89 research outputs found

    Radiotherapeutic Options for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

    Get PDF
    Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is a common paraneoplastic condition in advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatobiliary tract malignancies. Tumors with PVTT are frequently associated with adverse and aggressive features such as intrahepatic tumor dissemination, early treatment failure, or deterioration of hepatic function. Therefore, the treatment outcomes for PVTT in historical series are often dismal and discouraging. More recently, beneficial effects and excellent outcomes of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for treating this disease have been reported, and the use of EBRT is becoming more common because of the non-invasive nature of RT and rapid advances in RT technology. We hope to be able to cure this devastating condition in the near future with more advanced and efficacious disease management strategies. The current status and clinical trial results for EBRT as a promising treatment option for managing PVTT will be discussed here.ope

    Democratic Spirit in Greek Tragedy: Analyzing the Metaphor of Athens

    No full text
    λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμ˜λŠ” μ œλ„ν™”λΏλ§Œ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 민주정신이 κΉƒλ“€μ–΄μ•Ό 꽃을 ν”ΌμšΈ 수 μžˆλŠ”λ°, 이 정신이 κ°€μž₯ 잘 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜ μžˆλŠ” ν…μŠ€νŠΈκ°€ κ³ λŒ€ 그리슀 λΉ„κ·Ήμž‘ν’ˆλ“€μ΄λ‹€. 이것듀은 λ‹¨μˆœν•œ λ¬Έν•™μž‘ν’ˆμ΄ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ•„ν…Œλ„€ λ―Όμ£Όμ • μ‹œκΈ°μ— μ‹œλ―Όλ“€μ˜ λ§ˆμŒμ„ μ‚¬λ‘œμž‘κ³  κ³΅κ°λŒ€λ₯Ό ν˜•μ„±ν•œ μΌμ’…μ˜ μ •μΉ˜μ μΈ ν˜Ήμ€ μ •μΉ˜κ΅μœ‘μ μΈ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ˜€κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. 그런데 이 μž‘ν’ˆλ“€μ΄ μ•„ν…Œλ„€(의 λ―Όμ£Όμ •)에 λŒ€ν•΄ 직접적인 찬양을 λŠ˜μ–΄λ†“κ³  μžˆλŠ” 것은 μ•„λ‹ˆλ‹€. 였히렀 λ‹Ήμ‹œ μ•„ν…Œλ„€μ™€ κ²½μŸκ΄€κ³„ 에 있던 λ‹€λ₯Έ 그리슀 λ„μ‹œκ΅­κ°€λ“€, μ˜ˆμ»¨λŒ€ ν…Œλ² λ‚˜ μ•„λ₯΄κ³ μŠ€ 등을 μ£Όμš” μ†Œμž¬λ‘œ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜λ©° λ˜ν•œ νŠΈλ‘œμ΄λ‚˜ μ½œν‚€μŠ€κ°™μ€ λΉ„κ·Έλ¦¬μŠ€ 지역도 많이 닀루고 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ 그리슀 비극에 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ 민주정신을 μ•Œμ•„λ³΄κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 이 μž‘ν’ˆλ“€μ—μ„œ μΌμ’…μ˜ 메타포(metaphor)둜 μ‚¬μš©λœ μ•„ν…Œλ„€μ— 주의λ₯Ό κΈ°μšΈμ—¬μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. 이런 메타포 뢄석을 톡해 μ•„μ΄μŠ€ν‚¬λ‘œμŠ€, μ†Œν¬ν΄λ ˆμŠ€, μ—μš°λ¦¬ν”Όλ°μŠ€μ˜ μž‘ν’ˆλ“€μ„ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄λ©΄, λ―Όμ£Όμ •μ΄λž€ μ΄λ°©μΈλ“€μ˜ λͺ¨μž„μœΌλ‘œμ„œ 이듀 κ°„μ˜ ν™”ν•΄κ°€ μ •μΉ˜μ  μ •μ˜μ΄λ©°, μž…λ²•μžμ΄μž λ²”λ²•μžμΈ 이쀑적 정체성을 κ²¬λ””λŠ” μžκ°€ μ •μΉ˜μΈμ΄κ³ , μ΄λ°©μΈκΉŒμ§€λ„ λ©€λ²„μ‹­μœΌλ‘œ λ°›μ•„λ“€μ΄λŠ” 것이 λ―Όμ£Όμ •μ‹ μ΄λΌλŠ” 것을 μ•Œ 수 μžˆλ‹€. Democracy will blossom when its institutionalization is completed and its spiritualization is incarnated. Greek tragedies take special care of the spirit of democracy because they are not simply literary works but texts for political education. They do not make direct expressions on the merits of Athenian democracy, but give us the democratic teachings by dealing with the problems raised in such rival cities as Thebes, Argos and Kolchis and suggesting their solutions with the metaphor of Athens. Analyzing that metaphor shown in the texts of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, we can realize that democratic spirit includes the reconciliation among strangers as political justice, the endurance of dual identity as law-legislator and law-breaker, and the membership open for those who respect the regime regardless of their nationality.이 논문은 2008λ…„ μ •λΆ€(κ΅μœ‘κ³Όν•™κΈ°μˆ λΆ€)의 μž¬μ›μœΌλ‘œ ν•œκ΅­μ—°κ΅¬μž¬λ‹¨μ˜ 지원을 λ°›μ•„ μˆ˜ν–‰λœ μ—°κ΅¬μž„(NRF-2008-005-J01803)

