47 research outputs found

    ์ฝ”๋กœ๋‚˜19 ์ตœ์ „์„ ์—์„œ ์‹ธ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ

    Get PDF
    Special Issu

    Effects of an Education Program using a Narrative Approach for Women with Breast Cancer

    Get PDF
    Purpose: This study investigated the effects of an education program integrating self-efficacy theory and narratives on self-efficacy, knowledge, and resilience in women with breast cancer. Methods: This study employed a nonequivalent control group posttest only design. A 3-day program consisting of sessions in which participants shared their experiences of breast cancer, lectures on breast cancer, and breast self-examinations was implemented. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires in 2013. Results: The mean age of participants was 50.8ยฑ5.3; approximately half (52.8%) had Stage II breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. The results showed that the levels of self-efficacy, knowledge, and resilience were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p<.05). Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that programs integrating self-efficacy theory and narratives would be effective in promoting resilience as well as self-efficacy and knowledge in women with breast cancer. Further studies are needed to identify the effects of such education programs for people with other types of cancer or chronic illnesses

    A Study on Exercise Behavior, Exercise Environment and Social Support of Middle-Aged Women

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify exercise environments and social support associated with exercise behaviors in middle-aged women. Method: Subjects were 207 women aged between 41 and 59 yr in an urban community. The research instruments utilized in this study were exercise stages, exercise environments, exercise partners and social support scale. Subjects were given a self-report questionnaire. Data was analyzed using the SPSS Win program. Result: The subjects were in the stages of precontemplation (3.4%), contemplation (25.1%), preparation (40.6%), action (5.8%), and maintenance (25.1%). Subjects who engaged in regular exercise were 30.9%. The mean score of the exercise environment was 6.34. The mean score of social support was 21.28, and 65.7% of subjects had exercise partners. The score of the exercise environment was significantly associated with the exercise stage (p=.01). The number of exercise partners of regular exercise groups was significantly greater than that of non-regular exercise groups (p=.00). The score of social support of regular exercise groups was significantly greater than that of non-regular exercise groups (p=. 00). The score of social support was significantly associated with the exercise stage (p=.00). Conclusion: Exercise environments and social support need to be considered in planning exercise programs to improve exercise behavior among middle-aged women

    Hospital Nurses Experience of Do-Not-Resuscitate in Korea

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The purpose of the study was to describe the experiences of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) among nurses. Methods: Data were collected by in-depth interviews with 8 nurses in 8 different hospitals. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Eight major themes emerged from the analysis: DNR decision-making bypassing the patient, inefficiency in the decision-making process of DNR, negative connotation of DNR, predominance of verbal DNR over written DNR, doubts and confusion about DNR, least amount of intervention in the decision for DNR change of focus in the care of the patient after a DNR order, and care burden of patients with DNR. Decision-making of DNR occurred between physicians and family members, not the patients themselves. Often high medical expenses were involved in choosing DNR, thus if choosing DNR it was implied the family members and health professionals as well did not try their best to help the patient. Verbal DNR permission was more popular in clinical settings. Most nurses felt guilty and depressed about the dying/death of patients with DNR. Conclusion: Clearer guidelines on DNR, which reflect a family-oriented culture, need to be established to reduce confusion and to promote involvement in the decision-making process of DNR among nurses

    Experimental study on the pancreatic regeneration after partial pancreatectomy in rats

