3 research outputs found

    Different role of functional domains of hTR in DNA binding to telomere and telomerase reconstruction

    Get PDF
    Even if template sequence of hTR played an essential role in telomere binding, a 326 nucleotide fragment of hTR containing template, pseudoknot, and CR4โ€“5 domains is critical for both binding with telomeric DNA and reconstitution of telomerase activity. A functional study with antisense oligonucleotides suggested that targeted disruption of the template region efficiently abrogated both telomeric DNA binding and telomerase activity, whereas disruption of the CR4โ€“5 region induced only loss of telomerase activity. hTR interacts with telomeric DNA via structural region composed of the template, pseudoknot, and CR4โ€“5 domains, however, each structural domain plays a distinct role in telomere binding and telomerase activity reconstitution.ope

    In vivo selection of metastatic clones of gastric cancer cell line by orthotopic implantation model

    No full text
    ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์œ„์•”์˜ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ๊ธฐ์ „์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํ˜ˆ์•ก์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•œ YCC-16 ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ„์•” ๋™์†Œ์ด์‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™•๋ฆฝํ•œ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ ํด๋ก ๋“ค์„ ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ™•๋ฆฝ๋œ ํด๋ก ๋“ค์˜ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์„ธํฌ์„ฑ์žฅ๊ณก์„  ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ์ด๋™๋Šฅ ์ธก์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ Boyden chamber assay, ์ง‘๋ฝํ˜•์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ soft agar assay, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์„ธํฌ์นจ์œค๋Šฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ zymography๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์œ ์ „์  ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ํ•ตํ˜•๋ถ„์„, cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (micro-CGH)๊ณผ cDNA microarray๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ๋™์†Œ์ด์‹ ๋™๋ฌผ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ YCC-16์€ ๊ฐ„, ํ, ๋น„์žฅ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋ณต๊ฐ•๋‚ด ๋ฆผํ”„์ ˆ๋กœ์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”ํ•œ ์ „์ด ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š”๋ฐ ๋น„ํ•ด (3๋งˆ๋ฆฌ/3๋งˆ๋ฆฌ, 100%), ๊ฐ„์ „์ด์—์„œ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ ํด๋ก ๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ์ „์ดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹์„ ๊ฑฐ์นœ ์ „์ดํด๋ก ๋“ค์˜ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ๋น„์œจ์€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ (passageโ…ก: 2๋งˆ๋ฆฌ/5๋งˆ๋ฆฌ, 40%; passageโ…ข: 3๋งˆ๋ฆฌ/5๋งˆ๋ฆฌ, 60%; passageโ…ฃ: 3๋งˆ๋ฆฌ/5๋งˆ๋ฆฌ, 60%) ์„ธํฌํ˜•ํƒœ๋Š” ํฐ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. 2. ๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ YCC-16์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋™์†Œ์ด์‹ ์›๋ฐœ๋ถ€์œ„ ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ S1L0์€ ์ด๋™๋Šฅ๊ณผ ํด๋ก ํ˜•์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (YCC-16 vs S1L0, p=0.045). ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋™๋Šฅ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ (S1L0 vs S1L1, S2L2์™€ S3L3, p=0.045), ์นจ์œค๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ํด๋ก ํ˜•์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (S1L1 vs S2L2 vs S3L3, p=0.045). 3. ๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ YCC-16๊ณผ ๋™์†Œ์ด์‹ ์›๋ฐœ๋ถ€์œ„์ธ ์œ„์—์„œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•œ ์ข…์–‘์„ธํฌ์ฃผ S1L0, ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹๋ณ„๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•œ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ์„ธํฌ์ฃผํด๋ก ๋“ค์ธ S1L1, S2L2์™€ S3L3์—์„œ ์œ ์ „์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ตํ˜•๋ถ„์„๊ณผ micro-CGH๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฐ ํด๋ก ๋“ค์˜ ์œ ์ „์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์€ ๋™์ผํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํด๋ก ๋ณ„๋กœ๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํด๋ก ๋“ค์˜ ํ•ตํ˜•๊ณผ micro-CGH ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ต๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ 40๊ฐœ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์„ ๋ฐœ๊ตดํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋“ค ์ค‘ mRNA ๋ฐœํ˜„๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” 10๊ฐœ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์„ ์„ ๋ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ณ„๋œ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ฆ์‹, ๋ถ„ํ™”์™€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ YCC-16๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค์„ cDNA microarray๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ chemokine์ธ CXCL1 ๋“ฑ 23๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ๊ด€๋ จ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์„ ์„ ๋ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์„ฏ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์—์„œ ์„ธํฌ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ๋ฐœํ˜„์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž 31๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ตดํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ์ค‘์—์„œ dystroglycan (DAG1)์€ ๋™์†Œ์ด์‹ ์›๋ฐœ๋ถ€์œ„ ์ข…์–‘์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ S1L0์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค์—์„œ ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹๋ณ„๋กœ์˜ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด๋Šฅ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์„ ์„ ๋ณ„ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ (transmembrane protein 16A, RAC CDC42 exchange factor, UNC-5 homolog C, EST), ์ด๋“ค์€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ฆ์‹๊ณผ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ์ธ YCC-16๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค๊ณผ์˜ ์œ ์ „์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋Šฅ ๋“ฑ ๋ถ„์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค์—์„œ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ฆ์‹๊ณผ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์œ ์ „์  ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„๋˜์–ด ๊ฐ„์ „์ด ํด๋ก ๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ„๋Œ€๋™์†Œ์ด์‹์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์นจ์œค์„ฑ๊ณผ ํด๋ก ํ˜•์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ถ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ด๋Šฅ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ]We established liver metastatic subclones of YCC-16 using repeated orthotopic implantation in nude mice, named as S1L1, S2L2, and S3L3. We carried out biologic and genetic evaluations to characterize and compare the established cell lines. The results were as follows; 1. Parental cell line, YCC-16, showed wide-spread metastasis over liver, lung, spleen and intra-abdominal lymph nodes (3/3, 100%), but 3 metastatic subclones were characterized by liver-metastatic patterns only. The cellular morphologies appeared no differences with one another, though metastatic tendency was increasing as passages proceeded (passageโ…ก: 2/5, 40%; passageโ…ข: 3/5, 60%; passageโ…ฃ: 3/5, 60%). 2. Metastatic subclones showed the increasing tendency in clonogenecity and the invasiveness following the passages (S1L1 vs S2L2 vs S3L3, p=0.045) and the increasing motility compared with the orthotopic primary cell line (S1L0 vs S1L1, S2L2, S3L3, p=0.045). This indicated that cells with increased clonogenecity might be prone to metastasize. 3. Each subclone had its own distinct karyotypic pattern despite of similar background in general. 40 genes with genetic aberrations were screened by comparing karyotype and micro-CGH between patental cell line and the subclones. Furthermore, 10 genes were selected by matched to the genes expression levels. We found that the genes were mostly involved in cellular proliferation, differentiation and signal transduction. Twenty three genes were screened by comparing YCC-16 and liver-metastatic subclones using cDNA microarray, which might be related to liver specific metastasis. Among the adhesion related genes, 31 genes showing differential expressions among the YCC-16, orthotopic primary S1L0 and the liver metastatic subclones were selected. The result of semiquantitative real-time PCR of DAG1, producing adhesion-related dystroglycan, showed that the expression levels of DAG1 in YCC-16 and metastatic subclones were lower than that of orthotopic primary S1L0. In addition 4 genes were selected, which showed stepwise patterns of increasing or decreasing expressions in the 3 liver-metastatic subclones (transmembrane protein 16A, RAC/CDC42 exchange factor, UNC-5 homolog C, EST). They were generally involved in cell proliferation and signal transduction. In conclusion, the divergences of YCC-16 and the metastatic clones in genetic change was shown in differential expression of adhesion-related molecules. The major genetic changes characterizing liver-metastatic subclones were mainly attributed to the differential expressions of proliferation and signal transduction related genes and we observed that the genetic changes caused cellular phenotypic changes, resulting in a metastatic process.restrictio