    Discharge mode transition simulation of dielectric barrier discharge in He-O2 mixture and its application to adsorbability enhancement of activated carbon

    No full text
    Thesis (master`s)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μ›μžν•΅κ³΅ν•™κ³Ό ν•΅μœ΅ν•©μ „κ³΅,2004.Maste

    μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ μ§ˆλ³‘μ— SHARPIN이 μ—°λ£¨λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμŒμ„ λ³΄μ—¬μ£ΌλŠ” 자기곡λͺ…μ˜μƒ νŠΉμ„±μ„ ν™œμš©ν•œ μ „μž₯μœ μ „μ²΄ μ—°κ΄€μ„± 뢄석

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :λ³΄κ±΄λŒ€ν•™μ› 보건학과(보건학전곡),2020. 2. μ›μ„±ν˜Έ.[Introduction] Despite active research on Alzheimers disease (AD), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified so far only partially, explain the heritability of AD. Here, our goal was to identify genetic variants of AD-related traits in Koreans through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). [Methods] We conducted genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on the hippocampus, entorhinal, inferior parietal, middle temporal, and superior frontal regions in Koreans. GWASs were conducted with and without adjustment for effects of Apolipoprotein E (APOE). For significantly associated SNPs, they were replicated with the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and European Union AddNeuroMed and we compared the standardized uptake value ratio using amyloid positron emission tomography (PET). We also summarized five cognitive traits by genotypes using the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). [Results] For our discovery GWAS, we found that rs77359862 near SHANK-associated RH Domain Interactor (SHARPIN) was significantly associated with entorhinal and hippocampus traits (P = 5.0Γ—γ€–10γ€—^(-9) and 5.1Γ—γ€–10γ€—^(-12), respectively). Gene-based analyses for SHARPIN with ADNI and AddNeuroMed data were consistent with the significant discovery analysis result (P = 0.002 and 0.044, respectively). Furthermore, rs77359862 affects amyloid beta accumulation and has significant differences between carrier and non-carrier groups on frontal memory regions in the SNSB data. [Discussion] We found that SHARPIN was significantly associated with the entorhinal and hippocampus, indicating that SHARPIN may have an important role in the pathogenesis of AD.[λ°° κ²½] μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ μ§ˆλ³‘μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν™œλ°œν•œ 연ꡬ에도 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  아직 μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έμ™€ κ΄€λ ¨λœ μœ μ „μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ가 λΆ€μ‘±ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ”μš±μ΄ λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„ μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ μ§ˆλ³‘μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ듀은 백인듀 μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ 이루어지고 μžˆλŠ”λ° ν•œκ΅­μΈκ³Ό 백인 μ‚¬μ΄μ—λŠ” μœ μ „μ  λ³€μ΄μ—μ„œ λ§Žμ€ 차이λ₯Ό λ³΄μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. κ·Έλž˜μ„œ ν•œκ΅­μΈμ„ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜λŠ” μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ μ§ˆλ³‘μ— λŒ€ν•œ μœ μ „μ  연ꡬ가 ν•„μš”ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. [λ°© 법] ν•œκ΅­μΈμ˜ μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ μ§ˆλ³‘μ— μœ„ν—˜ν•œ μœ μ „μ  변이 μš”μΈμ„ μ°ΎκΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œ μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ μ§ˆλ³‘κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ MRI ν˜•μ§ˆμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ APOE 효과λ₯Ό κ³ λ €ν•œ 것/ κ³ λ €ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 것 두 가지 λͺ¨ν˜•μœΌλ‘œ μ „μž₯μœ μ „μ²΄ 뢄석을 μ‹œν–‰ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ 희귀 μœ μ „μ²΄λ₯Ό λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•œ μ „μž₯μœ μ „μ²΄ 뢄석과 μœ μ „μžκΈ°λ°˜ ν…ŒμŠ€νŠΈλ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘  μœ μ „μ  변이가 μ•„λ°€λ‘œμ΄λ“œ 베타 좕적에 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ”μ§€ ν™•μΈν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ–‘μ „μž 단측 촬영 λ°μ΄ν„°μ—μ„œ ν‘œμ€€ν™” μ„­μ·¨ κ³„μˆ˜λ₯Ό κ³„μ‚°ν•œ ν›„ ν™•μΈν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. [κ²° κ³Ό] APOE 효과λ₯Ό 넣지 μ•Šμ€ λͺ¨ν˜•μ—μ„œ APOE, APOC1, SHARPIN, NECTIN2, TOMM40이 μœ μ˜ν•œ 것을 ν™•μΈν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. APOE 효과λ₯Ό 넣은 λͺ¨ν˜•μ—μ„  SHARPIN κ³Ό EPPK1이 μœ μ˜ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 그리고 SHARPIN은 ADNI 와 AddNeuroMed λ°μ΄ν„°μ—μ„œ μœ μ „μžκΈ°λ°˜ ν…ŒμŠ€νŠΈλ‘œ ν•΄λ‹Ή λ°μ΄ν„°μ—μ„œλ„ μœ μ˜ν•¨μ„ ν™•μΈν–ˆκ³  뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ•„λ°€λ‘œμ΄λ“œ 베타 좕적에도 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. [λ…Ό 의] μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έμ™€ κ΄€λ ¨λœ MRI ν˜•μ§ˆμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ ν•œκ΅­μΈ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ „μž₯μœ μ „μ²΄ 뢄석을 μ‹œν–‰ν•œ 첫 μ—°κ΅¬μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. 졜근 SHARPIN이 μ•ŒμΈ ν•˜μ΄λ¨Έ κ΄€λ ¨ μœ μ „μžλ‘œ 제기되고 있고 제 연ꡬ도 μ΄μ „μ˜ 연ꡬ듀과 κ²°κ³Όκ°€ μΌμΉ˜ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 이 연ꡬ에선 SHARPIN이 μ•„λ°€λ‘œμ΄λ“œ 베타 좕적에 영ν–₯을 μ€€λ‹€λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.Introduction 7 Methods 8 1. Study participants 8 2. Genotyping, quality control analyses of SNP genotype data, and imputation 9 3. MRI phenotyping 10 4. GWAS without adjusting for APOE effects 10 5. GWAS after adjusting for APOE effects 11 6. Gene-based analyses 12 7. Statistical analyses of amyloid PET and cognitive traits 12 8. Replication analyses 13 Results 13 1. Descriptive statistics of study subjects 13 2. GWAS without adjusting for APOE effects 14 3. GWAS after adjusting APOE effects 15 4. Replication analyses 16 5. Gene-based analysis of common variants 16 6. Gene-based analysis for rare variants 17 7. Semi-automated quantitative analysis using SUVR 17 8. Cognitive data analyses 18 9. rs77359862 functions on SHARPIN 19 Discussion 19 References 43Maste

    The Study on the preferred orientation control and the giant grain growth of Pt films

