29 research outputs found
Methods for establishing CRS in the Psychomotor Domain
One of current issues in evaluation is with regard to the distinctions between, and relative advantages and disadvantages of norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement. However, criterion-referenced measurement is more emphasized with changing the educational circumstances in which a predeterminded standard of performance is used rather than a normative standard. Criterion referenced standard(CRS) represents desired levels of performance or status on a criterion domain or attribute, and provides diagnostic information about whether status or performance is adequate. The use of CRS in testing is to categorize students into master or nonmaster based on the CRS or the cut-off score. The problems of CRS are that they are arbitrary and that the consequences of misclassifications. A variety of methods for establishing CRS have been developed. Mehtods that are applicable in the psychomotor domain of physical education are judgemental, normative, empirical, and combination methods. The judgemental mehtod is to establish CRS by the experts' opinion. The normative method is to use normative data along with the information to setting the CRS. A CRS with empirical method is to base on empirical data of predeterminded master and nonmaster. The combination method is to use the combination of the above methods. An important aspect of developing CRSs is establishing their reliability and validity. The reliability and the validity of CRS are defined as the consistency and accuracy of classification, master or nonmaster. One type of reliability of CRS is rater reliability that is the same concept of objectivity. And P and Kappa coefficients are used as the indices of the CRS reliability in test-retest apporach. The validity of CRS is evaluated based on a probability of correct decision, Phi coefficient, and a utility.μ΄ λ
Όλ¬Έμ μμΈλνκ΅ μ¬λ²λν λ°μ κΈ°κΈμ μ§μμ μν΄ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ‘μ
(An) assessment of water qualities in major rivers of Korea : Using water quality index proposed by U.S. NSF
νκ²½κ΄λ¦¬νκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]νμ²μμ€μ BOD, λΆμ λ¬Όμ§, μ©μ‘΄μ°μλ λλ λμ₯κ· κ΅° μ λ±μ ν¨μ λμ΄ λ§κ³ μ μκ²λ§μΌλ‘λ μ€μΌμ λκ° μ μ ν μ€λͺ
λ μ μλ€.
λ°λΌμ κ°λ₯νν μμ§μ‘°μ¬ νλͺ©μ λͺ¨λ ν¬ν¨ν κ°λ¨ν ν¨μΆλ μ§μλ‘ λνλΌ νμμ±μ΄ μꡬλλ€. κ·Όλμ μ°λ¦¬λλΌ μ£Όμνμ²μ λ λ‘ μ€μΌλκ° μ¦κ°νκ³ μμ΄ κ·Έ μ΄μ©μ±κ³Ό μνκ³ λ³΄μ‘΄κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨λμ΄ μμ§μ€μΌλμ μ¬νκ°κ° μ΄λ£¨μ΄ μ ΈμΌ ν κ²μ΄λ€. μ΄μ λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ μ£Όμνμ²μ μμ§ μ€μΌλλ₯Ό λ―Έκ΅NSFκ° μ μν μμ§νκ° λ°©λ²μ μ΄μ©νμ¬ νκ°νμ¬ λ³΄μλ€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μμ½νλ©΄ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
1. λΆνκ° μκ³μ μμνΈλ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 67.6μΌλ‘ λΉκ΅μ μ€μΌλκ° λκ² νκ°λμλ€. μ΄λ μΆμ²μμμ λ°°μΆλλ μννμμ 곡μ₯νμλ‘ μ€μΌλκ³ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. λ¨νκ° μκ³μ μΆ©μ£Όλ, μ¬μ£Όλ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 66.9, 67.4λ‘ μΆ©μ£Όμμ μ¬μ£Ό μλ₯μ μ§μ²μμ μ μ
μν€λ μ€μΌλ¬Όμ§λ‘ μ€μΌλκ³ μλ€.
νλΉνλ₯λ ꡬμ μ§μ μμ νλ₯λ‘ κ°μλ‘ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· κ΅¬μκ° 68.0, λλ 65.8 ,λ³΄κ΄ 54.9, μΈλκ΅ 52.9, μ 2νκ°κ΅ 47.0, νμ£Ό 36.0, μ λ₯ 34.9λ‘ μ μ°¨ μ€μΌλκ° λμμ§λ κ²μΌλ‘ νκ°λμλ€. μ΄λ μ§μ²μΈ μ€λμ², μμμ²μ λΉλ‘―νμ¬ κ·Έ μ°μμ μ°μ¬νμ¬ μ
λ κ΅°μ μ§μ²μμ μ μ
μν€λ μ€μΌλ¬Όμ§λ‘ μ€μΌμ΄ λκ³ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. 2. λλκ° μκ³μ μκ΄, κ³ λ Ήκ΅, λμ, μ ν¬κ΅λ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 66.5, 51.0, 64.0, 67.5μ΄μλ€. μ΄λ€μ μμΈμ 보면 μκ΄μ ꡬ미μμ μννμ λ° κ³΅μ₯νμλ₯Ό μ μ
μν€κΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ©°, κ³ λ Ήκ΅, λμ, μ ν¬κ΅λ λꡬμμμ κΈνΈκ°μ ν΅νμ¬ μννμ λ° κ³΅μ₯νμλ₯Ό
λ€λ μ μ
μν€λ―λ‘ μ€μΌλκ³ μλ€.
3. κΈκ°μ μ ꡬκ°μ΄ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 73.8μ΄μμΌλ‘ λΉκ΅μ μνΈν μμ§μ λνλ΄κ³ μλ€. μ΄κ²μ κΈκ°μ μμμ μ μ
λλ μ€μΌλ¬Ό μ§λμ λΉνμ¬ μ μλμ΄ λ§μ κ΄κ³λ‘ λΉκ΅μ μνΈν μμ§μ μ μ§νκ³ μλ€.
4. μμ°κ°μ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 69.9μ΄νλ‘μ, νμμ μ μλμ΄ μ μ λλ¬Έμ΄λ€. νΉν λ²½μ§μ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 44.2λ‘ κ·Έ μ€μΌλκ° λμλ€. μ΄κ²μ κ΄μ£Όμμμ λ°°μΆλλ μννμ λ° κ³΅μ₯νμλ‘ μ€μΌλκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€.
5. μ¬μ§κ°μ μ ꡬκ°μ΄ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 80.4μ΄μμΌλ‘ μνΈνκ² λνλ¬λ€. κ·Έκ²μ μ°μμ΄ λλΆλΆ λκ²½μ§λ‘μ λμ
λ°°μ μΈμλ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€.
6. λ§κ²½κ°μ μμ§νκ°μ§μκ° νκ· 53.7λ‘ μ€μΌλκ° λΉκ΅μ λμλ€. μ΄κ²μ νμμμ μ λλ μ μ λΏλ§ μλλΌ μ μ£Όμ, μ΄λ¦¬μμμ λ°°μΆλλ λ€λμ μ€μΌλ¬Όμ§λ‘ μ€μΌλκΈ° λλ¬Έμ΄λ€.
μ΄μμ μμ§νκ°μ§μλ‘ λ³΄μ μ£Όμκ³΅λ¨ λ° λμ λΆκ·Όμ νμ²μ μμ§μ€μΌλκ° λμΌλ―λ‘ μ΄μ λν μ μ ν μμ§κ΄λ¦¬κ° μꡬλλ€.
λν μμΌλ‘ λμ± μ°λ¦¬λλΌμ μ€μ μ¦, μ©λ, μνκ³ λ³΄κ±΄ λ±μ μν νκ°μ§μ κ°λ°μ λν μ°κ΅¬κ° μꡬλλ€.
[μλ¬Έ]Major Rivers of Korea were assessed by a method using Water Quality Index proposed by U.S. NSF in 1970.
That water qualities of the major rivers mere measured by Korea National Environmental Protection Institute from 1982 to 1983, and were applied to Water Quality Index.
The results are as follows.
1. In north Han River watershed, WQI of Euiam Lake which is polluted by domestic and industrial wastewaters discharged from chuncheon City Shows 67.6.
In South Han River watershed WQIs of Chungju Dam and Yeoju show 66.9 and 67.9 respectively.
At lower stream of Paldang, WQIs of Gueui, Dugdo, Bogwang, Indogyo, 2nd Han River bridge, Haengju and Jeonryu show 68.0, 65.8, 54.9, 52.9, 47.0. 36.0 and 34.9, respectively. The more down stream the more polluted, because it is polluted by the
pollutants inflowed froms Jungryang-stream, Anyang-stream and other small streams.
2. In Nagdong River watershed WQI of Waegwan which is polluted by domestic and Industrial waste waters discharged from Gumi City shows 66.5. WQIs of Goryeonggyo, Daeam and Jeogpogyo which are polluted through Geumho River by large amounts of domestic and industrial wastewaters discharged from Daegu City show 51.0, 64.0 and 67.5 respectively.
The whole section of Geum River maintains a good water quality because of large quantities of rater compared with amounts of inflowed pollutants, and its WQI shows 73.8.
WQI of Yeongsan River shorts 69.9, and especially that of Byeogjin shorts 44.2 because of being polluted by domestic and industrial wastewater discharged from Gwangju City.
The whole section of Seomjin River maintains a quite good Quality because of not being polluted by any pollutants except agricultural drainage, and its WQI shows more than 80.4.
Since there os a small quantity of water in Mangyeong River and it is polluted by a lot of pollutants discharged from Jeongju City and Iri City, its WQI shows 53.7.
Above the results of assessment by using water quality Index, it can be said that major industrial complex and Urban areas are more polluted than the other areas.
Proper water quality management should be necessary in these areas. And it can be recommended to apply water quality index such as NSFWQI in order for assessment of water qualities.restrictio
μ΄κΈ°μ μΈ μ¬μ©μλ₯Ό κ³ λ €ν P2P μμ€ν μ€κ³ λ° λΆμ
Thesis(doctors) --μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μ κΈ°. μ»΄ν¨ν°κ³΅νλΆ, 2009.2.Docto
Applications and outcomes of hemodialysis using continuous renal replacement therapy machine in dogs : a review of six cases
Thesis(master`s)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μμνκ³Ό μμλ΄κ³Όνμ 곡,2006.Maste
A Study on the Impact of Food Industry Marketing Communication Activities on Menu, Selection Criteris and Customer Satisfaction - Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Menu Selection Criteria -
A study on folk custom concerning the traditional wedding ceremony based on old documentary, wedding β catalogs of goods
Adiaspiromycosis of an Apodemus agrarius captured wild rodent in Korea
Adiaspiromycosis is caused by pulmonary infection with Emmonsia. Inhalated spores of Emmonsia cause asymptomatic infection to necrogranulomatous pneumonia, depending on the burden of adiaspore and host immunity. For disease monitoring of wild rodents captured on Jeju Island in Korea, we examined the lung tissue of wild rodents histopathologically. Spores composed of thick three-layered walls were found following histopathological examination and were diagnosed as adiaspiromycosis. Adiaspiromycosis has been found in mammals in many parts of the world. To our knowledge, this is the first report of adiaspiromycosis of an Apodemus agrarius captured in Korea.N