    No full text
    ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์ธ๋ถ€ ์ทจ์žฅ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์— ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ˆ์ œ์ˆ ์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ทจ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์ ˆ์ œ ํ›„ ์ €๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ์žฌ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ์ทจ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ˆ์ œ ํ›„ ์ž”์—ฌ์ทจ์žฅ์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์žฌ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ์™•์„ฑํ•จ์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”๊ฐ€ ํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ทจ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ˆ์ œ๋กœ ์ž”์—ฌ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์œ„์ถ•๊ณผ ์žฌ์ƒ์ƒ์ด ํ˜ผ์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ๋„ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ทจ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ˆ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ ˆ์ œ ํ›„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜ˆ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ insulin์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ ์ทจ์žฅ์˜ ์ •์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ •๋„์˜ ์ ˆ์ œ์„ ์—๋„ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์˜๊ฒฌ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. 95% ์ดํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”๊ฐ€ ํ•˜๋ฉด 80%, 75%์„ ์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋Š” ์ทจ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ์žฌ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ  ์™ธ๋ถ„๋น„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ์žฌ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์‹คํ—˜์€ ํฐ์ฅ์—์„œ 60%, 80%์˜ ์ทจ์ ˆ์ œ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ํ›„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ฒฝ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ทจ์žฅ์˜ ์™ธ๋ถ„๋น„ ๋ฐ ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ํฐ์ฅ์˜ ์ฒด์ค‘์€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„์— ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋‚˜ ๊ณง ํšŒ๋ณต๋˜์–ด ์ •์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 2. ์ž”์—ฌ์ทจ์žฅ์˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋Š” 60%์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ ๋ฐ 80%์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๊ณ„์† ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์ž”์—ฌ์ทจ์žฅ์˜ ์กฐ์ง๋‹จ๋ฐฑ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ ˆ์ œ์ทจ์žฅ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ฌํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3. ๋‹ด์ทจ์•ก ๋ถ„๋น„๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์งํ›„ ์˜์˜์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, 60% ์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” 1์ผ ํ›„์—, 80%์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” 30์ผ ํ›„์— ํšŒ๋ณต๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4. ์ทจ์žฅ์˜ amylase ๋ฐ lipase ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์งํ›„ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์˜์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, 60%์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์—์„œ amylase ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์€ 100์ผ ํ›„์—, lipase๋Š” 30์ผ ํ›„์— ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณต๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ 80%์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” amylase ์™€ lipase ๋ชจ๋‘ 100์ผ ํ›„๊นŒ์ง€ ํšŒ๋ณต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. 5. 60% ์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋‹น๋Ÿ‰์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹คํ—˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„๋™์•ˆ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋ณ„ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, 80%์ ˆ์ œ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์งํ›„์— ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ผ ํ›„์—๋Š” ์ตœ๊ณ ์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  10์ผ ํ›„์—๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ์น˜์— ์ ‘๊ทผ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•ด ๋ณด๋ฉด 60%์˜ ์ทจ์ ˆ์ œ๋กœ ์ทจ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ํฐ ๋ณ€๋™์ด ์—†์œผ๋‚˜, 80%์˜ ์ทจ์ ˆ์ œ๋กœ๋Š” ์‹ฌํ•œ ์ทจ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ €ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋ฉฐ ์ทจ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ์กฐ๊ธฐ์— ํšŒ๋ณต๋˜๋‚˜ ์™ธ๋ถ„๋น„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ์žฅ ์‹œ์ผ์ด ์ง€๋‚˜๋„ ํšŒ๋ณต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] Recently a major resection of the pancreas has been carried out not only to treat carcinoma of pancreas but also chronic pancreatitis. But limited and often contradictory reports have been made on the effects of partial surgical pancreatectomy in mammals. It was suggested that the growth of the residual tissue in pancreatectomized rat is very active, because pancreas has the great power of regeneration after partial pancreatectomy, while others observed that rat pancreas after partial surgical resection of the organ revealed a perplexing mixture of the organ revealed a perplexing mixture of atrophy and regeneration of acinar tissue. On the other hand, another results showed that the amount of insulin required to control diabetes after partial resection of pancreas is much greater than needed after total pancreatectomy. Because the anti-insulin system, such as glucagon secretion and hyophyseoadrenal function, is probably depressed after total pancreatectomy. Furthermore, minimal resection line which will not agreeable, such as 75%, 80% or 95% resection of the total pancreas in rat. So far, studies on the exocrine function other than endocrine function after partial pancreatectomy have been limited. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to examine the changes of exocrine as well as endocrine function of pancreas at the different time interval after 60% or 80% pancreatectomy in rats. The results are summerized as follow;: 1. In both 60% and 80% resected groups, a slight decrease of the total body weight was observed at a day after partial pancreatectomy in rats, but the body weight was continued to increase for following loo days. 2. The weight of residual pancreas was continuously increased during experiment in both 60% and 80% resected groups. But the amount of tissue protein in residual pancreas was significantly decreased comparing with those of resected pancreas. 3. The flow rate of pancreatico-biliary juice was significantly decreased in both resected group at the immediately after pancreatectomy. But it was recovered to control level after a day in 60% resected group, after 30 days in 80% resecter group. 4. The output of amylase and lipase in resected groups were significantly decreased comparing with control group in just after pancreatectomy. In the 60% resected group, the output of amylase was recovered during the following 100 days after pancreatectomy, while lipase output of amylase and lipase were not recovered during 100 days after pancreatectomy. 5. In order to examine the endocrine function, blood sugar level were examine at all experimental periods after partial pancreatectomy. There was no difference between control and 60% resected group in the sugar level. But in the 80% resected group the level was significantly increased immediately after pancreatectomy, and reached the highest level at 3 days. Then it was decreased to control level during the next 10 days after pancreatectomy. The above results showed that in 60% resected group little changes were observed on pancreatic function, but severe functional impairments were observed in 80% resected group. This results suggested that the endocrine function was recovered with \in a short period, although the exocrine function was not recovered for a long time after 80% pancreatectomy in rats.restrictio

