139 research outputs found

    κΉ€μΆ˜μˆ˜ μ‹œμ˜ λ©œλž‘μ½œλ¦¬μ™€ νƒˆμ—­μ‚¬μ„± 연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    2011λ…„ 2μ›” ν˜„λŒ€λ¬Έν•™ λ°•μ‚¬ν•™μœ„ λ…Όλ¬Έ, μ§€λ„κ΅μˆ˜ κΉ€μœ μ€‘ 선생

    κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘ 함양을 μœ„ν•œ μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 슀포츠ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš©λ°©μ•ˆ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ 체윑ꡐ윑과, 2018. 2. 졜의창.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ ν˜„ν™©μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³  μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 슀포츠 ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš© λ°©μ•ˆμ„ λͺ¨μƒ‰ν•˜λŠ”데 μžˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš© λ°©μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œ κ²½κΈ°λ ₯을 ν–₯상 μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” 방법, 지식을 μŠ΅λ“ ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 방법, 인성을 λ°œλ‹¬μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” λ°©μ•ˆμ„ λͺ¨μƒ‰ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘μ˜ κ°œλ…κ³Ό κ΅¬μ„±μš”μ†ŒλŠ” 무엇인가?, μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ ν˜„ν™©μ€ μ–΄λ– ν•œκ°€?, μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 슀포츠ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš©λ°©μ•ˆμ€ 무엇인가? λΌλŠ” 3κ°€μ§€μ˜ μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Έμ œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ λ¬Έν—Œμ—°κ΅¬λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ 질적 연ꡬ 방법을 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ μ‹œμ€‘μ— μΆœκ°„λœ κ³¨ν”„μ„œμ  400κΆŒμ„ μ„ μ •ν•˜μ—¬ 이쀑 250κΆŒμ„ μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ κ°œλ…κ³Ό λͺ©λ‘ λ³„λ‘œ 정리 ν–ˆμœΌλ©°, λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μž₯λ₯΄ 별 λΆ„λ₯˜λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ 각 μž₯λ₯΄λ³„ μ½λŠ” 골프 자료λ₯Ό μ·¨ν•©ν•˜κ³  λŒ€ν‘œμ  μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ λ„μ„œλ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ μ½λŠ” 골프λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ 슀포츠ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš© λ°©μ•ˆμ„ λͺ¨μƒ‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ 연ꡬ과정을 ν†΅ν•œ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 첫째, μš΄λ™μ„ μ˜¬λ°”λ₯΄κ²Œ, 골프λ₯Ό μ˜¬λ°”λ₯΄κ²Œ λ°›μ•„λ“œλ¦¬κ³  느끼기 μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 골프λ₯Ό λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ ‘κ·ΌμœΌλ‘œ λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” 것이 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ©°, 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 골프 기술, 이둠, 지식, 골퍼의 λ§ˆμŒμžμ„Έ λ“±μ˜ κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘μ΄ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘μ€ 기술적인 츑면인 골프λŠ₯(能), 지식적인 츑면인 골프지(ζ™Ί), λ§ˆμŒκ°€μ§μ— κ΄€ν•œ 골프심(εΏƒ)으둜 ꡬ뢄 지을 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ ν˜„ν™©μ€ κ΅­λ‚΄ λŒ€ν˜•μ„œμ κ³Ό κ΅­λ‚΄μ™Έ μ˜¨λΌμΈμ„ 톡해 μΆœνŒλ˜μ–΄ μžˆλŠ” 골프관련 μ„œμ  400μ—¬κ°œ μ •λ„λ‘œ νŒŒμ•…ν–ˆμœΌλ©°, 절판된 μ„œμ κ³Ό λ‚΄μš©μ  ν•œκ³„κ°€ μžˆλŠ” μ„œμ μ€ μ œμ™Έν•˜κ³  250κΆŒμ„ μ„ μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ„ μ •λœ 250ꢌ κ°€μš΄λ° λ‚΄μš©μ„ 확인 ν›„ 16개의 μž₯λ₯΄λ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ μž₯λ₯΄λ‘œλŠ” 경영, 골프μž₯, ꡐ양, 기술, μ†Œμ„€, 심리, μˆ˜ν•„, 인물, μžκΈ°κ³„λ°œ, μž‘μ§€, 정보, λ§Œν™”, 유머, μ˜ν•™, 쒅ꡐ, ν΄λŸ½μ΄λ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš©λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œ κ²½κΈ°λ ₯을 ν–₯상 μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” 뢀뢄인 골프λŠ₯에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ κΈ°μˆ μ„œμ κ³Ό μ‹¬λ¦¬μ„œμ μ„ μ½μŒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 이둠을 μ ‘ν•˜κ³  사색을 톡해 본인만의 이둠이 μ •λ¦½λ˜μ–΄ κ²½κΈ°λ ₯을 ν–₯상 μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 