43 research outputs found
A Study on the strategies for interaction improvement in hypertext learning systems
ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ์ฌ)--์์ธๅคงๅญธๆ ก ๋ํ์ :๊ต์กํ๊ณผ ๊ต์ก๋ฐฉ๋ฒ์ ๊ณต,1998.Docto
Serious leisure scale(SLS) development through serious leisure conceptualization
ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ์ฌ) --์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ํ์ :์ฒด์ก๊ต์ก๊ณผ,2008.2.Docto
The Development of Standardized ICT Literacy Assessment for Secondary School Student
์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ชฉ์ ์ ์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ์๋ค์ ์ ๋ณดํต์ ์์(ICT literacy; ์ดํ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์) ์์ค์ ํ๋นํ๊ณ ์ ๋ขฐ๋ก์ด ๋ฐฉ์์ผ๋ก ์ธก์ ยทํ๊ฐํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๋ฐํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ถ์๊ณผ ์ ๋ฌธ๊ฐํ์ํ ๋ด์ฉ ๋ฑ์ ์ข
ํฉํ์ฌ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์์ ๊ฐ๋
์ ๊ท์ ํ๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ๊ฐํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ์ ํ๋ ์(frame)์ ๊ฐ๋ฐํ์๋ค. ์ฆ, ๋ชจ๋ ๋ฌธํญ์ '๋ด์ฉ์์ร๋ฅ๋ ฅ์์'๋ก ๊ตฌ์ฑ๋ ์ด์๋ถ๋ฅํ์์ ์์๋ฅผ ์ธก์ ํ ์ ์๋๋ก ๊ฐ๋ฐ๋์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ด์ฉ์์๋ โ ์ปดํจํฐ์ ๋คํธ์ํฌ, โก ์ ๋ณด์ฒ๋ฆฌ, โข ์ ๋ณด์ฌํ์ ์ค๋ฆฌ๋ก, ๋ฅ๋ ฅ์์๋ โ ๋ฌธ์ ์ ์ธ์, โก ์ ๋ณด์ ํ์, โข ์ ๋ณด์ ๋ถ์๊ณผ ํ๊ฐ, โฃ ์ ๋ณด์ ์กฐ์ง๊ณผ ์ฐฝ์ถ, โค ์ ๋ณด์ ํ์ฉ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ฆฌ, โฅ ์ ๋ณด์ ์ํต์ผ๋ก ๊ตฌ์ฑ๋์๋ค. ๊ฐ๋ฐ๋ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ ํ๋ ์์ ์ธ ์ฐจ๋ก์ ๊ฑธ์น ์ ๋ฌธ๊ฐํ์ํ๋ฅผ ํตํด ๊ฒํ ํ๊ณ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก ์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต๋ณ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋ฌธํญ์ ๊ฐ๋ฐํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ๊ฐ๋ฐ๋ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ์ ์ํธ๋๋ฅผ ๊ฒ์ฆํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ์ฐ์ 10๋ช
์ ์ ๋ฌธ๊ฐ ํ์ ์ ํตํด ๋ฌธํญ๋ณ ๋ด์ฉํ๋น๋๋ฅผ ํ์ธํ์๋ค. ์์ธ๋ฌ ์๋๊ถ ์ง์ญ์ ์์ฌํ ์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต์ ์คํ์ 207๋ช
๊ณผ ๊ณ ๋ฑํ์ 128๋ช
์ ๋์์ผ๋ก ์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ด 60๋ฌธํญ์ผ๋ก ๊ตฌ์ฑ๋ ์๋น๊ฒ์ฌ๋ฅผ ์ค์ํ์ฌ ๊ฐ ๋ฌธํญ์ ์ ๋ต๋ฅ ๊ณผ ๋ณ๋ณ๋๋ฅผ ๋ถ์ํ์๋ค. ์ต์ข
์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ฐ๋ฐ๋ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ๋ ์คยท๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋ฅ๋ ฅ์์๋ณ๋ก 5๋ฌธํญ์ฉ ๊ณ ๋ฃจ ๋ถํฌํ๋๋ก ํ์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ๋์ด๋์ ๋ณ๋ณ๋๊ฐ ๊ฒ์ฆ๋ ์ด 30๊ฐ์ ์ํธํ ๋ฌธํญ์ผ๋ก ์ ๋ณํ์ฌ ๊ตฌ์ฑํ์๋ค. ์์ฑ๋ ์คโค๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ฉ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ์ ๋ฐ๋ถ์ ๋ขฐ๋๋ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.72์ 0.62์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ํ์ธ์ ์์ธ๋ถ์์ ํตํ ๊ตฌ์ธํ๋น๋๋ ์ํธํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค.