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μž¬λ£Œκ³΅ν•™λΆ€,2001.Docto

    솔-μ € 법을 μ΄μš©ν•œ ν•˜μ΄λ“œλ‘μ‹œ μ•„νŒŒνƒ€μ΄νŠΈ ν•©μ„±μ‹œ 용맀의 영ν–₯

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :ν˜‘λ™κ³Όμ • λ‚˜λ…Έκ³Όν•™κΈ°μˆ μ „κ³΅,2004.Maste

    νƒ„μ†Œλ‚˜λ…ΈνŠœλΈŒ μ‹­μžν˜• 접합을 μ΄μš©ν•œ μ „κ³„νš¨κ³Ό νŠΈλžœμ§€μŠ€ν„°μ˜ 전기적 νŠΉμ„±

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사) --μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :물리학뢀,2007.Docto

    The Postmodern Interpretation of Feminity as Subject

    No full text
    μš” μ•½νŽ˜λ―Έλ‹ˆμ¦˜μ€ λ‚¨μ„±μ€‘μ‹¬μ£Όμ˜μ˜ μ§€λ°°λ‘œλΆ€ν„° μ—¬μ„±μ˜ 해방을 지ν–₯ν•œλ‹€. νŽ˜λ―Έλ‹ˆμ¦˜μ΄ λ‚¨μ„±μ€‘μ‹¬μ£Όμ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ 해체λ₯Ό 지ν–₯ν•˜λŠ” ν•œ "포슀트λͺ¨λ˜" 담둠이라 ν•  수 μžˆμœΌλ‚˜, μ—¬μ„±μ˜ ν•΄λ°© 문제λ₯Ό "μ£Όμ²΄λ‘œμ„œμ˜ μ—¬μ„±"의 확립에 두고 μžˆλŠ” ν•œ 포슀트λͺ¨λ”λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ˜ "νƒˆμ£Όμ²΄ν™”"와 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ 양립할 수 μžˆλŠ”κ°€μ˜ λ¬Έμ œκ°€ λ˜ν•œ μ œκΈ°λœλ‹€. 이 문제λ₯Ό μ§„μ§€ν•˜κ²Œ 닀루고 μžˆλŠ” "ν¬μŠ€νŠΈνŽ˜λ―Έλ‹ˆμŠ€νŠΈ" νŽ˜λ―Έλ‹ˆμ¦˜μ˜ λ…Όμ˜λŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같이 μš”μ•½λœλ‹€: 첫째, λ°œλ²„μŠ€(lsaac D. Balbus)λŠ” ν•œνŽΈμœΌλ‘œ ν‘Έμ½”μ˜ 계보학적 뢄석에 따라 κ°€λΆ€μž₯적 λ‚¨μ„±μ€‘μ‹¬μ£Όμ˜λ₯Ό ν•΄μ²΄μ‹œν‚€λŠ”λ° λ™μ˜ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ, λ‹€λ₯Έ ν•œνŽΈ ν‘Έμ½”μ²˜λŸΌ μ—¬μ„±μ˜ 쑴재λ₯Ό μ£Όμ²΄ν™”μ‹œν‚€μ§€ μ•ŠμœΌλ©΄ 여성은 λ‹€μ‹œ ν›ˆμœ‘λ˜μ–΄μ§ˆ 것이라고 μš°λ €ν•œλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, 코넬(Drucilla Cornell)κ³Ό 터쉬웰(Adam Thurschwell)은 μ—¬μ„±μ˜ μžμ•„λŠ” λ‹¨μˆœνžˆ μ—¬μ„±λ§Œμ˜ 아이덴티티λ₯Ό 찾음으둜써 ν˜•μ„±λ˜λŠ” 것이 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ λ‚¨μ„±μ΄λΌλŠ” λ˜λ‹€λ₯Έ μ‘΄μž¬μ™€ 간주관적 관계 μ†μ—μ„œ λΉ„λ‘œμ†Œ λ“œλŸ¬λ‚˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μ—¬μ„±μ˜ 주체성은 그리 μ‰½κ²Œ κ·œμ •λ  수 μ—†λ‹€κ³  λ³Έλ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, λ²„ν‹€λŸ¬(Judith Butler)λŠ” μ—¬κΈ°μ„œ ν•œ 걸음 더 λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ 여성은 μ—¬μ„± 자체의 λ‚΄λΆ€λ‘œλΆ€ν„° μ—΄λ €μžˆλŠ” 쑴재이기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— κ²°μ½” μ–΄λ–€ 주체둜 κ·œμ •λ  수 μ—†μœΌλ©° μ—¬μ„±μ΄λΌλŠ” λ³΄νŽΈμ„±μ€ λ¬΄μ—‡μœΌλ‘œ κ·œμ •λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 채 미래의 μž¬μ˜λ―Έν™”μ— μ—΄λ € μžˆμ„ λ•Œ κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜λ‹€κ³  μ£Όμž₯ν•œλ‹€. 