    Attenuation of telomerase activity by hammerhead ribozyme targeting human telomerase RNA induces growth retardation and apoptosis in human breast tumor cells

    No full text
    Ribozyme possesses specific endoribonuclease activity and catalyzes the hydrolysis of specific phosphodiester bonds, which results in the cleavage of target RNA sequences. Here, we evaluated the ability of hammerhead ribozymes targeting human telomerase RNA (hTR) to inhibit the catalytic activity of telomerase and the proliferation of cancer cells. Hammerhead ribozymes were designed against 7 NUX sequences located in open loops of the hTR secondary structure. We verified the ribozyme specificity by in vitro cleavage assay by using a synthetic RNA substrate. Subsequently, we introduced ribozyme expression vector into human breast tumor MCF-7 cells and assessed the biologic effects of ribozyme. Hammerhead ribozyme R1 targeting the template region of hTR efficiently cleaved hTR in vitro, and stable transfectants of this ribozyme induced the degradation of target hTR RNA and attenuated telomerase activity in MCF-7 cells. Moreover, the ribozyme R1 transfectant displayed a significant telomere shortening and a lower proliferation rate than parental cells. Clones with reduced proliferation capacity showed enlarged senescence-like shapes or highly differentiated dendritic morphologies of apoptosis. In conclusion, the inhibition of telomerase activity by hammerhead ribozyme targeting the template region of the hTR presents a promising strategy for inhibiting the growth of human breast cancer cells.restrictio
    corecore