The purpose of this study is to develop the ICT literacy assessment for secondary school student to evaluate their ICT literacy level. To do this, the concept of ICT literacy and framework of the test were developed on the basis of literature reviews and a series of expert conferences. Item pool was developed under the strands of 'contents' and 'abilities'. The strands of contents were categorized into 3 dimensions: i) computer and network, ii) information processing, and iii) information society and ethnical issues. The strands of abilities were categorized into 6 dimensions: i) to identify a problem, ii) to process information acquired, โ
ฒ) to evaluate the reliability of information acquired, โ
ณ) to create and re-organize information acquired, v) to utilize and manage information acquired, and โ
ต) to communicate and share with information. The contents of item pool were reviewed by the expert conferences three times and the content validity of the test was also verified by 10 experts. The 60 items with five-multiple choices were prepared for junior and senior high school respectively. The pilot test was performed and analyzed for item difficulty and item discrimination, targeting 207 junior high school students and 128 senior high school students. With the results from preliminary test and expert conferences, the final version of ICT literacy assessment was confirmed. The developed ICT literacy assessment items were selected in balance with 5 items from each ability strands. The 30 items have been prepared verified by the degree of item difficulty and discrimination. The complete form of ICT literacy assessment has good construct validity, which was checked by the confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation model. Also, the split-half reliability was estimated .72 and .62 respectively
An Evaluation Study on the ICT Literacy of Secondary School Students in South Korea
์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ชฉ์ ์ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ์คโ
๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์(ICT literacy; ์ดํ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ด์ ์ผ๋ก ์ธก์ โ
ํ๊ฐํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด ๋ฐฑ์๊ทผ ์ธ(2009)์ '์คโ
๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ฉ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ๊ฒ์ฌ๋๊ตฌ'๋ฅผ ํ์ฉํ์ฌ ์คํ์ 15,117๋ช
๊ณผ ์ธ๋ฌธ๊ณ ๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต 1ํ๋
ํ์ 2,429๋ช
์ ๋์์ผ๋ก ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ์์ค์ ํ๊ฐํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ์ด 12๋ช
์ ์ ๋ฌธ๊ฐ ํจ๋์ด ์ฐธ์ฌํ ๋ถ๋งํฌ(bookmark) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ์ ํ์ฉํ์ฌ ์คโ
๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ์์ค์ ๊ฐ๊ฐ '์ฐ์', '๋ณดํต', '๊ธฐ์ด', '๋ฏธํก'์ ๋ค ๋จ๊ณ๋ก ๊ตฌ๋ถํ์๋ค. ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ์คโ
๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์ ์์ค์ '๊ธฐ์ด' ์์ค(100์ ๋ง์ ์ ํ์ฐ์ ์๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก ์คํ์์ 39.40์ , ๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ 39.93์ )์ธ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ผ๋ก, ์คํ์์ '์ฐ์' 4.2%, '๋ณดํต' 45.5%, '๊ธฐ์ด' 43.1%, '๋ฏธํก' 7.2%์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ '์ฐ์' 2.8%, '๋ณดํต' 41.3%, '๊ธฐ์ด' 48.8%, '๋ฏธํก' 7.1% ์์ค์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ์์ธ๋ฌ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์์ ๋ด์ฉ์์๋ณ๋ก๋ ์คํ์์ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ '์ ๋ณด์ฌํ์ ์ค๋ฆฌ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ์ข์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์๊ณ '์ ๋ณด์ฒ๋ฆฌ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ถ์กฑํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ฉด ๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ '์ปดํจํฐ์ ๋คํธ์ํฌ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ์ข์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์์ผ๋ฉฐ, '์ ๋ณด์ฌํ์ ์ค๋ฆฌ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ถ์กฑํ์๋ค. ๋ํ ICT ๋ฆฌํฐ๋ฌ์์ ๋ฅ๋ ฅ์์๋ณ๋ก๋ ์คํ์์ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ '์ ๋ณด์ ํ์ฉ๊ณผ ๊ด๋ฆฌ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ์ข์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์๊ณ '์ ๋ณด์ ๋ถ์๊ณผ ํ๊ฐ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ถ์กฑํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ฉด ๊ณ ๋ฑํ์์ '์ ๋ณด์ ๋ถ์๊ณผ ํ๊ฐ'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ์ข์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์์ผ๋ฉฐ, '์ ๋ณด์ ํ์'์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ถ์กฑํ์๋ค.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ICT literacy of secondary school students in South Korea. 15,117 junior high school students and 2,429 senior high school students took the ICT literacy test which was developed by Baek, et al. (2009). The competency levels for ICT literacy were categorized as 'insufficient', 'basic', 'normal', and 'excellent' using bookmark method. The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, the average ICT literacy level of secondary school students in South Korea appeared 'normal' level. To be specific, 4.2% out of the total number of junior high school students accounted for excellent, 45.5% for 'normal, 43.1% for basic, and 7.2% for insufficient. As for the senior high school students, 2.8% out of the total accounted for excellent, 41.3% for normal, 48.8% for basic, and 7.1% for insufficient. Second, as for the strands of contents, junior high school students showed the best results in 'information society and its ethical issues', the least in 'information processing'. Besides, senior high school students showed the best results in 'computer and network', the least for 'information society and its ethical issues'. Third, as for the strands of ability, junior high school students showed the best results in 'to utilize and manage information acquired', the least in 'to evaluate the reliability of information acquired'. Whereas, senior high school students showed the best results in 'to evaluate the reliability of information acquired', the least for 'to search information'