결둠적으둜, 여성해방을 μœ„ν•΄ μ–΄λ–€ μ •μΉ˜μ  μ•„μ΄λ΄ν‹°ν‹°λ‘œμ„œμ˜ μ—¬μ„±μ˜ 주체성이 μš”κ΅¬λ˜μ§€λ§Œ, 그것은 μ–΄λ–€ μ •μΉ˜μ  μ˜λ„κ°€ 게재된 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ 근본적 주체의 ν˜•μ„±μ΄ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μž„μ‹œμ μΈ 것이며, μ—¬μ„±μ˜ 보편적 μ˜λ―ΈλŠ” μ—¬μ„± μžμ‹ μ˜ λ‚΄λΆ€μ—μ„œ λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ” μž¬μ˜λ―Έν™”μ— ν–₯상 μ—΄λ €μžˆμ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀.ABSTRACTInstructor of Political Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Major Publications: "Praxis in Temporality: The Heideggerian Interpretation of Praxis"(1998)(Ph. D. dissertation) "A Critique on Mancur Olson's Behavior Theory," History and Society, Vol. 3, No. 21(December 1998) Feminism looks for the emancipation of the feminine from the patriarchic domination. Insofar as it searches for the destruction of patriarchy, feminism can be viewed as "postmodern." However, a dilemma comes that insofar as it directs toward the establishment of feminity as subject, feminism can also be doubted as compatible with the postmodern slogan of "the decentering of the subject." "Postfeminist" feminists deal seriously with this dilemma. Their claims are summarized as follows: First, while he agrees with the Foucauldian genealogical destruction of patriarchy, Isaac D. Balbus warns against the Foucauldian decentering of feminity as subject because the repudiation of subject simply results disciplining women. Second, Drucilla Cornell and Adam Thurschwell state that the rigid gender dichotomy serves as ideology and that the sexes are the relational selves. According to them, the subjectivity of feminity cannot easily be determined as something because the feminine is intersubjectively formulated in relation with the masculine. Third, Judith Butler takes one more step. According to her, feminity as subject cannot be achieved on the fixed foundation, because the feminine is reproduced within from the interior of feminity in which the feminine is permanently open and contested for the resignification of feminity itself. Conclusively, the subjectivity of women is needed as a political identity for their emancipation, but it is not an essential, but simply an "ad hoc," subjectivity which possesses a political intention. The universality of feminity as subject should be understood in relation not only with masculinity but with the indeterminate openness of feminity itself

    The Ethics of Global Citizen: In Terms of Hans KΓΌng and Emmanuel Levinas

    No full text
    λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 문화와 전톡. κ°€μΉ˜κ΄€μ˜ 혼재둜 κ°ˆλ“±κ³Ό 좩돌이 자주 λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ” μ§€κ΅¬ν™”μ‹œλŒ€μ—” μ§€κ΅¬μ‹œλ―Όλ“€μ΄ κ·Όκ±°ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 윀리의 수립이 μ ˆμ‹€ν•˜λ‹€. 이에 쒅ꡐ적 νƒœλ„μ—μ„œ μ§€κ΅¬μœ€λ¦¬λ₯Ό κ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” ν€‘μ˜ λ…Όμ˜μ™€ νƒ€μžμ™€μ˜ μ΄ˆμ›”μ  관계λ₯Ό 윀리둜 μƒκ°ν•˜λŠ” λ ˆλΉ„λ‚˜μŠ€μ˜ λ…Όμ˜λŠ” 도움이 λœλ‹€. λ¨Όμ € 퀑은 ν˜Όλž€μŠ€λŸ¬μš΄ μ§€κ΅¬μ΄Œμ—μ„œλŠ” μ΅œμ†Œν•œμ˜ 원칙을 μ§€ν‚€λŠ” μ§€κ΅¬μœ€λ¦¬κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•œλ° μ΄λŠ” λ‹¨μˆœνžˆ 도덕적인 λ¬Έμ œκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 쒅ꡐ적 νƒœλ„λ₯Ό 톡해 ν•¨μ–‘λœλ‹€κ³  λ³Έλ‹€. 즉 μ‹ κ³Ό 같은 μ΄ˆμ›”μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ 경건함이 μžˆμ–΄μ•Όλ§Œ 인간은 타인에 λŒ€ν•œ 쑴쀑과 ν˜‘λ ₯의 ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ 느끼게 λœλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀. 그런데 ν˜„μ‹€μ„Έκ³„μ—μ„œλŠ” 쒅ꡐ κ°„μ˜ 좩돌이 λ¬Έλͺ… κ°„μ˜ μΆ©λŒμ„ μ•ΌκΈ°ν•˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ―€λ‘œ, 쒅ꡐ κ°„μ˜ λŒ€ν™”κ°€ λ¨Όμ € μ„ ν–‰λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. 즉 쒅ꡐ κ°„ λŒ€ν™” μ—†μ΄λŠ” 평화가 μ—†λ‹€λŠ” 것이닀. 반면 λ ˆλΉ„λ‚˜μŠ€λŠ” ν˜„λŒ€μ‚¬νšŒ 폭λ ₯μ„±μ˜ 원인이 톡일성과 전체성을 μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 잘λͺ»λœ κ·ΌλŒ€μ  주체가 νƒ€μžμ„±μ„ λ§μ‚΄ν•˜λ €λŠ” 데 μžˆλ‹€κ³  λ³Έλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό κ·Ήλ³΅ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” λŒ€μƒκ³Ό 세계λ₯Ό 자기 μ˜μ‹μ˜ ν‘œμƒκ΄€κ³„μ—μ„œ νŒŒμ•…ν•˜κ³  이λ₯Ό λ™μΌμ„±μœΌλ‘œ ν™˜μ›μ‹œν‚€λ €λŠ” κ·ΌλŒ€μ  주체의 인식둠을 버리고, λŒ€μƒκ³Ό 세계λ₯Ό 싀쑴적 ν–₯μœ κ΄€κ³„ μ†μ—μ„œ 직접 λŒ€λ©΄ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ νƒ€μžλ₯Ό ν™˜μ›λ  수 μ—†λŠ” νƒ€μžμ„± κ·Έ 자체둜 λ°›μ•„λ“€μ΄λŠ” νƒœλ„κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. 이런 윀리적 관계 μ†μ—μ„œλ§Œ νƒ€μžμ„±μ— μ‘λ‹΅ν•˜μ—¬ λ¬΄ν•œ μ±…μž„μ„ 지며, μ΄λ•Œ λΉ„λ‘œμ†Œ 우리의 κ°œλ…μ΄λ‚˜ ν˜•μ œμ• κ°€ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚  수 μžˆλ‹€. 이런 큉과 λ ˆλΉ„λ‚˜μŠ€μ˜ λ…Όμ˜λŠ” νƒ€λ‹Ήν•˜λ‚˜, 이λ₯Ό μ‹€μ²œν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μ •μΉ˜μ  κ³ λ €λŠ” λΆ€μ‘±ν•œ 것이 흠이닀. μΈκ°„κ΄€κ³„λ‘œμ„œμ˜ μœ€λ¦¬λŠ” μ •μΉ˜μ„Έκ³„μ˜ λ―Όμ£Όν™”κ°€ λ¨Όμ € μ„ ν–‰λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό κ·Έ 함양이 κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. Global ethics is desperately needed in the age of globalization in which the diversity of conflicts and clashes frequently occurs. The arguments of Hans KΓΌng and Emmanuel Levinas are helpful for its understanding. Above all, KΓΌng sees that global ethics as the minimal principle for global citizens may be established by incarnating religious attitudes. In other words, men may be ethical when they have the piety to the transcendental God toward whom the individual man exceeds himself. In the real world, however, the basic problem lies in the fact that the transcendental religions are conflicting and even fighting each other. Therefore, the first thing 10 do is to have dialogues among religions, without which there is no peace. On the other hand, Levinas contends that violences in the modem world are theoretically derived from the concept of 'modem subject" that pursues unity and totality. In order to overcome them. therefore, we have to repudiate the modern epistemology in which I reduce others to my own representation, and to accept the idea that others are recognized as others themselves in my 'jouissance' of the world. In such an attitude I am infinitely responsible for the others. and I and others will make the concept of Β·we: The ideas of KΓΌng and Levinas are very insightful, but in a sense unsatisfiable because they do not take into account the political that lies ahead of the ethical. Ethics as that which are relational among men is achievable when political democracy proceeds in the real world.이 논문은 2005λ…„ μ •λΆ€(κ΅μœ‘μΈμ μžμ›λΆ€)의 μž¬μ›μœΌλ‘œ ν•œκ΅­ν•™μˆ μ§„ν₯μž¬λ‹¨μ˜ μ‹œμ›μ„ λ°›μ•„ μˆ˜ν–‰λœ μ—°κ΅¬μž„(KRF-2005-005-J08702

    Political Theory of Post-Modernism : A Reconstruction of Dallmayr's notions of Intersubjectivity

    No full text
    ν˜„λŒ€ μ„œκ΅¬ μ •μΉ˜μ² ν•™μ΄ λ‹Ήλ©΄ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ¬Έμ œλŠ” "μœ„κΈ°"의 ν˜„λŒ€λ₯Ό μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ κ·Ή λ³΅ν•˜λŠλƒλ‘œ μ§‘μ•½λœλ‹€. ν˜„λŒ€ μ„œκ΅¬μ‚¬νšŒλ₯Ό κ·ΌλŒ€μ„± (modernity)에 철학적 κΈ°λ°˜μ„ 두고 자본주의 λ°œλ‹¬κ³Ό λ”λΆˆμ–΄ ν˜•μ„±λœ μ‹œλ―Όμ‚¬νšŒ (civil society)둜 κ·œμ •ν•  λ•Œ, ν˜„λŒ€ μ„œκ΅¬μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ μœ„κΈ°λŠ” 무엇보닀도 "κ·ΌλŒ€μ„±μ˜ μœ„κΈ°"라고 λ³Ό 수 μžˆλ‹€. 17"8세기에 μ‹œμž‘λ˜μ–΄ ν”„λž‘μŠ€ 혁λͺ…κ³Ό μ‚°μ—…ν˜λͺ…을 거쳐 ν™•μž₯λ˜μ–΄μ˜¨ μ‹œλ―Όμ‚¬νšŒλŠ” μ†Œμœ„ ν•©λ¦¬μ„±μ˜ μ¦λŒ€, μƒμ‚°μ„±μ˜ ν–₯상, κ°œμΈλ“€μ˜ κΆŒλ¦¬μ™€ 이읡의 ν™•λŒ€λΌλŠ” 일견 긍정적인 λ°œμ „μ„ ν•΄μ™”μœΌλ‚˜, 이와 λ”λΆˆμ–΄ ν˜Ήμ€ 긍정적인 λ°œμ „μ˜ μ–‘λ©΄μ„±μ—μ˜ν•΄ μœ„κΈ°μ— λ΄‰μ°©ν–ˆμŒμ„ 뢀인할 수 μ—†κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 이미 19μ„ΈκΈ° ν›„λ°˜λΆ€ν„° 마λ₯΄ν¬μŠ€μ™€ λ‹ˆμ²΄λŠ” 비둝 μž…μž₯의 μ°¨μ΄λŠ” μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ 각각 μ‹œλ―Όμ‚¬νšŒμ˜ μœ„κΈ°λ₯Ό κ²½κ³ ν•œ λ°” μžˆλ‹€
    • …
    corecore