24 research outputs found

    ๅณๆดพๅ‹ขๅŠ›๊ณผ ๅ—ๆœ้ฎฎ้Žๆธก็ซ‹ๆณ•่ญฐ้™ข : ํ•œ๋ฏผ๋‹น์„ธ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ „๋žต์  ์ž ์‹๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธๅคงๅญธๆ ก ๅคงๅญธ้™ข :ๆ”ฟๆฒปๅญธ็ง‘,1997.Maste

    Fluctuation of Real-Estate Values and Korean Elections in the 2000s

    No full text
    ํ•œ๊ตญ ์„ ๊ฑฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์ œํˆฌํ‘œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์  ๋‚œ์ ๋“ค์„ ์•ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ง€์—ญ์ฃผ์˜ ํ†ต์ œ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์™€ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ธก์ •์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ, ๋™ํƒœ์  ๊ด€์ ์˜ ๋ถ€์žฌ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์š”์•ฝ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ๋„์ž…์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•œ๊ตญ์„ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋„“ํžˆ๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ์จ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ค‘๋ฒ”์œ„ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ ๊ทน์  ํ™œ์šฉ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•จ์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ถ„์„์˜ ํ•œ ์˜ˆ๋กœ ๋ถ€๋™์‚ฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋ณ€๋™์ด 2000๋…„๋Œ€ ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์„ ๊ฑฐ์— ๋ฏธ์นœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ‘œ์ค€์ •๋‹น์ถฉ์„ฑ๋„์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€๋‚œ ์„ ๊ฑฐ๋“ค์—์„œ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ์  ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ํ†ต์ œํ•œ ํ›„, ๋ถ€๋™์‚ฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฝ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์ด ์„ ๊ฑฐ์— ์–ด๋–ค ๋‹จ๊ธฐ์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์— ๋‹ค๋‹ค๋ž๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ž๊ฐ€ ์†Œ์œ ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋น„์†Œ์œ ์ž๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ถ€๋™์‚ฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ƒ์Šน์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ •๋ถ€ ์—ฌ๋‹น์„ ์ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์ž‡๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋‘˜์งธ, ๋น„์†Œ์œ ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋ถ€๋™์‚ฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ƒ์Šน์„ ์ •๋ถ€ ์—ฌ๋‹น์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฒ˜๋ฒŒ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ์—๋Š” ์†Œ๊ทน์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ด๋Ÿฐ ํŒจํ„ด์€ ๋Œ€ํ†ต๋ น ์„ ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊ตญํšŒ์˜์› ์ด์„  ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ „๊ตญ์  ์„ ๊ฑฐ์—์„œ ๋” ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜๊ณ  ์ง€๋ฐฉ์„ ๊ฑฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋ฉฐ, ๋„ท์งธ, ์ •๋‹น๋ช…๋ถ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋น„๋ก€๋Œ€ํ‘œ ์„ ๊ฑฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํŒŒ์ ์ธ ์ง€์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‚ด๋ฉด์„œ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ณ ๋ ค๋Š” ๋œ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. The literature on economic voting in Korea generally suffers from three methodological difficulties: namely, how to control for the regional voting pattern that has dominated Korean elections; how to measure the relevant economic variables; and how to consider and incorporate the dynamic aspect of elections. These difficulties are indeed general dilemmas that are directly related with how survey data sets are collected and organized. I propose an empirical model that can overcome such difficulties utilizing "mid-range" aggregate analysis which combine electoral returns, the fluctuation of real-estate values, and the ownership structure of the electorate. The results show that the Korean voters tho own households tend to reward the incumbent party more actively when real-estate values rise, while non-owners are less active in punishing the incumbent party and its candidates. Korean voters also recognize and differentiate high-profile elections against lower-profile or local elections: they tend to weigh the economic situation more heavily in presidential and national assembly elections; on the other hand, the results show that economy matters less in local elections. As the paper exemplifies, I argue that more important issues and research agendas can be tackled by the literature when we expand our methodological scope in studying Korean elections

    (The) comparison of effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection according to the injection interval f

    No full text
    ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์—ฐ๋ น๊ด€๋ จํ™ฉ๋ฐ˜๋ณ€์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ๋ง‰์‹ ์ƒํ˜ˆ๊ด€์—์„œ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€๋‚ดํ”ผ์„ฑ์žฅ์ธ์ž์˜ ๋‹จํด๋ก ์„ฑ์ค‘ํ•ฉํ•ญ์ฒด์ธ bevacizumab์€ ์œ ๋ฆฌ์ฒด๊ฐ•๋‚ด ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ๋ณ‘๋ณ€ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ ฅํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ ์•„์ง ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ง€์นจ์ด ์ •ํ•ด์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ €์ž๋“ค์€ ์—ฐ๋ น๊ด€๋ จํ™ฉ๋ฐ˜๋ณ€์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ๋ง‰์‹ ์ƒํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ์œ ๋ฆฌ์ฒด๊ฐ•๋‚ด bevacizumab ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ฃผ์ž…์‹œ ์‹œํ–‰๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ต์ •์‹œ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ง๋ง‰๋‘๊ป˜๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ›„ํ–ฅ์  ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก๊ณ ์ฐฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋ฆฌ์ฒด๊ฐ•๋‚ด bevacizumab ์ฃผ์ž…์ˆ ์„ 3ํšŒ ์ด์ƒ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ์—ฐ๋ น๊ด€๋ จํ™ฉ๋ฐ˜๋ณ€์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ๋ง‰์‹ ์ƒํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ฃผ์ž…๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด 4์ฃผ์ธ ๊ตฐ์„ I๊ตฐ(22์•ˆ), 6์ฃผ์ธ ๊ตฐ์„ II๊ตฐ(17์•ˆ), 8์ฃผ์ธ ๊ตฐ์„ III๊ตฐ(13์•ˆ)์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹œ์ˆ  ์ „ํ›„ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ต์ •์‹œ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋น›๊ฐ„์„ญ๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜์ƒ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ง๋ง‰๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ํ˜ธ์ „์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์‹œ์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ตœ์ข… ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์‹œ์ ์ธ 24์ฃผ์— ์Šค๋„ฌ๋ Œ ์‹œ๋ ฅํ‘œ์ƒ I๊ตฐ๊ณผ II๊ตฐ์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ต์ •์‹œ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ƒ์Šนํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(P=0.038, 0.041). ๋น›๊ฐ„์„ญ๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ง๋ง‰๋‘๊ป˜๋Š” II๊ตฐ์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ์†Œํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(P=0.035). ์œ ๋ฆฌ์ฒด๊ฐ•๋‚ด ์ฃผ์ž…ํ•œ bevacizumab์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ฐ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด ๋ณด์•˜์„ ๋•Œ, ์‹œ์ˆ  6์ฃผ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋งฅ๋ฝ๋ง‰์‹ ์ƒํ˜ˆ๊ด€์˜ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ต์ •์‹œ๋ ฅ์ด ํ˜ธ์ „๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ฃผ์ž…์‹œ์˜ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์€ 4์ฃผ ๋‚ด์ง€ 6์ฃผ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด ์ ์ ˆํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] Intravitreal Bevacizumab(Avastin๏ผŸ) injectin(IVBI), a recombinant monoclonal antibody for humam vascular endothelial factor(VEGF), has been used as an off-label treatment for choroidal neovasulari-zation(CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration(ARMD); our aim was to find out which interval of injection is optimum to obtain the improvement of visual acuity and central macular thickness for subfoveal CNV due to ARMD. The case material of this retro- spective study comprised three groups of patients with subfoveal CNV due to ARMD. Group I: IVBI of 4 week interval, group II: IVBI of 6 week interval, group III: IVBI of 8 week interval. Main outcome measures are pre and post operative best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and central macular thickness(CMT) by optical coherence tomography(OCT) III. The BCVA of the group I and II at 24 weeks after IVBI revealed statistically significant visual improvement(P=0.038,0.041). The postoperative CMT of the group II showed statistically significant change(P=0.035). Considering the interval of IVBI, our study is suggesting the optimum injection interval of IVBI for ARMD is 4 or 6 week.ope

    Framing the Issue of Economic Democracy during the 18th Presidential Election: A Survey Experiment

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ œ18๋Œ€ ๋Œ€์„ ์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋ฏผ์ฃผํ™”์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์Ÿ์ ๋“ค ์ค‘์—์„œ ๋ณต์ง€์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์˜ ๊ทœ๋ชจ, ๋น„์ •๊ทœ์ง ๋…ธ๋™์ž์˜ ์ •๊ทœ์ง ์ „ํ™˜, ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์—… ์ˆœํ™˜์ถœ์ž ๊ทœ์ œ๋ผ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์Ÿ์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ๊ถŒ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์‹คํ—˜์„ค๋ฌธ(survey experiment)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž์„ธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ ๋‹ค. ์„ค๋ฌธ ์‘๋‹ต์ž๋“ค์„ ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ๊ฐ ์ด์Šˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‘œํ˜„๋œ ๋ฌธํ•ญ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ด๋ฐ(framing)์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ์ •์ฑ… ์„ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ค ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”์ง€, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ”„๋ ˆ์ด๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์˜ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์œ ๊ถŒ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋ฏผ์ฃผํ™” ์Ÿ์ ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ… ์„ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์ •์ฑ… ์Ÿ์ ์ด ์–ด๋–ค ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œ๋˜๋Š”๊ฐ€์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํ”„๋ ˆ์ด๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ •์น˜์  ์„ฑํ–ฅ, ์ฆ‰ ์ง€์ง€ํ›„๋ณด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์„ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ž‘๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ •์ฑ…์Ÿ์ ๊ณผ ์‘๋‹ต์ž๊ฐ€ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ›„๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋ˆ„๊ตฐ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ด๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ฐจ๋ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. We assess how issue framing affects voters preference on three economic issues that emerged during the 18th residential Election in Korea: (1) the welfare budget, (2) the contingent workers problem, and (3) regulation on cross-shareholding practices. We conduct a survey experiment where we vary the wording of questions integrating two competing issue frames for each policy debate. Respondents are randomly assigned to one of the two issue frame conditions. We examine whether issue framing significantly influences voters policy preference and identify the variables moderating framing effects. Our results clearly show that, depending upon how the policy debate is framed, voters preference changes significantly. Second, the magnitude of its effects is not however comparable to that of the candidate preference. Third, the size of framing effects์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2012๋…„ ์ •๋ถ€(๊ต์œก๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋ถ€)์˜ ์žฌ์›์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์žฌ๋‹จ์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž„(No. 2012S1A5A2A03)

    Preparation of Chitin/Chitosan Nanoparticles by Electrospray

    No full text
    ์ตœ๊ทผ ์˜์•ฝํ•™์šฉ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค ์†Œ์žฌ๋กœ ๊ฐ๊ด‘์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ‚คํ‹ด๊ณผ ํ‚คํ† ์‚ฐ์„ ์ „๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ํž˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์žฅ์น˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฏธ์„ธ์ž…์ž ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ œ์กฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‚คํ‹ด ๋˜๋Š” ํ‚คํ† ์‚ฐ ์‹œ๋ฃŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€(์‚ฌ์Šฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—‰ํ‚ด์ด ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์  ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ๋†๋„) ์ด์ƒ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ทน์„ธ ์„ฌ์œ ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๋†๋„ ์ดํ•˜์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๊ต์  ๊ท ์ผํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‚คํ† ์‚ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, 5% ์ดˆ์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์•ก์— ๋…น์—ฌ 4~5 wt%๋กœ ๋ถ„์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 200~400nm ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์ œ์กฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ž…์ž์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ปค์ง€๋ฉด์„œ ๋‹ค์†Œ ๋ถˆ๊ท ์ผํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ์„ฑํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ธ€๋ฆฌ์ฝœ ํ‚คํ† ์‚ฐ์€ ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋†’์€ ๋†๋„์ธ ์•ฝ 55 wt% ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž…์ž์˜ ํ‰๊ท ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์•ฝ 300ยญ500 nm ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‚คํ† ์‚ฐ์„ ์ดˆ์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์•ก์— ๋…น์—ฌ์„œ ๋ฌด์ˆ˜ ์•„์„ธํŠธ์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ Nยญ์•„์„ธํ‹ธํ™” ํ‚คํ‹ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ํฌ๋ฆ„์‚ฐ์— ๋†๋„๋ณ„๋กœ ๋…น์—ฌ ์ „๊ธฐ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ 7 wt% ์ดํ•˜์—์„œ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ํ‚คํ‹ด์ด๋‚˜ ํ‚คํ† ์‚ฐ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์ œ์กฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์šฉ๋งค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋†๋„์™€ ์ ๋„์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ณก์„ ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์Šฌ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—‰ํ‚ดํ˜„์ƒ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์„ฌ์œ ์ƒ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋†๋„์—์„œ ์ „๊ธฐ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฌด์—‡๋ณด๋‹ค๋„ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋ถ€ ๋‚˜๋…ธํ•ต์‹ฌ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜๊ธฐ์ˆ ์‚ฌ
    corecore