14 research outputs found

    ๋„์„œ๊ด€ ํšŒ์›์ œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ

    Get PDF
    ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ ๋„์„œ๊ด€ ์ž๋ฃŒ์‹ค์€ 2000๋…„๋„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹ ๋ถ„์ฆ๋งŒ ์ œ์ถœํ•˜๋ฉด ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ์ด ์ž์œ ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ์ถœ์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์—ด๋žŒ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•œ ์ฒด์ œ๋กœ ์šด์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. 2000๋…„ ์ด์ „์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ „ ์˜ˆ๊ณ  ์—†๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์€ ํ—ˆ๋ฝํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ณ , ์†Œ์†๊ธฐ๊ด€์˜ ์ถ”์ฒœ๊ณต๋ฌธ์„ ์ง€์ฐธํ•ด์•ผ๋งŒ ์ถœ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€๋งŒ์˜ ๊ฐ•์ ์ธ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๊ณ  ์˜ค๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ๋ถ„์ฆ ์ œ์‹œ๋กœ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋“ค์–ด์˜ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉํ•˜๋‹ค๋ณด๋‹ˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ์‹ค๋‚ด์—๋„ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ(์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ์‚ฌ์šฉPC์ ๊ฑฐ, ๋™์˜์ƒ ๊ณต๋ถ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ PC๋…์ , ๋Œ€์ถœ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€ ๋„์„œ์˜ ํŒŒ์†, ์‹œ์„ค๋ฌผ ์ด์šฉ์‹œ ์ฃผ์ธ์˜์‹ ์ƒ์‹ค ๋“ฑ)๋„ ๋งŽ๊ณ , ์ผ์ผ 500์—ฌ๋ช… ์ถœ์ž…ํ•˜๋‹ค๋ณด๋‹ˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ์‹ค๋‚ด ์—ด๋žŒ์„์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ์ด ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์ด์ƒ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ํ•™์Šต๊ถŒ ๋ณด์กด์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ ์ œํ•œ๊ตฌ์—ญ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์ธ ํ•™์Šต์ด ์ค‘์‹ฌ์ธ ์—ด๋ฐ˜์—ด๋žŒ์‹ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด์šฉ์ •์ฑ…์€ ์—ด๋žŒ์‹ค๊ณผ ์ž๋ฃŒ์‹ค ์ถœ์ž…๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ†ต์ œ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๋ณด๋‹ˆ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ์ด ์ด์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์•„์ง€๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ถœ์ž…ํ†ต์ œ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค์น˜ํ•˜์˜€์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ณ ์‹œ๊ณต๋ถ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋™๋ฌธ๋“ค์˜ ๋ถˆ๋งŒ์ด ํ›„๋ฐฐ ํ•™์ƒํšŒ ์ง‘ํ–‰๋ถ€๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค ์ž์œจ์ ํ†ต์ œ๋„ ์–ด๋ ต๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉํ•ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค

    ํ•œ๊ตญ ๋ฉ”๋“ค๋ผ์Šค์„ผํ„ฐ์˜ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ๊ณผ ๋ฐœ์ „๋ฐฉ์•ˆ