    ์žฌ์ •์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์ง€ํ‘œ์„ ์ •์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ : ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์žฌ์ •์ˆ˜์ง€๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ํ–‰์ •๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ–‰์ •ํ•™๊ณผ ์ •์ฑ…ํ•™์ „๊ณต,1998.Maste

    Discourse Analysis as a Way of Understanding Health and Illness

    No full text
    Purpose: Health professionals need to be more sensitive to the languages used in clinical settings to better understand their patients and to generate better health outcomes. The purpose of this article was to introduce discourse analysis as a way of understanding languages related with health and illness. Methods: This was a review of studies done by multiple scholars dealt with discourse analysis. Results: This study provides theoretical backgrounds and basic assumptions of discourse analysis. Several key concepts were demonstrated compared with phenomenology and grounded theory methods. Those were data collection, analysis, and purpose of the study. In addition, evaluation criteria of discourse analysis was provided with strategies to improve quality of the study. Lastly, exemplary texts on discourse analysis in healthcare area were presented to promote understanding. Conclusion: Discourse analysis can help healthcare professionals develop effective communication strategies by gaining insight and sensitivity on languages related with health and illness that are habitually used in healthcare settingsOAIID:RECH_ACHV_DSTSH_NO:T201700068RECH_ACHV_FG:RR00200001ADJUST_YN:EMP_ID:A003229CITE_RATE:0DEPT_NM:๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผEMAIL:[email protected]_YN:NCONFIRM:

    Angular Distribution of Molecular flow from Nozzles in Thermal Evaporation Process

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2016. 8. ๋ฐ•ํฌ์žฌ.๋ฐ˜๋„์ฒด, OLED ์ œ์กฐ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์—ด์ฆ์ฐฉ(Thermal Evaporation) ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์†Œ์Šค๋Š” ํŠน์ •ํ•œ ์šฉ๊ธฐ์— ๋“ค์–ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ๊ฐ€์—ดํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ™” ํ˜น์€ ์Šนํ™”์‹œ์ผœ ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ธฐํŒ์— ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋•Œ ๋…ธ์ฆ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ(Angular Distribution)์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ธฐํŒ์— ์ฆ์ฐฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜๊ฐ€ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค. ๋ˆ„์„ผ(Knudsen)์˜ ์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธ ๋ฒ•์น™(Cosine Law)์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์–‡์€ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋…ธ์ฆ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž๋Š” ์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ , ๊ธธ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž๋Š” ์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ค์ œ ๋…ธ์ฆ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ๋ถ„๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ธ์ฆ์— ์ž…์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ์™€ ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ ์ „์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ํ•ด์„์  ํ•ด์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ์ด ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋งค๋ฒˆ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์ธ ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ๊ณผ ์›๋ฟ”ํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์—์„œ ํŠน์ •ํ•œ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ด์„์  ํ•ด(analytical solution)๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌํ•ด์ง„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์‹ค์ œ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ต ๊ฒ€์ฆ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.์ œ1์žฅ. ์„œ๋ก  1 1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ 1 1.2 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ 3 1.3 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด์šฉ 5 ์ œ2์žฅ. ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์ด๋ก  7 2.1 ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 7 2.2 ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ 9 2.3 ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ๋ถ„๋ฒ• 11 2.3.1 ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ๋ถ„๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 11 2.3.2 ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์— ์ถฉ๋Œํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 13 2.3.3 ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์— ์ถฉ๋Œํ•œ ํ›„ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 16 2.4 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 19 2.4.1 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 19 2.4.2 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ 20 2.4.3 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 21 ์ œ3์žฅ. ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 24 3.1 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ 24 3.1.1 ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ™” 24 3.1.2 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 27 3.1.3 ๋…ธ์ฆ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์— ์ถฉ๋Œ ํ›„ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 29 3.1.4 ๋…ธ์ฆ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์— ์ถฉ๋Œ ํ›„ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 37 3.1.5 ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ž…๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 40 3.1.6 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 42 3.2 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 44 3.3 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 47 3.3.1 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 47 3.3.2 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(r=1, l=2)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 52 3.3.3 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(r=1, l=3)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 57 3.3.4 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(r=1, l=4)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 61 3.3.5 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(r=1, l=6)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 65 ์ œ4์žฅ. ์›๋ฟ”ํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 69 4.1 ์›๋ฟ”ํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ 69 4.1.1 ์›๋ฟ”ํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 69 4.1.2 ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ž…๊ตฌ ์ „์ฒด์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 72 4.1.3 ๋…ธ์ฆ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด ์ „์ฒด์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 73 4.1.4 ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ž…๊ตฌ ์ผ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 76 4.1.5 ๋…ธ์ฆ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด ์ผ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 79 4.1.6 ๋…ธ์ฆ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด ์ผ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ถœ๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž 92 4.1.7 ์›๋ฟ”ํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 96 4.2 ์›๋ฟ”ํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 99 4.3 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 102 4.3.1 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 102 4.3.2 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(ri=1, ro=2, l=6)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 105 4.3.3 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(ri=1, ro=4, l=6)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 109 4.3.4 ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋…ธ์ฆ(ri=1, ro=6, l=6)์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 113 ์ œ5์žฅ. ์‹ค์ œ ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ 117 5.1 ์ •์ง€ ์„ฑ๋ง‰ ์‹คํ—˜ 117 5.1.1 ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 117 5.1.2 ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด 121 5.1.3 ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 123 5.2 ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 127 5.2.1 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 127 5.2.2 ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 132 5.2.3 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 135 5.3 ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต 142 5.3.1 ์ •์ง€ ์„ฑ๋ง‰ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(CASE 1) 142 5.3.2 ์ •์ง€ ์„ฑ๋ง‰ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(CASE 2) 148 ์ œ6์žฅ. ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ท ์ผ๋„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” 153 6.1 ์†Œ์Šค ๊ธฐํŒ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์˜ต์…‹ ์ตœ์ ํ™” 153 6.1.1 ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์†Œ๋ชจ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ธฐํŒ ๊ท ์ผ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™” 153 6.1.2 ์†Œ์Šค ๊ธฐํŒ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์˜ต์…‹ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ท ์ผ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™” 154 6.1.3 ์†Œ์Šค ๊ธฐํŒ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์˜ต์…‹ ์ตœ์ ๊ฐ’ 157 6.2 ์†Œ์Šค์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ ์ตœ์ ํ™” 158 6.2.1 ์†Œ์Šค ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ธฐํŒ ๊ท ์ผ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™” 158 6.2.2 ์†Œ์Šค ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ท ์ผ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™” 159 6.2.3 ์†Œ์Šค ํ˜•์ƒ ์ตœ์ ๊ฐ’ 160 ์ œ7์žฅ. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  162 ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 164 APPENDIX 167 A. ๋…ธ์ฆ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” 167 A.1 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ 167 A.2 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 168 A.3 ๋ถ„์„ 172 Abstract 174Docto

    3์ฐจ์› ์ ์ธตํ˜• ๋‚ธ๋“œ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ์˜ ์…€ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ „๊ธฐ. ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2011.8. ์ด์ข…ํ˜ธ.Maste

    Estimates of marital fertility rate in Korea

    No full text
    ๋ณด๊ฑดํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ๊ณผ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ณ€๋™์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ธก์ •์€ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌ๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐ ๋ณด๊ฑด๊ณ„ํš์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๋  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํ•œ ์ธ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ ฅ, ๊ฐ€๊ตฌ๋‹จ์œ„ ์ธ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์ž„์—ฐ๋ น์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ถœ์ƒ์•„์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ธ๊ตฌ๋ถ„์„ํ•™์  ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์ „๊ตญ์˜ 15โˆผ49์„ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธํ˜ผ,์‚ฌ๋ณ„,์ดํ˜ผ ๋ฐ ๋ณ„๊ฑฐ ์‚ฌ์ƒ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ 17,615๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 1978๋…„ 1์›” 1์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 1978๋…„ 12์›” 31์ผ๊นŒ์ง€๋กœ ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ์ถœ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์„ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ, ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ์—ฐ๋ น-์ถœ์ƒ์ˆœ์œ„๋ณ„ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ, ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ํ•ฉ๊ณ„์ถœ์ƒ์œจ, ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์ด์žฌ์ƒ์‚ฐ์œจ์˜ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ, ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์ถœ์ƒ์ˆœ์œ„๋ณ„ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์ง€์—ญ๋ณ„ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ ๋ฐ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1 .์ „๊ตญ๊ณผ ๋„์‹œ์ง€์—ญ, ๋†์ดŒ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์„ธ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์—ฐ๋ น๊ตฐ์ด 20โˆผ 24์„ธ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ์„œ์šธํŠน๋ณ„์‹œ์—์„œ๋Š” 25-29์„ธ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 40์„ธ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ณ ์—ฐ๋ น ์ถœ์‚ฐ์ด ๋†์ดŒ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ 1,000๋ช…๋‹น 63์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 2. ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ํ•ฉ๊ณ„์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์€ ์ „๊ตญ 4.0, ์„œ์šธํŠน๋ณ„์‹œ 3.1, ๋„์‹œ์ง€์—ญ 3.5, ๋†์ดŒ์ง€์—ญ 4.1์ด์—ˆ๊ณ  ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ์˜ ์ด์žฌ์ƒ์‚ฐ์œจ์€ ์ „๊ตญ 2.0, ์„œ์šธํŠน๋ณ„์‹œ 1.6 ,๋„์‹œ์ง€์—ญ 2.2, ๋†์ดŒ์ง€์—ญ 1.9์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3.๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น-์ถœ์ƒ์ˆœ์œ„๋ณ• ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์€ ์ฒซ์งธ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์ด 28์„ธ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋‘˜์งธ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์€ 30์„ธ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์…‹์งธโˆผ๋‹ค์„ฏ์งธ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์€ 36์„ธ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์„ฏ์งธ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ˆœ์œ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถœ์ƒ์œจ์€ 40์„ธ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น์—์„œ ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ 1,000๋ช…๋‹น 3๋ช… ์ •๋„์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 4 .๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น-์ถœ์ƒ์ˆœ์œ„๋ณ„ ์ถœ์ƒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋น„์œจ์€ 19์„ธ ์ด์ „์˜ ์ถœ์ƒ์˜ 85%๋Š” ์ฒซ์งธ์˜ ์ถœ์ƒ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , 25โˆผ29์„ธ์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฒซ์งธ์™€ ๋‘˜์งธ์˜ ์ถœ์ƒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋น„์œจ์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, 40์„ธ ์ด์ƒ ๊ณ ์—ฐ๋ น ์ธต์—์„œ์˜ ์ถœ์ƒ์€ 60% ์ด์ƒ์ด ์—ฌ์„ฏ์งธ ์ˆœ์œ„ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ถœ์ƒ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 5 .๊ฒฐํ˜ผ๋ถ€์ธ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์€, 20โˆผ24์„ธ 17.4, 25โˆผ29์„ธ 16.2, 30โˆผ34์„ธ 7.9๋กœ 34์„ธ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ์ ์ฐจ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋‚˜ 35โˆผ39์„ธ 39.0์œผ๋กœ 35์„ธ ์ดํ›„์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น์ธต์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์ด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 6 .์ถœ์ƒ์ˆœ์œ„์™€ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋Š” ์ฒซ์งธ ์ˆœ์œ„์˜ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์ด ๋‘˜์งธ ์ˆœ์œ„๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ ์…‹์งธ์™€ ๋„ท์งธ์˜ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๊ณ  ์—ฌ์„ฏ์งธ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์˜์•„์‚ฌ๋ง์œจ์€ ์ถœ์ƒ 1,000๋ช…๋‹น 45.9๋กœ ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] While it is well known that the Korean fertility rate fell sharply in the recent years, it is less certain about the causes of the decline. Some previous researches indicated that there have been evidences whick are supporting various variables, related to the changes in level of fertility, have been changing quickly in Korea during the last decade. Those are, the numbers of family planning acceptor, family size preference among the acceptors , preference of effective contraceptives, change in life cycle, increment of age at marriage for both boys and girls, and urban-rural residence contribution. This study, therefore, aimed to measure fertility rates from only currently married women aged from 15 to 49 excluding single, divoreed, separated and widowed, and the births occurred from them. Marital total fertility rate, marital age-specific birth rate, marital gross reproduction rate and infant death rate of the married women were estimated by area from a total number of 17,615 married women observed from the 1978 national sample survey on vitar statistics improvement in Korea conducted by the Yonsei University Center for Family Planning and Population. Major findings from the measu ements are summarized as follows : 1. The estimated marital fertility rate in Korea for the year of 1978 was 4.0 for whole nation, and the rate by area was 3.1 in Seoul City, 3.5 in urban area excluding Seoul city, and 4.1in rural area. The marital gross repoduction rate for the same year of 1978 in Korea was 2.0 for whle nation, 1.6 for Seoul City, 2.2 for urban area excluding Seoul City and 1.9 for rural area. 2. The marital age-specific birth rate per 1,000 currently married women was 226 for 15- 19 age group, 276 for 20-24 age group, 271 for 25 - 29 age group, 126 for 30-34 age group, 49 for 35 - 39 age group,10 for 40-44 age group and 3 for 45-49 age group. 3 . Out of the total births occurred in the 1978 from the currently married women who has the proportion of having first baby was 85 percent for 15 - 19 age group, 70 percent for 20 - 24 age group 40 percent for 25-29 age group, 8.3 percent for 30-34 age group, 8.6 percent for 35 - 39 age group, and none for over 40 years . The proportion of having second baby was 15 percent for 15 - 19 age group, 25 percent for 20 - 24 age group, 41 percent for 25 - 29 age group, 25 percent for 30 - 34 age group 13 percent for 35 - 39 age group 8 percent for 40 -44 age group,, and none for 45-49 age group. 4. For the year of 1978, the estimated marital age-specific infant death rate was 0 percent for 15 - 19 age group, 17.4 percent for 20-24 age group, 16.2 percent for 25 - 29 age group, 7.9 percent for 30 - 34 age group, 39.0 percent for 35 -39 age group, and none for 40 years .The marital infant death rates estimated by birth order showed that more frequent deaths were found among the first and later births, six or more, than the deaths among the third and fourth births.restrictio
    corecore