8 research outputs found

    Comparative study on the change pattern of public administrative reform

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : ν–‰μ •ν•™κ³Ό, 2011.8. μ •μš©λ•.Docto

    A Study on Time Difference in Policy Evidence: A Focus on Birth Control Policy

    No full text
    이 논문은 2013λ…„ μ„œμšΈν–‰μ •ν•™νšŒ μΆ˜κ³„ν•™μˆ λŒ€νšŒ(5.31)와 μ§€λ°©μ •λΆ€ν•™νšŒ ν•˜κ³„ν•™μˆ λŒ€νšŒ(8.23)μ—μ„œ λ°œν‘œλœ 원고λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ •, λ³΄μ™„ν•œ κ²ƒμž„.증거에 κΈ°μ΄ˆν•œ 정책은 λ°”λžŒμ§ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ°›μ•„λ“€μ—¬μ Έ μ™”λ‹€. 그런데 정책은 μ‹œκ°„μ˜ 흐름 μ†μ—μ„œ μ§„ν–‰λ˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μ •μ±…μ˜ 근거둜 ν™œμš©λ˜λŠ” 각쒅 정책증거듀은 μ‹œμ°¨μ  문제λ₯Ό ν•„μ—°μ μœΌλ‘œ κ°–κ²Œ λœλ‹€. 정책증거와 κ΄€λ ¨ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 인지적 μ‹œμ°¨κ°€ 특히 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€. κ·Έ μ΄μœ λŠ” μ •μ±…κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ •μ±… μ°Έμ—¬μžλ“€μ΄ 정책증거λ₯Ό μˆ˜μš©ν•˜κ³  ν•΄μ„ν•˜λŠ” λ°μ—λŠ” ν•œκ³„κ°€ 있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. 또, μ‹œκ°„μ΄ 흐름에 따라 λ³€ν™”λœ μ •μ±…λ¬Έμ œμ™€ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 정책증거λ₯Ό μΈμ§€ν•˜λŠ” λ°λŠ” 큰 차이가 있고, κ·Έ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ •μ±… μ°Έμ—¬μžλ“€μ˜ νŽΈκ²¬μ„ λ§Œλ“€μ–΄ 내기도 ν•œλ‹€. 이런 μ μ—μ„œ κ³Όκ±° μ‚°μ•„μ œν•œμ •μ±…μ€ μ •μ±…μ˜ κ·Όκ±°κ°€ 된 μΈκ΅¬μ¦κ°€μœ¨ 정보와 이에 λŒ€ν•œ 해석이 μΌμ’…μ˜ 편견으둜 μž‘λ™ν•˜μ—¬ μ •μ±…μ˜ μž¬κ²€ν† κ°€ μ œλŒ€λ‘œ 이루어지지 λͺ»ν•œ λŒ€ν‘œμ μΈ μ‚¬λ‘€λ‘œ λ³Ό 수 μžˆλ‹€. κ·Έλ ‡μ§€λ§Œ μ •μ±… μ°Έμ—¬μžλ“€μ˜ 인지적 μ‹œμ°¨λ₯Ό μ€„μ—¬μ£ΌλŠ” 것은 κ²°κ΅­ μ •μ±…μ˜ 각 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œ ν™œμš©λ˜λŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μœ ν˜•μ˜ 정책증거듀이닀. μ •μ±…κ²°μ • λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œμ˜ 영ν–₯증거와 뢄석증거, ꡭ민듀을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜λŠ” μœ€λ¦¬μ¦κ±°μ™€ λŒ€μ€‘μ˜ νƒœλ„ 및 이해증거, μ§‘ν–‰λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œμ˜ 집행증거 등이 κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 역할을 ν•œλ‹€. λͺ¨λ“  정책이 이둠에 κ·Όκ±°ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμ²˜λŸΌ λͺ¨λ“  정책은 μ–΄λ–€ 증거에 κ·Όκ±°ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 점, 그리고 μ‹œκ°„μ˜ 흐름에 따라 μ •μ±…μ¦κ±°μ˜ 적싀성도 λ³€ν™”ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 점이 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€.An evidence-based policy process has been accepted as desirable. However, any policy process involves the passage of time and policy evidence does too. Therefore, the linkage between policy evidence and a time difference approach contributes to the mutual supplementation of these concepts. A cognitive gap is particularly important with regard to policy evidence. Policy participants have limitations in accepting and interpreting policy evidence in the policy process. Furthermore, there is a huge perception gap among policy participants in terms of policy problems and policy information. This gap creates bias among policy participants. Birth control policy in Korea from 1960s to 1980s is a typical example of a failure of policy reexamination. The reason is that initial information about the population growth rate and its interpretation influenced the thinking of policy makers. Various types of policy evidence will ultimately reduce any cognitive gap in each policy step. Impact evidence and analytical evidence in the policy making stage, as well as ethical evidence, public attitude evidence, and implementation evidence in the policy enforcement stage play important roles in reducing cognitive gap. It is important that all policies are based on theory, just as all policies are based on evidence

    계측별 μ§€λ°©μžμΉ˜λ‹¨μ²΄μ˜ κΈ°λŠ₯μˆ˜ν–‰λ°©μ‹μ— κ΄€ν•œ 싀증적 연ꡬ : κ΄‘μ—­μ‹œμ™€ 자치ꡬ의 μ„ΈμΆœμ˜ˆμ‚°μ„ μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ ν–‰μ •λŒ€ν•™μ› :ν–‰μ •ν•™κ³Ό 행정학전곡,2004.Maste
    corecore