105 research outputs found

    ์‹ ์žฅ ์žฌ์ด์‹ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ ๋‚ด์žฅ ์นจ๋ฒ” ์นดํฌ์‹œ์œก์ข…์—์„œ Sirolimus ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ด€ํ•ด ๋ฐ ์ด์‹์‹  ๋ณด์กด 1์˜ˆ

    Get PDF
    The use of immunosuppressant's increases the risk of developing malignancies in renal allograft patients. One of the most important malignancies, Kaposi's sarcoma, can cause mortality and graft failure among renal allograft patients. We report the case of a 39-year-old male diagnosed with multiple visceral Kaposi's sarcoma 6 months after a second cadaveric renal allograft. The patient's renal function was markedly deteriorated at admission and required hemodialysis initially. Radiologic studies revealed Kaposi's sarcoma in multiple lymph nodes, liver, lung, and peritoneum. The excisional biopsy of an inguinal lymph node confirmed this diagnosis. After diagnosis, tacrolimus treatment was gradually decreased, and sirolimus treatment initiated. The patient did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The Kaposi's sarcoma lesions decreased dramatically (both in size and number) 1 month after sirolimus treatment, and kidney graft function improved. This case thus shows successful sirolimus treatment of visceral Kaposi's sarcoma in a renal allograft patient.ope

    Formulation of Nanostructured Lipid Carriers(NLCs) of 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol(PPD) by Box-Behnken design

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์•ฝํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์•ฝํ•™๊ณผ, 2018. 2. ๊น€๋Œ€๋•.20(S)-Protopanaxadiol(PPD)๋Š” Compound K์™€ ginsenoside Rb1์—์„œ ๋‹น์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง„ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์ฒด๋กœ์„œ, matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) ํ™œ์„ฑ ๊ฐ์†Œ์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ”ผ๋ถ€๋…ธํ™”๋ฐฉ์ง€ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ™œ์„ฑ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ํก์ˆ˜๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๊ฐ์งˆ์ธต์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ธ๋ฐ, PPD๋Š” ๋ฌผ์— ์ž˜ ๋…น์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์ด ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ์งˆ์ธต์„ ์ž˜ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ํก์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ์•ˆ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ Fick์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฒ•์น™์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ, PPD์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ํก์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์šฉํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ œํ˜• ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. Lipid nanoparticle์˜ ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์ธ Nanostructured Lipid Carrier(NLC)๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋ฆฌํฌ์ข€์ด๋‚˜ ์—๋ฉ€์ ผ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์žฅ์ ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ํ”ผ๋ถ€์ˆ˜ํ™”ํšจ๊ณผ, ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ง€์†๋ฐฉ์ถœ, ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋“ฑ์ด ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ Box-Behnken Design์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์šฉ์„ฑ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ธ PPD์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ํก์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ NLC ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. PPD์˜ ์–‘(X1), ์˜ค์ผ์˜ ์–‘(X2), ๊ณ„๋ฉดํ™œ์„ฑ์ œ์˜ ์–‘(X3)์„ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ž…์ž์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ(Y1), polydispersity index (PDI) (Y2), ๋ด‰์ž…์œจ(Y3)์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์  ์กฐ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์–ป์€ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธก ๊ฐ’์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Y1, Y2, Y3 ๊ฐ’ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธก ๊ฐ’์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ 5%์ด๋‚ด์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์กฐ์„ฑ์ด ์ž˜ ๋„์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, X-ray diffraction (XRD)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ PPD๊ฐ€ NLC ์ œํ˜•์— ๋ฌด์ •ํ˜•์˜ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ๋ด‰์ž…๋˜์–ด์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์  ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ NLC๋ฅผ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ๋Œ€์ฒด ์ธ๊ณต๋ง‰์ธ Strat-Mโ„ข์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ ํ›„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ PPD์˜ ์ž”๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. PPD๋ฅผ ํ•จ์œ ํ•œ suspension๊ณผ oil solution์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ NLC ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, 3์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ 6์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ›„์˜ PDD ์ž”๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ชจ๋‘ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, PPD์˜ ํ”ผ๋ถ€ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ NLC ์กฐ์„ฑ์ด Box-Behnken design์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 2. Materials and Methods 5 2.1. Materials 5 2.2. HPLC analysis 5 2.3. Selecting liquid lipid and surfactant 7 2.4. Preparation of APPD-loaded NLCs 7 2.5. Experimental design 8 2.5.1. Size and PDI 9 2.5.2. Entrapment efficiency 9 2.5.3. TEM analysis 10 2.5.4. Power X-ray diffraction (XRD) 10 2.6. In vitro deposition test in Strat-Mโ„ข membrane 10 2.7. Statistical analysis 11 3. Results and Discussion 12 3.1. Solubility test 12 3.2. Experimental design using Box-Behnken design 12 3.2.1 Effect on particle size 12 3.2.2 Effect on PDI 13 3.2.3 Effect on EE 14 3.2.4 optimization and validation 15 3.3 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 15 3.4 X-ray diffraction study 16 3.5 In-vitro deposition study in Strat-Mโ„ข 16 4. Conclusion 18 References 19 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 37 APPENDIX 39Maste

