21 research outputs found

    ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋„๋ฉ”์ธ ์œตํ•ฉ ์•ŒํŒŒ๋น„ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์Šคํƒˆ๋ฆฐ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์˜ ํžˆ๋ถ€ ์„ฌ์œ ์•„์„ธํฌ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ํšจ๊ณผ

    No full text
    Graduate Program in Science for Aging/์„์‚ฌIn the skin aging process, wrinkle is generally formed by genetic and environmental elements. Active oxygen is known to occur in photoaging, typical case of externally caused aging, not to mention in internally caused aging. Active oxygen is known to reduce and transform collagen of dermis, and collagen synthesis, and express enzymes which break down substrate protein. Recently, there have been researches demonstrating that heat shock proteins have various effects on photoaging process. Alpha B crystallin, smaller type of heat shock proteins, is known to regulate lens epithelial cell death of man exposed to UVA, it is not known what effect it has on skin fibroblasts. This study, using protein transduction domain (PTD) which can transport proteins whose molecular weight is big into the cell efficiently in a short time, transported alpha B crystallin protein into human skin fibroblasts, and observed biological performance with hydrogen peroxide treatment. The observation revealed that, in the cell where PTD-alpha B crystallin is transported, expression of MMP-1 known as collagenase, MMP-2 known as gelatinase, and MMP-9 was inhibited, and collagen increased, and MEK-ERK signal channel for enzyme that break up collagen, were blocked. In conclusion, this study showed that alpha B crystallin protein will be used as emollient for skin aging through protein transduction technology.ope

    A pilot study of S-1 plus cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin for postoperative chemotherapy in histological stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Although its efficacy is unproven, 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP) is used to prevent postoperative relapse in gastric cancer. We investigated the safety and feasibility of S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) vs. FP for stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer. METHODS: Following curative resection, 41 stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer patients were assigned to SP (eight 14-day cycles of S-1 [40 mg/m(2) twice daily] plus cisplatin [60 mg/m(2)โ€‰day 1] administered every 3 weeks) or FP (six 3-day cycles of FU [1 g/m(2) per day] plus cisplatin [80 mg/m(2)โ€‰day 1] every 4 weeks). Doses were reduced based on predefined criteria. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were balanced between the two arms. In total, 124 cycles of SP (Nโ€‰=โ€‰20, medianโ€‰=โ€‰7, range 1-8) and 113 cycles of FP (Nโ€‰=โ€‰21, median 6, range 1-6) were administered. The median relative dose intensity per patient was 75% (49.99-100%) for S-1, 100% (75-100%) for cisplatin in SP, and 100% (64-100%) for 5-FU, 100% (60-100%) for cisplatin in FP. The relative dose intensity of FP was stable, while that of SP decreased during treatment. After median follow-up of 7.9 months (3.8-14.55), the median RFS was not reached. Relapse occurred in two (10%) patients on SP and five (23.8%) in the FP arm (Pโ€‰=โ€‰0.24). The incidence of grade 3-4 granulocytopenia was 36.8% with SP and 14.3% with FP. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (5.2% with SP vs. 4.8% with FP), vomiting (10.5% with SP vs. 0% with FP), and infection (5.2% with SP vs. 0% FP). CONCLUSION: S-1 plus cisplatin was feasible and tolerable as adjuvant treatment for stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer. However, because of decreased relative dose intensity during treatment, further study is warranted to determine optimal dosage and combination.ope

    The clinical significance of ascitic fluid CEA in advanced gastric cancer with ascites

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical significance of ascitic fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in advanced gastric cancer patients with ascites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2001 to February 2008, 119 gastric cancer patients with concurrent ascites who were clinically diagnosed with carcinomatosis, were retrospectively reviewed with regard to ascitic fluid cytology and clinicopathological parameters. Serum CEA (sCEA) and ascitic fluid CEA (aCEA) were measured using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 50 years (range 23-80 years). The median value of aCEA was significantly higher than sCEA [130.5 ng/ml (range 0.2-12.211 ng/ml) vs. 2.1 ng/ml (range 0.02-8.152 ng/ml), p or=5 ng/ml) (7.4 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.003). However, we found no difference in overall survival according to ascitic fluid cytology (median, 3.0 months vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.530). Multivariate analysis also demonstrated that aCEA levels of more than 5 ng/ml were associated with poor prognosis (HR = 2.88; 95% CI 1.45-5.74; p = 0.003), while sCEA levels were not associated with poor prognosis (HR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.67-2.03; p = 0.622). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that aCEA levels can be used as a prognostic marker for advanced gastric cancer patients with ascitesope

    Efficacy and feasibility of radiofrequency ablation for liver metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Optimal treatment for liver metastases from gastric cancer remains a matter of debate. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of liver-only metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 29 patients who developed liver-only metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma and subsequently underwent gastric resection and RFA (n = 20) or gastric resection and systemic chemotherapy (n = 9) between January 1995 and February 2008. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and was compared using the log rank test to evaluate RFA efficacy. RESULTS: Twenty patients who underwent RFA showed a median overall survival of 30.7 months (range: 2.9 to 90.9 months), a median progression-free survival of 6.8 months (range: 0.8 to 45.2 months), and median overall one-, three-, and five-year survival rates were 66.8%, 40.1%, and 16.1% respectively. The RFA group showed a 76% decreased death rate compared to the chemotherapy-only group (30.7 months versus 7 months, hazard ratio, 0.24; p = 0.004). Most patients tolerated RFA well, and complications were found to be minor (transient fever (20%) and/or right upper quadrant pain (25%)). One case of treatment-related death occurred due to sepsis that originated from a liver abscess at the ablation site. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that a use of RFA as a liver-directed treatment may provide greater survival benefit than chemotherapy and is an alternative option for the treatment of liver-only metastases from gastric cancer.ope
    corecore