivity growth obtained in the first step. The results indicate that more market-oriented regulatory reforms have positive effects on productivity growth
μ μΆμ°, κ³ λ Ήνμ λ°λ₯Έ μ¬νλ³΅μ§ κ³΅μ μ λ¬μ²΄κ³ κ°νΈ λ°©μ(Improvement measures for social welfare service delivery system for an aging, low-birth rate society)
μΆ©λ¨κ³΅κ³΅λμμΈ μΈλ―Έλ(CNIμΈλ―Έλ2017-145)(λ°μ±λ¨,μ΄μλ²)
곡곡λμμΈκ³Ό λμμ¬μμ μ°κ³, νλ ₯ λ°©μ λμΆ λ° μΆ©λ¨ κ³΅κ³΅λμμΈ νμ±νλ₯Ό ν΅ν μ§μμ¬μ λ°©λ²λ‘ λͺ¨μ- κ°ν λ° κ΅λ―Όμλ‘
- μΈμ¬λ§μ (μΆ©λ¨μ°κ΅¬μμ₯)
- μΈμ¬λ§μ (μΆ©μ²λ¨λ κ΅ν κ΅ν΅κ΅μ₯)
- λ°ν 1 (건μΆλμ곡κ°μ°κ΅¬μ μΌν°μ₯
- λ°ν 2 (κ²½κΈ°λνκ΅ κ±΄μΆνκ³Ό κ΅μ)
- ν λ‘ (μ’μ₯ μΆ©λ¨μ°κ΅¬μμ₯)