상과 양상의 상호관계: 러시아어의 경우

This paper aims to investigate the interrelation between aspect and modality in Russian. For this purpose we analyze the effect of the use of aspect in irreal" conditional sentences and imperative sentences, which can be counted as the ideal types of marked moods in Russian. Conditional sentences are designed to show (sequential and/or logical) causal relation between the two propositions, i.e. between the proposition in the protasis and the proposition in the apodosis. Since causal relation often implies temporal sequentiality, temporal sequentiality, in general, is highly correlated with perfective aspect. However, when the speaker has an intention to weaken the assertion of causality, he may substitute imperfective aspect for perfective. In imperative sentences where interpersonal function of communication is activated, substitution of imperfective aspect for perfective also assumes the function of weakening the demand for the termination of action. In imperative sentences the weakening effect minimizes the distance between the speaker and the listener and serves as the means of expressing speaker's intimacy and politeness toward the hearer. We can conclude that in both sentence types speaker's pragmatic intention serves as a motivation for the aspectual change

A Study on Deixis in Russian - The Attributes of a Sign

This study aims to explain that the multiple characteristics of deixis are due to the relations of the interaction between the two typical attributes (indexical and symbolic) of a sign. Deixis has indexical characteristics in that it keeps ontological relations with referents, and it also has symbolic characteristics in that it has invariant semantic elements. According to the functions and roles of the deictic expressions in various kinds of registers, we can see very different aspects of these two characteristics. Unlike our expectations, non-standard communications are very widely used. And in non-standard communications, relations between the deictic expressions and their referents show more symbolic characteristics compared with those in standard communications. Relations between deictic expressions and referents in the standard communications are metaphorically, and cognitively projected to the non-standard communications, and symbolic characteristics of the deictic expressions become more salient. This is similarly applied to the other types of the registers. In the narratives, unlike in the conversations, the symbolic characteristics of the deictic expressions, especially in the case of 'here' arid 'now', are more activated and make themselves function as a discourse deixis rather than as an anaphora.이 논문은 2005년 정부(교육인적자원부)의 재원으로 한국학술진홍재단의 지원을 받아 수행 된 연구임 (KRF-2005-079-AM0057)

Conditionals and Iconicity

The study explores inter relationship between conditionals and iconicity. So far the existence of iconicity in conditionals has been mentioned, but the nature of the iconicity has been neglected. In conditionals two different kinds of iconicity - temporal iconicity and causal iconicity - are observed. In conditionals with hypotheticality temporal iconicity (sequentiality or simultaneity) between two situations is reflected in the real level of logic. In contrast, in conditionals without hypotheticality temporal iconicity is expressed in the cognitive level. This pattem of ref1ection of temporal iconity can be applied to the causal iconicity. In conditionals with hypotheticality causal iconicity shows the causal relation between two situations in the real level of logic. That is direct ref1ection of reality. But in conditionals without hypotheticality shows the causal relation between two situations in the cognitive level. To understand the situations expressed in the protasis becomes a premise to get the validity to express the situations of apodosis .. In any case speaker' s cognitive inference is equally needed. While in conditionals with hypotheticality, speakers cognitive inference is used to place two real situations in the altemative-hypothetical world, in conditionals without hypotheticality speaker' s cognitive inference is need to construct new cognitive relations between situations. Conditionals, which can be connected easily with sequentiality, simultaneity, causality on the one hand can be used by speakers to reflect existent temporal, causal relationship of real world, on the other hand to build new cognitive temporal, causal relationship

2013년 3차 탄소복합소재 지식연구회

○ 행사명 : 2013년 3차 탄소복합소재 지식연구회 개최 ○ 일시 : 2013. 10. 08(화) 10:30~13:00 ○ 장소 : 한국탄소융합기술원 국제탄소연구소 ○ 참석 대상 : 지식연구회 위원 20명 내외 □ 세부 일정 10:30~10:40 접수 및 안내호남지원 10:40~10:45 개회 및 위원 소개사회자 10:45~10:50 인사말김은주 지원장 10:50~11:30 항공산업용 탄소복합재료의 개발동향서민강 박사(KCTECH) 11:30~11:55 탄화규소 복합재의 기술로드맵 및 브레이크 디스크의 슈퍼컴 지원 성과사례김정일 소장(데크) 11:55~12:10 질의 응답사회자 12:20~13:30 식사 및 토론(간담회)호남지

동물모형을 이용한 돼지의 생산형질과 번식형질에 대한 직접유전효과의 유전모수 추정

Thesis (doctoral)--서울대학교 대학원 :농생명공학부 동물육종학전공,2002.Docto

Исследования русского условнго предложения с "если" - с тоуки 3рения форм, семантики, дискурса

학위논문(박사)--서울대학교 대학원 :노어노문학과 노어학전공,2002.Docto

러시아어 재귀소유형용사 연구 : 관점이입을 중심으로

학위논문(석사)--서울大學校 大學院 :露語露文學科 露語學專攻,1996.Maste

고정구 설계의 자동화

학위논문(석사)--서울대학교 대학원 :기계설계학과,1995.Maste

"иметь" Possessive Construction in Russian

소유개념은 제 언어들이 공통적으로 보유하고 있는 범주이다. 그러나 그 개념이 개별 언어에서 어떻게 구체적으로 실현되는가에 대한 연구는 많은 어려움에 봉착해 온 것이 사실이다. 소유라는 개념자체가 매우 모호하고, 그 모호한 개념에 대한 개별 언어사용자들의 인식유형이 다르기 때문이다. 소유개념의 속성을 파악하기 위한 끊임없는 노력은 인류의 역사와 궤를 같이 해 온 것이 사실이며, 그 연구방향은 크게 보아 일반적으로 소유개념이 가지는 속성을 파악하는데 주력하거나, 소유개념의 표현양식들을 유형론적 관점에서 파악하는데 주력하는 두 가지 방향으로 전개되어왔다. 특히 최근에는 소유의 본질을 인지적 측면에서 규명하고자 하는 일련의 연구들이 주목받고 있다. The study explores semantic and pragmatic characterics of Russian 'иметь' possessive construction. So far it has Ьееп regarded as more restricted and secondary compared with 'у' possessive construction. But like 'у' possessive construction, it also has its own semantic and pragmatic tепitогу. First of all, it is in the human-oriented model. In this construction, various relations between possessors and possessees rather than assertion of possession or the existence of the possessees are evoked. Among these relations, ownership, availability, inherent feature, possessor's subjective attitude toward possessee are most frequently met.이 논문은 2002년도 학술진흥재단의 지원(박사 후 연수과정)에 의하여 연구되었음(KRF-2002-037-A00146