7 research outputs found

    ๋‹คํ™ฉํ™”์นผ์Š˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜ ๋‚ด ์นด๋“œ๋ฎด๊ณผ ์•„์—ฐ ์ €๊ฐ : ์นจ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ž‘, ์‚ฐํ™” ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2023. 2. ๋‚จ๊ฒฝํ•„.Heavy metals in sludge or leachate discharged from abandoned mines and smelters flow into the surrounding water system, causing serious water contamination. In particular, heavy metal contamination and acidification in groundwater are serious due to cadmium (Cd2+), zinc (Zn2+), and sulfate (SO42-) generated during the smelting process. In this regard, there are some cases of removing Cd2+ and Zn2+ from groundwater using calcium polysulfide (CPS), one of the reducing agents for remediation of groundwater, however, the mechanism of the heavy metal removal of CPS is not clearly known. In addition, heavy metals precipitated in the form of sulfides could be oxidized and dissolved in aqueous phase by dissolved oxygen (DO). Therefore, this study aimed to quantify the polysulfide (Sx2-), derive the precipitation mechanism of Cd2+ and Zn2+ by CPS, evaluate the effect of DO on precipitate formed from CPS injection, and finally apply the batch results to the contaminated groundwater. As a result of this study, the concentration of Sx2- in CPS 1% (w/v) was 82.2 mM, and 76.8 mM of Cd and 77.6 mM of Zn were removed per 1% of CPS injection. In addition, referring to the X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis, elemental sulfur (S8 or S0), gypsum (CaSO4ยท2H2O), CdS, and ZnS were present in the precipitate, and hydroxides such as Cd(OH)2 and Zn(OH)2 were not found. Moreover, there was little change in the pH in the aqueous solution before the heavy metal precipitation was completed, but after the heavy metal precipitation was completed, the pH showed a tendency to increase. Taken together, it was concluded that when CPS is injected into a heavy metal contamination source, CPS does not cause a change in pH if overdose is not injected and one S2- molecule is released from Sx2- and precipitates with heavy metals in the form of sulfide, and the rest is precipitated as S8. In addition, by exposing the precipitate to the aerobic conditions, it was revealed that Sx2- and bisulfide (HS-) react with DO suppressing the oxidation of heavy metals. Based on these results, CPS injection into the field groundwater confirmed that Cd2+ and Zn2+ in the groundwater could be successfully removed and the precipitate exists stably without dissolution for up to 21 days.ํ๊ด‘์‚ฐ์ด๋‚˜ ํ์ œ๋ จ์†Œ์—์„œ ์œ ์ถœ๋œ ์œ ์ถœ์ˆ˜๋‚˜ ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ์ง€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†๋“ค์€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ˆ˜๊ณ„๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜์–ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์ˆ˜์งˆ ์˜ค์—ผ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์˜ค์—ผ๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‚ฐ์„ฑํ™”๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ๋ฐ ์ด๋Š” ์ œ๋ จ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์นด๋“œ๋ฎด (Cd2+), ์•„์—ฐ (Zn2+), ํ™ฉ์‚ฐ์—ผ (SO42-)์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์•ผ๊ธฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ™˜์›์ œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ์“ฐ์ด๋Š” ๋‹คํ™ฉํ™”์นผ์Š˜ (Calcium polysulfide; CPS)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜ ๋‚ด Cd2+์™€ Zn2+๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•œ ๋ช‡๋ช‡ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ CPS์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์ด ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ž‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„  ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ ๋ฐ”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์ด ํ™ฉํ™”๋ฌผ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์นจ์ „ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์šฉ์กด ์‚ฐ์†Œ (Dissolved oxygen; DO)์— ์˜ํ•ด ์‚ฐํ™”๋˜์–ด ์ˆ˜์šฉ์•ก ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์šฉ์ถœ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹คํ™ฉํ™”๋ฌผ (polysulfide; Sx2-)์˜ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  CPS์— ์˜ํ•œ Cd2+์™€ Zn2+์˜ ์นจ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ž‘์„ ๋„์ถœํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ CPS ์ฃผ์ž…์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์นจ์ „๋ฌผ์˜ ์‚ฐํ™”์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ DO์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๊ด€ํ•ด์„œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์‹ค์ œ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์œผ๋กœ ์˜ค์—ผ๋œ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜์— ํšŒ๋ถ„์‹ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ์ ์šฉํ•ด๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, CPS 1%์—๋Š” 82.2 mM์˜ Sx2-๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์† ์˜ค์—ผ์ˆ˜์— ์ฃผ์ž…ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 76.8 mM์˜ Cd2+, 77.6 mM์˜ Zn2+๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ X์„  ํšŒ์ ˆ ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ• (X-ray diffraction; XRD)๊ณผ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ์ „์žํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ (Scanning Electron Microscope; SEM)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ CPS์— ์˜ํ•ด elemental sulfur (S8 ๋˜๋Š” S0), gypsum (CaSO4ยท2H2O), CdS, ZnS๊ฐ€ ์นจ์ „๋˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์‚ฐํ™”๋ฌผ ํ˜•ํƒœ์ธ Cd(OH)2๋‚˜ Zn(OH)2๋Š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์Œ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ํ•˜์—ฌ, CPS๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์ž…ํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์˜ ์นจ์ „์ด ์™„๋ฃŒ๋˜๊ธฐ ์ „์—๋Š” pH์— ํฐ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์˜ ์นจ์ „์ด ์™„๋ฃŒ๋œ ํ›„์—๋Š” pH๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด, Sx2-์—์„œ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ 2๊ฐ€ ํ™ฉ (sulfide)๋งŒ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜์–ด ์ค‘๊ธˆ์† ์นจ์ „์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€๋Š” S8 ๋˜๋Š” S0๋กœ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  CPS๊ฐ€ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์œผ๋กœ ์˜ค์—ผ๋œ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜ ์˜ค์—ผ์›์— ์ฃผ์ž…๋  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ CPS๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฃผ์ž…๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ด์ƒ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜ ๋‚ด์—๋Š” pH ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ํฌ์ง€ ์•Š์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋‚ด๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์นจ์ „๋ฌผ๋“ค์„ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ค‘์— ๋…ธ์ถœ์‹œ์ผœ ์‚ฐํ™” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์กฐ์„ฑํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด, Sx2-์™€ bisulfide (HS-)๊ฐ€ DO์™€ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์˜ ์‚ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ์–ต์ œํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ถ”๋ก ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ, CPS๋ฅผ ์‹ค์ œ ์ค‘๊ธˆ์†์œผ๋กœ ์˜ค์—ผ๋œ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜์— ์ฃผ์ž…ํ•ด๋ณด์•˜๊ณ  ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜ ๋‚ด Cd2+์™€ Zn2+๋ฅผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋œ ์นจ์ „๋ฌผ๋“ค์€ ์‚ฐ์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋˜๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์ž„์—๋„ 3์ฃผ๊นŒ์ง€ ์šฉ์ถœ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Literature review 3 1.3 Research objectives 5 2. Materials and method 6 2.1 Quantification of polysulfide concentration in CPS 6 2.2 Production of artificially contaminated solution & CPS injection batch 9 2.3 Effect of iron(II) in heavy metal precipitation by CPS 11 2.4 Evaluation of effect of dissolved oxygen 12 2.4.1 Oxidation experiment of precipitates formed by CPS with DO 12 2.4.2 Cadmium sulfide oxidation by DO 12 2.5 Field applicability batch test 13 3. Results 15 3.1 Concentration of polysulfide in CPS 15 3.2 Deriving heavy metal precipitation mechanism by CPS 17 3.2.1 Single heavy metal contaminated solution (1) Cd2+ 17 3.2.1 Single heavy metal contaminated solution (2) Zn2+ 24 3.2.2 Complex heavy metal contaminated solution 31 3.3 Effect of Fe2+ in heavy metal precipitation by CPS 37 3.4 Evaluation of effect of dissolved oxygen 39 3.4.1 Evaluation of oxidation of precipitates formed by CPS with DO 39 3.4.2 Evaluation of oxidation of CdS without elemental sulfur by DO 43 3.5 Field applicability test for CPS 47 4. Conclusions 49 4.1 Precipitation mechanism of Cd2+ and Zn2+ by CPS 49 4.2 Oxidation resistance of heavy metal precipitate from CPS 51 4.3 Field applicability test for CPS 52 5. Discussions 53 Reference 54 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 58์„