    Molecular Characterization of BRCA1 c.5339T>C Missense Mutation in DNA Damage Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Get PDF
    BRCA1 L1780P BRCT domain mutation has been recognized as a pathogenic mutation in patients with breast cancer. However, the molecular significance of this mutation has not yet been studied in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells in vitro. We established MDA-MB 231, HCC1937, and HCC1395 TNBC cell lines expressing BRCA1 L1780P mutant. BRCA1 L1780P mutant TNBC cells showed increased migration and invasion capacity, as well as increased sensitivity to olaparib and carboplatin compared to BRCA1 wild-type cells. BRCA1 L1780P mutant TNBC cells showed decreased RAD51 expression and reduced nuclear RAD51 foci formation following carboplatin and olaparib treatment. The molecular interaction between p-ATM and BRCA1 was abrogated following introduction of BRCA1 L1780P mutant plasmid in TNBC cells, suggesting that the BRCA1 L1780P mutation disrupts the p-ATM-BRCA1 protein-protein interaction. We established an olaparib-resistant BRCA1 L1780P mutant TNBC cell line by chronic drug treatment. Olaparib-resistant cell lines showed upregulation of RAD51 expression upon olaparib treatment, and reduction in RAD51 expression in olaparib-resistant cells restored olaparib sensitivity. Collectively, these results suggest that the BRCA1 L1780P mutation impairs RAD51 recruitment by disrupting p-ATM-BRCA1 interaction, which is a crucial molecular factor in homologous recombination and olaparib sensitivity. Further therapeutic targeting of RAD51 in BRCA1 L1780P mutant breast cancer is warranted.ope

    Response Rate and Safety of a Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab, Atezolizumab, Docetaxel, and Trastuzumab Regimen for Patients With ERBB2-Positive Stage II/III Breast Cancer: The Neo-PATH Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

    Get PDF
    Importance: Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to anti-ERBB2 treatment has shown synergistic efficacy in preclinical studies and is thus worth investigating as a neoadjuvant treatment to maximize efficacy and to minimize toxic effects. Objective: To determine if neoadjuvant atezolizumab, docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab therapy for ERBB2-positive early breast cancer warrants continuation to the next phase. Design, setting, and participants: This nonrandomized, open label, multicenter, phase 2 trial was conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group and enrolled patients across 6 institutions in Korea from May 2019 to May 2020. Eligible patients were diagnosed with ERBB2-positive breast cancer (primary tumor size >2 cm or pathologically confirmed lymph node-positive cancer, without distant metastases) with a clinical stage of II or III. Interventions: Patients received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant pertuzumab (840 mg at first cycle, 420 mg during subsequent cycles), atezolizumab (1200 mg), docetaxel (75 mg/m2), and trastuzumab (600 mg via subcutaneous injection) every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) received 12 cycles of adjuvant atezolizumab, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab every 3 weeks after surgery. Patients without pCR were treated with 14 cycles of atezolizumab, 1200 mg, plus trastuzumab emtansine, 3.6 mg/kg, every 3 weeks. Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was pCR rate, which was defined as the absence of invasive cancer cells in the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0). Secondary end points included clinical objective response rate, 3-year event-free survival rate according to pCR achievement, disease-free survival, overall survival, toxic effects, and quality-of-life outcomes. Results: A total of 67 women (median [range] age, 52 [33-74] years) were enrolled. Hormone receptor expression was positive in 32 (48%) patients. Curative surgery was performed in 65 patients because 2 patients showed disease progression during neoadjuvant treatment and their tumors became unresectable. The overall pCR rate was 61% (41 of 67 patients). The pCR rate was higher in hormone receptor-negative disease vs hormone receptor-positive disease (27 of 35 [77%] patients vs 14 of 32 [44%] patients) and in programmed cell death 1-positive expression vs programmed cell death 1-negative expression (13 of 13 [100%] patients vs 28 of 53 [53%] patients). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 (12%) patients and 5 (8%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in only 4 patients (grade 3 skin rash, encephalitis, hepatitis, and fever). No treatment-related death occurred during the neoadjuvant phase. Conclusions and relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, treatment with the neoadjuvant atezolizumab, docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab regimen in patients with stage II or III ERBB2-positive breast cancer appears to have had an acceptable pCR rate and modest toxic effects. Further investigation of this immunotherapy combination in ERBB2-positive early breast cancer is warranted. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03881878.ope