    No full text
    ํ•œ๊ตญ๋ฉ”๋“ค๋ผ์Šค์„ผํ„ฐ๋Š” ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์˜ํ•™๋„์„œ๊ด€์—์„œ ๊ฒธํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ์˜ํ•™๋„์„œ๊ด€์€ ์˜ํ•™๋ถ„์•ผ ์ „๋ฌธ๋„์„œ๊ด€์œผ๋กœ์„œ ์˜๋Œ€, ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ๋Œ€, ๋ณด๊ฑด๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์•”์—ฐ๊ตฌ์†Œ ๋“ฑ ์—ฐ๊ฑด์บ ํผ์Šค์˜ ์˜ํ•™๊ด€๋ จ ์ข…์‚ฌ์ž(๊ต์ˆ˜, ํ•™์ƒ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›, ๋Œ€ํ•™์ง์›, ๋ณ‘์›์ง์› ๋“ฑ)๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ•™์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์•™๋„์„œ๊ด€ ์‚ฐํ•˜ 6๊ฐœ ๋ถ„๊ด€ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋„์„œ๋น„์™€ ์ „์‚ฐํ™” ๊ด€๋ จ๋น„์šฉ์€ ์ค‘์•™๋„์„œ๊ด€์—์„œ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ , ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์šด์˜๋น„๋Š” ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™์—์„œ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ์€ ์˜ํ•™๋ถ„์•ผ์™€ ๋†ํ•™๋ถ„์•ผ๋Š” ํƒ€ ํ•™๋ฌธ๋ถ„์•ผ ๋ณด๋‹ค๋„ ์ „๋ฌธ์ •๋ณด๊ธฐ๊ด€์ด ์œก์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ํ•™๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๊ตญ๋ฆฝ์˜๋ฃŒ์›์‚ฐํ•˜์˜ ๊ตญ๋ฆฝ์˜ํ•™๋„์„œ๊ด€์ธ NLM(National Library of Medicine)์ด ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ƒ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์˜ ์˜ํ•™๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ๊ธฐ๊ด€์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ˜„์‹ค์ด๋‹ค

    ์˜ํ•™์ •๋ณด์˜ ํ˜„์žฌ์™€ ๊ณผ์ œ

    No full text

    ๅญธ่ก“ๆƒ…ๅ ฑ์„ผํ„ฐ ็ต„็น”ยท้‹็‡Ÿ์— ้—œํ•œ ๅฐ่€ƒ

    No full text

    ๊ฑฐ๋ฏธ๋ชฉ)๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ตฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ํšํ•™๊ณผ, 2017. 8. ์ด๋„์›.Green roofs are emerging as potential habitats for biodiversity within urban environment. However, studies on biodiversity on green roofs, its ecological functions and the difference to those of other urban habitats at ground-level are limited to certain geographic range. Spiders (Arachnidaaraneae) are frequently studied taxa in understanding urban habitats for their importance in providing ecological functions and representing higher trophic structure. In this regard, this study assesses the spider communities on urban green roofs and ground-level habitats and examines what environmental factors influences spider community composition. Spider communities were compared at species and predatory guild level, in order to assess whether spider communities of two different habitat types provide different ecological functions. Spider community was surveyed using pitfall traps on 12 intensive green roofs of gu (district) office buildings and 12 adjacent ground-level habitats in Seoul, South Korea. Age, area, height, plant structure and surrounding landuses within 300m radius were surveyed as environmental variables. Spider communities were grouped into two groups by hierarchical cluster analysis. Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling was used to visualize compositional difference of spider communities and environmental variables explaining the composition. Analysis of similarities and similarity percentages analysis was performed to examine the significance of difference in spider community compositions. The results revealed that araneae community of each habitat type was significantly different, although some communities of green roof sites and ground-level sites were similar in composition. The compositional difference was explained by shrub and soil cover, and height of habitats, while landscape variables did not explain the compositional difference of spider communities. Difference in guild structure by habitat types suggest the functions of spider communities in each habitat could be different. Thus, perception of green roofs should not just be a surplus of green areas in urban environment, but a provision of distinct ecological communities, which is critical in terms of ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation.Contents โ…  Introduction 1 โ…ก Materials and Methods 5 1. Study sites 5 2. Spider sampling 9 3. Environmental variables 10 4. Data analyses 11 โ…ข Result 13 1. Spider community composition 13 2. Environmental variables 17 3. Community composition and environmental variables 18 4. Guild classification 21 โ…ฃ Discussion 26 1. Spider community structure in urban habitats 26 2. Community composition and environmental variables 30 3. Guild composition of spider communities 33 โ…ค Conclusion 35 โ…ฅ References 37 โ…ฆ Appendices 45 A1. Sample data used in this study 45 A2. Detailed profile of each study site 47Maste

    ์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ๋ฒ•์ƒ ๋„์„œ๊ด€๋ณด์ƒ๊ธˆ์ œ๋„ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    corecore