    Effect of worm cast and mycorrhiza application on the soil characteristics and crop growth in intercropping system

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๋†ํ•™๊ณผ,2005.Maste

    ์ˆ˜์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์œ ์—ญ์ธ์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•๊ณผ GIS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ : ํ•œ๊ฐ•์œ ์—ญ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ํšํ•™๊ณผ,1996.Maste

    Feasibility Evaluation for Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated with Heavy Metal using Calcium Polysulfide in Homogeneous media

    No full text
    In this study, column tests using relatively uniform Jumunjin sand media were conducted to evaluate the feasibility ofcalcium polysulfide (CaSx, CPS) in removing high concentration of Zn2+ in groundwater. The injected CPS solutionreacted rapidly with Zn2+ in artificial groundwater and effectively reduced Zn2+ by more than 99% through metal sulfideprecipitation. Since the density (d = 1.27 g/cm3) of CPS solution was greater than that of water, CPS solution settled downrapidly while capturing Zn2+ and formed stable CPS layer similar to dense nonaqueous phase liquid. Mass balance analysison Zn2+ in CPS solution suggested that CPS solution effectively reacted with Zn2+ to form metal sulfide precipitates exceptfor high groundwater seepage velocity of 400 cm/d. With greater groundwater seepage velocity, injected CPS did notcompletely dissolve at the CPS-water interface, but a partially-misible CPS layer continuously moved and reacted withZn2+ in the direction of groundwater flow. Since hydraulic conductivity (Kh) decreased slightly due to the generated metalprecipitates in the inter-pores of media, injection of CPS solution should be optimized to prevent clogging. As evidencedby both XRF and SEM/EDS results, ZnS precipitates were clearly observed through the reaction between the CPSsolution and Zn2+. Further study is warranted to evaluate the feasibility of CPS to remove high-concentration heavy metalcontaminatedgroundwater in complex and heterogeneous media.N
    corecore