    Real-world efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter retrospective analysis

    Get PDF
    Background: A recent phase II trial reported prolonged survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem/Cis/nab-P). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Gem/Cis/nab-P in Asian patients with advanced BTC in a real-world setting. Methods: We reviewed the data of patients who received Gem/Cis/nab-P for the management of advanced BTC between September 2019 and April 2021 at four institutes in Korea. Patients were classified into the Gem/Cis/nab-P and nab-P addition groups depending on the starting point of nab-P administration. Results: A total of 178 patients treated with Gem/Cis/nab-P were included in the study. Of these, 43.8% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 34.8% had extrahepatic CCA, and 21.3% had gall bladder cancer. A total of 117 (65.7%) patients received Gem/Cis/nab-P as the first-line treatment, while 61 (34.3%) were treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by nab-P addition. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate in all patients were 42.1% and 84.8%, respectively. The ORR in the Gem/Cis/nab-P group was 47.9%, while that in the nab-P addition group was 31.1%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.9-10.1] and 14.6 months (95% CI, 10.2-19.0), respectively. In patients who received Gem/Cis/nab-P as initial treatment, the median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.9) and the median OS was not-reached (95% CI, not available). Anemia (n = 42, 23.6%), neutropenia (n = 40, 22.5%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 16, 9.0%) were the most common grade 3-4 toxicities. A total of 20 patients (11.2%) had conversions from unresectable to resectable disease and underwent surgery with curative intent. Conclusion: Gem/Cis/nab-P showed favorable real-life efficacy and safety outcomes in Korean patients with advanced BTC, which was consistent with the phase II trial outcomes.ope

    Targeting YAP to overcome acquired resistance to ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer

    Get PDF
    Clinical benefit of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) in ALK-rearranged lung cancer has been limited by the inevitable development of acquired resistance, and bypass-molecular resistance mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated a novel therapeutic target through screening FDA-approved drugs in ALK-TKI-resistant models. Cerivastatin, the rate-limiting enzyme inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, showed anti-cancer activity against ALK-TKI resistance in vitro/in vivo, accompanied by cytoplasmic retention and subsequent inactivation of transcriptional co-regulator YAP. The marked induction of YAP-targeted oncogenes (EGFR, AXL, CYR61, and TGFฮฒR2) in resistant cells was abolished by cerivastatin. YAP silencing suppressed tumor growth in resistant cells, patient-derived xenografts, and EML4-ALK transgenic mice, whereas YAP overexpression decreased the responsiveness of parental cells to ALK inhibitor. In matched patient samples before/after ALK inhibitor treatment, nuclear accumulation of YAP was mainly detected in post-treatment samples. High expression of YAP in pretreatment samples was correlated with poor response to ALK-TKIs. Our findings highlight a crucial role of YAP in ALK-TKI resistance and provide a rationale for targeting YAP as a potential treatment option for ALK-rearranged patients with acquired resistance to ALK inhibitors.ope

    EGFR-Mediated Reactivation of MAPK Signaling Induces Acquired Resistance to GSK2118436 in BRAF V600E-Mutant NSCLC Cell Lines

    Get PDF
    Although treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC(V600E)) with GSK2118436 has shown an encouraging efficacy, most patients develop resistance. To investigate the mechanisms of acquired resistance to GSK2118436 in NSCLC(V600E), we established GSK2118436-resistant (GSR) cells by exposing MV522 NSCLC(V600E) to increasing GSK2118436 concentrations. GSR cells displayed activated EGFR-RAS-CRAF signaling with upregulated EGFR ligands and sustained activation of ERK1/2, but not MEK1/2, in the presence of GSK2118436. Treatment of GSR cells with GSK2118436 enhanced EGFR-mediated RAS activity, leading to the formation of BRAF-CRAF dimers and transactivation of CRAF. Interestingly, sustained activation of ERK1/2 was partly dependent on receptor-interacting protein kinase-2 (RIP2) activity, but not on MEK1/2 activity. Combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition blocked reactivation of ERK signaling and improved efficacy in vitro and in vivo Our findings support the evaluation of combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition in NSCLC(V600E) with acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors.ope

    Protective effect of bisphosphonate on the cortical bone at key locations of the femur in aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss: A three-dimensional cortical bone mapping study

    Get PDF
    Aromatase inhibitor treatment in breast cancer is associated with accelerated bone loss and an increased risk of fracture. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the mainstay treatment of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL), which might improve femoral bone at key locations prone to fracture. To test this hypothesis, we performed three-dimensional cortical bone mapping based on quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who were receiving aromatase inhibitors. Data of subjects who had both baseline and at least one follow-up QCT at Severance Hospital (South Korea) between 2005 and 2015 were analyzed (BP users, n = 93; BP non-users, n = 203). After exclusion of BP users with low medication persistence (proportion of days covered: <50%), BP users and non-users were 1:1 matched (n = 54 for each group) in terms of age, lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (LSvBMD), femoral neck areal BMD (FNaBMD), and total hip areal BMD (THaBMD). During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, BP use attenuated bone loss in LSvBMD (+7.2% vs. -3.8%, p < 0.001), FNaBMD (+1.3% vs. -2.7%, p < 0.001), and THaBMD (-0.3% vs. -2.5%, p = 0.024). BP had a protective effect on cortical parameters of femoral bone: estimated cortical thickness (CTh) (+3.3% vs. + 0.1%, p = 0.007) and cortical mass surface density (CMSD, cortical mass per unit surface area was calculated by multiplying cortical BMD with CTh) (+3.4% vs. -0.3%, p < 0.001). CMSD increased by up to 15% at key locations such as the superior part of the femoral neck and greater trochanter. BP prevented the thinning of average CTh of the femoral neck (-1.4% vs. -6.1%, p < 0.001), particularly at the superior anterior quadrant of femoral neck (absolute difference: +12.8% point vs. non-users). Compared to BP non-users, BP users had improved cross-sectional moment of inertia (+4.4% vs. -0.7%, p = 0.001) and less increase in buckling ratio (+1.3% vs. + 7.5%, p < 0.001). In summary, BP use prevented cortical bone deficits observed in AIBL at key locations of the proximal femur.ope

    Ifosfamide-induced Fanconi syndrome with diabetes insipidus

    Get PDF
    Ifosfamide-induced Fanconi syndrome is a rare complication that typically occurs in young patients due to a cumulative dose of ifosfamide > 40โ€“60 g/m2, a reduction in kidney mass, or concurrent cisplatin treatment. It is usually characterized by severe and fatal progression accompanied by type II proximal renal tubular dysfunction, as evidenced by glycosuria, proteinuria, electrolyte loss, and metabolic acidosis. Diabetes insipidus is also a rare complication of ifosfamide-induced renal disease. We herein describe a case involving a 61-year-old man who developed ifosfamide-induced Fanconi syndrome accompanied by diabetes insipidus only a few days after the first round of chemotherapy. He had no known risk factors. In addition, we briefly review the mechanisms and possible therapeutic options for this condition based on other cases in the literature. Patients who receive ifosfamide must be closely monitored for renal impairment to avoid this rare but fatal complication.ope

    Anaemia and pathologic complete response rate according to carboplatin dose in HER2+ breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant TCHP

    Get PDF
    Grade 3/4 anaemia, which is mainly induced by carboplatin, frequently occurs in patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP). However, dose reduction of carboplatin may raise concerns about the oncological outcome. This study investigated the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, occurrence of grade 3/4 anaemia, and transfusion rate according to carboplatin dose in patients treated with neoadjuvant TCHP. We retrospectively analysed 294 patients treated with neoadjuvant TCHP between April 2015 and December 2020. Case matching was performed using propensity score matching. Among patients treated with neoadjuvant TCHP, carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve 6 (AUC6) was used in 234 patients (79.6%) and upfront carboplatin AUC5 was used in 60 patients (20.4%). No significant difference in pCR rate was found between the two groups (AUC6: 70.9%, AUC5: 80.0%). In both oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER- patients, no significant differences were observed between the AUC6 and AUC5 groups (ER+: 54.3% vs. 50.0%, ER-: 81.7% vs. 86.0%). The case-matched cohort showed consistent findings. The AUC5 group had lower frequencies of grade 3/4 anaemia (18.3% vs. 34.2%) and transfusion events (10.0% vs. 21.8%) than the AUC6 group. Compared with AUC5, carboplatin at AUC6 would associate with a 2.7-fold increased risk of grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy-induced anaemia. Carboplatin AUC5 has comparable cytotoxic effects to carboplatin AUC6 in patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with six cycles of neoadjuvant TCHP, with fewer complications associated with clinically meaningful anaemia. AUC5 may be the optimal carboplatin dose to reduce TCHP-induced anaemia in patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with TCHP.ope
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore