139 research outputs found

    Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes Between Two Alternative Sequences with Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    Sequential treatment of androgen receptor axis targeted agents (ARAT), abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZA), in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) demonstrated some positive effects, but cross-resistances between ABI and ENZA that reduce activity have been suggested. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare oncologic outcomes between the treatment sequences of ABI-ENZA and ENZA-ABI in patients with mCRPC. The primary endpoint was a combined progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A total of five trials on 553 patients were included in this study. Each of the included studies was retrospective. In two studies including both chemo-naรฏve and post-chemotherapy mCRPC patients, for ABI-ENZA compared with ENZA-ABI, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were 0.37 (p < 0.0001; 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.23-0.60) and 0.64 (p = 0.10; 95% CIs, 0.37-1.10), respectively. In three studies with chemo-naรฏve mCRPC patients only, for ABI-ENZA compared with ENZA-ABI, pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.57 (p = 0.02; 95% CIs, 0.35-0.92) and 0.86 (p = 0.39; 95% CIs, 0.61-1.21), respectively. The current meta-analysis revealed that ABI-ENZA had a significantly more favorable oncological outcome, but the level of evidence was low. Therefore, large-scale randomized trials may be needed.ope

    ํŠธ๋žœ์Šคํฌ๋จธ์˜ ์–ดํ…์…˜ ์Šค์ฝ”์–ด ์กฐ์ž‘์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์‚ฌ์ด์–ธ์Šค๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์‚ฌ์ด์–ธ์Šคํ•™๊ณผ, 2023. 2. ์ด์žฌ์ง„.Although Korean has distinctly different features from English, attempts to find a new Transformer model that more closely matches Korean by reflecting them are insufficient. Among the characteristics of the Korean language, we pay special attention to the role of postpositions. Agglutinative languages have more freedom in word order than inflectional languages, such as English, thanks to the postpositions. This study is based on the hypothesis that the current Transformer is challenging to learn the postpositions sufficiently, which play a significant role in agglutinative languages such as Korean. In Korean, the postpositions are paired with the substantives, so paying more attention to the corresponding substantives seems reasonable compared to other tokens in the sentence. However, the current Transformer learning algorithm has many limitations in doing so. Accordingly, it is shown that the performance of the natural language understanding (NLU) task can be improved by deliberatively changing the attention scores between the postpositions and the substantives. In addition, it is hoped that this study will stimulate the research on new learning methods that reflect the characteristics of Korean.ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด๋Š” ์˜์–ด์™€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋ฅผ Transformer์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด์— ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด ํŠน์„ฑ ์ค‘์— ํŠนํžˆ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋•๋ถ„์— ์˜์–ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ตด์ ˆ์–ด์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ฌธ์žฅ ๋‚ด ๋‹จ์–ด ์ˆœ์„œ์˜ ์ž์œ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๊ต์ฐฉ์–ด๋ผ๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ Transformer์˜ attention score ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ต์ฐฉ์–ด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ Transformer์—์„œ๋Š” ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ํ•™์Šต๋˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์— ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์„ ๋‘”๋‹ค. ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด์—์„œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น ์ฒด์–ธ๊ณผ ์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌถ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ฌธ์žฅ ๋‚ด์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ token์— ๋น„ํ•ด ํ•ด๋‹น ์ฒด์–ธ์„ ์ข€๋” attentionํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํƒ€๋‹นํ•ด ๋ณด์ด์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ Transformer ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์กฐ์‚ฌ-์ฒด์–ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ attention score๋ฅผ ์ธ์œ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ด์œผ๋กœ์จ NLU(Natural Language Understanding) ๊ด€๋ จ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ task์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ ํ•œ๊ธ€ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ž๊ทน์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Related work ๏ผ• Chapter 3. Korean and Transformer 7 Chapter 4. Methodology ๏ผ™ Chapter 5. Results and Analysis 15 Chapter 6. Future work 20 Chapter 7. Conclusion 21 Bibliography 22 Abstract in Korean 26์„

    ์œ„์•” ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ๊ฐ ๊ตฌ์—ญ๋ณ„ ๋ฆผํ”„์ ˆ ์ „์ด์œจ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์ถ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2018. 2. ์–‘ํ•œ๊ด‘.Background and Aim The prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) on each lymph node (LN) station is important for tailored surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction program which can calculate the probability of LNM according to LN stations in gastric cancer patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 4,660 patients who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer from 2003 to 2013 and the LN status was well examined in according to the LN stations, at Seoul National University Hospital. We reviewed preoperative endoscopic findings and/or gross pathologic findings, and reclassified the tumor locations by the endoscopic terms. All of the involved locations were included into the analysis. The variables which can get preoperatively were evaluated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to develop a LNM prediction model using whole data for each LN station. The performance of the prediction model was validated in terms of discrimination and calibration using a total of 200 bootstrap samples. Results The multiple analysis identified depth of tumor, gross type, involved locations as covariates associated with LNM. But the significant factors were somewhat different according to the LN stations. In the validation, the prediction equation exhibited good discrimination. Calibration plot of the prediction equation predicted LNM rate corresponding closely with the actual rate. Conclusions We developed a LNM prediction program on each LN stations. Validation revealed good discrimination and calibration, suggesting good clinical utility. The LNM prediction program improved individualized predictions of LNM of each LN stations.Introduction 1 Patients and Methods 4 Results 9 Discussion 14 Reference 19 Tables 22 Figures 38 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 57Docto

    Does an Alternative Sunitinib Dosing Schedule Really Improve Survival Outcomes over a Conventional Dosing Schedule in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) can obfuscate the maintenance of a conventional schedule of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Accordingly, alternative schedules seeking to improve the safety profile of sunitinib have been tested. Recently, two meta-analyses similarly described improved safety profiles favoring a two weeks on and one week off (2/1) schedule, but with conflicting results for survival outcomes. Therefore, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, including all recently published studies and using complementary statistical methods. Endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and AEs of 15 types. Eleven articles were included in this meta-analysis. Using adjusted findings, we noted statistically better results in progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.84; p = 0.005), but no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.04; p = 0.08). Moreover, the 2/1 schedule was beneficial for reducing the incidence of several AEs. Conclusively, our meta-analysis suggests that the 2/1 schedule holds promise as an alternative means of reducing AEs and maintaining patient quality of life. While the survival outcomes of the 2/1 schedule seem also to be favorable, the level of evidence for this was low, and the interpretation of these findings should warrant caution. Large scale randomized trials are needed to support these results.ope

    Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bladder neck preservation (BNP) on long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies that assessed the difference in urinary continence and oncologic outcomes between patients who underwent RALP with BNP and those who underwent RALP without BNP. Four trials (1880 cases with BNP, 727 controls without BNP) were considered suitable for meta-analysis. BNP was associated with significantly better urinary continence outcomes at 3-4 months (odds ratio (OR), 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.52-5.48; p = 0.001), 12 months (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10-3.74; p = 0.02), and 24 months (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.13-9.20; p = 0.03) after RALP. There was no difference in the rate of overall positive surgical margin (PSM) (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72-1.39; p = 0.99) and that of PSM at the prostate base (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.13; p = 0.09) between the two groups. The BNP technique during RALP leads to early return of urinary continence and long-term urinary continence without compromising the oncologic outcomes.ope

    A Study on the Insured Perils of Fishing Vessel Insurance Clauses

    Get PDF
    Fishing vessel insurance of National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives indemnifies the assured against marine losses by reason of maritime perils. This insurance contract is to indemnify the losses incurred by reason of perils of the seas, that is to say, sinking, stranding, collision, extraordinary action of winds waves and fire, damage, salvage. Therefore this insurance is a rational protective measures for preserving fishermen's property by the exposure to maritime perils. This insurance contract is embodied in fishing vessel insurance clauses and is effected between the assured, the fishermen and the insured, National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives. But there may be some problems on the perils covered by fishing vessel insurance clauses because these clauses are not clearly and accurately prescribed in part. Especially where the assured may claim payment from fortuitous accidents or casualties of the seas causing the loss, they used to raise a question in argument about the ambiguity of these clauses. So these problems may need to be reformed for the purpose of preventing or decreasing those of the assured, the fishermen. After drawing out some problems on the perils covered by fishing vessel insurance clauses, this thesis will suggest the improving schemes on the perils covered by these clauses with studying Marine Insurance Act, 1906, hereinafter called MIA, Institute Time Clauses-Hulls, 1983, hereinafter called ITC-Hulls and P&I insurance. To research this, papers and books published at home and overseas are referred to and the practical experiences of the writers' taking charge of fishing vessel insurance work for about 20 years are helpfully added. Problems on the perils covered by these clauses are divided into both those against the insurance theory and those in these clauses. Problems of these clauses against the insurance theory are as follows : First, as the problems regarding the perils covered principle by maritime perils, these clauses are seemed to be adopted through the named-perils. But these clauses are not specifically designated by the perils covered, so it is difficult to judge whether the perils are insured against. Second, as the problems regarding the proximate cause and the reasonable cause, the former is expressed as 'caused by' and the latter is expressed as 'attributable to'. But this is not specifically designated, so causes confusion for interpretation of these clauses. Third, as the problems regarding warranty of seaworthiness, these clauses are not a voyage policy but a time policy. So the provisions of this section seem not to be suitable for a time policy. So, problems in these clauses are summarized as follows : First, as the problems regarding the term 'damage', these are embraced in the scope of perils. So this is not only suitable for the insurance theory but also perils insured against unnecessary misunderstanding of the assured about payment of claims may occur. Second, as the problems regarding the term 'loss', this means marine loss. This is not suitable for the provisions of this section because this includes several meanings, such as physical loss, expenses and collision liability. Third, as the problems regarding salvage charges and sue and labour charges, these are used same meaning. So the former seems to be payed in addition to claims paid like the latter, the meaning of these terms is confused. Fourth, as the problems regarding faults in respect of unlicensed master and chief engineer, and fishing vessel under 29 gross tons and fishing vessel over 30 gross tons are equally dealt with even though the former are pooler than the latter. Improving schemes on the perils covered by these clauses is divided into improving schemes and defects in these clauses. Improving schemes in these clauses are as follows : First, as improving schemes regarding the perils covered by principles of maritime perils, this will be obviously specified like the perils clauses of ITC-Hulls and expanded to be of great advantage to the fishermen. Second, as improving schemes regarding the proximate cause and the reasonable cause, in practice the latter seems to be adopted. A standard for causation needs to be established to avoid the confusion for interpretation of these clauses or for practice. Third, as improving schemes regarding warranty of seaworthiness, the provisions of this section shall be revised into the provision of MIA because this is unsuitable for a time policy. Also Article 17.3.1 and Article 17.4.1 which are warranty of legality shall be embraced in Article 17.1. Therefore the strict regulations as an implied warranty will be consistently preserved. Fourth, as improving schemes regarding 'damage', this term will be revised or deleted because this is not to be embraced