골프관련 μ§€μ‹μ˜ 함양인 골프지에 κ΄€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 역사, λ¬Έν™”, μ†Œμ„€ 등을 μ½μŒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ 골프관련 지식을 μŠ΅λ“ ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰ 골퍼의 λ§ˆμŒκ°€μ§μ— λŒ€ν•œ 골프심은 κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 정신인 λ£°κ³Ό λ§€λ„ˆλ₯Ό 잘 지킀며, 골프λ₯Ό 톡해 λ§ˆμŒμˆ˜μ–‘ 및 μžκΈ°κ³„λ°œμ΄ 될 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μˆ˜ν•„, κ΅μ–‘μ„œμ μ„ μ½μŒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ 심적 μ†Œμ–‘μ„ 함양 ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€κ³  κ²°λ‘ μ§€μ—ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 μ œμ–Έμ„ ν•˜κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€. 첫째, μ½λŠ” 골프λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•œ 골프코칭 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ΄ κ°œλ°œλ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. 골프코칭 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ— μ½λŠ” 골프 μ˜μ—­μ΄ μΆ”κ°€ λ˜μ–΄ κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘ 높일 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ ν•΄μ•Ό ν•  것이닀. λ‘˜μ§Έ, ν˜„μž₯의 μ½”μΉ˜λ“€μ—κ²Œ μ½λŠ” 골프에 λŒ€ν•œ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. μ½λŠ” 골프λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ ν˜„μž₯의 ν”„λ‘œ, μ½”μΉ˜λ“€μ˜ 기술적인 츑면에 νŽΈμ€‘λœ κ΄€μ‹¬μ—μ„œ λ²—μ–΄λ‚˜ λ‹€λ°©λ©΄μ˜ 골프 지도가 κ°€λŠ₯μΌ€ ν•˜λŠ” μ—­λŸ‰μ„ 발휘 ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μ§€λ„μžκ΅μœ‘μ— κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ가 이루어 μ Έμ•Ό ν•  것이닀.β… . μ„œλ‘  1 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„± 1 2. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ  4 3. 연ꡬ 문제 5 4. 연ꡬ 방법 5 κ°€. 연ꡬ섀계 5 λ‚˜. μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘ 6 λ‹€. 자료 뢄석 7 5. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ œν•œμ  9 β…‘. μš΄λ™μ†Œμ–‘κ³Ό κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘ 10 1. μš΄λ™μ†Œμ–‘ 10 κ°€. μš΄λ™μ†Œμ–‘μ˜ κ°œλ… 10 λ‚˜. μš΄λ™μ†Œμ–‘μ˜ κ΅¬μ„±μš”μ†Œ 12 2. κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘ 14 κ°€. κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘μ˜ κ°œλ… 14 λ‚˜. κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘μ˜ κ΅¬μ„±μš”μ†Œ 15 3. μš΄λ™μ†Œμ–‘κ³Ό κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘μ˜ 인문적 μ ‘κ·Ό 19 κ°€. μš΄λ™μ†Œμ–‘ ν•¨μ–‘μ˜ 인문적 μ ‘κ·Ό 19 λ‚˜. κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘ ν•¨μ–‘μ˜ 인문적 μ ‘κ·Ό 21 β…’. μ½λŠ” μŠ€ν¬μΈ μ™€ μ½λŠ” 골프 23 1. μ½λŠ” 슀포츠 23 κ°€. μ½λŠ” 슀포츠의 κ°œλ… 23 λ‚˜. μ½λŠ” 슀포츠의 ν™œμš© 27 2. μ½λŠ” 골프 31 κ°€. μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ κ°œλ… 31 λ‚˜. μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 리슀트 33 λ‹€. μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ μž₯λ₯΄ 48 3. λŒ€ν‘œμ  μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 뢄석 67 κ°€. κΈ°λŸ‰ν–₯상 μ½λŠ” 골프 67 λ‚˜. 문화이해 μ½λŠ” 골프 77 λ‹€. ν™•μž₯λ³€μš© μ½λŠ” 골프 86 β…£. μ½λŠ” κ³¨ν”„μ˜ 슀포츠ꡐ윑적 ν™œμš© λ°©μ•ˆ 92 1. 골프 λŠ₯(能)μ†Œμ–‘ ν–₯상 92 κ°€. 골프 λŠ₯(能)μ†Œμ–‘ ν–₯상을 μœ„ν•œ 방법 92 λ‚˜. 골프 λŠ₯(能)μ†Œμ–‘ ν–₯상을 μœ„ν•œ μ½λŠ” 골프 94 2. 골프 지(ζ™Ί)μ†Œμ–‘ 증진 96 κ°€. 골프 지(ζ™Ί)μ†Œμ–‘ 증진을 μœ„ν•œ 방법 96 λ‚˜. 골프 지(ζ™Ί)μ†Œμ–‘ 증진을 μœ„ν•œ μ½λŠ” 골프 97 3. 골프 심(εΏƒ)μ†Œμ–‘ 함양 100 κ°€. 골프 심(εΏƒ)μ†Œμ–‘ 함양을 μœ„ν•œ 방법 100 λ‚˜. 골프 심(εΏƒ)μ†Œμ–‘ 함양을 μœ„ν•œ μ½λŠ” 골프 101 β…€. κ²°λ‘  및 μ œμ–Έ 103 1. κ²°λ‘  103 2. μ œμ–Έ 105 κ°€. κ³¨ν”„μ†Œμ–‘ 함양을 μœ„ν•œ κ³¨ν”„κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ μ œμ–Έ 105 λ‚˜. 후속연ꡬλ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μ œμ–Έ 106 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 109 117 Abstract 118Maste

    A Study on the Derivation of Landscape Resources and Characteristics Analysis of Taean Coast National Park in Social Media

