5 research outputs found

    (A) study on health promoting lifestyle and its related factors of missionary

    No full text
    ์—ญํ•™๋ฐ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•ด์™ธ๊ฑฐ์ฃผ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ ์š”์ธ์„ ๊ตฌ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ์ค‘์žฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ–ฅํ›„ ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๊ธฐํš์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•จ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์ผ ์„ ๊ต๋‹จ์ฒด ์†Œ์†์˜ ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์ด๋ฉฐ, e-mail์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 320๋ช…์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ์„ค๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ SAS Window ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ํ†ต๊ณ„๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ t-test, ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋ถ„์„(ANOVA), ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ถ„์„(Pearson''s Correlation Coefficient), ๋‹ค์ค‘ํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„(Multiple Regression)์„ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1. ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  2.93์ (์ตœ๊ณ  4์ )์ด๋ฉฐ, ์—ฐ๋ น์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก, ๋ฏธํ˜ผ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์†Œ๋“์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก, ํ‰๊ท ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ์ˆ˜๋ก, ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถœํ‡ด๊ทผ ๊ทผ๋ฌดํ˜•ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹์˜ 11๊ฐœ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์˜์—ญ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์œ„์ƒ์  ์ƒํ™œ, ์กฐํ™”๋กœ์šด ๊ด€๊ณ„, ์ž์•„์‹คํ˜„ ์ˆœ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ „๋ฌธ์ ์ธ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ์šด๋™ ๋ฐ ํ™œ๋™, ์ž์•„์กฐ์ ˆ ์ˆœ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2. ์ธ์ง€-์ง€๊ฐ์š”์ธ์€ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ ์ต์„ฑ์ด 3.53์ (์ตœ๊ณ  4์ ), ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์žฅ์• ์„ฑ์ด 1.72์ (์ตœ๊ณ  4์ ), ์ž๊ธฐ ํšจ๋Šฅ๊ฐ์ด 3.89์ (์ตœ๊ณ  5์ ), ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ง€์ง€ 2.96์ (์ตœ๊ณ  4์ ), ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ๋Š” 2.88์ (์ตœ๊ณ  4์ )์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„์™€ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ ์ต์„ฑ, ์žฅ์• ์„ฑ, ์ž๊ธฐ ํšจ๋Šฅ๊ฐ, ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ง€์ง€, ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ, ์—ฐ๋ น, ํ‰๊ท ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์‹œ๊ฐ„, ๊ฑฐ์ฃผ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„๊ณผ์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŠน๋ณ„ํžˆ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„์™€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ง€์ง€๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„(r=0.5632, p<.0001)๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4. ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„์™€ ๊ด€๊ณ„์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ง€์ง€, ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ ์ต์„ฑ, ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ, ์ž๊ธฐ ํšจ๋Šฅ๊ฐ, ์—ฐ๋ น๊ณผ ํ‰๊ท ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด ์š”์ธ๋“ค์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„๋„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์–‘์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ 24์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ƒ๊ทผ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€์˜ ๊ทผ๋ฌดํ˜•ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถœํ‡ด๊ทผ ๊ทผ๋ฌด์— ๋น„ํ•ด, ๋˜ ๋น„๋งŒ(BMI 25์ด์ƒ)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์ค€์ฒด์ค‘์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ์Œ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ด€๊ณ„์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ง€์ง€(Rยฒ=.3221, p<.0001)์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ์„ค๋ช…๋ ฅ์€ 49.73%์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹ ์‹ค์ฒœ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ˜„์ง€์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์™€ ๊ธด๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋„คํŠธ์›์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •๊ธฐ์ ์ด๊ณ , ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๋ฝ๊ณผ ๊ฒฉ๋ ค๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ๊ฐ์ด ์—†๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜„์ง€์—์„œ๋Š” ์†Œ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒํ˜ธ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ตํ†ต์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ž์กด๊ฐ์„ ๋†’์ด๋„๋ก ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ฆ์ง„ ์ƒํ™œ์–‘์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์ •๋ณด ์ œ๊ณต ๋ฐ ๊ต์œก์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŠน๋ณ„ํžˆ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ๋Œ€์ฒ˜๋‚˜ ์ž์•„์กฐ์ ˆ, ์šด๋™, ์•ˆ์ „๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ƒํ™œ์—์„œ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฌธ๊ธฐ๊ด€๊ณผ ์ „๋‹ด์ƒ๋‹ด์ž๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์ข…ํ•ฉ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(Total member care system)์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ์„ ๋ฐœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์€ํ‡ด๊นŒ์ง€ ์„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ๋ณต์ง€ ํ˜œํƒ์„ ์ œ๊ณต&#61598;๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถœํ‡ด๊ทผ ๊ทผ๋ฌด๋กœ ๊ทผ๋ฌดํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ทœ์น™์ ์ธ ์ƒํ™œ์„ ์‹ค์ฒœํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ]The purpose of this study were to investigate the health promoting lifestyle of overseas missionaries and to help them develop and practice such a lifestyle and also to use it in the health promoting program for missionaries. Missionaries from one mission organization have been targeted for this study. After getting 320 questionnaires answered via e-mail, we have calculated and have come up with a statistical data using the SAS Window program as well as the t-test, ANOVA, Pearson''s Correlation Coefficient and Multiple Regression. The result is as follows: First, according to the targeted person''s general distinctive qualities, the rate for practicing the health promoting lifestyle was 2.93 on average. Statistically, the older people, those who were married, and had high incomes, as well as the people with the average of longer sleeping hours in general showed to have a constant numeric data of working hours with accurate time from the start to the end of each day''s work. Out of the eleven ways of health promoting lifestyle, sanitary life, harmonious relationship and self-achievement were the three that were best practiced in health promoting lifestyle. The least practiced ones were professional health maintenance, exercise and activity and self-control. Second, measured datas as follows : the perceived benefits:3.53, perceived barriers:1.72, perceived self-efficacy:3.89, social support:2.96, perceived health status:2.88. Third, statistically, the amount of the health promoting lifestyle being practiced, the perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, social supports, perceived health status, age, average sleeping time, residing period and human relationships are meaningfully related. The amount of the health promoting lifestyle being practiced and social support are highly related in meaningful ways.(r=0.5632, p<.0001) Fourth, social support, perceived benefits and health status, self-efficacy, age and average sleeping time are related to health promoting lifestyle. As these factors increase or improve, one''s health promoting lifestyle also gets better. Also, health promoting lifestyle worsen in one''s life when one works 24 hours a day each day compared to another working for a set amount of time. The same thing happens when one is over weighed (over BMI 25) compared to another with a standard weight. The most related factor to this is social support(Rยฒ=.3221, p<.0001) and the combination of that variable explained 49.73% of the health promoting lifestyle. Therefore, in order to improve the health promoting lifestyle of missionaries, it is important to form a tight network with the missionaries. They should make sure to create no isolation through continuous and regular contact and encouragement. On their mission fields, they should form a small group through which they can help each other and build relationships through fellowship which can improve their self-respect. They should start an education that will provide a regular and continuous information on health promoting lifestyle. It is important to prompt people to practice the health promoting lifestyle by making programs on stress relieving, self-control, exercising and safety management. They should establish a total member care system with the help of professional organizations and counselors and provide a health welfare benefits to the missionaries from the time of their recruitment to retirement. They should also try to improve the working time by setting up an exact time for starting and finishing their work each day. It is important to let them live an orderly life.ope
    corecore