in the scope of perils. Fifth, as improving schemes regarding the term 'loss', this term will be revised as 'loss or damage' because this is not suitable for the provisions of this section. Sixth, as improving schemes regarding salvage charges and sue and labour charges, these will be obviously specified not only by the concept but also the measure of indemnity. Seventh, as improving schemes regarding faults in respect of unlicensed master and chief engineer, this will be adjusted to be an advantage to a smaller fishing vessel. Improving defects in these clauses are as follows : First, the damage for 'violent theft by persons from outside the vessel' will be covered. Second, P&I insurance will be carried out for fishing vessel. For example, liabilities for non-contact damage, wreck removal and oil pollution will be covered these clauses. The offshore fishing vessel shall be undertaken to be insured by fishing vessel insurance in the near future. Finally, regarding improving defects in these clauses and to undertake the offshore fishing vessel, government must play an important role for the fishermen.็ฌฌ 1 ็ซ  ๅบ่ซ– = 1 ็ฌฌ 1 ็ฏ€ ็ก็ฉถ์˜ ็›ฎ็š„ = 1 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ฏ€ ็ก็ฉถ์˜ ๆ–นๆณ• ๋ฐ ็ฏ„ๅœ = 4 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ซ  ๆตทไธŠๅฑ้šช์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๏งค่ซ–็š„ ่€ƒๅฏŸ = 6 ็ฌฌ 1 ็ฏ€ ๆตทไธŠๅฑ้šช์˜ ๆ„็พฉ = 6 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ฏ€ ๆตทไธŠๅฑ้šช์˜ ๆ“”ไฟๅŽŸๅ‰‡ = 7 1. ๅŒ…ๆ‹ฌ่ฒฌไปปไธป็พฉ = 7 2. ๏ฆœๆ“ง่ฒฌไปปไธป็พฉ = 8 ็ฌฌ 3 ็ฏ€ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช๊ณผ ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช = 9 1. ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 10 2. ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช = 10 3. ้žๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 11 ็ฌฌ 4 ็ฏ€ ่ฟ‘ๅ› ไธป็พฉ = 12 1. ๆ„็พฉ = 12 2. MIA, 1906ไธŠ์˜ ่ฟ‘ๅ› ไธป็พฉ = 14 3. ITC-Hulls, 1983ไธŠ์˜ ่ฟ‘ๅ› ไธป็พฉ = 17 ็ฌฌ 3 ็ซ  ITC-Hulls, 1983ไธŠ์˜ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 18 ็ฌฌ 1 ็ฏ€ ๆ„็พฉ = 18 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ฏ€ ็›ธ็•ถๆณจๆ„็พฉๅ‹™๋ฅผ ่ฆไปถ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 20 1. ็ด„ๆฌพ์˜ ่ฆๅฎš = 20 2. ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช์˜ ๅ…งๅฎน = 21 ็ฌฌ 3 ็ฏ€ ็›ธ็•ถๆณจๆ„็พฉๅ‹™๋ฅผ ่ฆไปถ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 28 1. ็ด„ๆฌพ์˜ ่ฆๅฎš = 28 2. ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช์˜ ๅ…งๅฎน = 30 ็ฌฌ 4 ็ฏ€ ITC-Hulls, 1983ไธŠ์˜ ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช = 34 1. ๆˆฐ็ˆญๅฑ้šชๅ…่ฒฌ = 35 2. ๅŒ็›Ÿ็ฝทๆฅญๅฑ้šชๅ…่ฒฌ = 36 3. ๆƒกๆ„่กŒ็ˆฒๅ…่ฒฌ = 36 4. ๆ ธๅฑ้šชๅ…่ฒฌ = 37 ็ฌฌ 4 ็ซ  P&Iไฟ้šชไธŠ์˜ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 39 ็ฌฌ 1 ็ฏ€ ๆ„็พฉ = 39 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ฏ€ P&Iไฟ้šชไธŠ์˜ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 40 1. ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๊ณผ ้—œ่ฏ๋œ ่ฒฌไปป = 41 2. ่ˆน่ˆถ๊ณผ ้—œ่ฏ๋œ ่ฒฌไปป = 42 3. ๆตทๆด‹้‚„ๅขƒ๊ณผ ้—œ่ฏ๋œ ่ฒฌไปป = 44 ็ฌฌ 3 ็ฏ€ P&Iไฟ้šชไธŠ์˜ ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช = 45 1. ๆˆฐ็ˆญๅฑ้šชๅ…่ฒฌ = 45 2. ๆ ธๅฑ้šชๅ…่ฒฌ = 45 3. ๅ…ถไป– ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช = 46 ็ฌฌ 5 ็ซ  ๆผ่ˆนไฟ้šช็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ์˜ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 47 ็ฌฌ 1 ็ฏ€ ๆ„็พฉ = 47 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ฏ€ ๆตทไธŠๅ›บๆœ‰์˜ ๅฑ้šช = 48 1. ๆฒˆๆฒ’ = 49 2. ๅ็ค = 49 3. ่ก็ช = 50 4. ้ขจๆณข์˜ ็•ฐๅธธํ•œ ไฝœ็”จ = 59 ็ฌฌ 3 ็ฏ€ ๅ…ถไป– ๅฑ้šช = 59 1. ็ซ็ฝ = 59 2. ๆๅ‚ท = 60 3. ๆ•‘ๅŠฉ = 60 ็ฌฌ 4 ็ฏ€ ๆผ่ˆนไฟ้šช็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ์˜ ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช = 64 1. ็ด„ๆฌพ์˜ ่ฆๅฎš = 65 2. ๅ…่ฒฌๅฑ้šช์˜ ๅ…งๅฎน = 67 ็ฌฌ 5 ็ฏ€ ็‰นๅˆฅ็ด„ๆฌพ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช = 77 1. ่ขซๆ“Š, ๆ•็ฒ, ๆ‹ฟๆ•, ๆŠ‘็•™ๅฑ้šช = 78 2. ๆผๅ…ทๅฑ้šช = 78 3. ๆผ็ฒ็‰ฉ่ฃœๅ„Ÿ = 79 4. ๅฏฆๆ่ฃœๅ„Ÿ = 79 5. ไฟ้šชๅฅ‘็ด„ๆœŸ้–“ ็ต‚ไบ†ๆ—ฅๅปถ้•ท = 81 6. ๆฉŸ้—œๅ–ฎ็จไบ‹ๆ•…่ฃœๅ„Ÿ = 81 ็ฌฌ 6 ็ซ  ๆผ่ˆนไฟ้šช็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช์˜ ๅ•้กŒ้ปž ๋ฐ ๆ”นๅ–„ๆ–นๆกˆ = 83 ็ฌฌ 1 ็ฏ€ ๆผ่ˆนไฟ้šช็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช์˜ ๅ•้กŒ้ปž = 83 1. ไฟ้šช๏งค่ซ–ไธŠ์˜ ๅ•้กŒ้ปž = 83 2. ็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ์˜ ๅ•้กŒ้ปž = 94 ็ฌฌ 2 ็ฏ€ ๆผ่ˆนไฟ้šช็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ ๆ“”ไฟๅฑ้šช์˜ ๆ”นๅ–„ๆ–นๆกˆ = 99 1. ็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ์˜ ๆ”นๅ–„ๆ–นๆกˆ = 99 2. ็ด„ๆฌพไธŠ์˜ ๆœชๅ‚™้ปž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๆ”นๅ–„ๆ–นๆกˆ = 103 ็ฌฌ 3 ็ฏ€ ้ ๆด‹ๆผ่ˆน์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๆผ่ˆนไฟ้šช ๅผ•ๅ— = 109 ็ฌฌ 7 ็ซ  ็ต่ซ– = 111 1. ็ก็ฉถ็ตๆžœ์˜ ่ฆ็ด„๊ณผ ็คบๅ”†้ปž = 111 2. ็ก็ฉถ์˜ ้™็•Œ์™€ ๅ‘ๅพŒ ็ก็ฉถๆ–นๅ‘ = 115 ๅƒ่€ƒๆ–‡็ป = 11

    ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์  ์ˆ˜์ž์› ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋ชจํ˜• ์„ค์ •์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(Design of water allocation model)

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ตญํ† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ๋กœ์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    Prognostic factors of second and third line chemotherapy using 5-fu with platinum, irinotecan, and taxane for advanced gastric cancer.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to find out whether the sequence of chemotherapeutic regimens including second- and third-line taxane and irinotecan influences the survival of patients with unresectable gastric carcinoma and to identify clinical characteristics of patients with improved response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty gastric carcinoma patients who were treated by third-line sequential chemotherapy between November 2004 and July 2010 were enrolled in this study. Their overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were set up as primary and secondary end points. For the sequence of chemotherapy regimen, two arms were used. Arm A was defined as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+cisplatin (FP) or folinic acid, 5-FU and oxaliplati (FOLFOX), followed by folinic acid, 5-FU and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and paclitaxel or docetaxel plus 5-FU, with or without epirubicin. Arm B was defined as FP or FOLFOX, followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel plus 5-FU, and FOLFIRI. RESULTS: The median OS of all patients was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval, 13.6 to 18.3 months), which is longer than historical control of patients who did not receive third-line chemotherapy. The sequence of second and third-line regimen, including irinotecan and taxane, did not present significant difference in OS or TTP after failure of 5-FU with platinum chemotherapy. In survival analysis of patients' clinicopathologic characteristics, poor prognosis was shown in patients with poorly differentiated histologic features, elevated serum carcinoembryonic level, and shorter TTP of first line chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: It is possible for patients to respond differently to chemotherapy due to differences in clinical features and underlying gene expression profiles. Development of individualized chemotherapy regimens based on gene expression profiles is warranted.ope
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore