10 research outputs found

    CAI ν™˜κ²½μ—μ„œ μžκΈ°μ‘°μ ˆν•™μŠ΅κ³Ό μžλ£Œμ œμ‹œλ°©λ²•μ΄ 학업성취에 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 효과

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :κ΅μœ‘ν•™κ³Ό κ΅μœ‘λ°©λ²•μ „κ³΅,1998.Maste

    A Case Study of Teacher Role in Online Discussions: A Contextual Approach

    No full text
    λ…Όλ¬Έ μš”μ•½μ΄ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 사둀연ꡬλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ ꡐ싀과 가상곡간을 λ³‘ν–‰ν•˜λŠ” ν˜Όν•©ν˜• ꡐ수-ν•™μŠ΅ ν™˜κ²½μ—μ„œ 온라인 토둠을 μ‹€μ‹œν•  λ•Œ ꡐ수자의 μˆ˜μ—…κ΄€μ΄ 온라인 ν† λ‘  운영 방식에 μ–΄λ– ν•œ 영ν–₯을 미치며 그둜 인해 μ–΄λ– ν•œ 역할을 μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜λŠ”κ°€λ₯Ό 질적으둜 νƒμƒ‰ν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 연ꡬ λŒ€μƒμ€ μ„œμšΈμ‹œμ— μ†Œμž¬ν•˜λŠ” ν•œ λŒ€ν•™κ΅μ˜ λŒ€ν•™μ› κ°•μ’Œμ΄κ³ , 연ꡬ μ°Έμ—¬μžλŠ” ꡐ수자 1λͺ…κ³Ό 연ꡬ에 자발적으둜 μ‘ν•œ 8λͺ…μ˜ 학생이닀. 연ꡬ μžλ£ŒλŠ” κ΄€μ°°, λ©΄λ‹΄, λ¬Έμ„œλΆ„μ„μ— μ˜ν•΄ μˆ˜μ§‘λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 연ꡬ 결과에 μ˜ν•˜λ©΄, 온라인 토둠을 μš΄μ˜ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ수자의 μ—¬λŸ¬ 역할듀은 온라인 토둠을 지속적인 λŒ€ν™”μ˜ κ³΅κ°„μœΌλ‘œ ν™œμš©ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ수자의 운영 방식과 관련이 있고, 온라인 ν† λ‘  운영 방식은 λŒ€ν™”μ˜ κ΄€μ μœΌλ‘œ μˆ˜μ—…μ„ 바라본 ꡐ수자의 μˆ˜μ—…κ΄€κ³Ό λ°€μ ‘ν•˜κ²Œ 관련이 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. ꡐ수자의 μˆ˜μ—…κ΄€κ³Ό 온라인 ν† λ‘  운영 λͺ©μ μ— κ·Όκ±°ν•˜μ—¬ 온라인 토둠을 μš΄μ˜ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ수자의 역할은 크게 μ˜¨λΌμΈν† λ‘  이전 단계와 온라인 ν† λ‘  진행 λ‹¨κ³„λ‘œ λ‚˜λˆ„μ–΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ‘Œλ‹€. 온라인 ν† λ‘  이전 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œμ˜ ꡐ수자의 역할은 읽기 μžλ£Œμ™€ ν•™μŠ΅μž κ°„μ˜ κ°œλ³„μ μΈ λŒ€ν™”λ₯Ό μ΄‰μ§„μ‹œν‚€λŠ” κ²ƒμ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 온라인 ν† λ‘  진행 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œμ˜ ꡐ수자의 역할은 크게 두 κ°€μ§€λ‘œμ„œ 첫째, ν’μ„±ν•œ λŒ€ν™”λ₯Ό μƒμ„±ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ ν•™μŠ΅μžλ“€μ΄ μžμ—°μŠ€λŸ½κ²Œ '내뱉'을 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ ν† λ‘  λΆ„μœ„κΈ°λ₯Ό ν˜•μ„±ν•˜λŠ” 것이고, λ‘˜μ§Έ, 집단 λŒ€ν™” μ†μ—μ„œ κ΅μˆ˜μžμ™€ ν•™μŠ΅μž κ°„ 1λŒ€1 λŒ€ν™”λ₯Ό μ΄‰μ§„μ‹œν‚€λŠ” κ²ƒμ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όμ—μ„œ μ œμ‹œν•œ 각 단계별 κ΅μˆ˜μžκ°€ μˆ˜ν–‰ν•œ 역할듀에 λŒ€ν•œ ꡬ체적인 ꡐ수 μ „λž΅λ“€μ€ λŒ€ν™”μ˜ 관점을 κ°–κ³  μžˆλŠ” κ³ λ“±κ΅μœ‘κΈ°κ΄€ κ΅μˆ˜μžλ“€μ΄ 온라인 토둠을 μš΄μ˜ν•˜λŠ”λ° 도움을 μ œκ³΅ν•  것이닀. 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ λ°ν˜€μ§„ ν•œ 가지 ν₯미둜운 점은 ꡐ수자의 μ—­ν• μ΄λΌλŠ” μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œλŠ” 온라인 ν† λ‘  이전 단계와 온라인 ν† λ‘  진행 단계λ₯Ό κ΅¬λ³„ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ, ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ ν•™μŠ΅ κ²½ν—˜ μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œλŠ” 이 두 λ‹¨κ³„μ˜ 경계가 λͺ¨ν˜Έν•˜μ—¬ ν•™μŠ΅μžλ“€μ΄ 자유둭게 두 단계λ₯Ό λ„˜λ‚˜λ“€λ©° ν•™μŠ΅μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§„λ‹€λŠ” 점이닀. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ, 연ꡬ 결과듀을 ν† λŒ€λ‘œ 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ€‘μš”ν•œ μ‹œμ‚¬μ λ“€μ„ μ œμ•ˆν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. The purpose of this study is to investigate teachers' role in online discussions using a contextual approach that is based on teachers' perspective on class and the purpose of online discussions. The research site was a graduate course at a university in Seoul and the research participants were the instructor and eight out of fifteen graduate students. Observation, interviews, and document analysis were conducted for data collection. According to the research findings, the instructor's perspective on class, the purpose of online discussion, and the instructor's roles were closely related with each other. First above all, the instructor's perspective on class was a view of dialogue and had an influence on the decision of how to use online discussion and the instructor's roles. Based on the perspective on class, the instructor considered an online discussion board as another place for dialogue and enabled learners to participate in online discussion every week. In order for learners to have active dialogue in each online discussion, the instructor played a variety of roles before and during online discussions. Before online discussions, the main role of the instructor was to facilitate individualized dialogue between learners and reading materials. During online discussions, the instructor played two different roles for learners' active dialogue. The first role was to make learners free to be themselves and the second one to facilitate one on one dialogue with learners among the whole class discussions. Specific instructional strategies that the instructor used before and during online discussions in this study will help instructors using a dialogue perspective on class design and use an online discussion for their class. Based on the valuable findings, this study suggests several important implications in terms of teachers' role in online discussions
    corecore