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : ν™˜κ²½λŒ€ν•™μ› ν™˜κ²½μ‘°κ²½ν•™κ³Ό, 2018. 2. μ†μš©ν›ˆ.2007λ…„ γ€Žκ²½κ΄€λ²•γ€μ΄ μ œμ •λ¨μ— 따라 μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌμ˜ 경관은 법적 κ·Όκ±°λ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ μžμ—°ν™˜κ²½, 역사문화, μƒν™œκ³΅κ°„μ„ μ•„μš°λ₯΄λŠ” κ²½κ΄€κ³„νš 수립 및 적용이 κ°€λŠ₯ν•΄μ‘Œλ‹€. μ΄λ•ŒλΆ€ν„° 경관에 λŒ€ν•œ ꡬ체적인 관리가 μ‹œμž‘λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜ γ€Žκ²½κ΄€λ²•γ€μ€ λ„μ‹œμ§€μ—­μ˜ 경관관리λ₯Ό μ€‘μ μ μœΌλ‘œ 닀루고 μžˆμ–΄, μžμ—°κ²½κ΄€μ— λŒ€ν•œ 경관평가 및 관리에 κ΄€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” ν˜„μž¬κΉŒμ§€λ„ λ„μ‹œμ§€μ—­ 경관에 λΉ„ν•΄ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 미흑할 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ κ²½κ΄€μžμ›μ— κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ도 ν˜„ν™©μ‘°μ‚¬ μ°¨μ›μ—μ„œ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€κ±°λ‚˜ μ „λ¬Έκ°€μ˜ 주관적 νŒλ‹¨μœΌλ‘œ μ„ μ •λ˜κ³  ν‰κ°€λ˜μ–΄ μ™”λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 경관은 λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” λŒ€μƒκ³Ό 주체, μ²΄ν—˜ν™œλ™ λ“± λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μΌœκ°€ μ–½ν˜€ ν˜•μ„±λ˜λŠ” κ²ƒμž„μ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  ν˜„μž¬κΉŒμ§€ μ‹€μ‹œλ˜μ–΄μ˜¨ κ²½κ΄€μžμ› μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ‹œκ°μ  μžμ›μ— κ΅­ν•œλ˜μ–΄ 쑰사 및 κ΄€λ¦¬λ°©μ•ˆμ„ λ§ˆλ ¨ν•˜κ³  있으며, μ‚¬λžŒμ΄ μ²΄ν—˜ν•˜λŠ” 경관에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ λ―ΈλΉ„ν•˜κ²Œ μ—°κ΅¬λ˜μ–΄ μ™”λ‹€. 이에 λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” κΈ°μ‘΄ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„λ₯Ό λ³΄μ™„ν•˜λŠ” λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œμ„œ μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•œ 경관연ꡬλ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹œκ°μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 경관사진과 ν•¨κ»˜ 사진에 ν¬ν•¨λœ ν…μŠ€νŠΈ 및 방문자의 ν–‰νƒœλΆ„μ„μ„ λ³‘ν–‰ν•˜μ—¬ λ‹€κ°λ„μ˜ κ²½κ΄€μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ μ œκΈ°ν•˜λ©°, 체계적인 κ²½κ΄€κ³„νš 및 지속가λŠ₯ν•œ 경관관리λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μˆ˜μš”μžμ˜ μž…μž₯μ—μ„œ λ°”λΌλ³΄λŠ” κ²½κ΄€κ³Ό 이에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식 뢄석 λ˜ν•œ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€κ³  μΈμ‹ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄λŠ” 기본적으둜 μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ΄ μ²΄ν—˜μ„ ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜ κ²½ν—˜μ„ 톡해 λŠλ‚€μ μ΄λ‚˜ 사물 λ˜λŠ” ν˜„μƒμ— λŒ€ν•œ 주관적인 견해λ₯Ό 타인과 κ³΅μœ ν•˜λŠ” νŠΉμ§•μ΄ μ‘΄μž¬ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ νŠΉμ„±μ— μž…κ°ν•˜μ—¬ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄ 뢄석을 톡해 μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ΄ μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ κ²½κ΄€μ—μ„œ ν™œλ™ν•˜κ³  ν–₯μœ ν•˜λ©° μ²΄ν—˜ν•˜λŠ”μ§€ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ„ 연ꡬ λŒ€μƒμ§€λ‘œ μ„ μ •ν•˜μ—¬, μΈμŠ€νƒ€κ·Έλž¨μ—μ„œ λŒ€μ€‘μ΄ μΈμ‹ν•˜λŠ” νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€μ„ λ„μΆœν•˜κ³ , 사진과 ν•¨κ»˜ μž‘μ„±λœ ν…μŠ€νŠΈ 뢄석을 톡해 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ κ²½κ΄€μœ ν˜•μ„ λΆ„λ₯˜ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ κ²½κ΄€μžμ› λ„μΆœ 및 κ²½κ΄€νŠΉμ„± 뢄석을 μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 크게 λ„€ λΆ€λΆ„μ˜ μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ λ„μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 첫째, ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€ κ΄€λ ¨ 선행연ꡬ 고찰을 톡해 ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€μ˜ μœ ν˜• 및 κ΅¬μ„±μš”μ†Œλ₯Ό μ •λ¦¬ν•˜κ³  λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ λ‹€λ£¨κ³ μž ν•˜λŠ” ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€μ˜ κ°œλ…μ„ κ·œμ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€μ˜ κ°œλ… 및 λ²”μœ„λŠ” λ§Žμ€ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ μ–ΈκΈ‰ν•˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ‚˜, μ—°κ΅¬λ§ˆλ‹€ 차이가 μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜μ—¬ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œμ˜ ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ°œλ…μ„ μ„€μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ˜ κ°œλ… 및 μ˜μ˜μ™€ κ²½κ΄€ κ΄€λ ¨ 선행연ꡬλ₯Ό κ³ μ°°ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 경관연ꡬ λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄ λΆ„μ„μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ λ„μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κΈ°μ‘΄ κ²½κ΄€μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 섀문쑰사λ₯Ό 톡해 방문객의 인식을 νŒŒμ•…ν•΄μ™”λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ„€λ¬Έμ‘°μ‚¬λŠ” 사전에 μ„€κ³„λœ 쑰사항λͺ©μ— 따라 ν”Όν—˜μžμ˜ 닡변이 μœ λ„λ˜λŠ” ν•œκ³„κ°€ λ°œμƒλ˜λ©°, 방문객의 자유둜운 μ˜κ²¬μ„ μ·¨ν•©ν•˜κΈ° μ–΄λ ΅λ‹€. 반면 μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄λŠ” 자발적 μ°Έμ—¬λ‘œ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λŠ” ν˜•νƒœμ΄κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μ„€κ³„λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 의견과 경관에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식을 가감 없이 νŒŒμ•…ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” μž₯점을 νŒŒμ•…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, νŠΉμ •μ§€μ—­μ„ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ 방문객이 μΈμ‹ν•˜λŠ” κ²½κ΄€μžμ› 및 κ²½κ΄€νŠΉμ„±μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄ μΈμŠ€νƒ€κ·Έλž¨μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ κ΄€λ ¨ κ²Œμ‹œλ¬Όμ˜ ν…μŠ€νŠΈ 뢄석을 톡해 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ— λŒ€ν•œ 방문객의 μ „λ°˜μ μΈ 인식을 μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό 톡해 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ μ£Όμš” 곡간을 μ„ μ •ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€μ„ λ„μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€μ— ν•΄λ‹Ήλ˜λŠ” 사진에 ν•¨κ»˜ μž‘μ„±λœ μ½”λ©˜νŠΈμ™€ ν•΄μ‹œνƒœκ·Έλ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ μ£Όμš” ν‚€μ›Œλ“œλ₯Ό λ„μΆœν•˜κ³  μ£Όμš” κ²½κ΄€ 및 ν™œλ™κ³Ό μ„ ν˜Έμš”μΈμ„ μ •λ¦¬ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, 방문객듀이 κ·Έ κ³΅κ°„μ—μ„œ μ–΄λ–€ μ²΄ν—˜μ„ ν•˜λ©° μ–΄λ–€ μžμ›κ³Ό μš”μ†Œλ₯Ό μ€‘μš”ν•˜κ²Œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ”μ§€ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ—λŠ” 6개의 ꡬ역이 λ°©λ¬Έκ°μ—κ²Œ μ£Όμš” κ³΅κ°„μœΌλ‘œ μΈμ‹λ˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ μ•Œ 수 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 이에 ν•΄λ‹Ήλ˜λŠ” λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€μ€ 31κ°œκ°€ λ„μΆœλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ 31개의 λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 방문객이 μ„œμˆ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ˜κ²¬μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ 경관에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식을 λ„μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ„·μ§Έ, 방문객의 경관인식과 μ£Όμš” ν™œλ™μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ˜ ν™œλ™μ— 기반 ν•œ κ²½κ΄€ μœ ν˜• λΆ„λ₯˜ 틀을 μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³ , λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€(CP)의 κ²½κ΄€μœ ν˜•μ„ λΆ„λ₯˜ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ•žμ„œ λ„μΆœν•œ λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€ 31κ°œμ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 경관쑰망, 곡간이미지, λžœλ“œλ§ˆν¬, μ²΄ν—˜ 4κ°€μ§€μ˜ κ²½κ΄€ μœ ν˜•μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„λ₯˜ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 6개의 ꡬ역이 λŒ€ν‘œμ„±μ„ λ„λŠ” κ²½κ΄€μœ ν˜•μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ΄ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ 경관을 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ ν–₯μœ ν•˜κ³  μ–΄λ–€ ν™œλ™λ“€μ„ ν•˜λŠ”μ§€ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μ’…ν•©ν•˜λ©΄ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 기쑴에 μ‹œν–‰λ˜μ–΄ μ˜€λŠ” κ²½κ΄€μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„λ₯Ό λ³΄μ™„ν•˜κ³  지역적 νŠΉμ„±μ„ λ°˜μ˜ν•œ κ²½κ΄€μžμ› 연ꡬ λ°©λ²•μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ μΈμ‹ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 체계적인 κ²½κ΄€κ³„νš 및 지속가λŠ₯ν•œ 경관관리 λ°©μ•ˆ μˆ˜λ¦½μ„ μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” λŒ€μ€‘μ΄ μΈμ‹ν•˜λŠ” 경관에 λŒ€ν•œ λ‹€κ°λ„μ˜ λΆ„μ„μ˜ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” μ „μ œν•˜μ—, 자발적 μ°Έμ—¬λ‘œ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λŠ” μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ κ²½κ΄€μžμ› λ„μΆœ 및 κ²½κ΄€νŠΉμ„± 뢄석을 μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 경관에 λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ€‘μ˜ 인식을 νŒŒμ•…ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ‹€μ‹œλ¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, λ„μΆœλœ μ—¬μ„― 개의 μ£Όμš” 곡간에 ν•œμ •ν•˜μ—¬ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ§„ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ ν–₯ν›„ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ—μ„œ μ‘°μ„±ν•œ νƒλ°©λ‘œμ˜ ꡬ간별 연ꡬλ₯Ό μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ μ§„ν–‰ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ 전역에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ—°κ΅¬λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•  뢀뢄이며, μ΄λŠ” νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ κ²½κ΄€κ³„νš 및 κ²½κ΄€κ΄€λ¦¬λ°©μ•ˆμ˜ 기초자료둜 ν™œμš©λ  수 μžˆλŠ” μ˜λ―Έκ°€ μžˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ μ μš©ν•œ 연ꡬ 방법을 μ—¬λŸ¬ 지역을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ§„ν–‰ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ ν–₯ν›„ μ²΄ν—˜μ— 기반 ν•œ 경관관리 λ°©μ•ˆ 수립으둜 λ°œμ „ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ κΈ°μ΄ˆμ—°κ΅¬λ‘œμ„œ κΈ°μ—¬ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κΈ°λŒ€ν•œλ‹€.Since the legislation of γ€ŽLandscape Act』in 2007, the world of the landscape in South Korea has been allowed to plan and apply the landscape that incorporates the natural environment, historical culture, and living space based on the legal foundation. From this time on, explicit management on landscape began. Nevertheless, because γ€ŽLandscape Act』mainly concerns the management of urban area landscape, the assessment and management of natural landscape are still relatively meager compared to that of the urban area landscape. In addition, the research on landscape resources has been conducted on the level of a status survey or selected and evaluated based on the subjective judgment of experts. Moreover, the scope of the previous studies on landscape resources has been limited to surveying and seeking management strategies only pertaining to visible resources although landscape comprises many layers including the viewed object, the viewing entity, and experience activities. Consequently, the experiential landscape perceived by people has rarely been studied in comparison. In this light, the present study conducted a landscape study using social media as a way of remedying the limitation of previous studies. This study addresses the need for multilateral landscape research by combining the analysis of visual landscape images with analysis of text about the image as well as the users behavior. In addition, this study recognized that systematic landscape planning and sustainable landscape management requires an analysis of the landscape from the consumers perspective and their perception. One characteristic of social media is sharing with others ones emotion from certain experience or ones subjective view of objects or phenomenon. Based on this characteristic, the present study aimed to analyze social media to discover how people behave and what they experience and enjoy around a scenic landscape. This study selected Taean Coast National Park as the research targetelicited typical landscape points of Taean Coast National Park that the public recognizes on Instagram. Then this study elicited the landscape resources and analyzed the characteristics of Taean Coast National Park manifested in social media by classifying the landscape types in Taean Coast National Park based on the analysis of text description of the uploaded images. Based on this, the present study derived four implications. First, through the literature review of previous studies on the coastal landscape, this study organized the types and components of the coastal landscape, and defined the concept of the coastal landscape that this study aims to cover. Although the concept and scope of the coastal landscape were mentioned in many studies, this study has re-established the concept of the coastal landscape because of the discrepancy in concepts between the studies. Second, through examining the previous studies on the landscape in terms of the concept and significance of social media, this study addressed the need for analysis of social media in the field of landscape study. Previous landscape studies have used a questionnaire survey method to understand the visitors perception. However, it is difficult to collect visitors unsolicited opinions because a questionnaire survey is limited in that the response of the survey participant is induced according to the survey items that were designed in advance. By contrast, social media encourage people to participate in them voluntarilythus, it is advantageous because unsolicited opinions and perception on landscape can be examined without adding or subtracting any content. Third, this study analyzed the landscape resources and characteristic of landscape perceived by visitors in a certain area as shown in social media. Through text analysis of the relevant posts on Instagram, this study examined the overall perception of visitors to Taean Coast National Park. Based on this, primary attractions of Taean Coast National Park are selected, and representative landscape points were extracted. In addition, by analyzing the comment and hashtags posted along with the photos of the representative landscape, this study extracted keywords and organized the main landscape, activities, preferred factors so as to investigate what the visitors experience in the space and what resources and element they value. This study discovered that Taean Coast National Park has six areas that are perceived to be primary attractions by visitors. A total of 31 landscape points that belong to these areas have been extracted. Subsequently, this study analyzed the visitors description and opinions about these 31 landscape points and derived the perception of landscape in Taean Coast National Park. Fourth, this study analyzed the visitors perception of the landscape and their main activitiesthen established the criteria of landscape type classification based on peoples activities and categorized the CP (Consensus Photograph) landscape. Accordingly, with regard to 31 landscape points previously derived, the landscape types were divided into landscape view, space image, landmark, and experience. By analyzing six representative landscape types, this study investigated how the visitors enjoy the landscape of Taean Coast National Park in terms of activities. To sum up, the present study remedied the limitation of previous landscape studies and recognized the need for research method of studying landscape resources that reflect the regional characteristics. Under the premise that multilateral analysis on the landscape perceived by the public is essential for establishing a systematic landscape planning and sustainable landscape management strategy, this study extracted the landscape resources of Taean Coast National Park manifested in the social media, which is operated by voluntary participation, and conducted an analysis of landscape features. The present study was conducted to investigate the publics perception of landscape, targeting the six main spaces. With regard to this, future studies can investigate the entire Taean Coast National Park by performing an additional research by trail section that runs through Taean Coast National Park. This has significance to be used as baseline data for landscape planning and management for Taean Coast National Park. Furthermore, by applying the research method used in the present study to a study targeting many areas, it is expected that this study will contribute to establishing the experience-based landscape management plan as a baseline study.β… . μ„œλ‘  1 1.1 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½ 및 λͺ©μ  1 1.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ²”μœ„ 4 1.2.1 λ‚΄μš©μ  λ²”μœ„ 4 1.2.2 곡간적 λ²”μœ„ 4 1.3 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 방법 5 1.3.1 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 방법 5 1.3.2 λΆ„μ„λŒ€μƒ μ„ μ • 및 μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘ 방법 6 1.3.3 데이터 νšλ“ 및 처리 8 1.4 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 흐름 10 β…‘. 이둠적 κ³ μ°° 11 2.1 ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€ 11 2.1.1 ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€μ˜ κ°œλ… 11 2.1.2 ν•΄μ•ˆκ²½κ΄€μ˜ μœ ν˜•κ³Ό κ΅¬μ„±μš”μ†Œ 14 2.2 μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄ 21 2.2.1 빅데이터 21 2.2.2 μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ™€ SNS의 κ°œλ… 및 SNS의 λ°œλ‹¬κ³Όμ • 22 2.2.3 μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ˜ 의의 27 2.3 선행연ꡬ κ²€ν†  28 2.3.1 κ΄€λ ¨ 선행연ꡬ κ³ μ°° 28 2.3.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ°©μ•ˆμ  35 β…’. λŒ€μƒμ§€ 뢄석 및 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆμ˜ κ²½κ΄€κ°€μΉ˜ λ³€ν™” 37 3.1 λŒ€μƒμ§€ 뢄석 37 3.1.1 λŒ€μƒμ§€ κ°œμš” 37 3.1.2 μžμ—°ν™˜κ²½ 뢄석 39 3.1.3 μΈλ¬Έν™˜κ²½ 뢄석 42 3.2 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ κ²½κ΄€κ°€μΉ˜ 인식 λ³€ν™” 52 3.2.1 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆμ˜ κ°€μΉ˜ 인식 λ³€ν™” κ³Όμ • 52 3.2.2 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆμ˜ κ°€μΉ˜ 인식 λ³€ν™”μ˜ μ’…ν•© 59 β…£. μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ— λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ κ²½κ΄€μžμ› 및 νŠΉμ„± 뢄석 60 4.1 μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄ 데이터 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 60 4.1.1 전체 데이터 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 60 4.1.2 경관뢄석을 μœ„ν•œ μ£Όμš” 곡간 μ„ μ • 66 4.2 μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μ—μ„œμ˜ νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ λŒ€ν‘œκ²½κ΄€ 69 4.3 ν…μŠ€νŠΈ 뢄석을 ν†΅ν•œ 방문객의 κ²½κ΄€ 인식 νŒŒμ•… 77 4.3.1 학암포 ꡬ역 77 4.3.2 신두리 ꡬ역 80 4.3.3 천리포-만리포 ꡬ역 85 4.3.4 λͺ½μ‚°ν¬-μ²­ν¬λŒ€ ꡬ역 90 4.3.5 λ“œλ₯΄λ‹ˆν•­-백사μž₯ν•­ ꡬ역 93 4.3.6 꽃지 ꡬ역 95 4.4 μ£Όμš” ꡬ역별 κ²½κ΄€νŠΉμ„± 뢄석 99 4.4.1 학암포 ꡬ역 101 4.4.2 신두리 ꡬ역 103 4.4.3 천리포-만리포 ꡬ역 105 4.4.4 λͺ½μ‚°ν¬-μ²­ν¬λŒ€ ꡬ역 107 4.4.5 λ“œλ₯΄λ‹ˆν•­-백사μž₯ν•­ ꡬ역 109 4.4.6 꽃지 ꡬ역 111 4.5 λΆ„μ„μ˜ μ’…ν•© 113 4.5.1 기쑴에 μ•Œλ €μ§„ κ²½κ΄€μžμ›κ³Ό 방문객이 μΈμ‹ν•˜λŠ” κ²½κ΄€μžμ› 비ꡐ 113 4.5.2 νƒœμ•ˆν•΄μ•ˆκ΅­λ¦½κ³΅μ›μ˜ κ²½κ΄€μœ ν˜• 뢄포 114 β…€. κ²°λ‘  116 5.1 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μš”μ•½ 116 5.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 의의 및 ν–₯ν›„κ³Όμ œ 118 [μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ] 119 [Abstract] 124Maste

    Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism associated with short-term treatment response to venlafaxine

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms of serotonin transporter, especially serotonin transporter linked promoter region (5- HTTLPR) and serotonin transporter intron 2 variable number tandem repeat (5-HTTVNTR), have been suggested to be associated with treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, there have been only few reports of the association between 5-HTTLPR or 5-HTTVNTR and treatment response to venlafaxine. METHODS: 84 Korean major depressive disorder patients were included in this study. They were administered 75 mg of venlafaxine XR (extended release) for 1 week and then took 150 mg for the next 3 weeks. All patients were evaluated at baseline and week 4 by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). RESULTS: (1) Treatment response of depressive symptoms (BDI, HAM-D, MADRS) to venlafaxine at week 4 was associated with the non-s/s (l/l and l/s) genotype of 5-HTTLPR; (2) in repeated measures ANOVA, the BDI, MADRS and HAM-A scores decreased more significantly in patients with the non-s/s genotype than in those with the s/s genotype, and (3) multiple regression analyses suggested that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism is a predictive factor for short-term treatment response to venlafaxine. However, 5-HTTVNTR showed no significant association with treatment response to venlafaxine. Both 5-HTTLPR and 5-HTTVNTR were not associated with side effects of venlafaxine. CONCLUSION: The 5-HTTLPR non-s/s genotype can be associated with venlafaxine treatment responses. However, further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm this finding.ope

    μš°μšΈλ³‘μ˜ μΉ˜λ£Œλ°˜μ‘κ³Ό MRP1 μœ μ „ λ³€μ΄μ™€μ˜ μ—°κ΄€μ„±

    No full text
    Dept. of Medical Science/박사Multidrug resistant protein 1(MRP1/ABCC1), a member of ATP binding cassette(ABC) transporter superfamily, is known as a xenobiotics efflux pump. It is expressed highly in the blood brain barrier(BBB) and choroid plexus of blood cerebrospinal fluid barrier(BCSFB) and has been implicated in altering the treatment response to psychotropic drugs such as antidepressants. This study aimed to identify the association between genetic variations in MRP1/ABCC1 and the therapeutic response to the antidepressant citalopram in the depressive disorder. One hundred and twenty three patients who had been administered citalopram monotherapy to control their major depressive disorder were recruited and genotype data from sixty four patients who had completed their eight-week follow up were evaluated together with those from one hundred controls. Nine MRP1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showing more than 5% allele frequency in the Korean population were analyzed. The c.4002G>A, a synonymous SNP in exon 28, showed a strong association with the remission state at 8 weeks (P=0.005, O.R. 4.7, 95% C.I. 1.5~14.7). The c.4002G>A forms a linkage disequilibrium(LD) block with three other SNPs including c.5462T>A in the 3’ untranslated region. Accordingly, the haplotype showed a significant association with the remission state (P=0.014). Subsequent molecular studies were conducted to support the association between these MRP1 polymorphisms and the citalopram response. Thus kinetic studies using MRP1-enriched membrane vesicles revealed that citalopram is a substrate of MRP1 (Km=1.99 ΞΌM, Vmax=137 pmol/min/mg protein). In addition, individuals with A allele of c.4002G>A or c.5462T>A polymorphisms showed higher MRP1 mRNA levels in peripheral blood cells. The cause of the difference in mRNA expressions was assumed from the RNA structural changes according to the c.5462T>A which forms a LD block with c.4002G>A. These results suggest that MRP1 polymorphisms may be a predictive marker of citalopram treatment in major depression.ope

    λ‘œλ΄‡ μš΄λ™ ν•™μŠ΅μ„ μœ„ν•œ 뉴턴 방식 μ•Œκ³ λ¦¬μ¦˜

    No full text
    Thesis (master`s)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :기계항곡곡학뢀,2000.Maste

    (A)Study on the additive model

    No full text
    Thesis(master`s)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :톡계학과,2006.Maste
    • …
    corecore