49 research outputs found
The Political Significance of National Identity among Americans
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ κ΅λ―Όμ 체μ±μ΄ κ°μ§λ μ μΉμ μλ―Έλ₯Ό λ―Έκ΅μΈμ λμμΌλ‘ νμ¬ μ΄ν΄λ³΄μλ€. κ΅λ―Όμ 체μ±μ μλ¬Έν μ€μ¬μ£Όμμ μλ―Ό 곡νμ£Όμλ‘ λΆλ₯νμ¬ μ΄ν΄λ³΄μμΌλ©° μ΄λ€ λ ννμ κ΅λ―Όμ μ²΄μ± μΈμμ΄ μ΄λ―Όκ³Ό μ΄μ€ μΈμ΄ λ¬Έμ μ λν νλμ νμ±κ³Ό ν¬νμ°Έμ¬μ λ―ΈμΉλ μν₯λ ₯μ κ³ μ°°νμλ€. 21st Century Americanism Survey μλ£λ₯Ό νμ©ν κ²½νμ λΆμ κ²°κ³Όλ κ΅λ―Όμ μ²΄μ± μΈμμ΄ κ°μΈλ€μ νλ λ° ννμ μ€μν μν μ νλ€λ κ²μ 보μ¬μ€λ€. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μ κ²°κ³Όλ κ°μΈμ μ μΉμ κ²°μ μ μμ΄μ μμ§μ μ λ
μ μν₯λ ₯μ΄ μ€μνλ€κ³ μ£Όμ₯νλ μμ§ μ μΉμ΄λ‘ μ μ€λͺ
λ ₯μ λ€μ ν λ² μ¬νμΈν΄μ£Όλ κ²μ΄λ€. μ΄λ―Ό λ¬Έμ μ μ΄λ―Όμλ€μ΄ μ¬μ©νλ μΈμ΄μ κ΄λ ¨ν μ견μ λ¬Όλ‘ μ΄κ³ ν¬ν μ°Έμ¬ ννλ κ°μΈμ κ΅κ°μ λν νλμ κΉμμ΄ μ°κ΄λμ΄ μμμ μ μ μλ€.
This study examines the political significance of national identity among Americans. With a focus on the two components of national identity, ethnoculturalism and civic republicanism, we utilize the 21st Century Americanism Survey and run a regression analysis. The results show that Americans national identity has an impact on not only Americans attitudes toward immigration and bilingual education, but also voting participation. The findings of this study confirm the symbolic politics theory, which emphasizes an important role played by symbolic predispositions on individuals political attitudes/behaviors
The Perception Gap on Political Tolerance between the Winner and the Loser and Its Effects
λμλ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμκ° κ³΅κ³ νλμ§ μν΄μλ μ κ±°λ₯Ό ν΅ν μ κΆ κ΅μ²΄μ κ°λ₯μ±μ΄ νμ μ΄λ €μκ³ , μ κ±°κ²½μμμμ μΉμμ ν¨μκ° λΉμ·ν μμ€μ μ μΉκ΄μ©μ 보μ΄λ κ²μ΄ μ€μνλ€. μ΄μ λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ λμλ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμνμμ μ κ±°λ₯Ό ν΅νμ¬ νμ°μ μΌλ‘ μμ°νκ² λλ μΉμμ ν¨μλ‘μμ μ§μκ° μ μΉκ΄μ©μ λ¬Έμ μ κ΄λ ¨νμ¬ μ΄λ ν κ΄κ³λ₯Ό νμ±νκ³ μλκ°λ₯Ό κ²½νμ μΌλ‘ λΆμνκ³ μλ€. μ΄λ₯Ό ν΅νμ¬ λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ νκ΅μμ μ μΉκ΄μ©μ μ΄λ ν νΉμ§λ€μ 보μ΄λκ°μ λν μ΄ν΄λ₯Ό λκ³ , κ·Έ μμ€μ μ κ³ νκΈ° μν΄μλ μ΄λ ν μ κ·Όκ³Ό λ
Έλ ₯λ€μ΄ μꡬλλμ§μ λνμ¬ μ μνκ³ μλ€. μ°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Ό, νκ΅μμ μΉμμ ν¨μμ μ μΉκ΄μ©μ λν μΈμμ μλΉν μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό 보μ΄κ³ μλ€λ μ μ λͺ©κ²©ν μ μμλ€. κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ λ€μ€ νκ·λΆμμ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λκ³ λ³Ό λμλ μΉμ λλ ν¨μλ‘μμ μ§μλ κ°μΈμ μ μΉκ΄μ© μμ€μ κ²°μ μ§λλ° μμ΄ μΌμ μμ€ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€. μ΄λ¬ν μ μ κ³ λ €ν λ ν₯ν νκ΅μ μΉκ° ννμ μΈ κ΅λ©΄μΌλ‘ μ κ°λλ κ²μ λ°©μ§νκ³ λνμ ν λ‘ μ κΈ°λ°νμ¬ νμμ μΈ λ°©ν₯μΌλ‘ μ΄μλκΈ° μν΄μλ μΉμμ ν¨μ κ°μ μ‘΄μ¬νλ μ μΉκ΄μ©μ λν μΈμ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό μ’ν μ μλ λ°©μλ€μ λ€κ°μ μΌλ‘ λͺ¨μν νμκ° μλ€κ³ 보μ¬μ§λ€. νΉν μ΄λ₯Ό μν΄μλ μΉμλ
μμ μ μΉλ¬Ένλ₯Ό κ°μ νκ³ , μ’λ ν©μμ μ μΈ λ°©ν₯μΌλ‘ μ λ μ€μ μ νλ κ²μ΄ κΈ΄μν κ²μΌλ‘ νλ¨λλ€. The purpose of this study is to empirically analyze the preception gap on political tolerance between the winner and the loser. In addition, this study analyzes its effects in Korean politics. In this vein, this study will be helpful to understand the characteristics of political tolerance as well as to suggest what kinds of approaches or efforts are needed for improving the level of it in Korea.
Depending on the statistic analyses, we can witness that a significant perception gap on political tolerance between the winner and the loser does exist in Korea. Also, it effects to determine the level of political tolerance of the individuals. Considering the empirical findings, reducing the perception gap on political tolerance between the winner and the loser is necessary to ameliorate the winner-takes-all culture as well as to adopt the more consensual institutions.μ΄ λ
Όλ¬Έμ 2009λ
λ μ λΆμ¬μ(κ΅μ‘κ³ΌνκΈ°μ λΆ μΈλ¬Έμ¬νμ°κ΅¬μλκ°νμ¬μ
λΉ)μΌλ‘ νκ΅νμ μ§ν₯μ¬λ¨μ μ§μμ λ°μ μ°κ΅¬λμμ(KRF-2009-328-BOOOll